Lol Even Shanghai don't want to be Chinese / Chinks

[Thick Face Black Heart]

No different from sinkie chinks claiming they're different from China's chinks.

Singapore Chinese are of course very different from mainland Chinese. We have been moulded by the region for over a century and have come to adopt a different set of values and mindsets. Culturally, socially, politically, we are different. Even in terms of looks, we are different. Our habits, our mannerisms, our level of civility, are also all different.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

 

[yellowarse]

By the way, the Shanghainese top the annual PISA survey on education every year. It's just not topping the tests, but the incredible margin between them and the rest – no slouch either, like the Finnish, Sinkies and Koreans – which is akin to a two-grade difference.

---

PISA education tests: Why Shanghai pupils are so special

For the second time running, pupils in China’s financial capital have been world beaters in maths, science and reading. Here's why

Lucy Dong, left, and Amy Zhu. Outside school hours, the girls’ lives are a blur of extra-curricular activities:
English class, flute class, drumming class, handwriting class, calligraphy class, Taekwondo training,
modelling lessons and choir practice.

By Tom Phillip
8:20PM GMT 04 Dec 2013


Every day, Lucy Dong and her best friend Amy Zhu wake at 7am – 7.10am if they are lucky – munch through their breakfast of steamed buns and noodles, and head off to what may be the best schooling system in the world.

The 10-year-olds, who are natives of Shanghai, China’s sprawling financial capital, study in 35-minute bursts from around 8am to 4pm, with a small break for lunch – and a class meeting – sandwiched in the middle.

Outside school hours, the girls’ lives are a blur of extra-curricular activities: English class, flute class, drumming class, handwriting class, calligraphy class, Taekwondo training, modelling lessons and choir practice.

Over the coming years, as they chase their respective dreams of becoming an astronaut and a poetry reciter, Lucy and Amy’s lives are unlikely to be easy. But they will at least be part of an education system that appears to be paying great dividends.

This week, Shanghai was crowned – for the second time – the champion of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which compares the maths, reading and science skills of some 510,000 secondary school students around the world.

Shanghai’s students came top of the global class in maths with an average score of 613 (up from 600 in the last PISA tests of 2010). That was 119 points, or the equivalent of nearly three years of schooling, above the average, and placed Shanghai 25 places above Britain, which had 494 points.

Shanghai also came top in reading (570 points), just ahead of Hong Kong and Singapore, which joined it on the podium in all three PISA categories. Britain languished in 23rd place with 499 points.

Shanghai was also victorious in science (Britain came 21st) and excelled when it came to “top performers”. Twenty-five per cent of its students were placed in that bracket, the PISA results showed.

Some experts question the value of comparing cities and countries. Others point out that Shanghai’s relatively well-funded schools and well-paid teachers are not representative of the Chinese education system as a whole. Average pay for a Shanghai teacher is 4,400 yuan (£441) a month compared with 2,000 yuan in some cities in the southwestern province of Yunnan.

Even so, the latest results are likely to see more and more educators flock east in search of the mega-city’s magic formula.

Prof Kong Lingshuai of the College of Education at Shanghai Normal University has studied the city’s PISA successes. He says that the secret is a mix of “traditional elements and modern elements”. The former relate to the high expectations of “tiger” parents, and a belief instilled in Chinese children from a young age that effort is crucial to gaining a good education.

“Chinese parents pay great attention to their children’s education in the hope that their sons will one day become dragons and their daughters phoenixes,” says Prof Kong.

The “modern elements” include Shanghai’s willingness to constantly adapt its curriculum and teaching practices; its focus on improving under-achieving schools by pairing them with those that excel; its openness to foreign ideas; and the introduction of performance-related pay.

An obsession with training has also been key, says Prof Kong. As of last year, new teachers have to undergo a standardised, one-year training course before starting in the classroom.

Once qualified, they are required to complete at least 240 hours’ training in their first five years. Teachers are also encouraged to attend each other’s classes to promote a culture of “idea sharing, exchanging and positive competition”.

Outsiders often dismiss China’s education system as a pressure-cooker-style frenzy of exams that places too much emphasis on rote-learning and does little to stimulate creativity.

