• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Let's talk about Indians

Adani's Australian coal unit faces human rights complaint​

FILE PHOTO: A protester holds a sign as he participates in a national Day of Action against the Indian mining company Adani's planned coal mine project in north-east Australia, at Sydney's Bondi Beach in Australia, October 7, 2017.      REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

FILE PHOTO: A protester holds a sign as he participates in a national Day of Action against the Indian mining company Adani's planned coal mine project in north-east Australia, at Sydney's Bondi Beach in Australia, October 7, 2017. REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

Nov 22, 2024

MELBOURNE - India's Adani Group, whose billionaire chairman has been indicted for fraud by U.S. prosecutors, is facing accusations of racism at its Australian coal unit after an Aboriginal group filed a complaint with the country's Human Rights Commission.

The Nagana Yarrbayn Wangan & Jagalingou Cultural Custodians in Queensland state said it filed a complaint alleging serious racial discrimination by the unit, Bravus Mining and Resources, earlier this week.

The complaint details how Adani employees sought to “verbally and physically obstruct and prevent” members of the Aboriginal group from accessing springs near Adani's Carmichael coal mine “in order to perform cultural rites and share cultural knowledge”, the group said in a statement.


“We have endured years of discrimination and vilification from Adani, and we’re not putting up with this anymore," Nagana Yarrbayn Senior Cultural Custodian, Adrian Burragubba said in the statement.

"Adani has been on notice about their conduct since our lawyers sent a concerns notice last year, and they refused to take action. Legal recourse is the only answer,” he added.

A Bravus spokesperson "wholly rejected" the group's allegations, saying it was an attempt to stop Bravus from telling its side of the story and "sharing facts with the public about our interactions with him and members of his ‘Family Council’."

It said the mine had been operating safely and responsibly in line with Queensland and Australian law and in partnership with the majority Traditional Owner group for the mining area under the terms of ratified Indigenous Land Use Agreements and Cultural Heritage Management Plans for more than two years.

It has not received any notification from the Australian Human Rights Commission of a complaint, it added.

A spokesperson said the Commission was unable to confirm if a complaint has been received until it had been publicly acknowledged by both the complainant and the respondent.

The Aboriginal group said it was seeking compensation, an apology, the removal of offending social media, a retraction of media statements, and anti-racism and cultural awareness training for Adani’s directors, managers and employees.

The Carmichael coal mine battled a seven-year campaign from climate activists and some Aboriginal groups before shipping its first cargo in December 2021.

Adani Group companies' shares fell for a second straight day on Friday after U.S. prosecutors charged chairman Gautam Adani in an alleged bribery and fraud scheme. REUTERS
 

Adani shares extend losses after $44 billion rout on US charges​

Kenya on Nov 21 cancelled a procurement process worth nearly US$2 billion that was expected to award control of the country’s main airport to Adani Group.

Investors are also watching to see if more Adani deals could be scuttled in the wake of the indictments.PHOTO: REUTERS

Nov 22, 2024

Sydney – Stocks and bonds of India’s Adani Group dropped for a second day on Nov 22 after a US arrest warrant was issued for its billionaire founder Gautam Adani over an alleged US$265 million (S$356.7 million) bribery scheme.

Adani Green Energy, the company at the centre of the case, was down 8 per cent in early trade, and has lost a total of US$7 billion in market value since the news of the indictment. The conglomerate’s stocks have seen their combined market value fall by US$33 billion (S$44 billion).

US prosecutors have charged Adani and seven others with agreeing to pay bribes to Indian government officials to obtain contracts that could yield US$2 billion of profit over 20 years and to develop India’s largest solar power plant project.


Adani Group said the accusations levelled by US federal prosecutors and by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in a parallel civil case are “baseless and denied”, and that it will seek “all possible legal recourse”.

Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone debt maturing in 2027 traded at 91.5 cents on the dollar, down more than a cent on the day and more than 4 cents below Nov 20 prices.

Longer-dated maturities have fallen around 5 cents in two days and trade near 80 cents.

Ratings agency S&P warned in a statement that the group will need regular access to equity and debt markets given its large growth plans, but that access could now be hampered. “We believe domestic, as well as some international banks and bond market investors, look at Adani entities as a group, and could set group limits on their exposure,” it said.

