• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Oppie Chee Trying To Rip Off Sinkies With $100 Homemade Mashed Potatoes! Bukit Batok Residents Sibei Sianz That They Can't Get Rid Of Him!

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP’s Chee Soon Juan questions Jurong-Clementi TC on why included the soon-finished project in the 5-Year Master Plan for Bukit Batok - The Online Citizen
S.Ling

On Monday (19 October), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan came forward to question the move of Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to include the project which will be soon completed as part of the proposed work in the 5-Year Master Plan for Bukit Batok.
Writing in his Facebook post, Dr Chee revealed that the installation of an elevated boardwalk at the Bukit Batok Neighbourhood Park which was started since 2019 and “is already under way and almost completed” was featured in one of the sections in the Master Plan.
“Why did JRTC include this project among items proposed for future work when it is going to be completed soon? Why did it include the project as part of the Master Plan for 2020-2025?
“This is, to put it mildly, highly misleading,” the SDP chief said.
He also raised his concern on whether this elevated boardwalk will be “another one of those white elephant structures that looks and sounds good but residents hardly use”, which he had cited another example of unnecessary structures in his Facebook post previously.
Earlier on 17 September, Dr Chee highlighted that there is a lookout point over a canal which hardly anyone uses and an “amphitheatre” with seats facing a patch of overgrown grass built in the middle of nowhere “that no one asked for and nobody uses”.
“These are expensive structures that serve no apparent purpose,” he said, adding that such construction reflects “the kind of top-down approach to town planning where residents are not consulted that result in an enormous waste of resources”.
Giving another example, the SDP chief in his Monday’s post pointed out that the pergola – a stand-alone structure with wooden beams and no roof – near Blks 192 & 193 “did not serve any useful function” because “Singapore weather is such that if it is not hot, it’s rainy”.
He said, according to the residents, the pergola was then turned into pavilion after a roof was added on top of the beams, however, it was too narrow and small to hold activities.
He also added that someone has proposed to turn it into a linkway, but “the idea is apparently now abandoned”.
“Today, it stands as an impractical and purposeless concrete structure – again, money wasted like the canal-lookout point and the amphitheatre,” he noted.
121674982_10160957905758849_4351402777494250575_o.jpg
121643290_10160957906038849_4586427958747482599_o.jpg

Dr Chee who contested in the Bukit Batok SMC during the 2020 General Election, went on to criticise, “This is the kind of construction that the PAP likes to indulge in – grand, ostentatious projects that are announced just before elections – which subsequently become white elephants. This is a huge waste of tax dollars which can be used to help Singaporeans in more beneficial ways.
“BB residents (and in a larger context, Singaporeans) must question how our money is spent.
“With people slogging so hard to make a living, it seems a cruel sin that the government indulges in such mindless building without careful planning and consultation with residents.”
The online users also concurred Dr Chee’s view that there are too many “unnecessary upgrades and installation” that have “no practical usefulness”. They opined that such installation is a “pure waste of public fund” and “should be strongly condemned”.
uncessary-shelter-1.png
uncessary-shelter-2.png
uncessary-shelter.png

Another online user also pointed out that there are many useless things that the authorities had removed after built and then rebuilt it again. “Their standard is. You want, I built. Can use or not, not my problem,” he wrote.
uncessary-shelter-3.png

Earlier, Dr Chee has vowed to continue to come forward with the concerns of Bukit Batok’s residents regarding the municipal matters, especially on the People’s Action Party (PAP)’s proposals made in its 5-year masterplan during GE2020.
“Why do I do this? The short answer is that residents have the right to seek transparency and accountability (get those in office to explain what they’re doing and why they’re doing it),” he noted.
He also urged JRTC to construct a pathway for pedestrians in an area surrounding several housing blocks in Bukit Batok after he observed that the lack of pavements has forced residents to walk on the grass patch or walk on the road that endangered their safety.
Share this:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
me guess next GE BB will disappear ... CSJ is the biggest nightmare for the PAP..:geek:
Actually I have been thinking about it. The only way is to split the constituency up n give it to others. But the neighbouring constituencies also agar agar 55% for pap.
Look at the neighbouring Hong Kan SMC. Amy Kaur had a 10% swing against her so she sitting at 60%. N next erection she will have to throw letter due to pap rejuvenating policies. So not easy for BB to b absorbed. As it will put other areas at risk. So ah chee for now have to stay the course n work closer with ah bock
 

rotiprata

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually I have been thinking about it. The only way is to split the constituency up n give it to others. But the neighbouring constituencies also agar agar 55% for pap.
Look at the neighbouring Hong Kan SMC. Amy Kaur had a 10% swing against her so she sitting at 60%. N next erection she will have to throw letter due to pap rejuvenating policies. So not easy for BB to b absorbed. As it will put other areas at risk. So ah chee for now have to stay the course n work closer with ah bock
those arseholes will come up with a way..u can bet on it... jus as wat they did to TCB.. after he lost to TT by jus a nose at the home stretch...:geek:
 

GOD IS MY DOG

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
those arseholes will come up with a way..u can bet on it... jus as wat they did to TCB.. after he lost to TT by jus a nose at the home stretch...:geek:


yes............maybe in 2025..........PAP say go prison before, cannot contest..............Dr Chee went prison before mah
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
High rental cost kills businesses in S'pore, not coronavirus or e-commerce: SDP’s Chee Soon Juan - The Online Citizen
Coronavirus and e-commerce are not killing businesses in Singapore, but the high rental cost is, said Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) chief Dr Chee Soon Juan on Saturday (31 Oct).

