• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mininum Wage: Wool Comes From Sheep 羊毛出在羊身上

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
18,719
Points
0
If there's a minimum wage for workers, then there's a minimum price for consumers. It's profit out of the price that the wage is paid. Then middle class executives will feel the squeeze as their wages though much above the minimum, can't afford to pay for so many things anymore.

Is it then, exploitation of elder and unskilled workers for the cost benefits of the middle and upper cases? In a sense, yes, for the poor elderlies shouldn't have to work at all. The government should take care of basic dignifiable living standard and condition for those who can't afford to.

The government line has always been, if they take care of poor people out of the taxes from rich people, poor people would become lazy, don't work, don't save for their retirement; rich people would migrate somewhere else.

In my humble opinion, that line is as true as two graduate parents would produce a genius offspring; two uneducated parents would produce an idiot. Nobody wants to rely on welfare or charity for basic living. Nobody making a comfortable living would migrate just because of tax. Nobody is asking the government to tax the rich exhorbitantly high. However, regrettably and regressively, the government keeps decreasing and even abolishing taxes for the rich while increasing and introducing more taxes that burden the poor more and most, in the name of "fairness."

The government paid themselves millions and counting for more expensive, slower and worse governance while asking the people to work for cheaper, faster and better. Does that make any sense in rationale, dear hostages.
 
working adults should take care of parents, just as confucius taught

unfortunately many here are influenced by hollywood hollow values and dump their parents or have them work well into their retirement

we should import 1.5 million PRC youngsters to improve our stock

i know many PRC here and i think they will secure our economic future as well as strengthen our social fabric
 
As a former government servant ie. police, you should be paid pretty well too :confused:

Simple pay, yes. Pretty well, no. I was just an NS enlistee who would be starved to death if I didn't sign on for full salary. I'm no elite or white horse. That's why I left a.s.a.p. for somewhere with something more interesting and rewarding.

working adults should take care of parents, just as confucius taught

That's correct, in ancient society. However, in modern society, that's not so easily done than said. Two-income families, which side of in-laws to support or both sides? Add children to that equation and it's no wonder that birthrate is so low.
 
Total business cost is Fix cost + Variable Cost.

The biggest fix cost is the Rental. If government is not going to cut the land valuation. Singaporean worker has to suffer low wage. Who is the biggest land owner of SIngapore ? Singapore largest real estate company also belongs to the government. Largest utilities company also under the wing of government. Largest transport company also belongs to the government. Largest communication also belong to the government.

If the profit or sales of these companies cannot be cut, i think the only cost they can cut is the wage of it own people. Do i need to eloborate more ?
 
Total business cost is Fix cost + Variable Cost.

The biggest fix cost is the Rental. If government is not going to cut the land valuation. Singaporean worker has to suffer low wage. Who is the biggest land owner of SIngapore ? Singapore largest real estate company also belongs to the government. Largest utilities company also under the wing of government. Largest transport company also belongs to the government. Largest communication also belong to the government.

If the profit or sales of these companies cannot be cut, i think the only cost they can cut is the wage of it own people. Do i need to eloborate more ?

You ignorant imbecile. The biggest fixed cost is always wages.

Another csj-type talking through his arse.
 
wahlaneh...
山羊 goat or 绵羊 sheep? different u know cannot anyhow mix.
 
Back
Top