S&P added it could lower the ratings on Adani Electricity, Adani Ports and an Adani Green Energy subsidiary if the companies started to face weakening funding access and increased funding costs.

Investors are also watching to see if more Adani deals are scuttled in the wake of the indictments.

Kenya has cancelled a procurement process worth nearly US$2 billion that had been widely expected to award control of the country’s main airport to the Adani Group. It also nixed a separate 30-year, US$736 million public-private partnership deal that an Adani Group firm signed with the energy ministry in October to construct power transmission lines.

“India’s renewable energy sector, a critical pillar for global climate goals, may face reduced international investment as a result of this controversy,” said independent analyst Nimish Maheshwari, who publishes on Smartkarma.

“Investors may demand greater transparency and due diligence, slowing down the pace of project financing.”

Adani Green also cancelled a scheduled US$600 million US bond sale.

US prosecutors say Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani and others bribed Indian officials to gain business advantages in renewable energy projects in India that benefitted Adani Green and a company called Azure Power, which was listed on the New York Stock Exchange until late 2023.

They are also accused of making misleading statements to the public, including US investors, despite being made aware of the US investigation in 2023.

The Adani Group is a major corporate presence in its home market. Still, Citigroup analysts estimate Indian banks’ exposure to the group is less than 1 per cent of total loans for most lenders. REUTERS
 
Can give your opinions on race as long as it is not offensive.

S'pore's approach in prohibiting offensive speech but not sharing of opinions on race, protects minorities: Shanmugam​

The approach gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam.


The approach gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam.PHOTO: ST FILE
hariz_baharudin.png

Hariz Baharudin


JUL 5, 2021

SINGAPORE - Singapore's approach, in strictly prohibiting offensive speech on race, but not the sharing of opinions on these matters, gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam on Monday (July 5).

He added that if racially offensive speech by all is tolerated or allowed, it can be expected that more of such speech will be directed towards minority communities, who will then bear the brunt of it.

Mr Shanmugam was replying to Ms Raeesah Khan (Sengkang GRC), who had asked if laws against racist hate speech here are consistent with recommendations by the United Nations that state how measures to combat racist speech should not be used as a pretext to curtail expressions of protest.

Singapore's laws against racist hate and offensive speech are consistent with these recommendations, said the minister.

He said that under the Penal Code, it is an offence to commit acts that deliberately wound the racial feelings of any person, promote enmity between different racial groups, or conduct acts that are prejudicial to the maintenance of racial harmony.

"These laws apply equally to everyone, regardless of race," said Mr Shanmugam. He shared two incidents when such laws were used.

In the first, in January 2019, a Chinese man was charged under the Penal Code for deliberately intending to wound the racial feelings of the Malay population. The man had scrawled racist messages about Malays on walls in void decks and sheltered walkways in Geylang and Aljunied.

In the second, in June 2020, a Malay man who used a Twitter account with a Chinese name "@sharonliew86" to make racist remarks against people of different races was similarly charged.

While noting that a significant amount of discussion, commentary and sharing of experiences on race takes place, Mr Shanmugam said that Singapore takes a strict approach to offensive speech and hate speech.

This approach applies equally to all, regardless of majority or minority, which he said gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, and to give their views.

Should racially offensive speech be tolerated or allowed, more of such speech will likely be directed towards minority communities, added Mr Shanmugam.

"That will ironically reduce the safe space for discussion of such issues, and increase minority community concerns for safety and security. These are not hypotheticals. This is what has happened in several other countries," he said.

"We need to be careful about changing what has worked reasonably well in Singapore (though it is not perfect), and replacing it with policies which have not worked so well, in other places."

In his reply, Mr Shanmugam also noted that the UN recommendations have similarly taken the view that the protection of people from racist hate speech is not incompatible and is not "simply one of opposition" against the freedom of expression.

The minister added that is not clear in Ms Raeesah's question if she is suggesting that whenever anyone claims to be protesting against "injustice, expressing social discontent, or speaking in opposition", they should be exempted from the Penal Code and be allowed to engage in hate or offensive speech.