But in Shanghai at least, that may be starting to change. Authorities are attempting to move away from testing that relies too heavily on memorising facts and figures, and some schools are also giving students more time to play, rather than just study.

Gao Xinhong, a Shanghai student who became a minor local celebrity after getting the highest marks in this year’s “gaokao” university entrance exams, says the schooling system is becoming more flexible. “The greatest part of Shanghai’s education system was that it gave me a broad perspective compared to other Chinese cities. Shanghai’s education is good because it does not treat grades as the only thing for a student,” she says.

Zhu Yi, the father of 10-year-old Amy Zhu, agrees. “It is much better than before. Schools in Shanghai now focus on the all-round development of students,” says Mr Yi, a 44-year-old sports instructor.

He points to an ancient Chinese dedication to learning when asked to explain the city’s PISA successes, but warns: “Education is cultural. It can’t simply be copied or borrowed.”

Prof Kong says cultural factors have been central to Shanghai’s PISA glories but suggests western students hoping to catch up with their Asian peers would do well to take on some extra homework.

“The number of hours Chinese students put into homework is several times higher than their western pals,” he says.

Wang Huichun – a 40-year-old nurse who is the mother of Lucy – says that even Shanghai’s over-achieving students need to work harder if they are to keep succeeding.

“[My daughter’s] school is more interested in the arts than it is academic performance,” Ms Wang complains, in true “tiger mother” fashion. “There is not enough homework. It worries me a little.”

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Nigger narong wtf do you want me to say? This is called dissociation disorder if one is racially aware he will know that it exists amongst every race. For example there are black Americans that don't want to be called African Americans cos they were not born in Africa. Whoopi Goldberg is an example. There are Singhs that don't want to be called Indian cos in Sg it means tamil.

The point is it doesn't make that shanghainese guy any less Chinese and i didn't know the opinion of a few shanghainese = the opinions of all of them.

Anyway dissociative disorder affects Chinese dogs and it usually stems out of a superiority complex and it affects many Chinese like there are Chinese girls who think they are ang moh all because they are with an ang moh for example. Still doesn't change anything at all. A sheep can think it's a tiger and consider itself one does that make the sheep a tiger and vice versa?

You have a shallow understanding of culture. Overseas chinese are very different from mainland Chinese because we have for over a century come to adopt a different set of values, mindsets, mannerisms, habits, way of doing business, even way of thinking. We even look different and dress different.

Culture is something amorphous and which changes with time, geography, etc. The only permanent ties are genetic and even those change over thousands of years.

By your reasoning, you might as well claim we are all African because our ancestors from 20,000 years ago were from Africa.

I have no more linkage to mainland China than an Australian Aborigine has with New Guinea, or a modern white Australian has with his British roots, or a modern white American has with his European ancestry. Would you claim Australians to be British or Americans to be Europeans? That would be nonsense.

 

[Leongsam]

Singapore Chinese are of course very different from mainland Chinese. We have been moulded by the region for over a century and have come to adopt a different set of values and mindsets. Culturally, socially, politically, we are different. Even in terms of looks, we are different. Our habits, our mannerisms, our level of civility, are also all different.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

It will take far more than a century to change the genetic code of a Chinaman.

The only thing that has been bred out of the sinkie chinese gene pool is the lack of shame when it comes to pooping in front of the whole world. The rest of the crass behavior still manifests itself in every aspect of the chinky sinkie persona.

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

It will take far more than a century to change the genetic code of a Chinaman.

The only thing that has been bred out of the sinkie chinese gene pool is the lack of shame when it comes to pooping in front of the whole world. The rest of the crass behavior still manifests itself in every aspect of the chinky sinkie persona.

Why does even the China government support drafting a blacklist of its worst behaving tourists and banning them?

You don't see Singapore or Hong Kong or Taiwan doing the same.

Time, geography and politics changes our cultural identity and behaviour. As such, we cannot be lumped into a contiguous whole.

 

[yinyang]

..China government support drafting a blacklist of its worst behaving tourists and banning them? You don't see Singapore or Hong Kong or Taiwan doing the same.
Time, geography and politics changes our cultural identity and behaviour. As such, we cannot be lumped into a contiguous whole.

