<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Allow live music near homes
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Tuesday's report, 'Loud 'no' to live music near homes'.
Singapore is constantly trying to position itself as a 24/7 entertainment city, and one example was the Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) plan to allow live entertainment in pubs and restaurants near residential areas. Unfortunately, the plan has been shelved after negative feedback in a poll of some 250 residents.
Is the number polled too small for a representative feel of general reception to such a plan? Why should Serangoon Gardens and Upper Thomson be known only for food, but not entertainment?
It's not just about live music; it's about local music too. Why not let these budding musicians start somewhere near home, possibly at community level?
Perhaps most are concerned about increased noise levels. I believe much can be done to prevent noise pollution, for example by soundproofing. Certain restrictions could also be considered, and live music areas could be converted to study areas on weekdays. It would be good for parents to know their children are hanging out or studying near home, rather than further away.
Singaporeans may have the stereotypical idea that live music means sleaze, but this is not true of Singapore. Nightlife in Singapore is not the hardcore, hardsell variety which some countries exploit to lure tourists.
We should be more open-minded, and open to the potential growth of a new and lively sub-culture, by saying yes to live music in the neighbourhood.
Fiona Heng (Miss)
<!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><!-- Current Ratings : end --><!-- vbbintegration : start -->
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Tuesday's report, 'Loud 'no' to live music near homes'.
Singapore is constantly trying to position itself as a 24/7 entertainment city, and one example was the Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) plan to allow live entertainment in pubs and restaurants near residential areas. Unfortunately, the plan has been shelved after negative feedback in a poll of some 250 residents.
Is the number polled too small for a representative feel of general reception to such a plan? Why should Serangoon Gardens and Upper Thomson be known only for food, but not entertainment?
It's not just about live music; it's about local music too. Why not let these budding musicians start somewhere near home, possibly at community level?
Perhaps most are concerned about increased noise levels. I believe much can be done to prevent noise pollution, for example by soundproofing. Certain restrictions could also be considered, and live music areas could be converted to study areas on weekdays. It would be good for parents to know their children are hanging out or studying near home, rather than further away.
Singaporeans may have the stereotypical idea that live music means sleaze, but this is not true of Singapore. Nightlife in Singapore is not the hardcore, hardsell variety which some countries exploit to lure tourists.
We should be more open-minded, and open to the potential growth of a new and lively sub-culture, by saying yes to live music in the neighbourhood.
Fiona Heng (Miss)
<!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><!-- Current Ratings : end --><!-- vbbintegration : start -->