His remarks were made following the announcement last Friday (30 Oct) that Robinsons Singapore will be closing down for good after suffering from losses in recent years amid dwindling revenues.

Robinsons will also be closing down two of its department stores in Malaysia, citing the changing retail buying patterns and weak demand had led to the decision of closing down.

“Reports say that it is COVID-19 and online buying that has killed the once proud business. But there’s more to it than just the pandemic and e-commerce,” said Dr Chee in a Facebook post on Saturday.

“It’s called rent. High rental in Singapore is killing businesses,” he asserted.

Dr Chee pointed out that many retail brands in the Lion City – such as Marks & Spencer, John Little, MPH, Forever 21, and many others – have shuttered years before the global pandemic even took place.

“And if it’s consumers switching to shopping online, then why did O&G companies like Subsea 7, McDermott, Technip, and Saipem leave too? All cited cost as the main factor behind the exodus,” he argued.

Dr Chee went on to say that observers have noted that Singapore “is an extremely expensive place to do business”, which explains why a handful of banks – such as ANZ, Barclays, Standard Chartered, HSBC, the Royal Bank of Scotland, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, and ING – have trimmed their operations in Singapore.

He also cited Cathay Organisation’s executive director Choo Meileen, who pointed out that the high costs of development is driving up rent. Ms Choo also claimed that the beneficiary of all the fees and costs is not the landlord but the Singapore government.

As such, Dr Chee questioned, “How many Singaporeans attempting to make it in the retail sector find themselves working their heads off just trying to make the month’s rent?”

Between HDB, JTC, CapitaLand, Mapletree, and Surbana, the Government is the biggest landlord, he stated.

Dr Chee concluded his post saying, “The reality is that the PAP squats on much in this country, unwilling to budge even though its dead weight is suffocating everything under it.

“If Singaporeans don’t push ourselves out from under it, hard as it is, the sun will continue to set on this country.”

SDP proposed alternative economic ideas for Singapore
The SDP also released its alternative economic programme on Saturday, which seeks to create a system that works for all Singaporeans and “level up society”.

It noted that while the Government “clings to policies that help the elite get richer”, it aims to create an economic system that “makes our society more egalitarian by tapping on the people’s innovative best”.

The alternative party’s first idea is to build an alternative indicator of economic progress.

It continued, “The PAP almost exclusively relies on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth as a measure of society’s wellness. The problem is that GDP is an insufficient—and even misleading—indicator when the cost (social, environmental and financial) of production is not taken into account.

“With an alternative index, such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), that comprehensively measures the cost and benefit of economic growth, we can better gauge the efficacy of our policies.”

The SDP also proposed the legislation of a national minimum wage, and suggested retrenchment insurance be provided for retrenched workers while they look for reemployment.

Thirdly, the Party encourages entrepreneurship, and aims to cut down on importing cheap foreign labour so that employers will prioritise Singaporean workers when it comes to hiring.

“Only when local talent cannot be found should foreigners be employed,” it stated.

The SDP’s fourth idea is to increase Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) by divesting inefficient Government-Linked Companies (GLCs), and helping to reduce land costs and rentals for SMEs growth.

“We will also work towards weaning our economy off its addiction to multinational corporations (MNCs),” it added.

Noting that the country’s reserves should work for the people, the SDP highlighted that Temasek Holdings should be eliminated, and the Government Investment Corporation’s (GIC) operations must be made transparent and its accounts made public.

“The GIC must be restructured to function independently of the ruling party—no member of parliament or their relatives should hold governing positions in the company,” it noted.

The Party went on to suggest allocating more resources to help the most vulnerable segments of society, adding that the national budget for social programmes and healthcare must be increased in order to support the needy and elderly people.

The SDP also called for the abolishment of CPF Minimum Sum Scheme, saying that withholding the savings of retirees through the scheme is “not only impractical but also immoral”.

Lastly, the alternative party aims to empower Singapore’s workers, as it believes that no amount of coercion can bring about a higher quality of output and productivity.

“Singapore needs a new economic model that will take us into a new era of sustainable growth—one that will allow us to compete on the international stage instead of consigning our workers to a cycle of working harder and longer for less and less; one that uplifts our people instead of dumbing them down; and one whose priority is the wellbeing of all Singaporeans, not just the rich,” it remarked.

Share this:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP’s Chee Soon Juan ‘gratified’ that Bukit Batok MP has finally addressed issue of narrow pedestrian walkway
Kathleen.F
by Kathleen.F

3 November 2020

in Community, Politics

2 min read
2
bukit-batok-pedestrian-750x375.jpg



Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan in a Facebook post on Tuesday (3 November) said that he is “gratified” that Bukit Batok SMC Member of Parliament Murali Pillai has finally decided to address problems concerning a narrow pedestrian pass in an area in the constituency.
Noting that he had highlighted the issue of this narrow pedestrian pass on the flyover at BB Ave 1 in another Facebook post on 28 September, Dr Chee mentioned that residents had notified him about the danger that cyclists posed to pedestrians there, especially the young and elderly.

In his earlier post, Dr Chee relayed several emails and messages he had received from Bukit Batok residents over a range of municipal issues, including the pedestrian walk.
One resident told Dr Chee: “It’s extremely dangerous for some elderly who also frequent this route, especially when many cyclists speed through and do not give way to pedestrians.”