The Ministry of Home Affairs has invited her to clarify this, said Mr Shanmugam.
it follows , we cannot talk about his stay in Govt subsidised housing
 

ST Explains: What are the Adani indictments, and how do they affect S’pore’s financial sector?​

FILE PHOTO: The logo of the Adani Group is seen on the facade of its Corporate House on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, India, November 21, 2024. REUTERS/Amit Dave/File Photo


The indictment wiped out US$27 billion in market value in the listed companies under the Adani Group umbrella when it was first announced.PHOTO: REUTERS
Sue-Ann Tan


Sue-Ann Tan
Nov 26, 2024

SINGAPORE - Indian billionaire Gautam Adani is one of the world’s richest people, heading the country’s largest conglomerate Adani Group, which in 2020 won a bid to supply eight gigawatts of electricity to a state-owned firm through its renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy.

That deal was what Adani called the single largest solar development bid ever awarded.

But all this was called into question when US prosecutors alleged a bribery scheme in criminal and civil charges related to the bid, unsealed on Nov 20.

US prosecutors alleged that Mr Adani and seven others, including his nephew, promised to pay bribes to Indian government officials to win solar energy contracts.

The bribes are said to be over US$250 million (S$336.5 million) for solar contracts worth an estimated US$2 billion over 20 years. The prosecutors alleged that this plan was concealed as the group tried to raise money from US investors.

The Adani Group denied the charge, saying the allegations were “baseless”. It said it will seek all possible legal recourse to defend itself.

The indictment wiped out US$27 billion in market value in the listed companies under the Adani Group umbrella when it was first announced. The group has businesses spanning ports, airports, manufacturing and energy.

The saga has hit the global financial sector, affecting businesses like French oil firm TotalEnergies, which holds a stake in Adani Green Energy, as well as some 770 environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds that hold its shares.

Could lenders and investors have been forewarned of the crisis? What implications does it have on the financial sector here?

Investors exposed to Adani’s listed companies could feel a financial pinch if the shares lose market value as a result of reputational damage, said corporate governance expert Lawrence Loh. Professor Loh is the director for the centre of governance and sustainability at the National University of Singapore (NUS).

Adani Group saw some of its bonds being put on watch for a possible downgrade by ratings agency Fitch, Reuters reported on Nov 26.

Fitch said Adani Energy Solutions, Adani Electricity Mumbai and some of Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone rupee and dollar bonds are now on “watch negative”. Ratings on four Adani subsidiary senior unsecured US dollar bonds were downgraded from stable to negative, the agency added.

Governance advocate Professor Mak Yuen Teen of the NUS said banks that might have lent money to Adani companies run the risk of these firms being unable to service their loans due to loss of business or loss of access to capital.

It is unlikely the credit ratings of banks would be affected unless they have big exposures, he added.

But 770 ESG funds that hold Adani Green shares could see their holdings affected. According to Bloomberg, these funds oversee about US$400 billion and some of them are managed by the world’s largest asset managers.

ESG funds are investment funds that focus on companies that meet specific ESG criteria. ESG fund managers are expected to take extra measures to protect clients from risks. Such funds are also available to investors in Singapore.

Prof Mak said: “It is unfortunate that this case may be cited by opponents of ESG-investing to further push back against such investing.” He noted that Adani Green was doing rather well in most ESG ratings and that was why it was included as a component in many of such funds.

“The problem with ESG ratings is that by combining the E, S and G in one rating, poor corporate governance may be overshadowed by a company’s scores for other aspects – in Adani Green’s case, the ‘environment’ aspect,” he added.

“This is yet another example of why an assessment of a company’s sustainability must start with governance first... poor governance may ultimately still cause a company’s value to be destroyed.”

Prof Loh said: “The Adani case serves as yet another key lesson in the authenticity of ESG funds and the need for better global investment regulatory enforcement and coordination.”

So far, the local banking sector’s overall exposure to Adani Group is small, according to a Nov 25 statement by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Adani Group runs an edible oil and food business in India through a joint venture with Singapore-listed Wilmar International. Shares of Adani Wilmar, which is listed in India, have fallen since the indictment on Nov 20.

When contacted, Wilmar International declined to comment.

Aletheia Capital analyst Nirgunan Tiruchelvam is already reinforcing his sell recommendation on Wilmar International.

Wilmar International holds a 50 per cent stake in the Adani Wilmar joint venture, with Adani Enterprises holding the other 50 per cent. Mr Tiruchelvam noted that the two companies were planning to sell a minority stake in Adani Wilmar to comply with Indian securities laws.

