Mahatir says Cina Jiuhookias more racist than Melayu Jiuhookias

[syed putra]

Shall I start on how violent moslems were throughout history and tried to wipe out numerous cultures and religions from places they invaded?

I believe they were mongols who converted.

 

[ChristJohnny]

Standard Operandi :
Blame Others ...

Race and IQ

 

[winners]

Anyway, Mamak Kutty's credibility and trustworthiness have all been tarnished ever since the Sheraton Move. Only a very few still believes in him nowadays.

 

[JohnTan]

OK let's start with the bible. That book that advocates violence throughout the book. Even Moses in your bible ordered the killing of innocent women and children.

The Bible advocates violence throughout the bible? Sure, let's look at at John 3:16. Where's the violence in it?



You said "throughout"

 

[JohnTan]

I believe they were mongols who converted.

The arabs weren't any better. They were known for raiding and invading for booty and slaves. The arab moslems made war on non-moslems specifically for booty and religious warfare, all sanctioned by their mosques.

 

[mudhatter]

Stop day dreaming MUdsLiMe.... And stop talking garbage like your old fart muud mahathir aspiring to be PM again...
Wakakakakakakakakaka....

blackie ceca nigger stop talking trash and go jump from rooftop to your death like your old dp



Old Dr M has already been a PM again, settting a new world record of the oldest PM in the world.

Your laopeh old fart harry lee uplorried long time ago leaving behind eunuch loong in his wake to lord over you coolie blackie smelly ceca virus.

Eunuch loong and his eunuch brigades, eunuch battaliion.

 

[mudhatter]

Really? islam doesn't seem like a tolerant culture and religion.

Yes, it really is the case.

To you, everything seems to be turned upside down and you also like to take it up the arse, spreading monkeypox and what not along the way.

Don't make the error of thinking yours is the right way, entry through your backdoor is not healthy desirable or right just because it feels right to you.

 

[JohnTan]

Yes, it really is the case.

To you, everything seems to be turned upside down and you also like to take it up the arse, spreading monkeypox and what not along the way.

Don't make the error of thinking yours is the right way, entry through your backdoor is not healthy desirable or right just because it feels right to you.

Your son finished banging your arsehole yet?

 

[mudhatter]

Shall I start on how violent moslems were throughout history and tried to wipe out numerous cultures and religions from places they invaded?

Muslims, not Moslems you slanty twerp.

Muslims ruled over large chunks of the known world for the majority of the last 1400 years.

These are undeniable facts of life.

Americas were only discovered and widely known after Columbus, and really had its red indian inhabitants wiped out en masse after the anglos shipped their own sometime in the 1600s or 1700s. Even then, the poms did not take a lead until the Industrial Revolution.

 

[mudhatter]

Shall I start how violent Catholics were throughout history and how many indegenous cultures they wiped off the planet?

Yes.

You can continue on with subsequent pommie french spanish yankee cowboy dutch belgian and what not colonialism wiping out natives number of wars and loots and plunders massacres lies after lies spread by yanks since then continuously incessantly.

 

[mudhatter]

Your son finished banging your arsehole yet?

Why do you insist on projecting your inner faggot self onto others?

You do know that you getting your arse penetrated thousands of times by your ang moh priests and pastors is not a secret anymore, right?

 

[JohnTan]

Muslims, not Moslems you slanty twerp.

It has been moslems and mohameddans. You want to edit your religion again?

Muslims ruled over large chunks of the known world for the majority of the last 1400 years.

Those chunks of land you mentioned faced war and invasions from moslems.

These are undeniable facts of life.

It's undeniable facts of life that moslems committed lots of war atrocities and genocides in the lands they invaded. You seem to be denying them outright or otherwise justifying them on grounds that the because the war criminals were mohameddans like yourself, so it must be okay to kill, rape and loot others.

Americas were only discovered and widely known after Columbus, and really had its red indian inhabitants wiped out en masse after the anglos shipped their own sometime in the 1600s or 1700s.

America was discovered by the Vikings before Columbus. And it was the native americans that got wiped out by disease brought over by the Spanish.