In the post, he said he would be “happy to facilitate” a meeting between the town council and residents to discuss ideas to resolve the issue.
Dr Chee said in his most recent post that when Mr Murali did not respond, he raised the matter again in his virtual townhall meeting with residents on 24 October.
“I am pleased to inform residents that yesterday Mr Murali finally addressed the matter on his FB,” he said.
In a Facebook post on 2 November, Mr Murali said he had asked the Bukit Batok Environment Task Force (ETF) members: “How do we better design the approaches to the pedestrian path (in a cost-effective way) so as to put all users on notice and reduce the chances of unsuspecting cyclists pedaling through the paths thereby creating safety hazards for the pedestrians?”
He asked this when they walked the path along the flyover in question.


Mr Murali then invited the public to send in their suggestions of what could be done, adding that the ETD will conduct another site trip to review proposals before sending in the plan to the Land Transport Authority for its review.
Responding to the update, Dr Chee said: “While he did not offer any solutions, I am gratified to note that he has, at the minimum, seen the need to respond to the matter.”
Dr Chee called on the MP to “take a more active role in addressing the residents’ concerns”.
Previously in September, Dr Chee criticised Mr Murali’s apparent reluctance to build more sheltered walkways in the single-member constituency.
He said that it is “disappointing” that Mr Murali “continues to offer excuses and distractions rather than valid reasons”, despite “earnest and reasonable” requests from residents for a pavement from Block 187 to the bus-stop “for safety reasons”.
Dr Chee also separately urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council to construct a pathway for pedestrians in an area surrounding several housing blocks in Bukit Batok.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP chief Chee Soon Juan slams JRTC and NEA for purportedly failing to address residents' complaints, resulting in dengue cluster at Bukit Batok - The Online Citizen
Image source: Chee Soon Juan's Facebook
Image source: Chee Soon Juan's Facebook

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan in a Facebook post on Friday (13 November) slammed the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) and National Environment Agency (NEA) for allegedly failing to address residents’ complaints, which resulted in the dengue cluster at Blok 191 in Bukit Batok.

Dr Chee said he had visited Block 191 yesterday after he was alerted by a resident that there was a sump — part of a drainage system that collects and drains off water — near the Block that contained stagnant water.

“As you can see from the photo, the sump was constructed in such a manner that the in/out pipes draining it are above the bottom of the structure.

“The water coming in has nowhere to go and becomes a breeding ground for mosquitoes,” he said, referring to the photo he uploaded in his post.

Dr Chee said that the resident had written to the NEA and JRTC on 3 November to alert the authorities of the issue.

NEA reportedly replied that the stagnant water ‘had been removed immediately’, adding that it was monitoring the situation and would not hesitate to ‘take action against anyone found committing the mosquito breeding offence’,” he noted.

Dr Chee said that the resident had notified the NEA again after six days regarding the same issue, which he believed was caused by the recent frequent rain.

NEA, said Dr Chee, however, “repeated its standard line that it was monitoring the situation” and that “it will not hesitate to take action against anyone found committing the mosquito breeding offence”.

A cluster of dengue fever cases was reported at Block 191 on 11 November where the NEA said that the two cases are from Block 190 & 191, said Dr Chee.

Highlighting that “the problem is wrong on so many levels”, the SDP chief then posed a series of questions, condemning the authorities for failing to address the problem raised by the resident:

1. Which bright spark placed the sump pipes above the water?

2. Why did JRTC not take immediate action to rectify the problem? Even a temporary solution like filling up the bottom of the sump with a bag of sand until a permanent one is found could have been done.

3. Why did NEA inform the resident that the “water blockage had been treated and cleared by the Town Council” when this was clearly not the case? Note: NEA was referring to the water blockage and not the stagnant water itself.

4. Does JRTC know what it’s talking about? The problem is not one of blockage but faulty construction of the sump.

5. Even more inexcusable is why, after nearly a week later, was the problem not rectified as evidenced by stagnant water collecting again?

6. Will NEA now take firm action against JRTC as it has repeated promised? The Agency has been issuing fines against households for such careless acts.

Noting that he had highlighted in his Facebook post on 7 July about the blocked drainage and the possibility of a dengue outbreak, Dr Chee said: “Now, it seems that the lack of effort and attention has made my fears a reality.”

“I’ve said this repeatedly: Don’t take liberties with the people’s safety. BB residents await JRTC’s immediate action. I will be monitoring the situation,” he stressed.

Share this:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SDP chief Chee Soon Juan slams JRTC and NEA for purportedly failing to address residents' complaints, resulting in dengue cluster at Bukit Batok - The Online Citizen
Image source: Chee Soon Juan's Facebook
Image source: Chee Soon Juan's Facebook

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan in a Facebook post on Friday (13 November) slammed the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) and National Environment Agency (NEA) for allegedly failing to address residents’ complaints, which resulted in the dengue cluster at Blok 191 in Bukit Batok.

Dr Chee said he had visited Block 191 yesterday after he was alerted by a resident that there was a sump — part of a drainage system that collects and drains off water — near the Block that contained stagnant water.

“As you can see from the photo, the sump was constructed in such a manner that the in/out pipes draining it are above the bottom of the structure.

“The water coming in has nowhere to go and becomes a breeding ground for mosquitoes,” he said, referring to the photo he uploaded in his post.

Dr Chee said that the resident had written to the NEA and JRTC on 3 November to alert the authorities of the issue.

NEA reportedly replied that the stagnant water ‘had been removed immediately’, adding that it was monitoring the situation and would not hesitate to ‘take action against anyone found committing the mosquito breeding offence’,” he noted.

Dr Chee said that the resident had notified the NEA again after six days regarding the same issue, which he believed was caused by the recent frequent rain.

NEA, said Dr Chee, however, “repeated its standard line that it was monitoring the situation” and that “it will not hesitate to take action against anyone found committing the mosquito breeding offence”.

