If smoking kills, would'nt it be better to ban smoking than tax heavily? The benefit of a ban would be that the younger generation would not be influenced to pick up the habit.
Increasing the tax! increases the price of cigarettes and this has not stopped rich young kids from picking up the habit. Unless passive smoke is eating into your brains, you cannot see the sense in what I am about to say. BAN SMOKING!!
Banning is draconian, impractical and inhumane. It will just create an underground market. Moreover, how do we ban tourists, etc from smoking?
If smokers have any brain matter left at all, they will be trying their best to quit. many have successfully got rid of the addiction. Only the stupid and weak smokers are left with the life long addiction. So fucking idiotic.
Worse are smokers who make the following excuses:
1) My grandfather (or insert any male elderly person) smoked his whole life and he lived till 120 yr old
2) I exercise everyday
3) I smoke "lite" cigarettes (this is one of the dumbest)
4) I am not addicted, I enjoy smoking
5) Smoking relaxes me (another dumb reason. Smoking DOES NOT relax you, it just quenches your addiction for nicotine. It is like someone who takes off his shoes that are 2 sizes too small and proclaiming "Wow, that was relaxing".)
The first step for smokers is to admit that they are addicted, then to believe that they have to quit this unnecessary addiction, then to finally take steps to stop smoking.
If you don't think there's any problem with smoking, then your brains are already fried by all the toxins in cigarettes.