• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

NSP to adopt “minister-specific” strategy in next elections

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/11/nsp-to-adopt-minister-specific-strategy-in-next-elections/

Andrew Loh

“Whichever place we contest, it will be minister-specific. Not at the personal level but at the policy, ministry level. It’ll be ministry-oriented,” says the National Solidarity Party (NSP). Revealing the party’s General Elections strategy to The Online Citizen, the NSP says that one weakness of the opposition parties in Singapore in battling the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) in past elections was their lack of focus on specific ministries and their policies.

“This time round, [we’re] not really choosing Tampines per se,” says Mr Goh Meng Seng whom the party has appointed the team leader for the area for its contest in the next elections. “[We’re] choosing the minister of the ministry, instead.” The minister for National Development, Mr Mah Bow Tan, is one of the five Members of Parliament for the Tampines Group Representation Constituency (GRC). “This will be a change in focus in our election [campaign],” Mr Goh says. “We’re questioning the policies of the ministers and whether the voters want to have such policies under [their] charge.”

One of the main issues for the next elections which the NSP will fighting on will be public housing and the costs of HDB flats. Thus, the party intends to question Mr Mah’s housing policies.

The party believes HDB prices will make a big difference to how the residents in the GRC vote. “Tampines is a semi-matured estate,” Mr Goh explains, “with young voters – in their 20s – who will be looking to get married and to buy a flat. The high housing prices will have an impact on this group of voters.”

The NSP’s president, Mr Sebastian Teo, explains why high flats prices do not benefit flat owners. “If they sell it and buy it again, [they’re] going to incur heavy financial costs.” Higher HDB prices is not going to benefit the 80 per cent of Singaporeans who do not own more than one flat or house, he says. It only benefits the 20 per cent who do. “Majority of Singaporeans should know that this is a problem for them, and not those who own more than one house. The 20 per cent will be happy. If I have two houses, I will be happy. [HDB prices] can go up to one million [dollars]. I sell my HDB [flat], I’ll still have my private house.” But for the rest, they cannot re-mortgage their flats to cash out the value.

The party feels that the government’s housing policy is defective and is fueling the current rising prices of HDB flats. The question of whether the government should intervene, therefore, to quell the current red-hot housing market is moot. “Rather than [ask whether the government should] intervene, I think the policy itself is flawed,” says Mr Goh. According to him, the structure of the public housing policy, including the way flats are valued and the pricing mechanism, actually makes prices rise. “So, the intervention of the government right now actually [is causing] this problem. They should re-examine the whole system.”

The group of party members was at the Tampines Street 11 wet market and hawker centre on Sunday morning to sell the party’s newspaper, North Star News. Sales was brisk as residents, who were out doing their marketing or having their breakfast, gave their support. “Brother, I see you again,” one resident said to the party’s secretary-general, Mr Ken Sunn, as he was making the rounds at the tables.

“The ground is ok,” says Mr Teo. He is heartened that residents are more willing to buy the party’s newspaper now. As a sign of encouragement, he cited the sentiments on the ground about high HDB flats’ prices. “PAP [retained power] because of HDB,” he explains, “and PAP [will go] down also because of HDB. This is what people in the markets say.”

The NSP, which was founded in 1987, has contested Tampines GRC five times but has never won. Its only presence in Parliament since the party’s creation has been the Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) seat which was given to Mr Steve Chia in 2001. However, this has not deterred the party, which intends to contest three GRCs – Tampines, Jurong, Jalan Besar – and three Single-Member Constituencies – Yio Chu Kang, MacPherson, Nee Soon Central – come the next elections. Party members have been working these areas since the last GE, says Mr Sunn, with their weekly door-to-door visits and visits to the markets and hawker centres.

The next elections will see 12 NCMP seats created, up from the current provision for 9. How will this affect the NSP? “We will proceed as normal,” says Mr Teo. “It’s only 3 seats more. We’ll go back to the constituencies which we contested before and we’ll see how the situation develops.”

For Mr Goh, he is not interested in contesting any SMCs. Instead his focus is on “break[ing] the fortress of the GRC”. “Only then can you effect change, within the rules,” he explains. “[This is because] the PAP always reacts to changes. The only change we can make is when the fortress fall, they will think of something else.” So, is his Tampines team ready for the elections? “My team is already formed,” he says “but I’m not going to reveal it.” He gives two reasons for his reluctance to reveal more about his team – when the elections will be called and whether Tampines will remain a 5-member GRC or become a 4-member one. PM Lee, in announcing the changes to the political system recently, had said that the sizes of the GRCs will be reduced. Because of these two uncertainties, the NSP does not want to raise the public’s expectations, Mr Goh explains.