A cluster of dengue fever cases was reported at Block 191 on 11 November where the NEA said that the two cases are from Block 190 & 191, said Dr Chee.

Highlighting that “the problem is wrong on so many levels”, the SDP chief then posed a series of questions, condemning the authorities for failing to address the problem raised by the resident:

1. Which bright spark placed the sump pipes above the water?

2. Why did JRTC not take immediate action to rectify the problem? Even a temporary solution like filling up the bottom of the sump with a bag of sand until a permanent one is found could have been done.

3. Why did NEA inform the resident that the “water blockage had been treated and cleared by the Town Council” when this was clearly not the case? Note: NEA was referring to the water blockage and not the stagnant water itself.

4. Does JRTC know what it’s talking about? The problem is not one of blockage but faulty construction of the sump.

5. Even more inexcusable is why, after nearly a week later, was the problem not rectified as evidenced by stagnant water collecting again?

6. Will NEA now take firm action against JRTC as it has repeated promised? The Agency has been issuing fines against households for such careless acts.

Noting that he had highlighted in his Facebook post on 7 July about the blocked drainage and the possibility of a dengue outbreak, Dr Chee said: “Now, it seems that the lack of effort and attention has made my fears a reality.”

“I’ve said this repeatedly: Don’t take liberties with the people’s safety. BB residents await JRTC’s immediate action. I will be monitoring the situation,” he stressed.

Share this:

Oppie chee should stop harassing the good residents of Bukit Batok. Our grassroots survey indicate that the residents are very satisfied with the good Murali's dedication and care towards the ward's well fare.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal

SDP’s Chee Soon Juan calls for JRTC to review “rather dubious” upgrading projects in Bukit Batok

Kathleen.F
by Kathleen.F

20 November 2020

in Community

Reading Time: 2min read
5
chee-soon-juan-bukit-batok-750x375.jpg



In a Facebook post on Thursday (19 Nov), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Dr Chee Soon Juan urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to review “rather dubious upgrading projects”.
The politician highlighted three of these projects that are proposed in the People’s Action Party (PAP)’s five-year master plan for Bukit Batok.
First is the proposed replacement of the yellow canvas roof at a neighbourhood basketball court. Dr Chee said that the did not see any visible signs of disrepair, adding that the roof seems to be in “good condition”.
“JRTC needs to tell residents why, if there are indeed problems, can’t the roof be repaired instead of replaced,” he stressed, adding that the bigger question is why the basketball court was built in the first place.
Dr Chee then questioned, “Why was the gallery seating-capacity so large for a neighbourhood basketball court? As it is, we are struggling to find enough spectators to fill the stands for S-League football matches.”

“Has the facility become another white elephant requiring costly maintenance and repair/replacement paid for by residents?”
The next point he raised was about the toilets in the facility and how there are plans to upgrade them.
“Users of the facility visit the toilets to do what they have to do, not luxuriate in’ there. Is there a need to upgrade the toilets when they look perfectly serviceable?”
The third upgrading works Dr Chee noted was the PAP’s proposal to rip up and replace the seats at tables at the void deck at Blk 175 dubbed the “cosy corner”, which he pointed out is still in good condition.
The post also included photographs of all three spaces to illustrate his point that they are in good condition, needing a good cleaning at least or some repair work at most.
“JRTC must review these rather dubious upgrading projects and present BB residents a real plan telling residents exactly what is to be replaced and, more importantly, why, and how much it will cost (including the cost of maintenance),” Dr Chee asserted.

He went on to say that “residents should not be seduced by these PAP Master Plans during elections”, adding that much of the plans “consist of nonsense projects that a waste of funds” coming out of taxpayer pockets.
Dr Chee ended his post by arguing that this “cost of needless construction” can be saved and used instead for programmes that are beneficial to residents such as providing retrenchment benefits, reducing service and conservancy charges, and lowering rentals of shops and stalls which will in turn lower the cost of goods and services.

Share this:
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP’s Chee Soon Juan calls for JRTC to review “rather dubious” upgrading projects in Bukit Batok
Kathleen.F
by Kathleen.F

20 November 2020

in Community

Reading Time: 2min read
5
chee-soon-juan-bukit-batok-750x375.jpg



In a Facebook post on Thursday (19 Nov), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Dr Chee Soon Juan urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to review “rather dubious upgrading projects”.
The politician highlighted three of these projects that are proposed in the People’s Action Party (PAP)’s five-year master plan for Bukit Batok.
First is the proposed replacement of the yellow canvas roof at a neighbourhood basketball court. Dr Chee said that the did not see any visible signs of disrepair, adding that the roof seems to be in “good condition”.
“JRTC needs to tell residents why, if there are indeed problems, can’t the roof be repaired instead of replaced,” he stressed, adding that the bigger question is why the basketball court was built in the first place.
Dr Chee then questioned, “Why was the gallery seating-capacity so large for a neighbourhood basketball court? As it is, we are struggling to find enough spectators to fill the stands for S-League football matches.”

“Has the facility become another white elephant requiring costly maintenance and repair/replacement paid for by residents?”
The next point he raised was about the toilets in the facility and how there are plans to upgrade them.
“Users of the facility visit the toilets to do what they have to do, not luxuriate in’ there. Is there a need to upgrade the toilets when they look perfectly serviceable?”
The third upgrading works Dr Chee noted was the PAP’s proposal to rip up and replace the seats at tables at the void deck at Blk 175 dubbed the “cosy corner”, which he pointed out is still in good condition.
The post also included photographs of all three spaces to illustrate his point that they are in good condition, needing a good cleaning at least or some repair work at most.
“JRTC must review these rather dubious upgrading projects and present BB residents a real plan telling residents exactly what is to be replaced and, more importantly, why, and how much it will cost (including the cost of maintenance),” Dr Chee asserted.