Overseas chinese are very different from mainland Chinese because we have for over a century come to adopt a different set of values, mindsets, mannerisms, habits, way of doing business, even way of thinking. We even look different and dress different. Culture is something amorphous and which changes with time, geography, etc. The only permanent ties are genetic and even those change over thousands of years. ..or a modern white Australian has with his British roots, or a modern white American has with his European ancestry. Would you claim Australians to be British or Americans to be Europeans?

Do think it’s delineated between: Race, ethnicity, culture and nationality:

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-...re-ethnicity-creed-skin-color-and-nationality

https://www.boundless.com/communica...sider-38/culture-ethnicity-and-race-169-8389/

...rest of the crass behavior still manifests itself in every aspect of the chinky sinkie persona.

Even if sinkie traits are not exemplary, wouldn't this critique apply to most if not all nationalities and even race, ethnicitities and cultures?
It's like associating all lousy characteristics in same proverbial black (and melting) pot.
No differentiation, blunt tool across the board?

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Do think it’s delineated between: Race, ethnicity, culture and nationality:

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-...re-ethnicity-creed-skin-color-and-nationality

https://www.boundless.com/communica...sider-38/culture-ethnicity-and-race-169-8389/

Yes you're right.

However nationality is a strictly political construct. I would prefer to look at differences in culture that evolve over time as people settle in different parts of the world. This creates distinct ethnic groups over time as differences become much more than skin deep.

Racially, we are the same but race is to me a very shallow parameter to understanding humans.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Singapore Chinese are of course very different from mainland Chinese. We have been moulded by the region for over a century and have come to adopt a different set of values and mindsets. Culturally, socially, politically, we are different. Even in terms of looks, we are different. Our habits, our mannerisms, our level of civility, are also all different.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

Nigger you sure? Sure some chinese might not act like the rest but they are the anomalies. Perhaps one example would be say amos yee. Do many sinkies act like him?

Also what makes you think sinkie chinese look different? Do you know how big and varied China chinese are? Also not all sinkie chinese look alike but the worst thing and it really pisses me off is that sinkie Chinese think that ALL sinkie Chinese have to have that same look which is stupid. No single race and population looks alike. Take ang mohs for example. They have blond, brown, black hair and grey, green, blue eyes and they love their diversity. No wonder Ang mohs say asians look alike. Chinese already look pretty similar you hope they look 100% alike?

Anyway the biggest variation amongst sinkie Chinese i have noticed is that there are sinkie Chinese with the thai/malay look. Some of them especially the darker ones can pass off as malay but especially thai. Then there are the sinkie Chinese that have a more cina/ east asian look. No they are not from China they are sinkie but they just look more cina or have a more east asian look. Some of them might have say malay/thai in their bloodline but i doubt it. That's not important.

As for you claiming China Chinese don't look like sinkies well here's an eye opener.

Your idea is that all Chinamen look something like this aka a STEREOTYPICAL look:

Well you are obviously wrong. Here are some China ppl that look sinkie

Some ppl expressed surprise that Ian fang was from China and not a sinkie

qi yi wu comes from China too but he looks pretty sinkie

I think you will be shocked this guy is definitely a sinkie right? Wrong he's from China and he's one of the leading stars on channel 8, xu bin

Here's a few sinkie actors

desmond tan. Does he look different from China ppl. If he was in China would ppl go hey he's not one of us!.

Jack neo. Look at how cheena jack neo looks. He doesn't look any different from a Chinaman.

The only 2 sinkies that i think don't look too cheena are elvin ng and pierre png but let's be honest you sure all sinkies look like them? Nope in fact more sinkie Chinese look like jack neo and desmond.

See so who says sinkie Chinese look different from China people? Mind you someone from say beijing doesn't represent all China ppl and Sinkie Chinese have many varieations from the thai looking to the ang moh looking to the cheena looking ones and the ang moh look ones like pierre i doubt he has ang moh blood in him. Also there are malay looking China ppl and ang moh looking ones too.

You have a shallow understanding of culture. Overseas chinese are very different from mainland Chinese because we have for over a century come to adopt a different set of values, mindsets, mannerisms, habits, way of doing business, even way of thinking. We even look different and dress different.

