• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Sinkies Must Prepare to Safe Guard Peace and Sovereignty!

More importantly...have we got enough maids ?

1656916146612.png
 
Imagine if all your population are road sweepers .... you can guess where this country is heading.

Race and IQ
View attachment 151377


i dun think there's any country on earth like that
not in asean
not in africa
heck not even ceca virus fits the bill


Manual-Scavenging.jpg




ugh....must be tough for you to be born into a low caste ceca family

IQ & Race
 
ugh......


808362-sewers.jpg



can't imagine the pain low caste ceca virus would go through

born into a family of low caste sewarage worker

IQ & Race as ceca virus @ChristJohnny can explain well
 
ugh....must be tough for you to be born into a low caste ceca family

IQ & Race

High Caste, Low Caste ... still an Indian. At least there is a distinction. Unlike some Races who are still in denial. INCEST is a problem, however chose to ignore it. Worst still had become part of the culture.

Race and IQ
national-iq-scores.jpg
 
High Caste, Low Caste ... still an Indian. At least there is a distinction. Unlike some Races who are still in denial. INCEST is a problem, however chose to ignore it. Worst still had become part of the culture.

Race and IQ
View attachment 151480

:laugh:

search engines whether yankee or russkie (in many cases run by jews) also censoring search results nowadays

:laugh:

no i'm not talking about profit seeking big companies but self proclaimed privacy friendly search engines


:laugh:



inanycase this reminds me of



Besides being a child-molester, `holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, For Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister.

In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama, Son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line. " [ Chandra, P. 156 ]


So we see that hari and his mom were only practising a religious hindu ritual, Not knocking boots. What a disgusting religion.

This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, The Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas.

The term Devadasi originally described a Hindu religious practice in which girls were "married" to a deity.
This practice has been corrupted over the ages. The initiation process and so called coming-of-age rites for girls are used by the temple priests to have sex with 12-13 year old girls. All this is done willingly, Under the cover of "religion".The basic fact is if you want to go and dedicate your life to God then it is your choice. The key word here is choice. Can a 9 - 12 year old girl choose this? Or is it just something that she is forced to do?

Krishna's Incest with His Sister
Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had 16, 000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), Who were the wives of other men. The worst aspect of this supposed `god', However, Is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra! Not only that, He shared her with his brother Balarama [ Mah. Wh. 153 ]. So one big family of incest! The Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant versions.

Thus, "In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], The 3 images of Krishna, His brother Balarama, And his sister Subhadra, Are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, And upon his sister likewise, For having indulged in a criminal intimacy. " -- [ Mah. Wh 153 ]

Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, The older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen for all to see.