He went on to say that “residents should not be seduced by these PAP Master Plans during elections”, adding that much of the plans “consist of nonsense projects that a waste of funds” coming out of taxpayer pockets.
Dr Chee ended his post by arguing that this “cost of needless construction” can be saved and used instead for programmes that are beneficial to residents such as providing retrenchment benefits, reducing service and conservancy charges, and lowering rentals of shops and stalls which will in turn lower the cost of goods and services.

Share this:
Chee imply PAP give contract to own kakis make them rich like worker party? Jail him for libel! :mad:
 

tobelightlight

Alfrescian
Loyal
Very happy that Dr Chee is stepping up to take care of Bukit batok and find all kind of discrepancies by the PAP. Well Done Dr Chee.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP’s Chee Soon Juan questions PAP MP Murali Pillai on the need to replace canvas roof in Bukit Batok; highlights “wasteful spending of public funds” - The Online Citizen
The Online Citizen

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan took to Facebook on Tuesday (24 November) to question People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Murali Pillai on the need to replace a fairly new canvas roof at a neighbourhood basketball court in Bukit Batok.
Dr Chee raised this question following Mr Murali’s proposal in his 5-Year Master Plan for the constituency. Mr Murali is the MP for Bukit Batok.
In an earlier Facebook post, the SDP leader urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to review “rather dubious upgrading projects” at the constituency, one of which is the roof replacement of the basketball court.
Dr Chee said that he did not see any visible signs of disrepair, adding that the roof seems to be in “good condition”.
“JRTC needs to tell residents why, if there are indeed problems, can’t the roof be repaired instead of replaced,” he stressed, adding that the bigger question is why the basketball court was built in the first place.
Referring to this particular upgrading project, Dr Chee stated in the post on Tuesday that he found out that the roof was only installed in 2011 and the company that did it said it would last for 30 years.
“A check found that the roof was installed in 2011. A resident fed back to me that the company that did the installation said that the roof would “normally last 30 years”. That would take its lifespan to 2041. It seems odd then that Mr Murali wants to replace the roof in just 10 years,” he said.
As such, the alternative party chief noted that there are a few questions that have to be answered by Mr Murali.
The first question is for the Bukit Batok MP to clarify if “the above information regarding the roof’s installation date and lifespan is accurate”.
If the information is correct, then Dr Chee wants Mr Murali to tell the residents on why the roof needs to be replaced in the first place.
He then asked, “If it is going to be replaced, how much is it going to cost the residents and taxpayers, and how long is the new roof going to last?”
Don’t waste taxpayers’ funds
In the post, Dr Chee also highlighted that a large number of these projects are being upgraded or replaced without much thought and justification, resulting in wasting taxpayers’ funds.
To illustrate his point, Dr Chee cited another example of wasting public funds, which is the canal at BB West Ave 8.
“As part of his GE 2020 campaign, Mr Murali posted the completion of the canal, replete with the rocks in apparently for aesthetic purposes.
“The problem is that these rocks trap debris that are smelly and attract pests such as rats if they are not cleared in a timely manner. Do cleaners have to climb into these canals to clear the debris?” he explained.
If that’s not all, Dr Chee also said residents have voiced their unhappiness on the maintenance of the estate to him, which he will be disclosing more about in the coming days.
He went on to say that both JRTC and Mr Murali need to prioritise spending in order to make sure the funds are not used for “wasteful vanity projects that residents do not want and need”.
“Instead, these funds should be channelled to estate management to improve maintenance services for the better upkeep of Bukit Batok. This is what residents really want,” he noted.
He continued, “They must remember that the funds that they spend are residents’ hard-earned money and many don’t earn anywhere close to what the Ministers and MPs make.”
Share this:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP's Chee Soon Juan champions the conservation of the Bukit Batok Hillside Park; outlines concerns of redevelopment - The Online Citizen
Dr Chee Soon Juan by a natural stream in the BB Hillside Park (Image from Chee Soon Juan / Facebook)
Dr Chee Soon Juan by a natural stream in the BB Hillside Park (Image from Chee Soon Juan / Facebook)

Continuing to question various development projects in Bukit Batok, Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)’s Chee Soon Juan highlighted on Thursday (26 November) the clearing of the Bukit Batok Hillside Park for development.

In a Facebook post, he said a BB resident named Jimmy Tan brought to his attention several weeks ago “an issue that would have a profound impact on Bukit Batok and the rest of Singapore.” This was the clearing of the park and an adjacent plot of land that used to be the Tengah Forest for the development of a Housing Development Board (HDB) new town.

To illustrate the rise of the development, Dr Chee said the whole of the Bukit Timah Nature Reserve is smaller than the new town.

“Not content, the government is now considering clearing another forest beside it, the BB Hillside Park (it’s actually not a park but a mature secondary forest), as well as the Clementi Forest for more development,” wrote the veteran politician.

Dr Chee said several of his colleagues as well as SDP’s Young Democrats and Mr Tan made an excursion into the BB forest to get a first-hand look at “what we stand to lose”.

He went on to outline several concerns that Singaporeans ought to know about the potential clearing of the forest, starting with health concerns. Dr Chee noted, “More development means more people and more foreigners. This will add to an already stressful environment that worsens our mental health.”

