• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Regulators Refusing to Act - Hyflux & Noble Group's Decline

Dear All,

Utico hinted about full repayment after they raise money from listing. Our legal informed us that their counterparts representing the banks confirmed that the Utico proposal did not get their clients' nod as of yesterday. It is just their wishful thinking.
 
Dear All,

Utico hinted about full repayment after they raise money from listing. Our legal informed us that their counterparts representing the banks confirmed that the Utico proposal did not get their clients' nod as of yesterday. It is just their wishful thinking.

It is very bad. I will vote NO if I get to vote.
 
The deal is not confirmed. Told you all the NRI Indian in Utico cannot be trusted - They claimed the deal is on when Hyflux haven't sign it. Even our local Indians also don't trust NRI Indians. This kind of people you trust?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/hyflux-utico-deal-agreement-11850432

The only way to save Hyflux is that the same amount of money comes from a GLC or China SOE and takes over 88% of Hyflux. I wonder why the government refuses to match SMI or Utico.

In this way, creditors will be willing to refinance cheaply and government can look after the contracts of Hyflux. Then Perpetuals and Preference Shareholders will be more willing support a restructure in exchange for a lower-yield quasi-sovereign bond, eg. 2-3%pa. Doing so, the Perpetuals and Preference Shares can offload anytime near 100-par value.
 
Oxley Q4 profits dived 81%
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/oxley-q4-net-profit-dives-81

Total current liabilities (due for financing within a year) doubled to $2.375billion from $1.234billion a year ago.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/naazne...er-one-perks-up-a-sluggish-year/#10656d687e34
There were three dropoffs, including Ching Chiat Kwong, the former cop turned developer, who came to be known as the king of shoebox apartments. The debt-fueled expansion of his Oxley Holdings made investors wary, causing its shares to dip.
 
UAE's Utico confident of securing deal for Singapore's Hyflux: CEO
https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-u...-deal-for-singapores-hyflux-ceo-idUKKCN1VJ13I

ABU DHABI (Reuters) - United Arab Emirates-based Utico FZC said on Thursday it was confident a restructuring deal with Singapore’s indebted Hyflux Ltd (HYFL.SI) could be reached, after the two sides earlier issued conflicting statements about progress on an agreement.

Utico announced at the start of the week that a deal had been reached in which it would take 88% of Hyflux, but the Singaporean firm said on Wednesday no definitive agreement had been struck although discussions were advanced.

Hyflux, which is under a court-supervised restructuring process, was once considered a national champion running a strategically important water source for the city-state.
Utico Chief Executive Richard Menezes told Reuters his company was “confident” of reaching agreement because a deal had the approval of 70% of senior creditors, a majority of perpetual and preference shareholders and Utico’s board.

He said the Hyflux board was holding back over issues such as advisors fees, board representation and management oversight.
Once the Hyflux board and court approved the deal, Utico planned to set up a separate entity in Singapore to make the payments due, the CEO said, adding that Utico was committed to a proposed initial public offering (IPO) in two years.
“We can turn the company around and we are there for the long-term,” he said, adding Hyflux had valuable intellectual property and assets, and also had management team expertise.
 
DEAR ALL

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION:


I refer to the article - https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...d-causing-holdup-in-signing-rescue-deal-utico


When asked on Thursday why Utico said there was a signed deal, chief executive Richard Menezes said: "Because August 26 was the deadline and creditors,
note holders had accepted the restructuring agreement."​


The above Utico statement is completely untrue. At least not, my MTN legal group. Claiming "noteholders had accepted the restructuring agreement" is untrue. This person behaves like a typical dishonest NRI Indian merchant. I am not a racist person in real life but it is true that Indians tend to behave so, in the course of business.

To MTN holders, please do not be fooled by this statement. You and me didn't give any acceptance. This person cannot be trusted.
 
DEAR ALL

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION:

I refer to the article - https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...d-causing-holdup-in-signing-rescue-deal-utico


When asked on Thursday why Utico said there was a signed deal, chief executive Richard Menezes said: "Because August 26 was the deadline and creditors,
note holders had accepted the restructuring agreement."​


The above Utico statement is completely untrue. At least not, my MTN legal group. Claiming "noteholders had accepted the restructuring agreement" is untrue. This person behaves like a typical dishonest NRI Indian merchant. I am not a racist person in real life but it is true that Indians tend to behave so, in the course of business.

To MTN holders, please do not be fooled by this statement. You and me didn't give any acceptance. This person cannot be trusted.

WHAT THE FUCK! THIS IS ABSURB
My father is MTN noteholder. I wish to confirm we did not accept. UTICO IS LYING, THEY DID NOT get our support.
 
DEAR ALL

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION:

I refer to the article - https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...d-causing-holdup-in-signing-rescue-deal-utico


When asked on Thursday why Utico said there was a signed deal, chief executive Richard Menezes said: "Because August 26 was the deadline and creditors,
note holders had accepted the restructuring agreement."​


The above Utico statement is completely untrue. At least not, my MTN legal group. Claiming "noteholders had accepted the restructuring agreement" is untrue. This person behaves like a typical dishonest NRI Indian merchant. I am not a racist person in real life but it is true that Indians tend to behave so, in the course of business.

To MTN holders, please do not be fooled by this statement. You and me didn't give any acceptance. This person cannot be trusted.

The Securities Industry Council (SIC) administers the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers.

SIC should flag Utico about these misleading statements claiming notesholders' and banks' support.
 