Krishna's Incest with His Sister
by Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan
Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had
16,000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), who were the
wives of other men. The worst aspect of this
supposed `god', however, is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his
sister Subhadra ! Not only that, he shared her with his
brother Balarama [ Mah.wh.153 ]. So one big family of incest ! The
Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant
versions. Thus,
"In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], the 3 images of Krishna,
his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra,
are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap
reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his
sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy."
-- [ Mah.wh 153 ]
Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this
stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, the
older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen
for all to see.
" In the older tradition, Subhadra is said to have lived in criminal
intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is
universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of
the marriage of Subhadra [ to Arjun ]; and the
Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits
reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having
been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined
away as Maya, or delusion."
-- [ Mah.wh.153 ]
Remember, it is Krishna the Killer who was the cause of the Mahabharata
War. It is also Krishna who advised his warriors to
use cowardly and shady tricks like striking below the belt and attacking
opponents from behind during the Mahabharata War
! As a `divine punishment' for his cruelties and mass rape of 16,000
Indigenous Sudra women, he was killed by an archer,
his city (or village - how could barbaric Aryan Krishna even think of
living in a city ?) of Dwaraka was flooded, and his wives
all forced into prostitution. A just punishment indeed for Killer Krishna
!
The Brahmans always profess to be very strict in morality, so how does one
explain the discreapancy between their
supposed brahmacharya and their debauched gods ? The answer is that the
Aryans were highly primitive barbarians. They
introduced such uncouth practices as human sacrifice (`purushamedha'
sanctioned by the Vedas), horse sacrifice
(`ashwamedha'), widow-burning (`sati') and incest into India. The morality
of the ancient Aryans was very strict, being
another aspect of their lack of regard for human life. Thus, Manu
prescribes death for even talking to a married woman. This
was not limited to the Indo-Aryans, the German Aryan warrior would
instantly slay his erring wife and her paramour at the
slightest suspicion. As a result of such a strict and unnatural moral
code, which was even more severe than the Christian
one, a number of perversions arose, such as incest and beastiality. Incest
was very common in Vedic and Brahmanic society
as a method of releasing the suppressed urges, Indeed, the Vedas sanction
incest and allow it as a perfectly legitimate way
of gratification -
Brahma performed incest with his dauther [ Rig Veda III.31.1-2 ]. The
Vedas justify incest, and this fact was used by
Brahma to convince his daughter. When this was discovered, Prajapati
(Brahma) was pierced by Agni as a punishment
[ Sat.Br. XIII.9 ] [ Apte 63 ]. Brahma also, out of frustration,
copulated with a bear. This shows that the laws of morality
were very strict, and hence led to perversions in Hinduism.
In the Vedas the hero Pushan is the lover of his sister [ Rg Ved
VI.55.4 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Vedic god Agni himself, who pierced Brahma for his incest with his
daughter, is also the lover of his own sister [ Rg
Ved X.3.3 ] [ Apte 11 ]. This shows that the strict moral code was
meant merely as a facade for the public. Like some
Victorians in private, the Vedic Aryans engaged in serious
perversions.
The Vedic Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who
are brother and sister [ Apte 11 ].
The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister [ RgV
I.116.19 ].
The Vedic fire-god Agni is the son of his father and his sister [ Rg
Ved.I.91.7 ]
The Vedic god of the underworld Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying
marriage between brother and sister is
forbidden [ Rg.V.X.10 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Kinsey survey of the USA revealed that beastiality and incest were
common in regions where persons did not have the
opportunity for healthy interaction with the opposite gender, and hence
had to relieve their pent-up urges in perverted
fashions. This was also the case for the Vedic Aryans and Victorian
England. Surveys show that incest is still widespread
amongst Aryan Vaishnavas today, as a result of the fanatic Vaishnava
repression of such desires (a la Gandhi).
In addition, the child marriage of brother and sister, and in fact between
any close relations, was encoouraged by the
Brahmans in order to destroy the genetic stock of non-Brahman races, since
children born of such consanginous unions are
likely to display genetic degradation. In this manner the Brahmin Aryans
are away at the genetic heritage of the
non-Brahmins. The ghastly custom was enforced in South India (where all
the non-Brahmins are Dravidian) as well as in
North India (where only the Dalits and Adivasis are Dravidoid) on Aryan
and Dravidians alike.

References
[ Apte ] = `The Sacrament of Marriage in Hindu Society' , U.M.Apte, Ajanta
Publishers 1978 Delhi
[ Mah.wh ] = `India of the Vedic Age with reference to the Mahabharata',
J.Talboys Wheeler, reprint 1973, Cosmo Publications, Delhi
[ Rg Ved ] = Rig Veda
 
this post was brutal

it clearly exposed pap-piglets' fantasy lullabies it has been selling its peasants and which were actually originally sold by yankees to dumb stinkypura monkeys and zionist scum land thieves

to assure them that they are safely holed up in their tiny dot sized territories



worst reposting

Malaysia and/or Indonesia only need 20k ballistic missiles from Iran and game would be over.

we're talking short range, tactical, highly accurate ballistic missile



Keeping stinkypura honest.
OR
Keeping stinkies honest.



Coolie gene, peasant race of rickshaw pullers, whores, harlots, opium addicts, drug peddlers, nightsoil collectors, boatmen, stevedores, errand boys stinkies should not wrongly believe that just coz they've allied with their ang moh masters incl zionist terrorists and yankees, that by default, whatever they're forcefed into believing is, by default, the unassailable, unchanging truth.


Just coz yankee-zionist terrorist propaganda says Iran possesses only a few hundred (who'd believe this nonsense) or a few thousand (less than 10k - again, who'd believe this?) ballistic missiles, doesn't mean their wishful thinking is the truth.


Here, I quote prices of all sorts of nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles from shortest ranges to full on ICBM from the cheapest and most open source of all - CECA virus. No other source of info is more open and offers a cheaper rate.

It is very like Iran or Norkies can produce them much cheaper but they are not open about their cost structure and rightly so. National security and all that

Others, like Yankees or Frog eaters might be more open than Iran or Norkies but their cost structures are inherently more on the expensive side.

Let's take a look.

SRBM - Praher ( range 150 km)
cost 5 crore ropee = 50 million ropee, abt $0.6-0.7 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $=80 ropee

ICBM - Ugh-knee-V (range 5000 km with 1.5 ton payload, about 7500 km with 1 ton payload) -
cost 50 crore ropee = 500 million ropee, abt $6-7 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $1=80 ropee


IRBM - Ugh-knee-3 (range 3500 with 1.5 ton payload, abt 5000 km with 1 ton payload)
cost ??