“Study after study show that improvement in health and lower mortality risk is proportionate to the amount of open green spaces,” he added.

Next was the loss of a natural treasure that is the forest. “BB residents enjoy such a treasure at the moment and would lose it all if the forest is gone. In its place would be more concrete and HDB blocks and carparks,” said Dr Chee.

The third point he raised was about the effect the development would have on air quality and temperatures. Noting that greenery and forests help improve air quality and keep temperatures down, estates in south central Singapore with more built up areas are already about 1.5 degrees Celsius warmer than estates like BB currently.

“Higher temperatures lead to greater usage of air-conditioning adding to the climate crisis. With the development of Tengah and potential clearing of BB Hillside Park, the BB’s surface temperatures are set to rise,” he explained.

On top of there, there are also concerns of loss of biodiversity and habitat for wildlife.

Dr Chee stressed, “Ultimately, Singaporeans, especially the younger generations, must ask what kind of environment they want to live in.

“Is it one that clears every pocket of forested area for more and more people and buildings and cars and pollution and stress or one that provides us with a healthier quality of life that comes with greenery, space and nature?”

He then invited the public, especially residents of BB as well as BB MP Murali Pillai, to sign a petition initiated by the concerned resident Mr Tan. The petition calls for the conservation of the Bukit Batok Hillside Park and has 4,804 signatures at the time of writing.

He also shared a link to Mr Tan’s blog which has more information about the development taking place in the area as well as an interview the resident gave to TODAY online about the issue.

Share this:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
7 questionable infrastructure projects in Bukit Batok highlighted by SDP's Chee Soon Juan - The Online Citizen Asia
7 questionable infrastructure projects in Bukit Batok highlighted by SDP’s Chee Soon Juan

by kathleen
21/01/2021
Reading Time: 7min read
Dr Chee Soon Juan has been on a mission to highlight some of the more “questionable” neighbourhood renewal programme (NRP) projects that the People’s Action Party (PAP) proposed for Bukit Batok.
Dr Chee stood for elections at the Bukit Batok SMC in the previous general elections. He ultimately lost to PAP’s Murali Pillai.
Here is a list of the issues he’s highlighted so far pertaining to the NRP as well as other infrastructure issues in the area:
1. Linkways proposed near Blks 192 and 193 leading to desolate pavilion
On 12 October, he talked about a linkway to be built near Blks 192 and 193 according to the Jurong Town Council Bukit Batok 5-year master plan 2020-2025.
He question the placement of the linkway and asked what it would be connecting, as it is not indicated on the map. In fact, the spot on which the linkway is to be built is currently a standalone pavilion, he noted.
In this post, he also talked about a playground planned for the area even though there is also an existing playground just a few metres away. In that same post, he also noted that the proposed BBQ area also has BBQ pits that are rarely used by residents.
“Is the TC proposing tearing up the current pits and rebuilding new ones a few feet away?” he asked.
Dr Chee went on to note that the TC website says that the NRP will be “fully paid for by our government”. He countered this, saying that the construction, maintenance and upgrading costs will actually be borne by residents and taxpayers.
Two days later in the second part of this installation, Dr Chee described the Masterplan as “confusing” given that the plan to turn a pavilion into a link (in #1) has been altered so that now two linkways would be built to connect Blk 192 and 193 the pavilion.
He question whether this alteration made sense given the desolate state of the pavilion and the fact that residents have been “crying out” for much needed payment along the route from Blk 187 to the bus stop along Ave 1.
2. “White elephant” elevated boardwalk
Next, Dr Chee talked about the plans to install an elevated boardwalk at the BB Neighbourhood Park—which comes under the proposed works for the Planned Future Improvements Project.
He noted, “The problem is that the construction of this boardwalk is already almost completed. The information board indicated that the work had started back in 2019.”
He then asked why the JRTC included this project among items proposed for future work when it is going to be completed soon.
“This is, to put it mildly, highly misleading,” he asserted.
He also questioned whether the boardwalk would be yet another “white elephant” structure that looks good but won’t be used by residents.
3. Bad drainage at Blk 121
On 6 November last year, he highlighted the issue of inadequate drainage at Block 121 in Bukit Batok.
Dr Chee shared a video in his post – which was sent by a resident in the area – showing the drains outside the residence block being overflowed during a heavy downpour recently.
He stated that he has urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to “take prompt action” after informing them about the situation.
4. Replacing still-good canvass roof at basketball court ad other serviceable amenities
In the same month, Dr Chee highlighted the JTC’s plan to replace a fairly new canvas roof at a neighbourhood basketball court.
Dr Chee said that he did not see any visible signs of disrepair, adding that the roof seems to be in “good condition”.
“JRTC needs to tell residents why, if there are indeed problems, can’t the roof be repaired instead of replaced,” he stressed in a later post, adding that the bigger question is why the basketball court was built in the first place.
In that same post, he also questioned the need for the toilets in the facility to be upgraded, noting that the roof looks “perfectly serviceable”.
He also pointed out the plan to remove and replace the seats and tables at the void deck of Blk 175, called the “cosy corner”. Again, he noted that the structure is in good conditions, and questioned the need for this upgrade in the first place.
5. Changing ‘well loved’ rooftop carpark to garden with too-narrow footpaths
In the following month, Dr Chee shared that a BB resident pointed out to him the HDB’s proposal to change a rooftop carpark used by residents for recreational activities into a “garden. The resident also bemoaned the HDB’s lack of consultation with residents before even making such a proposal.
In the post, Dr Chee stated that the resident mentioned to him that if the garden is built as per HDB’s proposal, then there will be only a narrow footpath for residents to do other recreational activities.
“The problem is that the carpark has become a ‘well-loved space’ by the residents – people take walks in the morning, exercise, walk their dogs, play ball games with children, etc. It has become part of the fabric of many residents’ daily lives,” wrote Dr Chee.
He went on to state that while the authorities’ intentions are not wrong, but it is still important for JRTC and Mr Murali to “make a genuine attempt to consult residents and seek their views before going ahead with the reconstruction”.
6. Two new parks inside existing BB Hillside Park
Also in December, Dr Chee talked about the development of Bukit Batok Hillside Park which National Development Minister Desmond Lee would include two new parks.
However, Dr Chee highlighted that the area which the MND has renamed the Bukit Batok Hillside Nature Park actually lies within the current BB Hillside Park.
“It now seems that the govt will go ahead and clear BBHP for development and then leave a fraction of the forest as BBHNP,” said Dr Chee.
The second part MND will develop is named the BB Central Nature Park, he added.
“As I understand it and as described in the ST report, this area is already a forested one. Why would the MND want to develop it into a park and then rename it?” Dr Chee questioned.
7. Pointless shelter for passageway only 15 steps from existing sheltered linkway
In January, Dr Chee made a video about a shelter that is proposed for a passageway at Blk 642 in Bukit Batok Central leading to a bus stop, only 15 steps away from an existing linkway that leads to the same place.
In the video, Dr Chee described this proposal as “stupid” given how many people have lost jobs in these difficult times due to COVID-19. He described this as using money in a “careless manner” and that the planning is in “poor form”.
Bonus: Some projects have been cancelled & JRTC has set up a feedback form for residents
On 18 January, Dr Chee shared in a Facebook post that some of these ideas he has highlighted as being dubious have in fact been “ditched”.
This includes the initial plan to convert a pavilion to a linkway and building playgrounds and BB areas just metres away from existing ones.
Declaring that “common sense has prevailed”, Dr Chee also said he is glad that the JRTC has recently drawn up a feedback form to get ideas from residents, as he has repeatedly urged them to consult with residents on neighbourhood renewal projects.
“I note, however, that many of the ideas in the form are the same old suggestions: void-deck seating areas, games courts, playground, BBQ area, drop-off points, etc. These are amenities that already exist,” he continued.
Share this:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
7 questionable infrastructure projects in Bukit Batok highlighted by SDP's Chee Soon Juan - The Online Citizen Asia
7 questionable infrastructure projects in Bukit Batok highlighted by SDP’s Chee Soon Juan

