"Obviously, you still have an UNCLEAR mind."
My mind is very CLEAR. Can't say the same for yours
"If you look at my previous post, did I say he did something illegal?"
Let's look at your post:
<< My goodness! Do you understand the meaning of handshake? Both parties are responsible. How can u push the blame to Ren Ci alone? >>
You allude to some wrongdoing on Ong's part. Furthermore, you allude to the fact that Ong is as responsible as Ren Ci's people. Since Ren Ci's chaps are in the dock, it is reasonable to assume that you find Ong guilty of some improper behaviour.
Those are your words, CLEAR as daylight.
"As for the example, it is to illustrate the MEANING of handshake to you. I did not said there is bribery in Ren Ci case."
Again let's look at your post:
<< Example : If someone bribed you, & you accepted the money, can you say the problem lies with their person, & not you b'cos you are on the other side of the handshake. Pls be clear-minded. Black is black & white is white. Black cannot be white & vice versa. >>
Again, you allude to some shared responsibility for the person on the receiving end of such a transaction. Since Ren Ci's characters are charged with a crime, your words imply some shared responsibility on the part of Ong.
"Don't twist my words & start to draw your own assumption & conclusion."
I draw my conclusions from the natural meaning and implications of what you wrote. If you meant to convey something else, then you should express yourself CLEARLY. Write what you mean and mean what you write.
"If you still want to carry on arguing"
No need to argue
there is no convincing you
so you have your opinion and I have mine
"it will only put your MP Ong on the radar screen more often.....In other words, you are doing him more harm."
He is not my MP
I won't vote for him anyway
He is doing enough harm to himself with his defensive attitude and less than sincere efforts.
However, even the worst of us deserve to have the facts established first, before being accused of wrongdoing