You should brush up on your facts. Yes, I know you're eager to win a debate. But it has to be done with facts, not lies. And all facts, not selective facts like what islamist swine like you enjoy doing.

 

[JohnTan]

Why do you insist on projecting your inner faggot self onto others?

You do know that you getting your arse penetrated thousands of times by your ang moh priests and pastors is not a secret anymore, right?

i'm merely stating facts on what happens in a typical mohameddan family. Your father likely fucked you and your siblings in the arse. And likewise, so that other adult moslem men. How many of those guys who fucked you looked like osama bin laden? All of them?

 

[mudhatter]

It has been moslems and mohameddans. You want to edit your religion again?

Muslims, not Moslems. Nothing called Mohammedans, you are confusing with Christ-ians.

We do not endorse faggotry while you practise it and actively join pinkdotsg and wear it as a badge of honour.

Those chunks of land you mentioned faced war and invasions from moslems.

Those chunks of land faced war and invasions from kuffar like romans greeks persians ceca virus even chinks and what not. Muslims (not Moslems, you moron) only liberated large chunks of the known world.

It's undeniable facts of life that moslems committed lots of war atrocities and genocides in the lands they invaded. You seem to be denying them outright or otherwise justifying them on grounds that the because the war criminals were mohameddans like yourself, so it must be okay to kill, rape and loot others.

No Islamic army ever committed any atrocity.

Atrocities may have been commited by secular, alcohol drinking entities like Paki military on Bangla, or Paki military on their own sh*ttyzens near Afghanistan, or other secular regimes.

America was discovered by the Vikings before Columbus. And it was the native americans that got wiped out by disease brought over by the Spanish.

Stop believing any BS peddled by anglo-yankee establishment just because they feel it is necessary to rewrite historical facts to present them in positive light.

Vikings were nobodies throughout history and rightly so.

An insignifcant nobodies in history with no heritage, history, culture, intellect, intellectual, civilization. nothing of note.

Red Indians were wiped out by massacres and genocides rather than diseases or other BS excuses invented by anglo yankee terrorist invented stories nowadays, who the hell even believes these nonsensical revisionist history invented by anglo yankee kafir rats.

You should brush up on your facts. Yes, I know you're eager to win a debate. But it has to be done with facts, not lies. And all facts, not selective facts like what islamist swine like you enjoy doing.

You should have looked up a mirror before mouthing off a mouthful given how cumladen your mouth has long been (I know you like it more taking it up the arse given your perverse fetish but make no mistake, i tolerate no such perversions and your faggotry is not permissible anywhere near me or my kind).

 

[JohnTan]

Muslims, not Moslems. Nothing called Mohammedans, you are confusing with Christ-ians.

Followers of the arabic "prophet' were called mohameddans for centuries. You're simply trying to change history when it embarrasses your current narrative of islam.

We do not endorse faggotry while you practise it and actively join pinkdotsg and wear it as a badge of honour.

Who's "we" ?? The moslem afghans don't agree. So do many faggot mohameddans throughout the moslem world who fuck boys and get away with it.

No Islamic army ever committed any atrocity.

That's not true. The moslem islamic armies killed, burned and enslaved everywhere they raided and invaded.

Atrocities may have been commited by secular, alcohol drinking entities like Paki military on Bangla, or Paki military on their own sh*ttyzens near Afghanistan, or other secular regimes.

Wow! "May have"... So there was a good possibility that the millions of people killed in bangladesh were not killed by islamic paki armies.

See how quickly you defend war crimes the very moment you realize that the perps were moslems like yourself.

Stop believing any BS peddled by anglo-yankee establishment just because they feel it is necessary to rewrite historical facts to present them in positive light.

Stop believing any BS peddled by your fake islamic qurans, hadiths and whatever jihadist forums you masturbate to.

 

[mudhatter]

Followers of the arabic "prophet' were called mohameddans for centuries. You're simply trying to change history when it embarrasses your current narrative of islam.

Never were Muslims called by any other names.

Only christ-ians would like to call themselves according to the name of thieir prophet.

Who's "we" ?? The moslem afghans don't agree. So do many faggot mohameddans throughout the moslem world who fuck boys and get away with it.

Muslim, not Moslems.

