- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 6,746
- Points
- 113
No need to support Roy or little Girl, just mention ret of CPF at 55 you scares the shit out of PAP
Friend, what problems do you have today? Dissatisfaction with the ruling party? There is a means to change them, and its known as elections. The citizens of Peesai have been voting for More Good Years all this while, so you got More Good Years. What is there to protest? No freedom to vote? No freedom of speech? Yes, you get into trouble if you defame or slander someome of high standing, that is civil society, otherwise everyone can make all kinds of unsubstantiated claims. Unhappy with "merrygendering," well, that just happens to be within the game of politics, it is a dirty game.
And I never said the majority is right. Just that in society, we go along with the majority. Rebellion may take place if the majority is unjust and inhumane and the laws allow them to get away with it.
Whether life is happy in Singapore or not is up to the individual. Some say happiness is a choice.
There are things in Singapore I just don't agree with, but I don't think I will get support from much of society to see them enacted as law, so I just keep quiet and do things on the quiet. One of them is the three-quarter tank law when driving up north, but it looks like all other drivers accept it, I will be alone looking like a loser if I protest. Another thing is the harsh punishment for marijuana use/possession, but doesn't look like anyone else in Singapore even thinks about it. So what is there to protest about? Even if I think the majority is wrong and stupid, am I going to go against the grain? That's stupidity.
Cheers!
Agoraphobic; said:... And whether we agree or not, we all go by the choice of the majority.....
Cheers!
There will be differences in definitions, but I take political democracy as "Equal political rights for all." This equates to One man, One vote. And it is being practiced in Singapore. And the citizens mostly voted for we know who. With the shitty view I have of politics, I will normally pick the underdog because no matter who one picks, they're all going to line their own pockets.
Cheers!
She is right. I have always maintained that the Wayang PArty aka Workers Party is fake oppo. What is dissappointing is that the other parties many led by lawyers, would not lend a hand to Roy or HHH either. If I were them, I would actively recruit these popular bloggers to run for them in single constituencies in the next GE. I for one would vote for Roy over any PAP shit they want to field.
very hard to rock the boat when they have a group of mp's in parliament already collecting a hefty payout without the need to get back to their day jobs. you must sympathize. among sinkies, money is the main driver and incentive for behavioral modification. :p
You don't get it. So you come out and vote every 5 years, accept the majoritarian result, and then go to sleep for the next 5 years when you'll wake up again to vote?
We're not talking about violent revolution. We're talking about taking action to raise awareness of issues, garner support, come out with viable alternatives, expose shortcomings, so that in the next election people know better and can vote better for a better govt.
The key is to support the cause, not the activist. All social and special interest causes are ultimately political because they involve people who vote. Activists and politicians may use different platforms, but their causes do overlap and dovetail.
Ultimately, activist or politician, everyone is fighting for the betterment of society, for better governance.
........ but the water is slowly boiling, more and more of the 6.9m is being added,........
I think you have forgotten about the animal called GRC...........
Hope you can include "1 constituency 1 result". Don't combine ok?
It is a sure win system. If opp boycotted, isn't that playing into their hand, as that is exactly the results they wanted. By contesting, it implies opp has no objection yet the chance of opp winning is curtailed. They play big because they know wind is in their favour. So the chance of losing big is not going to happen. Just watch, things will change when they lose a few. The system will be changed and that will be the last change they can ever make. It is too late.Well, I personally do not agree with it (the GRC thing), but if it was illegal, the committee that overseas elections will not allow it, and in the worse case, the opposition parties could have boycotted the election for this GRC thing. But it looks like they fielded teams and took part too. On the other side of the coin, the ruling party will lose big too if the bet big. It's still the people's vote.
Cheers!
i wouldn't say no objection.As far as I know, there has been no objection.
You have stated your position and intention very clearly now. Our discussion shall lend here. Good night.That decision rests with the courts, election committee, or whichever authority that oversees the election process. As far as I know, there has been no objection.
Cheers!
It is a sure win system. If opp boycotted, isn't that playing into their hand, as that is exactly the results they wanted. By contesting, it implies opp has no objection yet the chance of opp winning is curtailed. They play big because they know wind is in their favour. So the chance of losing big is not going to happen. Just watch, things will change when they lose a few. The system will be changed and that will be the last change they can ever make. It is too late.
Its small minded fucks like you that is the cause for the problems we have today. U think the majority is always right and hence u will not oppose because it is accepted by the majority? What kind of fuck thinking is that? In countries like the US, in one election the Democrats can be the majority and the republicans the opposition, but if they think like you, than its acceptable to be democrats forever? Obviously not, the opposition republicans do what they do, which is complain and protest and sometimes they end up being the majority and elected to power. Part of being in a democracy is to always agitate for a better govt. And not to accept that the govt of the day is the best that you can get, and therefore should stay in power for ever. Otherwise, they will be complacent and fat like the PAP.
By the way, over 80 years ago, a certain country had working laws, civil institutions, and a very vibrant economy. They were voted in by majority. The majority was wrong. No one question them. that country is called Germany. and the govt voted in was called the National Socialist.
Life is happy in singapore my ass. If life was so happy, how come 40% voted for a change in govt. even with knowing the opposition is untested and unproven?