Culture is something amorphous and which changes with time, geography, etc. The only permanent ties are genetic and even those change over thousands of years.

By your reasoning, you might as well claim we are all African because our ancestors from 20,000 years ago were from Africa.

I have no more linkage to mainland China than an Australian Aborigine has with New Guinea, or a modern white Australian has with his British roots, or a modern white American has with his European ancestry. Would you claim Australians to be British or Americans to be Europeans? That would be nonsense.

Nigger you wrote thousands of years but how many generations of sinkies have settled here? The average would be those whose grandparents settled in Sg from China and their parents would be born sinkies while their grandparents would have been born in China. That would be the average for ppl born say 1970s onwards. Those born earlier it would be their dads who were born in China. For me i have peranakan heritage so i would say maybe my grandparents or even great grandparents were born in this region BUT is that thousands of years? Look you wrote thousands of years and sinkie Chinese are probably only like 1-2 generations removed from their China origins and even fewer with 3 or 4 generations that is a very short time span. For Americans it's even longer some of them have like 6-7 generations when their ancestors moved away from england. So pls don't talk shit to me about thousands of years and trying to link with with africans over 20k years ago when sinkies are only at the most 100 years with most even less from their China origins.

Next you compare papua new guineans and aborginals with Brits/americans and english? PNG ppl and aboriginals have thousands of years of seperation. In fact they are also related in some ways to the south indians but with like thousands of years of living in different lands. The english/americans/aussies on the contary have not lived so far apart and you want to know something. Do you know how close aussies/americans/british are? Who are the US closest allies? UK, Australia, Canada. Why? They are mostly english speaking ang mohs. It is much easier for a Brit to make it big in the US compared to say an Asian whether he's a sinkie/Chinaman/korean etc. So many brits + aussies have made it big in the US cos the ang mohs accept ppl of their own race and culture unlike Chinese dogs like you.

In fact i am going to ask this back at you. You say Sinkie Chinese look different from China ppl cos of the environment/culture etc ok fine. So if that is the case it surely applies to the Brits, UK, US ppl right? Therefore can you tell a Brit from an Aussie from an American just by looking at their faces? I mean they all live in different environments therefore they have to look different just as Sinkie Chinese look different from China ppl according to you right?

 

[scroobal]

No, it only takes a generation to make the leap if they leave their environment. A child that leaves with her family to a developed country before the age of 9 with no older sibling but younger siblings will develop and adopt the practices of the developed world. This occurs even if the parents continue to be stuck in the old world. The most important environment is the school where much of interaction dynamics, how to conduct oneself or behave in a group occurs.

I have met these kids who are adults now and their personal philosophy, mannerisms etc are of their new World and some have very conservative parents.

It will take far more than a century to change the genetic code of a Chinaman.

The only thing that has been bred out of the sinkie chinese gene pool is the lack of shame when it comes to pooping in front of the whole world. The rest of the crass behavior still manifests itself in every aspect of the chinky sinkie persona.

 

[scroobal]

You are not the only one. Many of us feel the same. The locals Indians are also proud to be Singaporeans and have no intention to be linked to the old country. They will cringe at the thought of joining a bunch of India Indians on a group tour to say Paris. Just look at the our students overseas, Happy to join group events with Malaysians but not those from China and India. Exception is when there is romance involved.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

 

[frenchbriefs]

Singapore Chinese are of course very different from mainland Chinese. We have been moulded by the region for over a century and have come to adopt a different set of values and mindsets. Culturally, socially, politically, we are different. Even in terms of looks, we are different. Our habits, our mannerisms, our level of civility, are also all different.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

singapore chinese like malaysia chinese and the various chinese diaspora that left for overseas greener pastures a hundred years ago are known as southern chinese,mainly we are the chinese that speak dialects such as hokkien,teochew,cantonese.culturally,physiologically and mentally we are as different as night and day from the northern barbarians what is mainly known as the Putonghua speaking PRCs.

this is what southern chinese are discribed as,"Stereotypically,southern chinese are raised in the pleasure dome of abundance,raised on rolling rice fields,with silkworms nipping at their whiskers,developing soft impressions of the peaceful and tranquil lands.they become cultured,erudite,soft and refined,fond of art as well as industry,southerners are said to be cunning and shrewd,industrious and scholarly,built as instruments of improvement of culture,they are said to be well suited for a life of entrepreneurship,for art,for industry and for a scholarly life."

as opposed to the northern barbarians that we all know are loud spoken,crude and uncouth and shits everywhere and are warriors and barbarians and killers and eats alot of bread and szi chuan mala cuisine.

