• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collision'

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Still wondering whether they found any lanjiao fragments in the mouth of his female passenger Ms Wu.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Still wondering whether they found any lanjiao fragments in the mouth of his female passenger Ms Wu.

They probably found the pussy hair in the mouth of the insured already.
 
Last edited:
M

Mdm Tang

Guest
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

can ........
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

how about the victims family? If they also bought insurance, will they pay the family?
or the insurance co will ask the victims family to claim from Ma Chi family?
machiam playing taiji?
:confused:
 

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

The question will be: who will compensate the victims? The insurance company or the deceased estate?
so does that mean all the victims are screwed? no compensation until the case settle?
The question will be: who will compensate the victims? The insurance company or the deceased estate?
Like that taxi driver and passenger also not paid.
They got killed in a collision not an accident.
What has Ma Chi's assets got to do with AXA and the law suit?
Insurance company alway wants to disclaim liability, accident is an accident,
they want to runaway with it! no wonder when I was young i ALWAYS hear
old ppl saying "Insurance eat ppl"
When Ma Chi bought this Ferrari Insurance happily accept with open arms why ??
premium super high! they know this is a damn fast car!!
AXA should not have accpted in the first place, why when accident happened than they claim
its not accident???
Sign white paper not say its Black!! AXA?? I am not trying to side anyone!
But AXA please be FAIR in your judgement!
All current Ferrari drivers take note, your next knock knock!!
AXA will denied your claim~!
In the event AXA needs to payout to his victims....they will sue MaChi and claim from him.
Apparently now 3rd parties also jam and won't get compensation....yet.
‘’The poor taxi driver and his passenger did not die in a collision . They died in a PAP and FT collusion !

For the avoidance of doubt regarding the respective liabilities (immediate vs.eventual) ('offending driver' vs his insurer) towards compensating victims (3rd party), the following case example remains instructive.

Victim wins civil suit against Ionescu
Mr Bong has sought more than $630k in damages. The default judgment was given to Ionescu, but the amount of damages to be paid will be decided later. -TNP
Sat, Aug 21, 2010; The New Paper

Exclusion clause

If a driver is convicted or pleads guilty to drink driving, the insurer's exclusion clause kicks in and the insurer can disclaim liability, he said.
But as laid out in the affidavit, even though NTUC Income is "no longer contractually bound to indemnify" Ionescu, the insurer is still required by law to pay Mr Bong first.
It will then recover the amount from Ionescu.
This is also a standard procedure in road accidents where the driver is intoxicated, said Mr K Anparasan, 42, partner at law firm KhattarWong.
He explained: "Even if the driver is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the insurer is required to pay the victim of the accident.
"The whole idea is to make sure the victim is not left uncompensated. The insurer reserves the right to go after the driver to recover that amount."
Mr Ken Loh, 43, managing director of insurance agency M Plus Consultancy, added: "The law is made to protect the innocent, so that the accident victims do not suffer loss without redress. If no one pays their bills, then public interest is hurt."
Victim wins civil suit against Ionescu
=====
Rest of the details pls see (or ask your MP to explain):
'Motor Vehicles (Third-Party Risks and Compensation) Act (CHAPTER 189)'
 
Last edited:
M

Mdm Tang

Guest
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Thank you for update.
 

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Confirm RIP with death cert. What insurance waiting for. Even suicide insurance still lan lan have to pay by law. Is very hard to support this case as try to con insurance money.

Suicide is compensated through life insurance. But the context of this case (AXA) is regarding MOTOR insurance.

Nobody will deny Ma Chi's family from benefiting from any life insurance policies that he might have bought but to expect AXA to compensate beyond its legal and contractual needs to compensate is certainly asking too much from a motor insurance company!

As per Ionescu example, AXA motor will first compensate but insofar as AXA disclaims liability, Ma Chi's estate will have to reimburse AXA for all compensations paid, as the 12May Rochor Road 'accident' [YouTube collision witness footage] was no 'honest mistake'.
 
Last edited:

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis


Thanks for linking this threads with the one containing my full opinion ['Ma Chi's family to AXA: illegal F1 street racing 'assailant' deserves full compensation'].

For the avoidance of doubt, not all logical people are PAP supporters.

"PAP supporter" : categorically denied.


Rgds,
B.C.
 
Last edited:

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Suicide is compensated through life insurance. But the context of this case (AXA) is regarding MOTOR insurance.

Nobody will deny Ma Chi's family from benefiting from any life insurance policies that he might have bought but to expect AXA to compensate beyond its legal and contractual needs to compensate is certainly asking too much from a motor insurance company!

As per Ionescu example, AXA motor will first compensate but insofar as AXA disclaims liability, Ma Chi's estate will have to reimburse AXA for all com compensations paid as the 12May Rochor Road 'accident' [YouTube collision witness footage] was no 'honest mistake'.

They are chinky chinks, what do you expect from them. That is how they behave.

The chinks think that having money will be able to solve all problems, even to live forever and be the king of the world.

Just like PAP, thinking money will solve all kinds of problem..a low class, immature and primitive thinking.
 
Last edited:

shelltox

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

In the event AXA needs to payout to his victims....they will sue MaChi and claim from him.
Apparently now 3rd parties also jam and won't get compensation....yet.

The way he drove was similar to committing suicide.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Good lah AXA settles all third parties claims, no payout to MaChiby and sue MaChiby estate to recover. Victims families all then seperately sue MaChiby estate for further compensation.
 

ionzu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Suicide is compensated through life insurance. But the context of this case (AXA) is regarding MOTOR insurance.

Nobody will deny Ma Chi's family from benefiting from any life insurance policies that he might have bought but to expect AXA to compensate beyond its legal and contractual needs to compensate is certainly asking too much from a motor insurance company!

ma chi's family should dispose of all assets before the impending trial. this is what a singaporean would do.
 
M

Mdm Tang

Guest
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

Ven Ionzu , i thought Ven must lead people do good ?
 

cheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

I am not siding this farking ma chi. But this insurance thingy, I feel that insurance bloody mother farker always want to siam when there is big payout.

Accident become collision .... Then buy insurance for fark???

for this case, insurance company know he was rich, so if insurance refuses to pay, they can claim from ma chi.
But if it is a average guy and has got no money then how? ? Insurance will lan lan pay.

There are many things behind insurance, especially their lawyers, very cunning to teach them how to refuse payout.

Government needs to really look into insurance SOP.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Ma Chi's family sues insurers AXA after they withdraw coverage for deadly 'collis

I am not siding this farking ma chi. But this insurance thingy, I feel that insurance bloody mother farker always want to siam when there is big payout.

That's how all insurance companies operate. You make a claim, they'll try their darndest best to legally deny you that claim.
 
Top