- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 18,719
- Points
- 0
Gordon Gekko (Wall Street 1987) : I don't work, people work for me. I don't create things. That's God's job. I own things.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
MP Baey said women who wear sexily is a form of sexual harassment to men!
- Thread starter kojakbt
- Start date
Gordon Gekko (Wall Street 1987) : I don't work, people work for me. I don't create things. That's God's job. I own things.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 219
- Points
- 18
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 2,578
- Points
- 0
That is true especially from a woman. Not bad. These female transgressors would have been stoned and killed in Islamic societies following an outcry.
Their harassment is a confrontation to get raped, and by dressing provocatively to reach that aim, they have to be sternly punished.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,006
- Points
- 0
If Singaporean males couldn't appreciate the reasonableness of Baey's arguments, then Singaporean males deserve to be fucked by Women's Charter.
If Singaporean males are wise enough to use their head instead of their dicks to think and support Baey's stance, this will be your first step towards curtailing feminism in Singapore. They tickle your dick and make you grovel. That is feminist power at her best. Remember, at this point you're only permitted to grovel and nothing else. You make a step further, voluntary or otherwise, the game changes and it becomes sexual harassment on your part. The Women's Charter will come down hard on you.
If a girl dressed scantily enough to give you a hard on, that is sexual harassment. I repeat, the fact that you enjoy getting a hard on does not mean you've not been harassed sexually. The fact that you like to be harassed sexually does not mean there is no sexual harassment.
When Baey speaks about women wearing scantily, most males have in mind young chio boos or OLs. You will not appreciate his reasoning unless you replace your fantasy with HC or Sun Ho.
Imagine some 50 something old hags prancing around in your office revealing their sagging boobs and extra-large G-String hanging below their big and loose tummy. Now you will begin to appreciate Baey's concern.
If Singaporean males are wise enough to use their head instead of their dicks to think and support Baey's stance, this will be your first step towards curtailing feminism in Singapore. They tickle your dick and make you grovel. That is feminist power at her best. Remember, at this point you're only permitted to grovel and nothing else. You make a step further, voluntary or otherwise, the game changes and it becomes sexual harassment on your part. The Women's Charter will come down hard on you.
If a girl dressed scantily enough to give you a hard on, that is sexual harassment. I repeat, the fact that you enjoy getting a hard on does not mean you've not been harassed sexually. The fact that you like to be harassed sexually does not mean there is no sexual harassment.
When Baey speaks about women wearing scantily, most males have in mind young chio boos or OLs. You will not appreciate his reasoning unless you replace your fantasy with HC or Sun Ho.
Imagine some 50 something old hags prancing around in your office revealing their sagging boobs and extra-large G-String hanging below their big and loose tummy. Now you will begin to appreciate Baey's concern.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 3,247
- Points
- 0
Baey is right. Women wearing low cut revealing cleavages is to wear for men to see and not for women to enjoy. The reasoning of hot humid weather, airy is all bullshit. They wear that for us to see. When we see, we are not supposed to touch. (That would be molest). If we crack jokes on their revealing dress (That would be sexual harrassment to some if they really take you to court.) Any advancement on the men's part even ogling will be deemed as satisfaction to these ladies but the words coming out of their mouth would be humsup lo. If men misunderstood the signals sent, (we mostly do when facing the opp sex), she can go to court and sue the man for (sexual harrassment, for molest, for mental depression, and that is going to cost a great deal for anyone). All because of revealing office outfit.
Either they remove the women's charter or they should ask them to button up. By revealing more and cannot solve anything, men will have to find other alternatives to relieve :p
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,006
- Points
- 0
Remember CNA Shankar.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 2,578
- Points
- 0
They are dirt. To even look at them is to insult and bring down ourselves.
They way he put it is not right. Not many however realise that women not dressing appropriately is a very common issue for new hires in many places. Usually the matters is addressed by the boss or HR. The other issue which is very much rare is body odour which applies to both sexes.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,172
- Points
- 48
nothing to do with like or don't like. normal men are wired to be attracted to naked or scantily dressed women. those that don't like are gay.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 985
- Points
- 0
This is a fair comment from a SG girl on fb:
Felicia Jieling: Better than people who dress like executives but behave like crazy women.
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personGwee Li Sui likes this. ·
Felicia Jieling: There's no such thing as an accident, once may be an accident, twice will be done on purpose. And normally, people who actually wear low-cut want to attract attention. I see nothing wrong with that. One wants to show, the other wants to see. Fair deal!
