MP Baey said women who wear sexily is a form of sexual harassment to men!

[Queen Seok Duk]

socially they may say don't like, but biologically they have a choice?
if the driver is distracted we can only remind him, ie if we are not too distracted ourselves. if he is not distracted then he is not wired correctly.

Nobody is disputing the biological fact that men are wired to naked or scantily dressed women. Yes, nobody is disputing this fact.

AND NO, you're NOT entitled to say:

if the driver is distracted we can only remind him, ie if we are not too distracted ourselves. if he is not distracted then he is not wired correctly.

Because BY VIRTUE OF YOUR own admission:

normal men are wired to be attracted to naked or scantily dressed women. those that don't like are gay.

Because you failed to distinguish 'attract' from like. So if you're in the bus, you're just as much distracted. If you're not distracted, by your own admission you are a Gay.

So I say, please don't assume that people with greater self-discipline are gays. It would be gracious to just admit that there are people out there who are better than us.

It's precisely because it's the natural instinct of men to be distracted by naked or scantily women that social rules have to be put in place. A person may be attracted to the sight of a naked woman, but in a social environment different from the privacy of your bedroom the same person may not like to be distracted by the sight of a naked woman.

 

[potato29]

And please don't assume that people with greater self-discipline are gays. It would be gracious to just admit that there are people who are better than us.

there will always be people better then us.

 

[jw5]

Mr Baey should go and produce a play about women who wear sexily and sexual harrassment.
He might want to consider recruiting a few of his parliamentary colleagues to be the actors and actresses.

 

[halsey02]

Mr Baey should go and produce a play about women who wear sexily and sexual harrassment.
He might want to consider recruiting a few of his parliamentary colleagues to be the actors and actresses.

One can already get hearing problem listening to one of his out of tune, tone deaf colleague, you want them to act...??

Many will go into convulsions...and the resthouse along Buangkok Green, may not manage a sudden spike in cases.

 

[jw5]

One can already get hearing problem listening to one of his out of tune, tone deaf colleague, you want them to act...??

Many will go into convulsions...and the resthouse along Buangkok Green, may not manage a sudden spike in cases.

That one would be perfect in the role of the salivating lecherous boss with poor diction.

 

[Samthaikong]

There is a Cantonese saying to this, "le um tai, sud lei hwei, le tai, sud lei hwei'...in others words, "you don't look, you are not giving her face, you look, you are outraging her medesty"..

Maybe horsey (baey) never got a chance to look properly, now he is complaining....maybe he should draw up a dree code..where the ladies, dress in black, cover all over, except a slit for the eyes & mouth...wera black glove & stockings..sound familar..

Anyway, we can avert our eyes and don't look, or cover it with our ten fingers with gaps...ha ha ha

I would say "um tai bai um tai " (if you don't see is your lost). They dress like that for men to see ...so why should we men pretend not to see ?

 

[scoobyhoo]

does any one suggest punishment will be bare buttocks caning in the public?

 

[Faidenk]

Please ask your tits to stop staring at my eyes!!

 

[potato29]

Because you failed to distinguish 'attract' from like. So if you're in the bus, you're just as much distracted. If you're not distracted, by your own admission you are a Gay.

is it possible to be attracted to something and not like it?

men can say what they want, greater self-discipline and all the crab. when attractive women, esp the slutty kind, are around, the women in his life(wife,gf,mum,mum-in-law) will be watching him with their eagle eyes.

i think i touch a raw nerve because u seem not to read and understand what i posted.

1. i did not say men who say they don't like naked ... blah blah blah.. are gay.
2. i did not say i am not distracted.

i have nothing against gay. they are born that way.

 

[eQuipment]

if women wearing more "cooling" or revealing clothes is classified sexual harrassment, honestly, i don't mind getting sexually harrased daily.

 

[Logisex]

Was talking to a Relationship Manager (RM) colleague and the topic of the big boobs RM handling the Korean clients came up again.........

He said: If she goes to meet cleints, once she wears a low cut dress and place her boobs on the table, everything is negotiable...........

So who says its a harassment?

 

[Queen Seok Duk]

is it possible to be attracted to something and not like it?

men can say what they want, greater self-discipline and all the crab. when attractive women, esp the slutty kind, are around, the women in his life(wife,gf,mum,mum-in-law) will be watching him with their eagle eyes.

i think i touch a raw nerve because u seem not to read and understand what i posted.

1. i did not say men who say they don't like naked ... blah blah blah.. are gay.
2. i did not say i am not distracted.

i have nothing against gay. they are born that way.

You used 'like' in the same context as 'attract'. I used 'like' in the social context, while' 'attract' in the biological context.

Yes, I had difficulties understanding you. If you didn't mean men who don't like naked women are gay, perhaps you can explain this statement:

normal men are wired to be attracted to naked or scantily dressed women. those that don't like are gay.

Okay, you did not say you will not be distracted. And because you're a normal man and you're wired correctly, that means you will be distracted. So a person who is distracted is not entitled to say :

ie if we are not too distracted ourselves

You're either distracted or you're not. Just as you're either consistent or inconsistent.

I know you've nothing against gay. In fact, I'm anti-homosexual. Touch a 'raw nerve' ? Implying that I'm a gay adds nothing to your ability to argue in a consistent manner.

 

[potato29]

Touch a 'raw nerve' ? Implying that I'm a gay adds nothing to your ability to argue in a consistent manner.

i am implying u are not as sharp as i expected u to be.
i believe it's because u think i am calling u gay.