spot on. lolone of Tua Pau Xian's subtle methods is to put his own ideas into the mouths of others, who cannot possibly refute his assertions. the Commissioner of Land and the PA are obviously not in a position to contradict him here.
spot on. lolone of Tua Pau Xian's subtle methods is to put his own ideas into the mouths of others, who cannot possibly refute his assertions. the Commissioner of Land and the PA are obviously not in a position to contradict him here.
Thank you for the short lesson.
No problem. Much happy to oblige.
New Tip:
(Courtesy of eatshitndie):
"When singled out and exposed, drown the thread with shit and pee. others will not look when the thread is dirty." eatshitndie, 28 Mar 2016
one of Tua Pau Xian's subtle methods is to put his own ideas into the mouths of others, who cannot possibly refute his assertions. the Commissioner of Land and the PA are obviously not in a position to contradict him here.
A TPX's over used ploy is to mix widely known facts with his own creativities to create a well glued impression of 'at scene' insight. I give him 4 star rating!
So lets be clear about Mindef controlling this case. They don't. Whenever these things occur, you can see and feel the tension between Mindef and MHA. Mindef will start playing games from the word go but the MHA will not let go because they have to explain to AG why they cannot get the answers and it is a not a pretty sight.
must bump this thread once a day. lol
Must do it at the right moment.
Great observation! Now, let us analyse how this "at scene insight" is done by using a recent post as an excellent guide.
Ref: Msg 82 of Shanmugam's response to Dominique's death-WTF!
In just 2 simple lines, this skilled TPX writer has created an omniscient TPX "at scene insight". His talent lies in not doing so in a crass manner like what a crap writer, unskilled in the fine art of writing great TPX stories would do by brashly declaring: "I know better because I was there!". Readers get turned off by such brashness and will then be less amenable and be less inclined to be persuaded by the rest of your bullshit.
So how does a good TPX writer do this? Easy peasy! And as easy as ABC!
The simple trick is to allow readers to feel clever in inferring or seeing for themselves, that the writer has "at scene insights" without the writer brashly declaring so. Once readers are made to feel clever as though they have uncovered something that was not intended to be revealed, they will feel the immense honour of being able to share a quiet "wink, wink, nudge, nudge" secret moment with a great TPX writer. When this happens, they will be more ready to believe the rest of the TPX bullshit that you spew.
So, if you ever wake up one morning and start your morning routine of feeling your balls (without thinking about Claire), and you find that they feel a little heavy, and your nut sacs taut with tension, have a go in writing a TPX "at scene insight" story.
Strangely, my balls do feel heavy at the moment and my nut sacs feel a little taut. So here goes...
"The tension in the room was palpable. LKY was clearly furious. He continued to rebuke Robert Orr, the US Ambassador, for allowing Hendrickson to meet Francis Seow, Teo Lai Huat and M. Jeganathan. I quietly wiped off some of his spittles that landed on my glasses with the tissue Dhanabalan had quietly slipped me under the mahogany coffee table. I sat very meekly, continuing to record the exchange."
Three lines and I am done. I have "accidentally" (Ooops!) disclosed my TPX confidential "at scene insight" moment. Having established my "insight" credentials, I am now ready to spew my other bullshit. Even without the help of Claire, I can feel the tension in my nut sacs slowly dissipating. Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh.....
PS: The US Ambassador in 1988 during the period the American diplomat, E. Mason Hendrickson, was expelled from Singapore was Daryl Arnold (1987 -1989) and not Robert Orr (1989 -1992). "Teo Lai Huat" and "M.Jeganathan" are some bullshit names that I pulled out of my ass. Don't worry about such things though as they are unimportant. Except for one or two assholes with too much time on their hands, no one will bother to check on such details.
Great observation! Now, let us analyse how this "at scene insight" is done by using a recent post as an excellent guide.
Ref: Msg 82 of Shanmugam's response to Dominique's death-WTF!
In just 2 simple lines, this skilled TPX writer has created an omniscient TPX "at scene insight". His talent lies in not doing so in a crass manner like what a crap writer, unskilled in the fine art of writing great TPX stories would do by brashly declaring: "I know better because I was there!". Readers get turned off by such brashness and will then be less amenable and be less inclined to be persuaded by the rest of your bullshit.
So how does a good TPX writer do this? Easy peasy! And as easy as ABC!
The simple trick is to allow readers to feel clever in inferring or seeing for themselves, that the writer has "at scene insights" without the writer brashly declaring so. Once readers are made to feel clever as though they have uncovered something that was not intended to be revealed, they will feel the immense honour of being able to share a quiet "wink, wink, nudge, nudge" secret moment with a great TPX writer. When this happens, they will be more ready to believe the rest of the TPX bullshit that you spew.
So, if you ever wake up one morning and start your morning routine of feeling your balls (without thinking about Claire), and you find that they feel a little heavy, and your nut sacs taut with tension, have a go in writing a TPX "at scene insight" story.
Strangely, my balls do feel heavy at the moment and my nut sacs feel a little taut. So here goes...
"The tension in the room was palpable. LKY was clearly furious. He continued to rebuke Robert Orr, the US Ambassador, for allowing Hendrickson to meet Francis Seow, Teo Lai Huat and M. Jeganathan. I quietly wiped off some of his spittles that landed on my glasses with the tissue Dhanabalan had quietly slipped me under the mahogany coffee table. I sat very meekly, continuing to record the exchange."
Three lines and I am done. I have "accidentally" (Ooops!) disclosed my TPX confidential "at scene insight" moment. Having established my "insight" credentials, I am now ready to spew my other bullshit. Even without the help of Claire, I can feel the tension in my nut sacs slowly dissipating. Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh.....
PS: The US Ambassador in 1988 during the period the American diplomat, E. Mason Hendrickson, was expelled from Singapore was Daryl Arnold (1987 -1989) and not Robert Orr (1989 -1992). "Teo Lai Huat" and "M.Jeganathan" are some bullshit names that I pulled out of my ass. Don't worry about such things though as they are unimportant. Except for one or two assholes with too much time on their hands, no one will bother to check on such details.
u naughty people. lol
Now is the right moment.
Excellent post!! Now i wonder if scrooballs and cronies (clones) will mention your name during their forum members hall of fame awards ceremony.
Funny thing. Every time I check out a thread with the last posting by a certain moniker I find myself the only viewer. It's the same with the kuku motherfucker. Better get out of here before the stench of gay gets on me!
Funny thing. Every time I check out a thread with the last posting by a certain moniker I find myself the only viewer. It's the same with the kuku motherfucker. Better get out of here before the stench of gay gets on me!
Absolutely agree.
JHolmesJr
Forum Tua Pau Xian clones working very hard.