“The sale would have involved selling a roughly 13 per cent interest in the company, which would have been valued at about US$736 million. The recent controversy may complicate and delay these plans,” he noted in a Nov 26 report.

It was reported in October 2022 that Adani was in early discussions with investors that included Temasek and Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC to raise at least US$10 billion to fund Adani Group’s expansion into clean energy, ports and cement businesses.

Temasek has since let go of its positions in Adani. GIC declined to comment when contacted by ST.

Experts said the Adani case serves as a wake-up call to the finance sector and should prompt financial institutions to reassess their risk evaluation frameworks.

This is especially relevant to Singapore as a major Asian financial hub with significant exposure to emerging market investments, said Associate Professor Ben Charoenwong from Insead Singapore.

He said the finance sector can strengthen due diligence processes by integrating research with macro views, to understand underlying governance structures.

It can also develop an ESG evaluation framework that gives enough weight to governance factors, as well-governed firms usually deliver good performance for investors, as well as less negative social and environmental outcomes.

“Third, enhance cross-border cooperation in regulatory oversight. Given Singapore’s position as a global financial hub, taking the lead in developing stronger international governance standards could be beneficial for the entire sector,” he said.

Companies should be aware of the “herding mentality” whereby firms might feel that a very large company like Adani cannot possibly get into trouble. This mentality can be strengthened by the pressure on companies to engage in the green economy, he said.

“Moreover, as investors herd into the company, other foreign investors who may have less information are also less likely to go through their own costly due diligence process and instead follow the herd,” he said.

He noted that there were already negative reports about Adani group business practices.

“It’s akin to finding a hair in your soup. While one instance might not be immediately harmful or ruin that dish’s taste, it raises questions about the entire kitchen’s operations overall,” he said.
 

Whistleblower Documents Reveal SEBI’s Chairperson Had Stake In Obscure Offshore Entities Used In Adani Money Siphoning Scandal​


August 10, 2024

Background: 18 Months Since Our Adani Report, SEBI Has Shown A Surprising Lack Of Interest In Adani’s Alleged Undisclosed Web Of Mauritius And Offshore Shell Entities

It has been nearly 18 months since our original report on the Adani Group presented overwhelming evidence that the Indian conglomerate was operating “the largest con in corporate history”. Our report exposed a web of offshore, primarily Mauritius-based shell entities used for suspected billions of dollars of undisclosed related party transactions, undisclosed investment and stock manipulation.

Since then, despite the evidence, along with over 40 independent media investigations corroborating and expanding on our original work, Indian securities regulator SEBI has taken no public action against the Adani Group.[1] Media has reported that SEBI is likely to impose mere token, technical violations on the Adani Group despite the breadth and magnitude of the issues.

Instead, on June 27th, 2024, SEBI sent us an apparent ‘show cause’ notice. SEBI did not allege any factual errors in our 106-page analysis, but instead claimed the disclosure around our short position– which we disclosed repeatedly– was deficient, arguing that we should have provided even more robust disclosure. [1,2]

The SEBI notice also claimed our report was “reckless” for quoting a banned broker with specific experience dealing with SEBI who detailed how the regulator was fully aware that firms like Adani used complex offshore entities to flout rules, and that the regulator participated in the schemes.

In our July 2024 response to the ‘show cause’ notice, we wrote that we found it odd how SEBI—a regulator specifically set up to prevent fraudulent practices – showed little interest in meaningfully pursuing the parties that ran a secret offshore shell empire engaging in billions of dollars of undisclosed related party transactions through public companies while propping up its stocks through a network of sham investment entities.

The Indian Supreme Court said that SEBI had drawn a blank in its investigation of these shareholders, as detailed in the court records. In late June 2024, Adani CFO Jugeshinder Singh described some regulator notices aimed towards Adani Group as “trivial”, apparently writing off the prospect of their severity even before the process was concluded.

Background: “IPE Plus Fund” Is A Small Offshore Mauritius Fund Set Up By An Adani Director Through India Infoline (IIFL), A Wealth Management Firm With Ties To The Wirecard Scandal

Vinod Adani – Brother Of Gautam Adani – Used This Structure To Invest In Indian Markets With Funds Allegedly Siphoned From Over Invoicing Of Power Equipment To The Adani Group

As detailed in our original Adani report, documents from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) alleged that Adani “grossly” overvalued the import valuation of key power equipment, using offshore shell entities to siphon and launder money from the Indian public. [1]

A subsequent investigation by non-profit project Adani Watch in December 2023 showed how a web of offshore entities, controlled by Gautam Adani’s brother, Vinod Adani, were recipients of funds from the alleged over-invoicing of power equipment.

