- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 616
- Points
- 0
"A charitable organisation giving out lower interest rate or zero interest rate loans to PAP ministers"
Which PAP ministers?
Which PAP ministers?
He is my MP
Fuck up MP
Never fullfil his promise during meet the people session.
Never reply email.
Act blur....
Hopeless, anyway he is just a work over MP not a elected MP...
2) Why did you choose to take the loan from Ren Ci instead of the banks?
3) Did you pay interest on the loan, and if so, was the interest rate comparable to then-prevailing market rates?
Renci obviously gives him interest free loans or a low interest rate loan.
otherwise, why would he loan from Renci instead of the banks ?
A charitable organisation giving out lower interest rate or zero interest rate loans to PAP ministers.....fantastic.
Can Renci loan me $60,000 too, zero interest rate for a year ? I promise I will return them in a year's time.
Someone please tell me which bank offers the highest deposit interest rate for $60,000?
send him an email "if you don't reply, i will not vote for you"
High living,my boy,high living,that's it.60k he dun have meh?????
i think we need to review MP pay.... should double it immediately
Just to be clear
In your opinion, what was wrong with his end of the handshake
I have no axe to grind if:
1. It was a bridging loan to facilitate a transition to a new appointment
2. The loan was temporary
3. It was interest bearing
4. There was full transparency and accountability
Dear John
Hmmmm by your argument, the fact that he is drawing any form of salary from Ren Ci means that he is depriving needy patients of treatment as an MP, thus as an MP he should just well work for free for Ren Ci as should all the staff and they should live on love and fresh air.
Locke
He must be the best or only one available for the ceo job. A sort of die die must employ him scenario. A ceo ought to know what is proper governance for a public charity. If he repaid the loan, with interest, before becoming an mp, I think he had not taken advantage of the situation or of the monk and we should give him the benefit of doubt.
Just to be clear
In your opinion, what was wrong with his end of the handshake
I have no axe to grind if:
3. It was interest bearing
4. There was full transparency and accountability
If a charity can run an efficient operation based on criteria 3 & 4, then well done!
I suspect that one needs a combination of 1 & 2 as well. Afterall, who really suffers if a charity can't achieve it's aims because of poor staffing.
For anybody who wants to join a charitable organisation should know that his personal willingness TO SERVE CHARITY is a noble course...vice verse charity organisation should not recruit people stirctly on commercial terms....let other profitable hospital had those who only concern about his own course of well beings...REMEMBER these monies in RENCI are all well wichers' DONATION ..
MINGYI had commited so many breaches in law and religious codes....lets examine the entire management of RENCI ...and weed off those self-centred people who are not commited to charitable course....
THE PUBLIC HAD LOST CONFIDENCE IN RENCI...NEED EXTRA EFFORT TO REPAIR THE DAMAGES...LIKE NKF...
SAD...
Typical allegation of the types of the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan.
Of course employee loans are lower interest or interest free.
And since when was OSH a minister? He wasn't even an MP then. .
Yes but then there must be proper and adequate transparency and accountability
He was an MP while paying back the Renci loan
I wonder are these incontrovertible facts?
Yes and that's why those Ren Ci characters are in the dock.
Not because it is improper to offer their staff commercial rates.
Has anyone established that yet?
Ong was an MP after the 2001 GE (took the loan in 2000)
A bridging loan isn't meant to bridge a long period
The repayment needs clarification too
No they are not yet
that's why I maintain that the man is innocent until PROVEN guilty
What's the rush to crucify some one just because he is a PAP MP
Let's wait for the facts to be established