Angmo always get the best. We are left with the chingchong ladies.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Monica Baey vs Nicolas Lim
- Thread starter JohnTan
- Start date
Angmo always get the best. We are left with the chingchong ladies.
When? Even if he is sentenced, the victim can still sue.
Go and read up on the news again. Don't expect to be spoon fed
Altogether now!!! HUAT AH!!!
馬後砲 y didn’t he fuck spf for inadequate punishment ? It’s the mata to mete out the punishment.
Similarly the girl who slept with the professor to get A ? She wasn’t punished either.
black dog has been quiet.
Half fuck back door minister open mouth taichi Nus when he jolly well knows police and agc failed to do their job.
Shangmmuggam used to be in the forefront of lots of issues - cats lah, puppies lah.
But he has been strangely silent on this matter which is under his purview.
Neither have we heard from the Chief of Police to explain why upskirt predators (who ain't no seen no puppies by their actions) get jailed for three months but someone who goes out of his way to search of bathing pussies are allowed to go scott free.
But he has been strangely silent on this matter which is under his purview.
Neither have we heard from the Chief of Police to explain why upskirt predators (who ain't no seen no puppies by their actions) get jailed for three months but someone who goes out of his way to search of bathing pussies are allowed to go scott free.
He only opened his mouth when he felt the pulse and knew the heat was on.
Before that, also act blur. As for women ministers like Josephine Teo and Grace
Fu, the silence is disgusting.
Before that, also act blur. As for women ministers like Josephine Teo and Grace
Fu, the silence is disgusting.
NUS management is just a bunch of eunuchs, with no backbones to match.
The president and the others meekly agreed to do what the minister says after one meeting.
If they so strongly believed in what they were doing, when using Peter Pang to defend NUS' response, they
should have to conviction to tell the minister to fcuk off.
Their bosses should have been involved earlier....or at least make some comments now.
http://nus.edu.sg/about/board-of-trustees
The president and the others meekly agreed to do what the minister says after one meeting.
If they so strongly believed in what they were doing, when using Peter Pang to defend NUS' response, they
should have to conviction to tell the minister to fcuk off.
Their bosses should have been involved earlier....or at least make some comments now.
http://nus.edu.sg/about/board-of-trustees
Two strikes and you are out?
Isn't this a simple case of go forth and peep - we will give you second chance.
Meantime, try not to get caught.
Isn't this a simple case of go forth and peep - we will give you second chance.
Meantime, try not to get caught.
The students are saying many case only got warning from POLICE. Clementi police division is a shithole
https://mothership.sg/2019/04/nus-town-hall-sexual-misconduct/
Townhall meeting details.
Management has allocated a generous one hour for everyone to air their views.
So sincere, so really serious about finding the truth.
Oh, I forgot, they want to check with overseas counterparts on "best practices"
to contain sexual harassment on campus.
Can someone just tell them to go google...
Townhall meeting details.
Management has allocated a generous one hour for everyone to air their views.
So sincere, so really serious about finding the truth.
Oh, I forgot, they want to check with overseas counterparts on "best practices"
to contain sexual harassment on campus.
Can someone just tell them to go google...
after sinkie poodles looked at video evidence, they saw a jungle and thought they're in bukit timah reserve.
if we perceive this even in a wider prospective, we will realize its evident that sillypore's "Nothing above the Law" is really BS!
how can spf ignore criminal prosecution when all evidence is laid out loud & clear while handling so many other similar cases inconsistently ??? !!!
obviously our law minister mr. sham will ignore this or pushes this to nusso.
both gahmen & nus have depicted such 'ethical behavior' to our new youngster from nus........ sigh.
how can spf ignore criminal prosecution when all evidence is laid out loud & clear while handling so many other similar cases inconsistently ??? !!!
obviously our law minister mr. sham will ignore this or pushes this to nusso.
both gahmen & nus have depicted such 'ethical behavior' to our new youngster from nus........ sigh.
Republic Poly Student Jailed For Filming Girls Showering
In 2016, 23-year-old Republic Polytechnic (RP) graduate Mr Ang Wei Sheng wrapped his head in a towel and snuck into the female shower area at the school’s swimming complex.
He then hid in one of the cubicles and waited for women to enter. When a lady came in, Mr Ang went into the cubicle next to the one she occupied and recorded her showering.
The lady, upon seeing a camera under the divider, started to shout. Mr Ang quickly fled the premises and a while later, deleted the recording.
For criminal trespass and insulting the modesty of a woman, he was sentenced to 10 weeks imprisonment.
This begs the question of why the NUS peeping tom did not receive a similar sentence.
NUS voyeur case
The victim of the recent peeping tom case, 23-year-old NUS undergraduate Ms Monica Baey, recounted the incident on her Instagram on 19 Apr.
Source
She expressed indignation at how the perpetrator had gotten off lightly — receiving only a conditional warning from the police, a term suspension from school and an order to write Ms Baey a formal apology.
Source
Ms Baey’s call for greater punishment spread quickly through the online circles. Many were supportive of her cause and in similar rhetoric, called on NUS to do more about the matter. One Facebook user Ms Quek even wrote a post detailing how to go about effecting change.