Ugh-knee-2
(range 2000 km with 1.5 ton payload abt 3000 km with 1 ton payload)

cost 35 crore ropee = 350 million ropee, abt $4.4-5 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $1=80 ropee



these costs are valid for low rate production, not mass production

for mass production, cost per unit will decline

Iran has been in the business of mass production of ballistic missiles

due to economies of scale and economies of scope with the wide variety of ballistic, cruise and air defence (surface to air) missiles that Iran has developed (or copied or modified) and produced, cost per unit will be even lower

It is entirely reasonable that short range, tactical ballistic missiles such as Fateh-313, Hormuz-1, Hormuz-2 or such, in Iran, when mass produced, would cost less than $0.2 million or less, even cost $0.1 million


At a unit cost of $0.2 million, 20k tactical Hormuz-1 or Fateh-313 (or other SRBM) will cost merely 20,000 X $0.2 million = $4,000 million or $4 billion

Spread out over 20 years, let's say, this amounts to only $200 million per year

Really, peanuts!!!

If the unit cost of an SRBM (like Hormuz- or Fateh-313 or maybe Dezful or such) were $0.1 million, 20k tactical SRBM will cost merely 20,000 X $0.1 million = $2,000 million or $2 billion

Spread out over 20 years, let's say, this amounts to only $100 million per year

Again, even cheaper and really, no more than peanuts!!!


Cost per unit of CECA Ugh-knee-5 ICBM is only $6-7 million at low rate of production. when mass produced, cost per unit is bound to fall. perhaps, to $3-5(?) million per unit

If Iran (or norkies) produce ICBM at same cost of $5 million per unit in mass production, then 10k ICBM would cost 10,000 X $5 million = $50,000 million or $50 billion

Spread out over 20 years, this amounts to only $2.5 billion per year

Again, extremely cheap, no more than peanuts!!!



At a cost of $3 million per unit when in mass production, 10k ICBM would cost 10,000 X $3 million = $30,000 million or $30 billion

Spread out over 20 years, this amounts to only $1.5 billion per year


Now, you may say there are maintenance costs, training costs, logistics costs etc. Yeah they are there but by no means should those costs surpass 40% of the original cost of production of the ICBM. You can multiply each of these numbers above by 1.4 and the numbers still look like peanuts.


What about nukes? nuclear warheads?

In 1994 K. Subrahmanyam suggested that a force of 60 warheads carried on 20 Agnis, 20 Prithvis and the rest on aircraft would cost about Rs 1,000 crore over 10 years


1,000 crore ropees = 10,000 million ropees = $125-143 million over 10 years,

Spread out over 10 years, cost per year would be $12.5-14.3 million per year

That is the cost for 60 nuclear warheads

Producing and maintaining 60000 nuclear warheads would only cost $12.5-14.3 million per year X 1000
OR LESS


since economies of scale and economies of scope

come into play


Even if Iran (or norkies) were to maintain and operate a stockpile of 6,000 (six thousand) nuclear warheads, cost per year would be less than $1.25-1.43 billion per year.


All things considered, a force of 100k Short range/tactical/medium range ballistic missiles, 10k ICBM and 6k nuclear warheads would cost Iran (or Norkies etc) no more than

- for 100k SRBM, over 20 years, $0.5-1 billion per year
- for 10k ICBM, over 20 years, $1.5-2.5 billion per year
- for 6k nuclear warheads, over 10 years, $1.25-1.43 billion per year


By spending merely $3.25-4.93 billion per year, Iran can produce, stockpile, maintain and operate a massive
nuclear deterrent force comprising

---> 100,000 (one hundred thousand) short range/medium range tactical ballistic missiles
----> 10,000 (ten thousand) ICBM
----> 6,000 (six thosand) nuclear warheads.


What's not to like?

Stinkypura coolie genes peasantpore brainwashed monkeys still want to believe in your ang moh zionist masters' fairytale stories lullabies sold to toddlers and children?

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:


the only plausible explanation for a lack of nuclear deterrent for 1900 million Muslims in OIC and 57 members of OIC is the theory of "IQ and Race"

Norkies have tested ICBM and nukes, why hasn't Iran? Dont tell me Iran is now afraid of sanctions embargo and isolation?

IQ & Race
 
it's insanity
complete insanity, irrationality, absurdity for 1900 million Muslims, 57 OIC members to lack nuclear deterrence against any number of enemies real or otherwise in this day and age, 2022 year in christian era

Islamic calendar is obviously different, so are persian bangla chink jap thai or other calendars
 
In a Nation of 5million in habitants, 3million are singkies, 2 millions are PR and foreigners. What is there to defend ?
It should be 3million sinkies, new sinkies and PR. The rest are foreigners. Ng Eng Hen can go fuck his mother's cheebye.
 
Back
Top