Just to clarify only, I will not try to post anything out of PH matters but FYI, many international Hotel Chains are management contracts, kind of like a tenant in a retail mall, they can relocate if things do not pan out to be, they can assign or sell the lease to next operator lock-stock and barrel including the renovations and furnishings, so their exit costs are low, same like me, going in to Iskandar / PH as a tenant only. So you cannot just ride on their coat tails blindly. Also please do not take things at face value, you do not know how much money is being greased to the decision maker of the hotel chain by the developer to setup shop there........this is Malaysia.
"In Asia, many hotels operate under management contract arrangements, as they can more easily obtain economies of scale, a global reservation systems, brand recognition etc. It is not unusual for contracts to be signed for 30 years, and having a fee as high as 3.5% of total revenues and 6-10% of gross operating profit. Management contracts have been used to a wide extent in the airline industry, and when foreign government action restricts other entry methods. Management contracts are often formed where there is a lack of local skills to run a project. It is an alternative to foreign direct investment as it does not involve as high risk and can yield higher returns for the company. The first recorded management contract was initiated by Qantas and Duncan Upton in 1978.[1][not in citation given]"
Notice the point, they do this to avoid higher risks.
Maybe you can enlighten us why of all places these international hotels all choose PH ? Just becos their exit costs are low ( to be confirmed whether true ) ?