In one complex structure, a Vinod Adani controlled company had invested in “Global Dynamic Opportunities Fund” (“GDOF”) in Bermuda, a British overseas territory and tax haven, which then invested in IPE Plus Fund 1, a fund registered in Mauritius, another tax haven.

Buch1.png
(Source: Adani Watch)
A separate investigation by the Financial Times showed that the parent fund of GDOF – the Bermuda-based Global Opportunities Fund (“GOF”) – was used by two Adani associates “to amass and trade large positions in shares of the Adani Group”.

These nested funds are managed by Indian Infoline (“IIFL”), now called 360 One per private fund data and IIFL’s marketing material. [1, 2]

IIFL, is a publicly listed wealth management firm in India which has a long history in setting up convoluted fund structures and with previous ties to the Wirecard scandal, Germany’s largest ever fraud case.[2] IIFL Wealth was alleged to have committed fraud in a takeover deal involving Wirecard, using a Mauritius fund structure, per a lawsuit in UK courts.

Buch2.png
(Source: Financial Times)
Sitting below GDOF in the multi-layer structure (two layers below the Global Opportunities Fund), is the IPE Plus fund, a small and obscure offshore fund registered in Mauritius. The IPE Plus Fund had only U.S. $38.43 million in assets under management (AUM) at the end of December 2017, per IIFL disclosures.

AdaniWatch reported that “by March 2017, ATIL, a Vinod Adani company, had a total balance of $40.38 million with GDOF”. Thus, while we are unable to see the total assets of parent fund GDOF, it appears a significant portion of the assets of the funds may be comprised of Adani money.

Beyond being used as an alleged funnel for Vinod Adani’s money, the tiny fund had other close ties to Adani. The Founder and Chief Investment Officer (CIO) of the IPE Plus Fund was Anil Ahuja, per his biography. At the same time, Ahuja was a director of Adani Enterprises where he served three terms spanning nine years ending in June 2017, per his biography and exchange disclosures. Prior to that he was a director of Adani Power. [Pg. 5]

Whistleblower Documents Show That Madhabi Buch, The Current Chairperson Of SEBI, And Her Husband Had Stakes In Both Obscure Offshore Funds Used In The Adani Money Siphoning Scandal

We had previously noted Adani’s total confidence in continuing to operate without the risk of serious regulatory intervention, suggesting that this may be explained through Adani’s relationship with SEBI Chairperson, Madhabi Buch.

Buch3.png
(Source: Hindu Business Line)
What we hadn’t realized: the current SEBI Chairperson and her husband, Dhaval Buch, had hidden stakes in the exact same obscure offshore Bermuda and Mauritius funds, found in the same complex nested structure, used by Vinod Adani.[3]

Madhabi Buch and her husband Dhaval Buch first appear to have opened their account with IPE Plus Fund 1 on June 5th, 2015 in Singapore, per whistleblower documents.

A declaration of funds, signed by a principal at IIFL states that the source of the investment is “salary” and the couple´s net worth is estimated at $10 million.

Buch4.png
(Source: Whistleblower documents)
Madhabi Buch was appointed a “Whole Time Member” of SEBI in April 2017, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Buch5.png
(SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch’s LinkedIn)
On March 22nd, 2017, just weeks ahead of that politically sensitive appointment, Madhabi’s husband, Dhaval Buch, wrote to Mauritius fund administrator Trident Trust, according to documents we received from a whistleblower. The email was regarding his and his wife’s investment in the Global Dynamic Opportunities Fund (“GDOF”).

In the letter, Dhaval Buch requested to “be the sole person authorised to operate the Accounts”, seemingly moving the assets out of his wife’s name ahead of the politically sensitive appointment.

Buch6.png
(Source: Whistleblower documents)
In a later account statement dated February 26th, 2018, addressed to Madhabi Buch’s private email, the full details of the structure are revealed: “GDOF Cell 90 (IPEplus Fund 1)”. Again, this is the exact same Mauritius-registered “cell” of the fund, found several layers deep in a convoluted structure, reportedly used by Vinod Adani.[4]

The total value of Buch’s stake was worth U.S. $872,762.25 at the time.