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike ·
Felicia Jieling: If you dress like a pro******* and behave like one, you'll be treated like one. Dress like an executive and behave like one, be treated as one. If you dress low-cut and expect people not to see, please do it at home, in your own bedroom. That way, only you can see. Men don't feel disturbed seeing women in low-cut dresses, even as a woman, I feel envious and can't help but see more.
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike ·
Felicia Jieling: Better than people who dress like executives but behave like crazy women.
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personGwee Li Sui likes this. ·
Felicia Jieling: There's no such thing as an accident, once may be an accident, twice will be done on purpose. And normally, people who actually wear low-cut want to attract attention. I see nothing wrong with that. One wants to show, the other wants to see. Fair deal!
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike ·
Felicia Jieling: If you dress like a pro******* and behave like one, you'll be treated like one. Dress like an executive and behave like one, be treated as one. If you dress low-cut and expect people not to see, please do it at home, in your own bedroom. That way, only you can see. Men don't feel disturbed seeing women in low-cut dresses, even as a woman, I feel envious and can't help but see more.
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike ·
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 12
- Points
- 0
i tink misquoted lah! sound so gay sia, his statement!
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,352
- Points
- 38
Anyone feel he is being harassed?
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,352
- Points
- 38
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 1,183
- Points
- 0
Imagine face to face with a woman wearing something like this. Have you ever ask the woman, when talking to her. You look at her breasts instead of her face. What will be her response?.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,006
- Points
- 0
This issue has been ongoing for a long time, but no MP had dared touch on the issue because of feminist power in Singapore.
What if Low Thia Khiang or Kenneth Jeyeratnam had made that same statement instead of a PAP MP ? You can rest assured that PAP will jump on the opportunity to win women votes, and speak in the same manner as what most of you have said.
Are Singaporean males helping themselves when they start stoning PAP MP Baey for his remark ? You know why Baey is different in this saga ?
First, he is a PAP MP.
Second, he used the term "sexual harassment".
Sexual harassment is an offence. Almost every sexual offence against women in Singapore will start off as sexual harassment, and at some point [at the whims and fancy of the women purportedly being sexually harassed] the offence mutates into molestation. And molestation, as every Singaporean male knows, carries with it a rotan.
If the allegation of molestation can be nipped in the bud at the stage of sexual harassment, many Singaporean males would have been spared the rotan.
If the law or the society recognizes that women who dressed scantily or provocatively will receive "less protection" from the law, it will help curb the haughtiness of most Singaporean females. How often have you heard your female colleagues say this: "If you have it, flaunt it !"
I'll not go to the extent of saying women who dressed scantily or in a manner enough to arouse an ordinary male she demands to be molested or raped. But at least an inference should be drawn against such women so that the offence of sexual harassment must not "exist" at the mercy of the woman's sole testimony.
If an opposition had made that statement that the PAP MP made, I would think twice to make a mountain out of a molehill. But now it's a PAP who opens the door to curtailing feminism and the brute powers of Women's Charter. Why don't Singaporean males jump on that opportunity ? If Singaporean males don't succeed, at most we stand to lose a PAP MP. What is the big deal ? If it was an opposition MP, I wouldn't want to risk lose any of them. If Singaporean males are smart, they should make a martyr out of Baey, and in turn kills two birds with one stone.
If you cast a stone at Baey, feminism at large will say : "Thank you Singapore males." You've just offered your hands to the shackles of Women's Charter and feminism in Singapore. More than ever before they've the RIGHT [given to them by Singaporean males] "to cock tease you, to sue you in court when they don't like your reaction to their cock teasing".
The bottom line for Singaporean males is this: Don't trade your rights and dignity for some inconsequential cheap thrills.
What if Low Thia Khiang or Kenneth Jeyeratnam had made that same statement instead of a PAP MP ? You can rest assured that PAP will jump on the opportunity to win women votes, and speak in the same manner as what most of you have said.
Are Singaporean males helping themselves when they start stoning PAP MP Baey for his remark ? You know why Baey is different in this saga ?
First, he is a PAP MP.
Second, he used the term "sexual harassment".
Sexual harassment is an offence. Almost every sexual offence against women in Singapore will start off as sexual harassment, and at some point [at the whims and fancy of the women purportedly being sexually harassed] the offence mutates into molestation. And molestation, as every Singaporean male knows, carries with it a rotan.
If the allegation of molestation can be nipped in the bud at the stage of sexual harassment, many Singaporean males would have been spared the rotan.
If the law or the society recognizes that women who dressed scantily or provocatively will receive "less protection" from the law, it will help curb the haughtiness of most Singaporean females. How often have you heard your female colleagues say this: "If you have it, flaunt it !"
