- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 23,396
- Points
- 113
post #10 is a weak attempt at sarcasm, but it's an epic fail. post #3 tries to butter your butts with extra virgin olive oil, but i believe you prefer lube. a yahoo search (no google search for me as in so doing they will reverse the role and search you from your sleep patterns to surf behavior to scratching of genitals) on french and german anti-bribery laws will easily yield legislative results and updates. either he knows and blatantly spreads fake news or he's too lazy to fact-check as speed of reply to you has becum an obsession. just don't forget he doesn't like to play second fiddle on this site. he's trying to take you down as the reigning alpha male. such bitchiness. woohoo!
Hahahahhahahah, u have explained alot. His post #3 actually was the one that started me on the path to whack him again. Claiming that the Singapore model for arms procurement is copied by other countries. Problem with that comment is that no one really knows what the Singapore model for weapons procurement is. There is no transparency in the procurement process, no independent oversight, and no clear stated objectives for the military. The entire military budget is shrouded in secrecy and has never been audited. In fact, the SAF will not even state who their enemy is and who they are buying weapons to defend against. Their purchases make no sense unless its buying for the sake of receiving bribes.
Yes, i think u are right in that speed of reply to me is his dominant goal. What a moron. Can't believe so many reputable posters here swallow his shit, hook line and sinker. Unless ...............of course, they are his own clones.