- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,017
- Points
- 48
You have been to Genting recently and have seen for yourself. Once the novelty phase wears off, casinos are only viable in the long run if they have a sizable local clientele.
interesting to note that in the early years, Genting had restrictions for Malaysians which were pretty similar to our current IR. However as casino gambling became accepted as a social norm, these restrictions were gradually removed.
A key difference between Genting and our IRs is debt. For Genting, it was built on the cheap. There was therefore never any serious debt involved. The current two IRs are different as they were built using a mountain of debt. If revenue continues to dive as it did in the past quarter, there might not be time for casino gambling to become widely accepted before the restrictions have to be relaxed/removed.
interesting to note that in the early years, Genting had restrictions for Malaysians which were pretty similar to our current IR. However as casino gambling became accepted as a social norm, these restrictions were gradually removed.
A key difference between Genting and our IRs is debt. For Genting, it was built on the cheap. There was therefore never any serious debt involved. The current two IRs are different as they were built using a mountain of debt. If revenue continues to dive as it did in the past quarter, there might not be time for casino gambling to become widely accepted before the restrictions have to be relaxed/removed.
With newer and better casinos coming up in the region and around the world, the novelty of MBS and RWS is wearing off. In the future, will MBS and RWS continue to do well like what it did for the first two years or will its future dim?
In prostitution, clients will go for fresher, younger and more hungry prostitutes. The older prostitutes will be sidelined unless they repackaged themselves. The same goes for casinos.
Likewise, unless MBS and RWS repackage themselves, they will find that they will be sidelined by high rollers who will go for the newer casinos. The future looks bleak for S casinos and the pap who thinks that it has got a sacred cash cow
So will the pap give new licences to MGM, Mirage, Caesar's Palace, Circus Circus, Harrah's, Monte Carlo, etc in the next few years to keep SG afloat?
My take is that the PAP shd not rely on gambling, tourism, services and vices to keep SG GDP up.
The pap shd be wise and follow Korea..invest on knowledge and technology. Such gain in technology and knowledge cant be easily replicated by other countries..look at Korea...booming..with Samsung, Hyundai, etc..producing cars, phones, etc...