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Singapore Chinese are of course very different from mainland Chinese. We have been moulded by the region for over a century and have come to adopt a different set of values and mindsets. Culturally, socially, politically, we are different. Even in terms of looks, we are different. Our habits, our mannerisms, our level of civility, are also all different.

If anyone were to compare me to a mainland Chinese, I would be offended.

Tell that to resident chink chauvinist ah jah.....
He calls me a Chinese dog when I am 'racist' towards chinks

 

[frenchbriefs]

Nigger you sure? Sure some chinese might not act like the rest but they are the anomalies. Perhaps one example would be say amos yee. Do many sinkies act like him?

Also what makes you think sinkie chinese look different? Do you know how big and varied China chinese are? Also not all sinkie chinese look alike but the worst thing and it really pisses me off is that sinkie Chinese think that ALL sinkie Chinese have to have that same look which is stupid. No single race and population looks alike. Take ang mohs for example. They have blond, brown, black hair and grey, green, blue eyes and they love their diversity. No wonder Ang mohs say asians look alike. Chinese already look pretty similar you hope they look 100% alike?

Anyway the biggest variation amongst sinkie Chinese i have noticed is that there are sinkie Chinese with the thai/malay look. Some of them especially the darker ones can pass off as malay but especially thai. Then there are the sinkie Chinese that have a more cina/ east asian look. No they are not from China they are sinkie but they just look more cina or have a more east asian look. Some of them might have say malay/thai in their bloodline but i doubt it. That's not important.

As for you claiming China Chinese don't look like sinkies well here's an eye opener.

Your idea is that all Chinamen look something like this aka a STEREOTYPICAL look:



Well you are obviously wrong. Here are some China ppl that look sinkie

Some ppl expressed surprise that Ian fang was from China and not a sinkie


The only 2 sinkies that i think don't look too cheena are elvin ng and pierre png but let's be honest you sure all sinkies look like them? Nope in fact more sinkie Chinese look like jack neo and desmond.


See so who says sinkie Chinese look different from China people? Mind you someone from say beijing doesn't represent all China ppl and Sinkie Chinese have many varieations from the thai looking to the ang moh looking to the cheena looking ones and the ang moh look ones like pierre i doubt he has ang moh blood in him. Also there are malay looking China ppl and ang moh looking ones too.





Nigger you wrote thousands of years but how many generations of sinkies have settled here? The average would be those whose grandparents settled in Sg from China and their parents would be born sinkies while their grandparents would have been born in China. That would be the average for ppl born say 1970s onwards. Those born earlier it would be their dads who were born in China. For me i have peranakan heritage so i would say maybe my grandparents or even great grandparents were born in this region BUT is that thousands of years? Look you wrote thousands of years and sinkie Chinese are probably only like 1-2 generations removed from their China origins and even fewer with 3 or 4 generations that is a very short time span. For Americans it's even longer some of them have like 6-7 generations when their ancestors moved away from england. So pls don't talk shit to me about thousands of years and trying to link with with africans over 20k years ago when sinkies are only at the most 100 years with most even less from their China origins.

Next you compare papua new guineans and aborginals with Brits/americans and english? PNG ppl and aboriginals have thousands of years of seperation. In fact they are also related in some ways to the south indians but with like thousands of years of living in different lands. The english/americans/aussies on the contary have not lived so far apart and you want to know something. Do you know how close aussies/americans/british are? Who are the US closest allies? UK, Australia, Canada. Why? They are mostly english speaking ang mohs. It is much easier for a Brit to make it big in the US compared to say an Asian whether he's a sinkie/Chinaman/korean etc. So many brits + aussies have made it big in the US cos the ang mohs accept ppl of their own race and culture unlike Chinese dogs like you.