As the party gears up for the elections, it is working on its manifesto which, Mr Sunn feels, needs to be updated. The party is also in the process of setting up its Youth Wing and recently recruited some new members, including former Workers’ Party candidates in the 2006 elections, Ms Lee Wai Leng and Mr Abdul Salim.

The Online Citizen asked the NSP’s sec-gen, who is one of the founding members of the NSP, what he thought of Prime Minister Lee’s performance in the last three years since the 2006 elections. “I think his performance is credible. I find that he has mellowed considerably since taking over [as Prime Minister],” Mr Sunn says. “He is facing the reality [and is] having a difficult time. We sympathise with him. However, the issue of cronyism still comes up once in a while and that is something that [the PAP] has to dispel. We foresee that he will continue to lead the party for one more election, health permitting.

“We don’t see much change in the PAP make-up. However, we do definitely see change in the opposition’s presence in Parliament because now we’re better-organised, better focused and more dedicated.”
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
opmdk9-1.jpg


BRING THE PAPEE TRAITORS TO JUSTICE!
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
It is strange that someone could conclude NSP has no plan to contest anything! Wishful thinking I guess. :wink:

Goh Meng Seng
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I welcome the plans by NSP, Seb Teo and Meng Seng et al. Please go to Tampines GRC and come to Jalan Besar GRC again. My vote is yours, together with many neighbours' and relatives'.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
I welcome the plans by NSP, Seb Teo and Meng Seng et al. Please go to Tampines GRC and come to Jalan Besar GRC again. My vote is yours, together with many neighbours' and relatives'.

hopefully u r still around. maybe even gone, the spirit remains.:p
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Please ask him what happened to Goal 2010.
More importantly, ask him why he never talks about it anymore or at least explain why it didn't succeed.
 

RK85

Alfrescian
Loyal
Should ask MBT to reveal & breakdown the prices of HDB flats once & for all.

Many ppl want to know the true cost & the so-called "subsidies" they are talking about..
 

phouse3

Alfrescian
Loyal
Targetting is a high-risk high-return strategy. It is good in theory. The risk can go against you, like when the prices of HDB flats come down. Your platform will vanish into thin air.

Are there any senior counsel/high court judge to challenge Shanmugam?
Are there any foreign relations expert to challenge George Yeo?
Are there any environment expert to challenge Yacob?
Are there any banker to challenge Tharman?
Are there anyone to negotiate FTAs?

The answers are quite obvious. So Low, Chiam(if health permits), Sebastian Teo and K Jeyaretnam(not decided yet) will contest a GRC together. This of course won't come to fruition if Chiam "retires" or Jeyaretnam changes his mind.

There is also some horse-trading in a triangular merry-go-round fashion. Sin Kek Tong from SPP is contesting NSP's Choa Chu Kang. NSP is contesting WP's Nee Soon Central. So naturally, I conclude that Steve Chia is going to Nee Soon Central and Sylvia Lim is going to Potong Pasir.

Just pure speculation to raise your adrenaline on a sleepy afternoon.
 

commoner

Alfrescian
Loyal
aiya,,,,,,, at the nomination day, PAP can change the game plan,,,,, so if MBT go to Tanjong Pagar, NSp will contest Tanjong Pasar should LKY put MBT in his underwear?

and the old SMCs, will they will be merged with a GRC and another SMC cut from a GRC?

so many variables now especially with Pinkie ass thinking of tinkling with more SMCs and smaller GRCs,,,,,,

work on the ground with the voters will reap better fruits than targeting specific minister,,,
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Thank you for all the responses.

There are many dimensions to this strategy. It is not solely about how to win the elections but rather using the GE as a means to extract accountability from the various ministers for all the policies that they have made.

PAP has used GRC to fortify their position by utilizing the ministers as the heavy weight anchoring the whole team. Voters will always be "misled" by such strategy and resulting them to use the ministers to compare with the weakest link of the opposition team. Meaning, when voters are to justify why they will vote PAP, it is always because they buy the PAP's idea that they couldn't lose those Ministers. But when justifying why they will not vote for opposition, it is always because of the weakest candidates in the whole team, even if the weakest candidate in that opposition team may be stronger than PAP's weakest team member.

This is unfair comparison but just a fact of life in Singapore. That's how Singaporeans make their voting choice.

Thus in order to break such unfair comparison, the only way is to make voters think twice about the ministers in their wards, whether it is worth keeping the ministers when there are so many lousy policies coming out from them.

This is basically the rational of the whole strategy.