Buch7.png
(Source: Whistleblower documents)
Later, on February 25th, 2018, during Buch’s tenure as a Whole-Time Member of SEBI, whistleblower documents show she personally wrote to India Infoline using her private Gmail account, doing business through her husband’s name, to redeem the units in the fund.

Buch8.png
(Source: Whistleblower documents)
In brief, despite the existence of thousands of mainstream, reputable onshore Indian mutual fund products, an industry she now is responsible for regulating, documents show SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch and her husband had stakes in a multi-layered offshore fund structure with miniscule assets, traversing known high-risk jurisdictions, overseen by a company with reported ties to the Wirecard scandal, in the same entity run by an Adani director and significantly used by Vinod Adani in the alleged Adani cash siphoning scandal.

The Supreme Court Said That SEBI Had “Drawn A Blank” In Its Investigations Into Who Funded Adani’s Offshore Shareholders

If SEBI Really Wanted To Find The Offshore Fund Holders, Perhaps The SEBI Chairperson Could Have Started By Looking In The Mirror

We Find It Unsurprising That SEBI Was Reluctant To Follow A Trail That May Have Led To Its Own Chairperson

In response to requests from the Indian Supreme Court to investigate the Adani matter, SEBI was said to have a hit a wall unveiling the holders of the offshore funds. The Supreme Court said that while SEBI seemingly agreed with our concerns over who funded Adani’s offshore shareholders, “it is evident that SEBI has drawn a blank in this investigation”.

Buch9.png
(Source: Supreme Court Expert Committee Report, May 6th, 2023)
We suspect SEBI’s unwillingness to take meaningful action against suspect offshore shareholders in the Adani Group may stem from Chairperson Madhabi Buch’s complicity in using the exact same funds used by Vinod Adani, brother of Gautam Adani.

To Date, SEBI Has Taken No Action Against Other Suspect Adani Shareholders Operated By India Infoline: EM Resurgent Fund and Emerging India Focus Funds

In our original report, we identified, among other funds, two Mauritius entities called EM Resurgent Fund and Emerging India Focus Funds. Both entities were disclosed as related parties of India Infoline (now called 360 One) and overseen by its employees, per its annual reports.[5] [Pg. 34]

We noted that the “the trading patterns [of these funds] suggest that the stock parking entities and the suspicious offshore entities may have artificially inflated the volume and/or price of some Adani listed companies.”

Our concerns were further corroborated by an investigation by the Financial Times, which found a “secret paper trail” at EM Resurgent and Emerging India Focus Funds. The investigation raised questions whether Adani used business associates as “front men” to “bypass rules for Indian companies that prevent share price manipulation.”

To date, SEBI has taken no action against these funds.

From April 2017 To March 2022, While Madhabi Buch Was A Whole Time Member And Chairperson At SEBI, She Had A 100% Interest In An Offshore Singaporean Consulting Firm, Called Agora Partners

On March 16th, 2022, Two Weeks After Her Appointment As SEBI Chairperson, She Quietly Transferred The Shares To Her Husband

On March 27th, 2013, Agora Partners Pte Ltd was registered in Singapore. It describes itself as a “business and management consultancy”, per a Singapore director search. [Pgs. 1-3] At the time, Madhabi Buch was disclosed as a 100% shareholder, according to the company’s 2014 annual return. [Pgs. 1-3]

In April 2017, Madhabi Buch joined SEBI as a whole time member, per her Linkedin, and became Chairperson at SEBI on March 1st, 2022. Buch remained a 100% shareholder of Agora Partners until March 16th, 2022, per Singaporean records.

Likely realizing the political sensitivity of such a conflict of interest, were it ever revealed, she transferred her stake in Agora Partners to her husband, Dhaval Buch per Singaporean share transfer details.

This offshore Singaporean entity is exempt from disclosing financial statements so it is unclear the amount of revenue it derives from its consulting business and from whom – crucial information for those assessing the probity of the Chairperson’s external businesses interests.[6]

This is especially important given the direct email evidence presented earlier showing SEBI’s Chairperson, Madhabi Buch, having done business via private email through her husband’s name in offshore fund entities.