I'll not go to the extent of saying women who dressed scantily or in a manner enough to arouse an ordinary male she demands to be molested or raped. But at least an inference should be drawn against such women so that the offence of sexual harassment must not "exist" at the mercy of the woman's sole testimony.
If an opposition had made that statement that the PAP MP made, I would think twice to make a mountain out of a molehill. But now it's a PAP who opens the door to curtailing feminism and the brute powers of Women's Charter. Why don't Singaporean males jump on that opportunity ? If Singaporean males don't succeed, at most we stand to lose a PAP MP. What is the big deal ? If it was an opposition MP, I wouldn't want to risk lose any of them. If Singaporean males are smart, they should make a martyr out of Baey, and in turn kills two birds with one stone.
If you cast a stone at Baey, feminism at large will say : "Thank you Singapore males." You've just offered your hands to the shackles of Women's Charter and feminism in Singapore. More than ever before they've the RIGHT [given to them by Singaporean males] "to cock tease you, to sue you in court when they don't like your reaction to their cock teasing".
The bottom line for Singaporean males is this: Don't trade your rights and dignity for some inconsequential cheap thrills.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,006
- Points
- 0
You can only speak for yourself, not on behalf of all males.
The term 'attracted' looks only at the biological aspect. The term 'like' includes the social aspect. If you're a passenger in a bus, you wouldn't want the driver in the bus getting too distracted by naked or scantily dressed women in the bus or along the streets.
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 81
- Points
- 0
"See no Touch".
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,172
- Points
- 48
socially they may say don't like, but biologically they have a choice?
if the driver is distracted we can only remind him, ie if we are not too distracted ourselves. if he is not distracted then he is not wired correctly.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 89,648
- Points
- 113
Did anyone go and watch the play produced by Baey entiteld "The Cabinet"?
Below is the online article from ST.
Couple's Cabinet affair
By Adeline Chia
To be staged at The Chamber in The Arts House, which used to be Parliament House, the production revolves around the trials and tribulations of a theatre company trying to put on a play called Mei Mei's Bras.
HE MAY be a Member Of Parliament (MP) but that has not stopped Mr Baey Yam Keng from producing a cheeky political play crammed with double entrendres. The piece is called The Cabinet, no less, and is written and directed by his wife, Lim Hai Yen.
To be staged at The Chamber in The Arts House, which used to be Parliament House, the production revolves around the trials and tribulations of a theatre company trying to put on a play called Mei Mei's Bras.
The three key characters in the play are the stage manager (SM), production manager (PM) and marketing manager (MM). These acronyms are, of course, familiar ones in Singapore's political scene, being used to refer to Senior Minister (Goh Chok Tong), Prime Minister (Lee Hsien Loong) and Minister Mentor (Lee Kuan Yew).
In the play, the characters make many references to Singapore politics, even when they seem to be talking about theatre.
For example, the brand of the cabinet, an actual cupboard that is used as a prop in the play, is GRC. This is ostensibly short for 'good, reliable and cheap'. In Singapore politics, it refers to Group Representation Constituency, or a multi-seat constituency.
The stage manager, or SM, says: 'A good and reliable cabinet is never cheap.'
Below is the online article from ST.
Couple's Cabinet affair
By Adeline Chia
To be staged at The Chamber in The Arts House, which used to be Parliament House, the production revolves around the trials and tribulations of a theatre company trying to put on a play called Mei Mei's Bras.
HE MAY be a Member Of Parliament (MP) but that has not stopped Mr Baey Yam Keng from producing a cheeky political play crammed with double entrendres. The piece is called The Cabinet, no less, and is written and directed by his wife, Lim Hai Yen.
To be staged at The Chamber in The Arts House, which used to be Parliament House, the production revolves around the trials and tribulations of a theatre company trying to put on a play called Mei Mei's Bras.
The three key characters in the play are the stage manager (SM), production manager (PM) and marketing manager (MM). These acronyms are, of course, familiar ones in Singapore's political scene, being used to refer to Senior Minister (Goh Chok Tong), Prime Minister (Lee Hsien Loong) and Minister Mentor (Lee Kuan Yew).
In the play, the characters make many references to Singapore politics, even when they seem to be talking about theatre.
For example, the brand of the cabinet, an actual cupboard that is used as a prop in the play, is GRC. This is ostensibly short for 'good, reliable and cheap'. In Singapore politics, it refers to Group Representation Constituency, or a multi-seat constituency.
The stage manager, or SM, says: 'A good and reliable cabinet is never cheap.'
Similar threads