In fact i am going to ask this back at you. You say Sinkie Chinese look different from China ppl cos of the environment/culture etc ok fine. So if that is the case it surely applies to the Brits, UK, US ppl right? Therefore can you tell a Brit from an Aussie from an American just by looking at their faces? I mean they all live in different environments therefore they have to look different just as Sinkie Chinese look different from China ppl according to you right?

only 1 or 2 generations?u do know the chinese have been here in singapore since the 1800s?in fact most of the current population today stems from a population of 1 million or so back in the wwii baby boomer days.im pretty sure most of us have grandmothers and even great grandmothers that were born on this island,that would make us 3rd or 4th gen at least.....even if we are only 100 years removed from China,guess what?none of us have ever been to china before or stepped foot in it,china has absolutely no influence on our lives when we were growing up other then deep rooted superstitions and tradition and culture.otherwise we are sinkies or malaysians or indonesians thru and thru and singapore is a totally different environment and circumstances altogether,a totally bizarre unique creation borned of the british colonial days and PAP's meddling.

sinkie chinese look different from the PRCs because we are southern chinese and they are northern.China is a huge place,clearly there is alot of diversity and permutations in different parts of the countries over the millenials of evolution.back when i worked in MBS i met a handful of very young "Tiongs" that came from our ancestors homeland,guangdong and fujian(hokkien)........it was a bizzare experience like gorillas in the mist,clearly something connected us deeply dispite our seperation for a hundred years.....their mannerisms,the way they spoke mandarin and dialect was eeriely similar to us,yet we are a different product,a product of the 21st century,westernization and soft living.it was like looking at our long lost cousins from jurassic era.

 

[HonkieSingie]

It's a well-known fact that the Shanghainese look down on all the other Chinese, including Beijingers. No love lost between Beijingers and Shanghainese. The former pride themselves on centuries of political power and nobility, the latter on their culture and economic and intellectual achievements.

Hong Kong would not be where it is today if not for the huge influx of wealthy bourgeois Shanghainese entrepreneurs after the war. They turned HK into a finanical, shipping and cultural powerhouse in less than half a century. Few know that Stephen Chow is Shanghainese, or that more than 90% of the tycoon families in HK hail from Shanghai.

That said, the Shanghainese have the highest IQ in the world, at about 107-108, higher than that of the Jews and Japanese. When it comes internalized racism (looking down on one's own race), the Chinese are right up there with the Indians and the Jews. Tough deciding who's the worst.

What a rubbish exaggerated talk. Typical of a Shanghai dog who boast their lies and nonsense. Shanghai is the capital of all fake goods and rubbish copy

Most of the richest people in Hong Kong come from Guangdong region of Chaozhou, Taishan, Guangzhou, Shunde but also with Shanghai, Zhenjiang. Go check wiki if you don't believe.

Shanghainese entrepreneurs after the war. They turned HK into a finanical, shipping and cultural powerhouse

Bullshit, they were getting their asses killed everywhere so the Brittish opened the doors for them. Shanghai can never be a cultural power not even today and it's a financial city because China made it so. They are a corrupt shameless loser, so how dare they boast of themselves.

Stephen chow is HONG KONG born. Although his father ancestry is from Jiangsu/Zhenjiang and mother is from Guangzhou but he himself had made racist/jokes movies against mainlander. He speaks Cantonese not stupid China language.





Fake Shanghai market.

Shanghai fake car company

[video=youtube;6rY3yNf-W3c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rY3yNf-W3c[/video]


[video=youtube;FtfJwMoTg-I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtfJwMoTg-I[/video]



Hong Kong is 100% real. No fake product, no fake equipment, no fake stuff


You Shanghai dogs still have much to learn

[video=youtube;eymkXV7m9O0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eymkXV7m9O0[/video]





China losers introducing and selling fake products to Hong Kong

 

[Asterix]