During Madhabi Buch’s Tenure As A Whole Time Member At SEBI, Her Husband Was Appointed As A Senior Advisor To Blackstone In 2019

He Had Not Worked For A Fund, In Real Estate Or Capital Markets Before, Per His LinkedIn Profile

Dhaval Buch, the husband of SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch, describes himself as having “deep experience in procurement and all aspects of the supply chain”, per his Linkedin. He spent most of his time at consumer company Unilever, rising to become Chief Procurement Officer, according to his Linkedin.

The same source shows that over the past two decades, he had never worked for a fund, in real estate or at a capital markets firm.

Despite the lack of experience in these areas, he joined Blackstone, a global private equity firm and large investor in India, as a “Senior Advisor” in July 2019, per his Linkedin.

Blackstone Has Been One Of The Largest Investors And Sponsors Of REITS, A Nascent Asset Class In India

During Dhaval Buch’s Time As Senior Advisor, While His Wife Was A SEBI Official, Blackstone Sponsored Mindspace and Nexus Select Trust, India’s Second and Fourth REIT To Receive SEBI Approval To Publicly IPO

Blackstone has been one of the largest investors and sponsors of REITs, a nascent asset class in India.

India’s first ever REIT, Embassy, obtained SEBI approval and IPO’ed on April 1st, 2019, sponsored by Blackstone, just 3 months before Dhaval Buch reported joining Blackstone in July 2019.

13 months later, in August 2020, Mindspace REIT, backed by Blackstone, became India’s second REIT to IPO, after SEBI approval.

Blackstone now sponsors Nexus Select Trust, described as India’s largest retail platform of assets, by ICICI Research, which listed in May, 2023 and became India’s fourth publicly traded REIT. Blackstone has multiple other interests across retail estate.

During Dhaval Buch’s Time As Advisor To Blackstone, SEBI Has Proposed, Approved And Facilitated Major REIT Regulations Changes

These Include 7 Consultation Papers, 3 Consolidated Updates, 2 New Regulatory Frameworks And Nomination Rights For Units, Specifically Benefiting Private Equity Firms Like Blackstone

Since Madhabi Buch became Chairperson in March 2022, SEBI has proposed and implemented a raft of REIT legislation, of significant benefit to Blackstone as one of the largest REIT sponsors in India, whom her husband works for.

This has included, among other more procedural updates:

  • 7 consultation papers on REITS, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
  • 3 consolidated updates to the “Master Circular” on REITs & 1 amendment. [1, 2, 3]
  • A new regulatory framework for “Micro, small & medium REITs” [1]
  • A new regulatory framework for “offer for sale” of REITs [1]
  • New board nomination rights, allowing unit holders like Blackstone to nominate directors. [1]
During this time, Blackstone cashed out its entire stake in Embassy REIT, in December 2023 valued at circa INR 71 billion (U.S. $853 million at the time), in India’s largest block trade of the year, per media reports.

During Industry Conferences, SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch Has Touted REITs As Her “Favourite Products For The Future” And Urged Investors To Look “Positively” Upon The Asset Class

While Making Those Statements, She Omitted To Mention That Blackstone, Who Her Husband Advises, Stands To Gain Significantly From The Asset Class

Perhaps the biggest champion of REITs in India is SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch, who has promoted the asset class at various conferences.

On March 20th, 2023, she said REITs are among her “favourite products for the future” at a News18 Rising Bharat Summit.

Buch10.jpg
(Source: MoneyControl)
At a SEBI-NISM research conference a year later, in March 2024, she urged investors to have a “positive” view on REITs, per media reports.

On April 2nd, 2024, at the CII Corporate Governance Summit, the Chairperson predicted enormous growth in REITs, suggesting it would become as large as India’s GDP along with InvITs (infrastructure investment trusts) and municipal bonds:

“[REITS, InvITs and municipal bonds] can be in value equal to our entire market the way it is valued today, in others words one time GDP” [1:15]
While making these statements, she failed to disclose the obvious beneficiary of these regulations: the fund her husband advises, Blackstone.[7]

Madhabi Buch Currently Has A 99% Stake In An Indian Consulting Business Called Agora Advisory, Where Her Husband Is A Director

In 2022, This Entity Reported $261,000 Revenue From Consulting, 4.4 Times Her Disclosed Salary At SEBI

Agora Advisory Private Limited was set up in India on May 7th, 2013, per its certificate of incorporation. It discloses consultancy as its main business activity. [Pg. 2]

To date, Madhabi Buch remains a 99% owner of the business with her husband, Dhaval Buch as a director, per its shareholding list and corporate records.