Afghans most certainly have never established a pinkdot SG, that's the sole preserve of stinkypura and your ilk.

Faggot christians jews ceca hindus chinks and stinkies abound. That's why all of their countries are littered with pinkdot sg or their local versions all around the world.

That's not true. The moslem islamic armies killed, burned and enslaved everywhere they raided and invaded.

That's not true. Christians and other kafir fanatics killed burned enslaved raped looted massacred genocided all around the world but only Islamic armies were consistenly the most upright liberators in recorded history.

Wow! "May have"... So there was a good possibility that the millions of people killed in bangladesh were not killed by islamic paki armies.

What is Wow! "May have".. supposed to mean?

How dumb, as a stupid yankee bot regurgitating single digit IQ trash championing faggotry and taking it up the arse, would you have to be to fail to understand what an alcoholic means?

See how quickly you defend war crimes the very moment you realize that the perps were moslems like yourself.

I'm not alcoholic. See how quickly you expose yourself as a single digit IQ yankee bot regurgitating trash championing faggotry and taking it up the arse, along the way failing to understand what an alcoholic means.

Stop believing any BS peddled by your fake islamic qurans, hadiths and whatever jihadist forums you masturbate to.

 

[JohnTan]

Never were Muslims called by any other names.

Only christ-ians would like to call themselves according to the name of thieir prophet.

Nope. They were called mohameddans or moslems in the past. Those terms are now less used because modern islamists find them offensive.

There are also historical variants of mohameddans, such as 'muhammadiyah', which basically means 'followers of mahomet'. That's a commonly used phrase amongst kelings and indons mohameddans.

That's not true. Christians and other kafir fanatics killed burned enslaved raped looted massacred genocided all around the world but only Islamic armies were consistenly the most upright liberators in recorded history.

I doubt people will find moslem armies as liberators when they get killed, raped or enslaved by islamic armies.

Like I said, you are supportive of war crimes whenever they are committed by mohameddans like yourself.

Afghans most certainly have never established a pinkdot SG, that's the sole preserve of stinkypura and your ilk.

moslems are better remembered for pillaging, plundering, slave catching and engaging in piracy. They are not very good at trading honestly as peaceful merchants.

 

[Loofydralb]

The Bible advocates violence throughout the bible? Sure, let's look at at John 3:16. Where's the violence in it?



You said "throughout"

I am enjoying this. Let the world see the hypocrisy of this christian trying to hide and deny violence is commanded in his bible. A far cry from the popular myth they like to potray that they are peaceful and loving. Either that or he really doesn't read his bible.

"In reading the Old Testament for seminary this year I stumbled upon Numbers 31:1-18, in which Israel destroys a city and takes the spoils to Moses. When their prophet Moses finds out, however, that they have saved the married women and man-children, he orders their deaths so as not to upset the Lord."

Really? You want me to show more verses where violence is advocated in the bible upon the innocent?

 

[JohnTan]

I am enjoying this. Let the world see the hypocrisy of this christian trying to hide and deny violence is commanded in his bible.

So am I.

I'm still waiting for your violence verses throughout the Bible.

Btw, don't mohameddans like you revere violence, especially violence committed against non-moslems? Nearly all mohameddans I know believe that launching attacks against non-moslems and taking their land as proof that their islam and arabic god is super great.

"In reading the Old Testament for seminary this year I stumbled upon Numbers 31:1-18, in which Israel destroys a city and takes the spoils to Moses. When their prophet Moses finds out, however, that they have saved the married women and man-children, he orders their deaths so as not to upset the Lord."

Really? You want me to show more verses where violence is advocated in the bible upon the innocent?

Yup. You said 'throughout'.

Quoting from one book of the Bible isn't throughout.

 

[Loofydralb]

Yup. You said 'throughout'.

Quoting from one book of the Bible isn't throughout.

Oh there is plenty more:

Book of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the Amalekites: "And utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them," God says through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."

Imagine your god so vindictive that animals are also not spared? How ridiculous and nonsensical can that be? There is more from that little book of yours.


And this is what your Christian scholar says when they compare violence between the two books:

"Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says.

Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.

Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.
Philip Jenkins, author of 'Jesus Wars'
Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against attack.

"By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."