-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
The Final Battlestar Galactica Apocalypse - Right here!!!
- Thread starter kopiuncle
- Start date
Is PAPIBCHIEF MBSSLOTS ???? THE LEADER OF THE CCCCBYE GANG????
Eh Kotek. You know what u have done so u better start heaping points on your PhuaCheeBye, SuayCheeBye, TuaCheeBye gang of clones. Don't tell that they are not yours because it so obvious they are. Your mass zaps are always standard and the same. 6-7 clones and -162.
I will give u another chance since my clones have zapped your clones before InfP was introduced into this forum. If i find any more mass zappings after SU8ZER0, i will return favor to your clones.
Ummm...still masturbating here.
I must be a clone of MBSSLOTS! I am around the range!
I must be a clone of MBSSLOTS! I am around the range!
No more masturbation?
And more from Shang Tsung.....the battle is now in full swing. now wait for the bombardment.....let ths battle begin...
Doesn't matter whether O or 0 cos it's the same owner. He has more but he uses only 7 so now u know who is the biggest donor.
From Neven Subotic
"Your threats to arrest us are meaningless to us as you cannot arrest an idea, any attempt to do so will make your citizens more angry until they will roar in one gigantic choir.
It is our mission to help these people and there is nothing - absolutely nothing - you can possibly to do make us stop."
The US can lock up hackers, but it can't crush their spirit
Jeremy Hammond is just the the latest to be targeted in a global witchhunt against the brightest minds of a generation
Laurie Penny
The Guardian, Thursday 14 November 2013 19.36 GMT
To 'the online culture … digital activists who risk everything for the public's 'right to know' are heroes'. Photograph: fotovisage/Alamy
Why is the US sending some of its best young minds to jail? On Friday Jeremy Hammond, a 28-year-old digital activist from Chicago, will learn how many years he is to serve for participating in the 2011 hack of the private security firm Stratfor. "I believe in the power of the truth," said Hammond, pleading guilty to helping liberate millions of emails from the company, which is paid by large corporations to spy on activists around the world. "I did this because I believe people have a right to know what governments and corporations are doing behind closed doors. I did what I believe is right."
Like the others who took part in the Stratfor hack, Hammond wasn't out for money, and he didn't get any. Nonetheless, he has spent the past 18 months in prison, including extended periods in solitary confinement, and now faces a 10-year prison sentence. Hammond is the latest target of a global witchhunt against hackers, whistleblowers and anyone who seeks to release private information in the public interest.
The witchhunt is being led by the US government, but its targets are international: Lauri Love, an activist from Suffolk, was arrested in Britain last month and may face extradition on charges of hacking into US government networks and a possible decade in a US jail. The legislation used to single out and lock up these people is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a flexible law that allows US courts to impose almost indefinite sentences against any crime committed with a computer, down to simple violation of terms of service.
In practice, by some staggering coincidence, the digital crimes that get prosecuted are those that happen to make governments and large corporations look foolish. Financial damage is the main thrust of the prosecutors' claim against Hammond and his fellow LulzSec members, but it isn't really the money that matters. Hammond is being asked to pay back just $250,000; by comparison, you would have to embezzle tens of millions of dollars to get an equivalent sentence for corporate fraud in the same Manhattan courtroom.
No, what matters is that people are using their computer skills to expose uncomfortable truths – including Stratfor's alleged involvement in spying on the Occupy Wall Street protests. "Punishment has to be proportionate to the harm caused," said Hanni Fakhoury, staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "These punishments are excessive."
With the right skills, you no longer have to hide out in a lonely Washington carpark to leak classified information. You don't have to break into a building to steal documents that might be in the public interest. You don't even have to put your trousers on. All you need to do is sit at your computer and type. The practical risks of hanging out the mucky bedsheets of power are decreasing just as a generation that has grown up with a weary distaste for government lies hits adulthood. Clearly, something has to be done to make them fearful again – and fast.
The witchhunt against hackers and leakers is designed as a deterrent. That, after all, is the logic behind sending people to prison: threaten potential scallywags with the loss of their freedom and livelihood and they might just fall in line. The wildly disproportionate sentencing of young digital activists suggests that there's something the US government and associated nation states are anxious to deter. The trouble is that this deterrent looks rather likely to backfire.
If one thing unites the hackers and whistleblowers hunted by the US government over the past three years, from Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden to notorious prankster Andrew "weev" Auernheimer, it is that they have little respect for the moral authority of the US government and its mechanisms. They are in their teens and 20s; they grew up in the Bush, Blair and Brown years and came of age just as the financial crash of 2008 swept away the socioeconomic justification for Anglo-American imperialism. The online culture that they helped create believes deeply in transparency and, to that culture, digital activists who risk everything for the public's "right to know" are heroes.
Jeremy Hammond is not the first information activist to be made a martyr by the US state, and he is unlikely to be the last. There are a lot of things you can do, if you are the most powerful nation on Earth, to make individuals afraid. You can destroy their chance of a safe and happy future. You can lock them up for years. But the one thing you can't do, ever, is force them to respect you – and if you can't do that, on a basic level, you have already lost.
hooray...more masturbation
To receive reciprocation from those that i have zapped in the past before and after the introduction of InfP is acceptable to me.
non stop masturbation can be harmful for your health.
fucking masturbation thread!
fucking masturbation thread!
Did bros descended on this thread to hijack it and thus rendering it useless as vile kopishit was using it to further his agenda?
Masterstroke!
Masterstroke!
all hallucinating about CSI...watching too many tv dramas causing hallucinations of mole here mole there..threats here threats there...a fucking bunch of sinkies with absolute daftness in this thread.
Member of detachable prick gang
Masturbation is free. Same like Fantasy.
Similar threads
