- Joined
- Nov 12, 2010
- Messages
- 280
- Points
- 0
You chee bye, bastard, father mother bastard, whole family all die!!! Dun start your racist slur with me as I did not start one on you, piece of worthless shit!!! Why dun you just let dog fuck till you drop dead?
Your understanding of the Hong Kong and China History is zero and it just shows your stupidity that you say that "That is why the Chinese, after 156 years, now own Hong Kong. This is since Hong Kong has always been their land. It is Chinese land."
Hong Kong's territory was acquired from three separate treaties: the Treaty of Nanking in 1842, the Treaty of Beijing in 1860, and The Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory in 1898, which gave the UK the control of Hong Kong Island, Kowloon (area south of Boundary Street), and the New Territories (area north of Boundary Street and south of the Shenzhen River, and outlying islands), respectively. Although Hong Kong Island and Kowloon had been ceded to the United Kingdom in perpetuity, the control on the New Territories was a 99-year lease. The finite nature of the 99-year lease did not hinder Hong Kong's development as the New Territories were combined as a part of Hong Kong. By 1997, it was impractical to separate the three territories and only return the New Territories. In addition, with the scarcity of land and natural resources in Hong Kong Island and Kowloon, the New Territories were being developed with large-scale infrastructures and other developments, with the break-even day lying well past 30 June 1997. Thus, the status of the New Territories after the expiry of the 99-year lease became important for Hong Kong's economic development.
Quote a better example if you can lah, you chee bye kia, pu bor!! Puki mak, Pundek!!
Now once again, which part of the word SOLD you do not understand?
Way, way before the treaties of the 1800s that you cited, the land that was Hong Kong was incorporated into China in 221 BC during the Qin dynasty. In essence, your country, China owns it.
Then came colonialism, and the Brits acquired it. It was ceded to the Brits, in your very own words, in "perpetuity". It is no different from my land, Singapura, which was ceded to the Brits, in "perpetuity".
The end of colonialism ended with the Brits returning the land to the owners or "leasing" it for a period of time before the land were eventually returned to the rightful owners. In the case of my land, it was returned to the Malays. In the case of Hong Kong, returned to your country, China. Ditto for Macau which was returned to your country China, by the Portuguese.
You are either too stupid or utterly clueless about your own Chinese history, about colonialism and how territories were acquired by wars/force, treaties or declarations of terra nullius by the European powers during the colonial era.
Educate yourself about European colonialism before you try to argue on and on, and very stupidly at that, about the word "sold" with me. I don't have all the time in the world to argue with dumb Chinks. Typing the world "sold" in bold and in larger fonts does not bolster your case. It makes you look like an ignorant, uneducated twat. Or more likely, you are simply too stupid for not being able to understand your own Chinese history, what colonialism was about, what happened during the era of European colonialism, the pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial era.