-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Please Guess??? Banks with Overwhelming Foreign Employees from Single Cuntry!
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
The two-week "search period" for sinkies is just a con job.
Someone can reject a piece of visible furniture - three thousand reasons
can be given on why none of the sinkies being interviewed for a job was
not accepted.
Someone can reject a piece of visible furniture - three thousand reasons
can be given on why none of the sinkies being interviewed for a job was
not accepted.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
This country is beyond farked.....and people still think 2020 elections will make a difference
.......
By 2030 foreigners will outnumber locals 65 to 35.
We won't even have enough true blue sinkies to make the majority vote.
.......
By 2030 foreigners will outnumber locals 65 to 35.
We won't even have enough true blue sinkies to make the majority vote.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
Singapore the only country where ur banking and finance and it sector is dominated by foreigners.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
Nvm amdk and ceca dominate ur banks,the banks have the audacity to say sinkies are not suitable for the job.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 10,030
- Points
- 113
OPEN LETTER TO DBS LTD
Dear Peter Seah Chairman >>>> (cc P Gupta), Ho Ching Termasek Holdings
.. 2020…2021…2022
DBS “DIGITAL TOKEN”? IS IT A TOOL ALSO FOR HACKING.SCAMMING? DID DBS SAVE A LOT OF MONEY AT EXPENSE OF DEPOSITOR’S SCAM PROTECTION? + QUESTION OF INTENSE PUBLIC CONCERN
When internet or online banking started depositors accessed their accounts, inter alia, using given dongle transmitted 6 digits to gain access and control over their transactions. Dongle is tied to depositor phone number known to DBS. Dongle is also always with depositor physically unless robbed or stolen by unauthorised/crooks.
Some years ago, without alerting or formally informing depositors “DIGITAL TOKEN” was phased in replacing the expensive (to DBS) but ABSOLUTELY RELIABLE DONGLE. Neither was depositor’s approval obtained to have these digital token -WHICH IS BASICALLY ANY SMART PHONE phased in to replance/displace the reliable and fully time tested dongle. No doubt the creator in DBS got a big pat on the back and a big feather in his cap for saving DSB a lot of money to have smart phone replace dongle which has high cost burden to DBS - purchased price; inventory costs; adminstration costs, distribution etc…!! Smart phone cost nothing to DBS.
HOWEVER DBS overlooked or ignored the serious consequence of this switch which basically exposed depositors to hackers/scammers. DBS willingly allow darkforces to switch control from dongle to their smartphone EVEN WHEN THEIR PHONE NUMBER IS FOREIGN OR UNREGISTERED WITH DBS LIKE THOSE TIED TO DONGLE.
UNDER ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES DOES DBS HAS RESPONSIBILITY FOR SCAMS DONE TO DEPOSITS WITH DBS?
OVER PAST YEARS THERE WERE MANY REPORTS RELATING TO DBS DEPOSITORS SCAMMED OR BEING SCAMMED, SOME WITH PARTICULARS INCLUDING MEDIA SUGGESTING LINKS TO DBS OR ITS PAST STAFF OR RELATED - HAS DBS INVESTIGATED AND WHAT IS THE RESULT OR WILL DBS BE INVESTIGATING INCLUDING ANY POSSIBILITY OF DEPOSIT PARTICULARS BEING COMPROMISED BY FOREIGN OR LOCAL STAFF?
Dear Peter Seah Chairman >>>> (cc P Gupta), Ho Ching Termasek Holdings
.. 2020…2021…2022
DBS “DIGITAL TOKEN”? IS IT A TOOL ALSO FOR HACKING.SCAMMING? DID DBS SAVE A LOT OF MONEY AT EXPENSE OF DEPOSITOR’S SCAM PROTECTION? + QUESTION OF INTENSE PUBLIC CONCERN
When internet or online banking started depositors accessed their accounts, inter alia, using given dongle transmitted 6 digits to gain access and control over their transactions. Dongle is tied to depositor phone number known to DBS. Dongle is also always with depositor physically unless robbed or stolen by unauthorised/crooks.
Some years ago, without alerting or formally informing depositors “DIGITAL TOKEN” was phased in replacing the expensive (to DBS) but ABSOLUTELY RELIABLE DONGLE. Neither was depositor’s approval obtained to have these digital token -WHICH IS BASICALLY ANY SMART PHONE phased in to replance/displace the reliable and fully time tested dongle. No doubt the creator in DBS got a big pat on the back and a big feather in his cap for saving DSB a lot of money to have smart phone replace dongle which has high cost burden to DBS - purchased price; inventory costs; adminstration costs, distribution etc…!! Smart phone cost nothing to DBS.
HOWEVER DBS overlooked or ignored the serious consequence of this switch which basically exposed depositors to hackers/scammers. DBS willingly allow darkforces to switch control from dongle to their smartphone EVEN WHEN THEIR PHONE NUMBER IS FOREIGN OR UNREGISTERED WITH DBS LIKE THOSE TIED TO DONGLE.
UNDER ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES DOES DBS HAS RESPONSIBILITY FOR SCAMS DONE TO DEPOSITS WITH DBS?
OVER PAST YEARS THERE WERE MANY REPORTS RELATING TO DBS DEPOSITORS SCAMMED OR BEING SCAMMED, SOME WITH PARTICULARS INCLUDING MEDIA SUGGESTING LINKS TO DBS OR ITS PAST STAFF OR RELATED - HAS DBS INVESTIGATED AND WHAT IS THE RESULT OR WILL DBS BE INVESTIGATING INCLUDING ANY POSSIBILITY OF DEPOSIT PARTICULARS BEING COMPROMISED BY FOREIGN OR LOCAL STAFF?
Similar threads