Source
Ms Quek wrote in her post that this isn’t the first time something like this has happened.
And indeed, a list of past disciplinary cases on NUS campusshows it. Very often, the perpetrators got off with police warnings, term suspensions and bans from entering certain parts of the campus.
NUS responds
As the elephant in the room got bigger, NUS issued a statement addressing the matter.
Source
What stood out – and vexed – many people was the lack of urgency in the college’s response. Many Facebook users did not hesitate to express their disappointment in the university’s handling of the matter.
Source
Facebook group NUS Students United, however, took slight issue with the overwhelming attention directed at NUS.
They explained that since the crime can be committed not just on NUS campus grounds but anywhere in the country, means that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) should be the ones answering.
Source
Ms Baey’s mother says trust in NUS is “now broken”
Ms Baey’s mother also expressed support for her daughter on Facebook. In a lengthy post, she described her daughter’s ordeal and said that because of what had happened, she can no longer place her trust in NUS.
Source
Company withdrew agreement with NUS
In light of the incident, urban farming company OnHand Agrarian wrote on Facebook that they will be suspending “all dealings with NUS until (the perpetrator) is expelled.”
This means “no talks, no internships, no site visits, no use of (the) company when you need industry partners … for government grant submissions.”
Different sentences for the same crime?
As we mentioned earlier, the RP graduate was jailed for 10 weeks for recording women in the shower. Ms Baey’s perpetrator had done the exact same thing. Yet, he only received a police warning and a school suspension.
In another more recent case, a man was jailed 12 weeks for filming women undressing and relieving themselves in toilet cubicles at Tampines Junction.
There are plenty of other such cases where a peeping tom was sentenced to a jail term instead of just being let off with a warning.
So it seems a little odd that Ms Baey’s perpetrator – as well as countless others before hers – would be let off so lightly.
Is there something we’re not seeing? Let us know in the comments what you think.
In 2016, 23-year-old Republic Polytechnic (RP) graduate Mr Ang Wei Sheng wrapped his head in a towel and snuck into the female shower area at the school’s swimming complex.
He then hid in one of the cubicles and waited for women to enter. When a lady came in, Mr Ang went into the cubicle next to the one she occupied and recorded her showering.
The lady, upon seeing a camera under the divider, started to shout. Mr Ang quickly fled the premises and a while later, deleted the recording.
For criminal trespass and insulting the modesty of a woman, he was sentenced to 10 weeks imprisonment.
This begs the question of why the NUS peeping tom did not receive a similar sentence.
NUS voyeur case
The victim of the recent peeping tom case, 23-year-old NUS undergraduate Ms Monica Baey, recounted the incident on her Instagram on 19 Apr.
She expressed indignation at how the perpetrator had gotten off lightly — receiving only a conditional warning from the police, a term suspension from school and an order to write Ms Baey a formal apology.
Ms Baey’s call for greater punishment spread quickly through the online circles. Many were supportive of her cause and in similar rhetoric, called on NUS to do more about the matter. One Facebook user Ms Quek even wrote a post detailing how to go about effecting change.
Ms Quek wrote in her post that this isn’t the first time something like this has happened.
And indeed, a list of past disciplinary cases on NUS campusshows it. Very often, the perpetrators got off with police warnings, term suspensions and bans from entering certain parts of the campus.
NUS responds
As the elephant in the room got bigger, NUS issued a statement addressing the matter.
What stood out – and vexed – many people was the lack of urgency in the college’s response. Many Facebook users did not hesitate to express their disappointment in the university’s handling of the matter.
Facebook group NUS Students United, however, took slight issue with the overwhelming attention directed at NUS.
They explained that since the crime can be committed not just on NUS campus grounds but anywhere in the country, means that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) should be the ones answering.
Ms Baey’s mother says trust in NUS is “now broken”
Ms Baey’s mother also expressed support for her daughter on Facebook. In a lengthy post, she described her daughter’s ordeal and said that because of what had happened, she can no longer place her trust in NUS.
Company withdrew agreement with NUS
In light of the incident, urban farming company OnHand Agrarian wrote on Facebook that they will be suspending “all dealings with NUS until (the perpetrator) is expelled.”
This means “no talks, no internships, no site visits, no use of (the) company when you need industry partners … for government grant submissions.”
Different sentences for the same crime?
As we mentioned earlier, the RP graduate was jailed for 10 weeks for recording women in the shower. Ms Baey’s perpetrator had done the exact same thing. Yet, he only received a police warning and a school suspension.
In another more recent case, a man was jailed 12 weeks for filming women undressing and relieving themselves in toilet cubicles at Tampines Junction.
There are plenty of other such cases where a peeping tom was sentenced to a jail term instead of just being let off with a warning.
So it seems a little odd that Ms Baey’s perpetrator – as well as countless others before hers – would be let off so lightly.
Is there something we’re not seeing? Let us know in the comments what you think.
totally agreed!
why there are inconsistency handling by spf?
mr shame should answer this to public!
Similar threads