by kathleen
21/01/2021
Reading Time: 7min read
Dr Chee Soon Juan has been on a mission to highlight some of the more “questionable” neighbourhood renewal programme (NRP) projects that the People’s Action Party (PAP) proposed for Bukit Batok.
Dr Chee stood for elections at the Bukit Batok SMC in the previous general elections. He ultimately lost to PAP’s Murali Pillai.
Here is a list of the issues he’s highlighted so far pertaining to the NRP as well as other infrastructure issues in the area:
1. Linkways proposed near Blks 192 and 193 leading to desolate pavilion
On 12 October, he talked about a linkway to be built near Blks 192 and 193 according to the Jurong Town Council Bukit Batok 5-year master plan 2020-2025.
He question the placement of the linkway and asked what it would be connecting, as it is not indicated on the map. In fact, the spot on which the linkway is to be built is currently a standalone pavilion, he noted.
In this post, he also talked about a playground planned for the area even though there is also an existing playground just a few metres away. In that same post, he also noted that the proposed BBQ area also has BBQ pits that are rarely used by residents.
“Is the TC proposing tearing up the current pits and rebuilding new ones a few feet away?” he asked.
Dr Chee went on to note that the TC website says that the NRP will be “fully paid for by our government”. He countered this, saying that the construction, maintenance and upgrading costs will actually be borne by residents and taxpayers.
Two days later in the second part of this installation, Dr Chee described the Masterplan as “confusing” given that the plan to turn a pavilion into a link (in #1) has been altered so that now two linkways would be built to connect Blk 192 and 193 the pavilion.
He question whether this alteration made sense given the desolate state of the pavilion and the fact that residents have been “crying out” for much needed payment along the route from Blk 187 to the bus stop along Ave 1.
2. “White elephant” elevated boardwalk
Next, Dr Chee talked about the plans to install an elevated boardwalk at the BB Neighbourhood Park—which comes under the proposed works for the Planned Future Improvements Project.
He noted, “The problem is that the construction of this boardwalk is already almost completed. The information board indicated that the work had started back in 2019.”
He then asked why the JRTC included this project among items proposed for future work when it is going to be completed soon.
“This is, to put it mildly, highly misleading,” he asserted.
He also questioned whether the boardwalk would be yet another “white elephant” structure that looks good but won’t be used by residents.
3. Bad drainage at Blk 121
On 6 November last year, he highlighted the issue of inadequate drainage at Block 121 in Bukit Batok.
Dr Chee shared a video in his post – which was sent by a resident in the area – showing the drains outside the residence block being overflowed during a heavy downpour recently.
He stated that he has urged the Jurong-Clementi Town Council (JRTC) to “take prompt action” after informing them about the situation.
4. Replacing still-good canvass roof at basketball court ad other serviceable amenities
In the same month, Dr Chee highlighted the JTC’s plan to replace a fairly new canvas roof at a neighbourhood basketball court.
Dr Chee said that he did not see any visible signs of disrepair, adding that the roof seems to be in “good condition”.
“JRTC needs to tell residents why, if there are indeed problems, can’t the roof be repaired instead of replaced,” he stressed in a later post, adding that the bigger question is why the basketball court was built in the first place.
In that same post, he also questioned the need for the toilets in the facility to be upgraded, noting that the roof looks “perfectly serviceable”.
He also pointed out the plan to remove and replace the seats and tables at the void deck of Blk 175, called the “cosy corner”. Again, he noted that the structure is in good conditions, and questioned the need for this upgrade in the first place.
5. Changing ‘well loved’ rooftop carpark to garden with too-narrow footpaths
In the following month, Dr Chee shared that a BB resident pointed out to him the HDB’s proposal to change a rooftop carpark used by residents for recreational activities into a “garden. The resident also bemoaned the HDB’s lack of consultation with residents before even making such a proposal.
In the post, Dr Chee stated that the resident mentioned to him that if the garden is built as per HDB’s proposal, then there will be only a narrow footpath for residents to do other recreational activities.
“The problem is that the carpark has become a ‘well-loved space’ by the residents – people take walks in the morning, exercise, walk their dogs, play ball games with children, etc. It has become part of the fabric of many residents’ daily lives,” wrote Dr Chee.
He went on to state that while the authorities’ intentions are not wrong, but it is still important for JRTC and Mr Murali to “make a genuine attempt to consult residents and seek their views before going ahead with the reconstruction”.
6. Two new parks inside existing BB Hillside Park
Also in December, Dr Chee talked about the development of Bukit Batok Hillside Park which National Development Minister Desmond Lee would include two new parks.
However, Dr Chee highlighted that the area which the MND has renamed the Bukit Batok Hillside Nature Park actually lies within the current BB Hillside Park.
“It now seems that the govt will go ahead and clear BBHP for development and then leave a fraction of the forest as BBHNP,” said Dr Chee.
The second part MND will develop is named the BB Central Nature Park, he added.
“As I understand it and as described in the ST report, this area is already a forested one. Why would the MND want to develop it into a park and then rename it?” Dr Chee questioned.
7. Pointless shelter for passageway only 15 steps from existing sheltered linkway
In January, Dr Chee made a video about a shelter that is proposed for a passageway at Blk 642 in Bukit Batok Central leading to a bus stop, only 15 steps away from an existing linkway that leads to the same place.
In the video, Dr Chee described this proposal as “stupid” given how many people have lost jobs in these difficult times due to COVID-19. He described this as using money in a “careless manner” and that the planning is in “poor form”.
Bonus: Some projects have been cancelled & JRTC has set up a feedback form for residents
On 18 January, Dr Chee shared in a Facebook post that some of these ideas he has highlighted as being dubious have in fact been “ditched”.
This includes the initial plan to convert a pavilion to a linkway and building playgrounds and BB areas just metres away from existing ones.
Declaring that “common sense has prevailed”, Dr Chee also said he is glad that the JRTC has recently drawn up a feedback form to get ideas from residents, as he has repeatedly urged them to consult with residents on neighbourhood renewal projects.
“I note, however, that many of the ideas in the form are the same old suggestions: void-deck seating areas, games courts, playground, BBQ area, drop-off points, etc. These are amenities that already exist,” he continued.
Share this:

