Bro. Thanks much for your reply. Yes, it's no longer compulsory. I just accepted my loan without any of these insurances, because my original idea was to have a life insurance.
After doing much research, I know MRTA is not the right product for me because its dead money without "extra" protections. Then I came across MLTA, which from many other sources I gathered, it is quite similar to life insurance because both are term assurance, protecting the full value of the coverage that one desires (higher premium correspondingly of course), and leaving also the "extras" in a manners of savings or double payment in the event of death. This is where I confused myself of the differences between MLTA and life insurance. Until now, I still have no clear answer. Some even claim that MLTA is an alternative name of life (term) insurance but I have a feeling that it's not.
So for your case, whenever u add more properties to your portfolio, u merely increase the assured value of your insurance? I suppose the duration of the policy wouldn't be extended whenever u add more properties right? So, at this juncture, on the assumption that I will repay off my loan in 8 years time (even though the loan tenure is, say, 20 years), would u take up 20 years term insurance, or 8 years and renew again at a later stage? Bearing in mind that I intend to acquire more properties in the future, so I guess full 20 years will be more viable because if I renew at a later stage, I gotta do check up and pay new premium based on my age and health condition at the point of renewal?
Sorry for lengthy questions ... Thanks for your time
P/s: btw, for MRTA, I was quoted 30k whereas for MLTA, the quote was 50k. It's ridiculously high for the MRTA. I don't know why anyone would go for MRTA for the mere price difference of 20k, when the 20k gives much much more protections and returns for MLTA. This is a flaw to me