Goh Meng Seng
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Should ask MBT to reveal & breakdown the prices of HDB flats once & for all.

Many ppl want to know the true cost & the so-called "subsidies" they are talking about..
I disagree.
They will simply provide a whole lot of numbers that support their argument and most people will not even understand the significance of the numbers, let alone be able to ascertain whether they are accurate or not.
Cost of housing and the influx of foreigners are emotional topics, hence it is better to use emotional rhetoric to sway the voters.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Targetting is a high-risk high-return strategy. It is good in theory. The risk can go against you, like when the prices of HDB flats come down. Your platform will vanish into thin air.

Are there any senior counsel/high court judge to challenge Shanmugam?
Are there any foreign relations expert to challenge George Yeo?
Are there any environment expert to challenge Yacob?
Are there any banker to challenge Tharman?
Are there anyone to negotiate FTAs?

The answers are quite obvious. So Low, Chiam(if health permits), Sebastian Teo and K Jeyaretnam(not decided yet) will contest a GRC together. This of course won't come to fruition if Chiam "retires" or Jeyaretnam changes his mind.

There is also some horse-trading in a triangular merry-go-round fashion. Sin Kek Tong from SPP is contesting NSP's Choa Chu Kang. NSP is contesting WP's Nee Soon Central. So naturally, I conclude that Steve Chia is going to Nee Soon Central and Sylvia Lim is going to Potong Pasir.

Just pure speculation to raise your adrenaline on a sleepy afternoon.
Agree that it's high risk high return and good in theory.
The opposition do not need to provide an "expert" to challenge the pap incumbent in their respective field. They simply need to show that the current "expert" has not made the lives of ordinary (not elite) Singaporeans better. Whichever party has the majority in parliament will have the responsibility of forming the new government, and in the event the former "expert" has been voted out, it is up to them to find a new "expert".
In any case, they may not have as much "expertise" as they think.
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Agree that it's high risk high return and good in theory.
The opposition do not need to provide an "expert" to challenge the pap incumbent in their respective field. They simply need to show that the current "expert" has not made the lives of ordinary (not elite) Singaporeans better. Whichever party has the majority in parliament will have the responsibility of forming the new government, and in the event the former "expert" has been voted out, it is up to them to find a new "expert".
In any case, they may not have as much "expertise" as they think.

A SPH reporter actually asked me this question on whether I could become the Minister of the Ministry of National Development. My first reaction is that PAP will be the government because most likely they will still win 50% of the seats. It is up to the ruling party to form the government and appoint its ministers. The question about whether I am confident to be a better minister is not quite relevant here.

Of course, if PAP really lost their minister in whatever portfolio, the new ministers that they chose to replace the losers will have to take voters' choice very seriously in reconfiguring his sets of policies. If not, he might well face the same fate next time round.

Goh Meng Seng
 

commoner

Alfrescian
Loyal
why belittle yourself,,,, to become Minister of ND, your need to employ good people to formulate goodolicies,,,, if you think you cannot do a better job than Mabbok Tan, why compete,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
why belittle yourself,,,, to become Minister of ND, your need to employ good people to formulate goodolicies,,,, if you think you cannot do a better job than Mabbok Tan, why compete,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I should think that a good minister formulates good policies and hires good civil servants to implement them.
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
why belittle yourself,,,, to become Minister of ND, your need to employ good people to formulate goodolicies,,,, if you think you cannot do a better job than Mabbok Tan, why compete,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Well, you have mistaken me. I am simply stating a plain fact to her. However, I do qualify myself that if PAP is seriously considering to form a coalition government even when they do not have to (which I think it is highly unlikely at this moment), I will give it a serious consideration provided that my party leadership would agree to such coalition.

I am confident that I could do a better job than Mah BT but there will be a social stigma for opposition supporters to accept the present opposition to go into a coalition with PAP. I would be part of the coalition with one condition, the salary of all ministers in the coalition will have to be cut by more than 50%. I would settle for $150K per year as I feel that ministers should only get a slightly more than average income. 5 times of the average $30K that the middle class is earning should be more than enough for a minister.

Whatever it is, any decisions made will be based on the overall interests of the people. To decline a coalition with PAP straight away may sound "politically correct" but the time will come one day whereby no one party gets more than 50% of the seats and inevitably a coalition government must be formed. For a small party like NSP, it will be quite challenging in deciding whether we should be in a coalition with PAP or WP then.

Goh Meng Seng
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I support Meng Seng as next minister of national development. Kick out Marlboro.

I also support Sebastian Teo as next minister of environment. Kick out Yacoup.

At least have some decent national development and environment.
 
Top