Was the Prophet himself circumcised?In other places, the cut the bloody clit off.
Malays on the other hand, they remove the skin making it even more sensitive.
I can tell you the muslims are not required to circumcise. Male or female. But malays custom they do not cut off the clit.they i think just make a slight slit. The arabs were influenced by jewish and christian traditions.and copied.When a woman masturbate they rub the top part of the clit. They cut off that part and sew it flat just exactly on the top of the entrance of the female hole. It does not make the Minah less desire to have sex or having an orgasm but the satisfaction factor is lessen much lessen.
Even when having natural sex like normal missionary position our dick and body forms a natural channel pushing the clit direction it's a natural design thingy, perfection.
So when you're having a diluted experience or taste what happen ? You desire it even more because you're just not that deeply satisfied hence circumcision is flawed and very wrong you can't beat nature c'mon .......... lol..........
Same with male circumcision it doesn't make sex better.
Who knows. This circumcision and syariah laws are based on hearsays written 200 years after mohamad diedWas the Prophet himself circumcised?
I can tell you the muslims are not required to circumcise. Male or female. But malays custom they do not cut off the clit.they i think just make a slight slit. The arabs were influenced by jewish and christian traditions.and copied.
You all got it all wrong. The aim is to make them MORE horny so easier for m&d fathers to fuck them.
The muslim community knows and understands that clowns and bootlickers run muis and the syariah courts to satisfy their political masters instead of strictly adhering to the sunnah.
But that's another issue.
Female genital mutilation, is not an act demanded by Islam. Only circumcision for men, is.
So this is another good example for non muslims to see that Islam is not what is practised by its followers, but it must be what is specified in the Quran and Hadiths. Its like an unchangeable constitution.
Thank you for understanding this.We are on the same tune on this point! Countries following strict islamic laws do not help infidels, work with temples, churches and other nonsense religion organisations not approved by the quran and hadiths. Sharing food tables with kaafirs also not encouraged, considered haram. Blasphemy and apostates are handled more harshly in these countries of true islam.
Thank you for understanding this.
Islam is built upon the Quran and the examples and verbal direction of the Prophet (collectively called the sunnah). No deviation, addition, removal, alteration, whether accidental or guided by personal desires.
What is clearly required is male circumcision as it clearly mentioned by the Prophet at many places and times, that we emulate Prophet Abraham. Even the Prophet and his companions of his time did it. No disagreement there.
However there are vague verbal instructions that many in the bedouin arabs (who wanted the previous culture of female circumcision to continue after the Prophet died) held as evidence that it must be done. This is the problem.
Idiots do not want to learn and dig up the authentic sayings but leave the research to others.
Truthfully, there are many benefits of male circumcision and zero benefits of FGM. Also the Prophet is strict and clear about all sorts of bodily harm.
May Allah guides us all.
The prophet did not write the quran. In its current form, was written by the abassids whose family originates from mecca, maybe 50-100 years after prophets death, and who deposed the umayids, who took shelter in spain.Islam is built upon the Quran and the examples and verbal direction of the Prophet (collectively called the sunnah). No deviation, addition, removal, alteration, whether accidental or guided by personal desires.
As a non muslim, its good that you learn Islam from the knowledgeable sources and stop spreading false information.Just to clarify this one point.
The prophet did not write the quran. In its current form, was written by the abassids whose family originates from mecca, maybe 50-100 years after prophets death, and who deposed the umayids, who took shelter in spain.
The sunnahs and hadiths were written even later and all these are by hearsays, including the quran. By epword of mouth.
We are on the same tune on this point! Countries following strict islamic laws do not help infidels, work with temples, churches and other nonsense religion organisations not approved by the quran and hadiths. Sharing food tables with kaafirs also not encouraged, considered haram. Blasphemy and apostates are handled more harshly in these countries of true islam.
Jesus was a man. He never claimed to be GodPAP and the Church has fought an uphill battle to civilize the moslems. We've seen some success in integrating moslems and their religion into mainstream society. Thanks be to our Lord Jesus and to the PAP.
The birmingham manuscript was written differently. One word could have different meanings.As a non muslim, its good that you learn Islam from the knowledgeable sources and stop spreading false information.
Now back to your assertion, it is easily debunked by the study of the Birmingham manuscript.
Jesus was a man. He never claimed to be God
"I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”Jesus was a man. He never claimed to be God
The worst ones are those that said only through Jesus the only son of God can we be saved ! These are all dogmas of religions.
The birmingham manuscript was written differently. One word could have different meanings.
PAP and the Church has fought an uphill battle to civilize the moslems. We've seen some success in integrating moslems and their religion into mainstream society. Thanks be to our Lord Jesus and to the PAP.