• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sun Ho in police complex for 8 hours

Who is talking about fans supporting her? We are talking about criminal breach of trust, corruption and fraud. That has nothing to do with the congregation. Don't try to act reasonable when you are just an imbecile CHC member trying to defend the organization.

So can you tell us which particular Act of Statutes the purported 'crimes' of KH would come under ?
 
CAD could begin with quite a few laws from the statues, for example:

Chapter 224 Section 403 Criminal misappropriation of property (maximum 2 years)
Chapter 224 Section 405 Criminal breach of trust (maximum 7 years)
Chapter 224 Section 415 Cheating (maximum 3 years)
Chapter 224 Section 423 Fraudulent transfer containing false statement of consideration (maximum 3 years)

I'm not saying or prejudging that they did it but under the circumstances, these are most likely the statute laws suspected to be breached that trigger CAD action.
 
CAD is damn lazy. They will not investigate from scratch simply on a complaint.

However, if they do bother to investigate, it probably means that someone had already fed them with some substantial evidence.
 
CAD could begin with quite a few laws from the statues, for example:

Chapter 224 Section 403 Criminal misappropriation of property (maximum 2 years)
Chapter 224 Section 405 Criminal breach of trust (maximum 7 years)
Chapter 224 Section 415 Cheating (maximum 3 years)
Chapter 224 Section 423 Fraudulent transfer containing false statement of consideration (maximum 3 years)

I'm not saying or prejudging that they did it but under the circumstances, these are most likely the statute laws suspected to be breached that trigger CAD action.

Ramseth, can print the details or not ?
 
Ramseth, can print the details or not ?

Me also no heads no tails, where got details? Just some speculative opinions based on some stuff learned from the good old Police Academy. Elementary stuff only, since I was never a CAD officer (who would have gone through another more detailed course on such laws). There's also a number of possible offences under Chapter 37 Charities Act relating to accounting, expense ratio etc. that I'm not familiar with (not in Police Academy syllabus) but became aware of after the string of high profile cases involving the NKF, Renci etc.
 
Last edited:
Re: could it be money laudering??

Not possible because it's a very 'clumsy' way of corruption.

think deeper about our 2 IRs. the same could have been carried out, done deal and appeared leegally A OK.

it's a manoeuvring of figures and the account books would look spick and spank.;)
 
Good analysis.

Then again, the church is not a charity organization. If the members are happy to support her singing career, is there anything wrong ?

for witch hunting, they should focus in FCBC where the pastor is also the wizard of oz and chee soon juan can unabashfully yell: WHERE'S MY MONEY!!!:D
 
i wonder whether sun ho got do a sharon stone to the interrogators or not? :p

12879-sharon_stone_know_explicit_no_panties_scene_basic_instinct_i.jpg
 
for witch hunting, they should focus in FCBC where the pastor is also the wizard of oz and chee soon juan can unabashfully yell: WHERE'S MY MONEY!!!:D

they should call u in too for trying to con black's property :rolleyes::oIo:
 
Me also no heads no tails, where got details? Just some speculative opinions based on some stuff learned from the good old Police Academy. Elementary stuff only, since I was never a CAD officer (who would have gone through another more detailed course on such laws). There's also a number of possible offences under Chapter 37 Charities Act relating to accounting, expense ratio etc. that I'm not familiar with (not in Police Academy syllabus) but became aware of after the string of high profile cases involving the NKF, Renci etc.

I mean the wordings of the statutes you posted lah.:cool:
 
So can you tell us which particular Act of Statutes the purported 'crimes' of KH would come under ?

DO you even read the newspaper reports? The CAD has already said that they are investigating Kong Hee and gang for fraud, criminal breach of trust and corruption. Why the red herring of demaning the statutes?

Personally, I would just have Kong Hee and Ho investigated- one for being so fugly and the other for marrying the fugly.
 
So can you tell us which particular Act of Statutes the purported 'crimes' of KH would come under ?

Unfortunately 'Brain Washing' has not been gazetted as criminal act.
Otherwise the whole bunch of PAP grapes and SPH will be fckked and wiped out of Singapore.
 
I mean the wordings of the statutes you posted lah.:cool:

That's all I know by Police Academy syllabus. They'll all seizeable offences, i.e. police can arrest when prima facie ground for suspicion is manifest and obvious or warrant can be applied for in case of delayed report.

Seizeable doesn't mean instant conviction or imprisonment, but detention in police lockup up to 48 hours for further investigation. One may be released unconditionally or on bail as set by the Investigation Officer, to decide during the time of bail whether or not to charge in court. Usually that's done within 24 hours. The 48-hour habeas corpus is just a law to legitimise detention over weekends and public holidays.

Once charged in court, the Prosecutor takes over the proceedings against the accused, and the Judge decides to convict, acquit, release temporarily on further bail for further investigation, or remand in custody, usually 7 days at a time, for the Prosecutor to gather more evidence.

As for the meanings, laws are drafted and cast as precisely close to contemporary dictionary meanings as possible. As for circumstantial implications and consequences, that's up to the prosecutors (or plaintiffs in civil cases), defence lawyers and judges to sort out case by case.
 
Back
Top