As far as I am concerned all humons are potential irritants and Chinks are the ones that are most likely to annoy me with their inconsiderate habits such as sneezing like fucking thunder without covering their CB mouths, talking loudly on their mobile phones in public libraries, etc, etc. Not only that, when confronted these farkers are not only the least likely to admit they are in the wrong, they are also the most likely to escalate their inconsiderate behaviour to prove that they are Chinks. In these aspects, Ang Mohs as a group, though there will always be some white trashs, are much better. White trashs are in the minority, though they can be as much of a nuisance as the yellow trashs. Yellow trashs are in the majority, where the Chinks are a majority of the population, it doesn't matter whether it is China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore or Hong Kong. These clowns can protest and cause trouble just because they are jealous of some "privileged treatment" over airport luggage! Overseas Chinese who have lived and worked in Western countries and know how to combine the best of both East and West, and who appreciate the fine things in life, like Western classical music and opera, like you know who, are a different kettle of fish. The other kinds of Chinks can go fuck spider for all I care!

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...-international-airport-over-left-luggage-saga

[video=youtube;JZlypbKfZEg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZlypbKfZEg[/video]

 

[JohnTan]

It's a well-known fact that the Shanghainese look down on all the other Chinese, including Beijingers. No love lost between Beijingers and Shanghainese. The former pride themselves on centuries of political power and nobility, the latter on their culture and economic and intellectual achievements.

Hong Kong would not be where it is today if not for the huge influx of wealthy bourgeois Shanghainese entrepreneurs after the war. They turned HK into a finanical, shipping and cultural powerhouse in less than half a century. Few know that Stephen Chow is Shanghainese, or that more than 90% of the tycoon families in HK hail from Shanghai.

That said, the Shanghainese have the highest IQ in the world, at about 107-108, higher than that of the Jews and Japanese. When it comes internalized racism (looking down on one's own race), the Chinese are right up there with the Indians and the Jews. Tough deciding who's the worst.

You need to thank the Brits for that. Prior to the arrival of the Brits, Shanghai had been an insignificant place in Chinkland. The Brits have a far better than than the Chinks in selecting port cities for maritime trade.

 

[HonkieSingie]

You need to thank the Brits for that. Prior to the arrival of the Brits, Shanghai had been an insignificant place in Chinkland. The Brits have a far better than than the Chinks in selecting port cities for maritime trade.

Although is true Hong Kong was undeveloped before the arrival of more chinks migrants, they came from Shanghai, Guanzhou and several cities in Guangdong.


This Shanghai people are very boastful. If they are as smart as they say why do they keep producing fake and cheap quality cars ?

[video=youtube;3mgt0nMovIQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mgt0nMovIQ[/video]

 

[yellowarse]

Stephen chow is HONG KONG born. Although his father ancestry is from Jiangsu/Zhenjiang and mother is from Guangzhou but he himself had made racist/jokes movies against mainlander. He speaks Cantonese not stupid China language.

Stephen's father is Shanghainese. Stephen was born in HK – 1st gen Shanghainese HKer – but spent his youth in Shanghai. He is fluent in both Shanghainese and Cantonese.

Your ignorance is laughable, were it not so pathetic. The post-war rise of HK is due in large part to the influx of Shanghainese industrialists fleeing the Chinese civil war, and on this point the academics are in concordance. Let me refer you to this first-rate book by Wong Siu-Lun (Oxford Press): Emigrant Entrepreneurs: Shanghainese Industrialists in Hong Kong.

An excerpt:

 

[HonkieSingie]

Stephen's father is Shanghainese. Stephen was born in HK – 1st gen Shanghainese HKer – but spent his youth in Shanghai. He is fluent in both Shanghainese and Cantonese.

Your ignorance is laughable, were it not so pathetic. The post-war rise of HK is due in large part to the influx of Shanghainese industrialist and on this point the academics are in concordance. Let me refer you to this first-rate book by Wong Siu-Lun (Oxford Press): Emigrant Entrepreneurs: Shanghainese Industrialists in Hong Kong.

An excerpt:

His grandfather was from Jiangsu China but his mother is from Guangzhou. He is actually 3/4 Cantonese with paternal ancestry from either Jiangsu or Zhenjiang.

Do you honestly think this guy looks Northern Chinese ?

Shanghai people played a role but they are not responsible for Hong Kong today. Don't exaggerate please.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Paging for Ching Chong Nigger Jamban Jah ....

aka jrt ..... not jack russell but jah rastafar terrier.