Why is the Singapore Government turning a Blind Eye to over 50,000 affected shareholders, bondholders, perpetual securities holders and preference shareholders?

I wish to present three numbers:
Ref: https://www.straitstimes.com/business/hyflux-perp-holders-and-preference-shareholders-owed-900m
  1. According to the above article, 60% of the 50,000 affected investors are owed $1.17billion (at least) = about $39,000 each
  2. The remaining investors & banks are owed at least $1.78 billion (at least) = about $89,000 each
  3. In another calculation, 34,000 retail investors are owed $900m in PnPs = about $26,500 each
Statistically, many individuals are affected by a mid five-figured amount. As PUB issued further warnings about TuasOne (the last gem of Hyflux), after the confiscation of Tuaspring water plant, it is undeniable that NEA/PUB plays an essential role towards to survival of Hyflux. Hyflux has footprints in China, Middle East, Africa and Singapore's infrastructural projects. There are moral obligations for the government to intervene and help Hyflux and her investors. There is nothing to be ashamed about, to seek a government assistance because this is a symbolic local brand that sank with over 50,000 investors, and it is unlikely to be a money-losing venture for the authorities. The magnitude is massive if we include the dependents of these investors.

Retail-investor sentiments are hardly considered by the management, court or restructuring team because the retail investors are ranked last in debt seniority.


Proposed Solution
A government-linked company or stat board is the best steward for all parties to move on with the restructuring. The crazy LNG contracts are ending and biggest cashflows are from Tuaspring, TuasOne and Singspring. With PUB or NEA's blessings, this is a profitable venture for any government-back acquirer with minimal tweaks on the current contracts, and being a quasi-sovereign company, the cost of financing will be extremely low for Hyflux (improving profitability for debt repayment) and acquires Hyflux's global infrastructural assets at a discount.

Assuming that Hyflux faces $3bn of debts and seeks to reduce them to move on. The acquirer can propose to switch all debts into a zero-rated bond of 12 years maturity backed by the government-linked acquirer. (no coupon payment for 12 years).
Proposed Zero-rated Bonds
Par Value at Maturity: $100
Maturity: 12 years
Assumption Bond Price at Day 1: $25 (Maturity - Yield to Date 12.24%pa)​
Assumption Bond Price at Day 1: $50 (Maturity - Yield to Date 5.94%pa)​
Assumption Bond Price at Day 1: $75 (Maturity - Yield to Date 2.42%pa)​

Assuming the creditors offloads everything at $25 (75% discount) to the acquirer on Day 1, effectively the acquirer only paid $750m to redeem ALL $3 billion debts. This is a very attractive deal, in all likelihood, the acquirer will happily queue to buy and strike-off these newly issued 12-years bond at 75% discount. There should be little panic-selling because other than the acquirer, new investors or insurers will love to buy these newly-minted quasi-sovereign bonds for >$50 because 5.94%pa is an attractive yield. Currently, a ten-years or perpetual bonds of our GLCs are just giving 4%pa.

These bonds will likely trade between $50-75 level for many years, which in on-par with similar debts in the secondary market. Affected bankers and individuals will have enough time to contemplate about offloading them to the open market or hold-till-maturity (for 100% capital return).

In return, the acquirer gets a majority stake in Hyflux's ordinary shares.

In fact, perhaps, the acquirer need not fork out much cash. Financial advisors will guide the acquirer to raise funds by issuing another batch of shorter-dated bonds to buy the zero-rated bonds at steep-discounts.


Eg. The acquirer issues 3-5 years bonds 2-3%pa (eg. similar coupon as GLCs such as Singtel, Capitaland or universities NUS, SMU) and use the funds to buy the zero-rated bonds at $25-50 level (5.94%-12.24%pa yield), translating to an immediate paper-gain due to debt-reduction.​



A win-win for all, if the government is willing to help.
Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
MIDDLE Eastern utility company Utico has regularly declared that it is locked, loaded and ready to go to the rescue of Hyflux, but court testimony on Monday suggested that the outcome may not be so clear.

“one point that concerned them was the source of funds – how this money or when the money (will) be paid to them,” said Mr Sandrasegara.
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...sion-debt-moratorium-creditors-utico-11955730

Other white knights waiting in the wings, says Hyflux's lawyer
Sticking points in deal put Utico's position in doubt; talks to carry on with other parties

"In parallel, we will continue discussions with this (unnamed) investor, and I understand from the (company's) financial adviser, there are other investors who have popped up and we will do the negotiations in parallel."
 
DEAR ALL

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION:


I refer to the article - https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...d-causing-holdup-in-signing-rescue-deal-utico


When asked on Thursday why Utico said there was a signed deal, chief executive Richard Menezes said: "Because August 26 was the deadline and creditors,
note holders had accepted the restructuring agreement."​


The above Utico statement is completely untrue. At least not, my MTN legal group. Claiming "noteholders had accepted the restructuring agreement" is untrue. This person behaves like a typical dishonest NRI Indian merchant. I am not a racist person in real life but it is true that Indians tend to behave so, in the course of business.

To MTN holders, please do not be fooled by this statement. You and me didn't give any acceptance. This person cannot be trusted.

Yes, you are correct. Notesholders' consensus was not obtained and not communicated. They mainly negotiate with the bank.

There are now speculations about a major announcement with another party, before the Oct 31 briefings.
 
Other white knights waiting in the wings, says Hyflux's lawyer
2EE28861-E0D2-4A41-8DDE-080A87E889DC.gif
 
Back
Top