Re: Reform Party: Ex SAF scholar joins Reform Party.
Hi [scroobal],
I agree with you.
Although I have resided overseas for almost three decades, I have tried to keep up with noteworthy news from SG, inspite of my old friends' advice to move on and ignore my birth country.
I believe that most individuals are aware that whatever type or colour of scholars, scholars are the top 5 per cent of any cohort of SG students. There are very few who are chosen as President's Scholars, SAFOS, SPFOS (and there are very few who are aware of how this was born, that is, if my memory does not fail me, two SAFOS who in my humble submission, did not quite make it at 1 SIR, may be because their men AWOL, and the two SAFOS were "transferred" to the SPF, and eventually made it to the top at SPF, top at CID / top at prison, which sort of provided the SPF with an idea to start the SPFOS. -- those two SAFOS were several years my senior), OMS (during my old days, there was the Colombo Plan Scholarship), and most of us are aware that they are very bright.
With respect to TT, he may appear to be less "successful" compared to the SAFOS, but I submit that he is an "Achiever." In addition, even if one or two individuals may consider him to be not so successful in his SAF career (or a failure?), perhaps, as a human being, we should consider offering him some encouragement and support for his courage and commitment thus far. I believe it is much easier to criticize and "demolish" any individual, because (to quote Francis Seow) we are all human beings, and we have our strengths and weaknesses. Severe and unfair criticism do not encourage other individuals who are pondering to make the decision to join a political party which is not PAP.
Our criticism and comments should be like snow flakes, which provide moisture and nourishment but does not hurt, whereas hail stones and freezing rain may damage the crops (we in Toronto experience all types of precipitation).
You are certainly an angry man and melodramatic as well.
No one claimed that Tony was SAFOS. He never the less was a scholar who obtained 1st class honours in engineering and it did not come from Batu Pahat University. Not many people are cut out to be in the SAF or the SAF might not be ready for him. He has however done well under his own steam. Ok, he hasn't walked the moon yet so lets us cut him some slack.
Hi [scroobal],
I agree with you.
Although I have resided overseas for almost three decades, I have tried to keep up with noteworthy news from SG, inspite of my old friends' advice to move on and ignore my birth country.
I believe that most individuals are aware that whatever type or colour of scholars, scholars are the top 5 per cent of any cohort of SG students. There are very few who are chosen as President's Scholars, SAFOS, SPFOS (and there are very few who are aware of how this was born, that is, if my memory does not fail me, two SAFOS who in my humble submission, did not quite make it at 1 SIR, may be because their men AWOL, and the two SAFOS were "transferred" to the SPF, and eventually made it to the top at SPF, top at CID / top at prison, which sort of provided the SPF with an idea to start the SPFOS. -- those two SAFOS were several years my senior), OMS (during my old days, there was the Colombo Plan Scholarship), and most of us are aware that they are very bright.
With respect to TT, he may appear to be less "successful" compared to the SAFOS, but I submit that he is an "Achiever." In addition, even if one or two individuals may consider him to be not so successful in his SAF career (or a failure?), perhaps, as a human being, we should consider offering him some encouragement and support for his courage and commitment thus far. I believe it is much easier to criticize and "demolish" any individual, because (to quote Francis Seow) we are all human beings, and we have our strengths and weaknesses. Severe and unfair criticism do not encourage other individuals who are pondering to make the decision to join a political party which is not PAP.
Our criticism and comments should be like snow flakes, which provide moisture and nourishment but does not hurt, whereas hail stones and freezing rain may damage the crops (we in Toronto experience all types of precipitation).