Oppie Chee is a fucking pest!! He lost in Bukit Batok. He should fuck off and stop being a nuisance and distraction to the good MP Murali.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Oppie Chee is a fucking pest!! He lost in Bukit Batok. He should fuck off and stop being a nuisance and distraction to the good MP Murali.
If Murali is a 'good' MP these issues would not have happen. Good on ah Chee to make pap accountable
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Raise wages of workers in food sector but lower rentals of operators: Chee Soon Juan


An increase in costs to operators can be offset by reducing rent, which forms a considerable chunk of the operating expenses of a business
Photo: FB screengrab/Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全


ingapore — The authorities should lower rental charges as part of plans to introduce a Progressive Wage Model in the food sector. This was the call by opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) leader Dr Chee Soon Juan in a Facebook post on Friday (Feb 5).

“The PAP (People’s Action Party) is considering introducing the Progressive Wage Model (aka minimum wage) in the food sector for cooks, servers, kitchen help, etc.,” wrote Dr Chee on Facebook. “But Senior Minister of State for Manpower Zaqy Mohamad is already warning that diners may have to pay more when eating out.”

Dr Chee called the trade-off as “nonsense”, noting such increase in costs to operators can be offset by reducing rent, which forms a considerable chunk of the operating expenses of a business.

Dr Chee highlighted that the food and beverage sector had been hit hard by the Covid-19 pandemic. There is also the impending Goods and Services Tax hike to consider, he added.


- Advertisement -
“Implementing the PWM policy in the food sector will kill off even more eateries. And as if things are not expensive enough for Singaporeans already,” he said.

“But, as always, it is the big chains (mainly foreign-owned) that can survive such added costs.”

Dr Chee noted that it would be the local mom-and-pop outlets, including many hawkers, that will suffer. “And we wonder why we can’t produce more local entrepreneurs.”

The SDP leader had touched on the issue of high rent, which was “killing businesses in Singapore”, in an earlier Facebook post. He compared various businesses leaving the market with high costs as a reason for the closures.

“It’s like this, the PAP grabs 99 of the 100 peanuts on the table and makes us (small business owners, workers and consumers) fight for that one remaining peanut,” he said.

Dr Chee said: “Let’s raise wages for our workers, the food sector, and otherwise. But let’s not penalise small business owners. Instead, let’s call for lower rent in Singapore. Let’s get smart.” / TISG
 
Top