- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 59,107
- Points
- 113
Maybe the SPF follows the SAF doctrine: you cannot engage enemies unless you outnumber them three to one.
for encirclement, 6 to 1 with extra 2 in support. :p
Last edited:
Maybe the SPF follows the SAF doctrine: you cannot engage enemies unless you outnumber them three to one.
If the COI panel have any brains, this bs about being outnumbered would have been torn apart.
There wasn't 400 protestors then. 90 law enforcers, most of them have firearms can't control 150 crowd, that's a serious concern on the capability of our SPF.
And communication radios and phones were not working in crisis.
How has our billions being spent on the SPF?
Maybe they were praying inside the ambulance: to Allah, Buddha and Jesus.
Radio comms set also kena jam that night, so better pray and listen to the instructions of the commander in heaven.
The Straits Times.....
The question of how many police officers there were compared with rioters on Dec 8 came up when former police commissioner Tee Tua Ba asked Assistant Superintendent of Police Jonathan Tang why he had not "engaged" the crowd when he reached the accident site.
.........
ASP Tang said he later managed to connect with other police officers, bringing his total manpower to nine police officers and four APOs. But as much as he wanted to start arresting the rioters at that point, the crowd still outmatched his small force.
"With this number of officers, we would not have been able to take decisive action to restore the peace," he said. "Yes, we were very, very outnumbered."
When asked later if he knew that there were actually some 90 police officers dealing with the rioters that night, he replied that he was not aware of these other officers as overloaded police radio and mobile networks had made communications with colleagues difficult.
"It definitely didn't feel like there were 90 police officers," he said, noting that even with that number, he would still consider the force outnumbered by rioters.
This is call take cover know. Almost every son of mother in stinking land. U donno meh?Haha this is really funny, got such thing as having 90 police officers but didnt feel like 90 and thought only 9 around, proof that must be all hiding so cannot be seen...
Haha this is really funny, got such thing as having 90 police officers but didnt feel like 90 and thought only 9 around, proof that must be all hiding so cannot be seen...
So if there are 400 rioters we need 2400 poodles? I think 50 pit bulls will do the job.for encirclement, 6 to 1 with extra 2 in support. :p
So if there are 400 rioters we need 2400 poodles? I think 50 pit bulls will do the job.
This is call take cover know. Almost every son of mother in stinking land. U donno meh?
50? I think just let loose 5 more than enough
True, 5 rottweilers also can, so big size the 400 ah neh see already sure scared and run off..
SG in real shit hole with such SPF. Why didn't they use their firearms to fire warning shots? When gang fights erupted in the 1950s, one warning shot and all gangsters ran for their lives. Gang fights used real parangs. Ah nehs used only projectiles.
Haha this is really funny, got such thing as having 90 police officers but didnt feel like 90 and thought only 9 around, proof that must be all hiding so cannot be seen...
True, 5 rottweilers also can, so big size the 400 ah neh see already sure scared and run off..