Buch11.png
(Source: India MCA Records)
Unlike the opaque Singaporean consulting entity, we have more visibility into the Indian entity. At the end of financial year 2022, Agora Advisory (99% owned by Madhabi Buch), generated INR 19.8 million (U.S. $261,000) revenue from consulting, per its annual report. [Pg. 6] This was 4.4 times Madhabi Buch’s previous disclosed salary as a Whole-Time member at SEBI.

Conclusion: Conflict Or Capture? Either Way, We Do Not Think SEBI Can Be Trusted As An Objective Arbiter In The Adani Matter

We think our findings raise questions that merit further investigation. We welcome additional transparency.

To the extent that any proceeds are derived from this report they will be donated to causes that support free expression.

Legal Disclaimer

This report does not constitute a recommendation on securities. This report represents our opinion and investigative commentary and we encourage every reader to do their own due diligence. Use of Hindenburg Research’s research is at your own risk. In no event should Hindenburg Research or any affiliated party be liable for any direct or indirect trading losses caused by any information in this report. You further agree to do your own research and due diligence, consult your own financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decision with respect to transacting in any securities covered herein. You should assume that as of the publication date of any short-biased report or letter, Hindenburg Research (possibly along with or through our members, partners, affiliates, employees, and/or consultants) along with our clients and/or investors has a short position in all stocks or bonds (and/or derivatives of the stock) covered herein, or reference securities such as related ETFs or mutual funds and therefore stands to realize significant gains in the event that the price of any security covered herein declines. Following publication of any report or letter, we intend to continue transacting in the securities covered herein, and we may be long, short, or neutral at any time hereafter regardless of our initial conclusions, or opinions. This is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor shall any security be offered or sold to any person, in any jurisdiction in which such offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. Hindenburg Research is not registered as an investment advisor in the United States or have similar registration in any other jurisdiction. To the best of our ability and belief, all information contained herein is accurate and reliable, and has been obtained from public sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, and who are not insiders or connected persons of the stock covered herein or who may otherwise owe any fiduciary duty or duty of confidentiality to the issuer. However, such information is presented “as is,” without warranty of any kind – whether express or implied. Hindenburg Research makes no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any such information or with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice, and Hindenburg Research does not undertake to update or supplement this report or any of the information contained herein.


[1] To date, we have seen no public orders on the SEBI website against the Adani Group.

[2] IIFL’s subsidiary filings in Mauritius detail many investment management structures going back over a decade. [Pg. 29] Some of these funds have been described by media as “opaque” and “Russian doll”-like.

[3] Both these countries are designated high risk country by global custodians, operating in India, who reportedly drew up a list at the behest of SEBI, per the Economic Times.

[4] Cells can be thought of as a “sleeve” of the company to hold specific assets distinct from others.

[5] EM Resurgent shared common directors Rohit Kumar and Maharoof Parokkot, per IIFL’s subsidiary filings and the Mauritius corporate registry. Emerging India Focus Fund also lists Amit Garg as a director, per the Mauritius registry. He is also a current director in IIFL’s subsidiaries.

[6] It is noted that politicians in India, for example, must file Affidavits disclosing their assets.

[7] Incidentally, one party that has benefitted from Blackstone’s foray into Indian real estate is Adani. In May 2024, it was reported that Blackstone, was “all set to buy” Adani’s BKC Office space in, in a deal worth INR 18-20 billion (U.S. $215 million to $240 million). This is part of Adani’s ongoing efforts to monetize real estate assets.
 
Comprain Ceca Comprain Ceca Comprain Ceca
But then you same Sinkies have time and time again voted for Papies
After the erections you same Sinkies come here and
Comprain Ceca Comprain Ceca Comprain Ceca
I say grow some balls and shout and scream in Orchard Road or Istana to Throw out Ceca Throw out Ceca Throw out Ceca
Otherwise start shouting
Helpa helpa helpa oooooo yeeeeee Sikhs please please we beg theeeeee helpa helpa helpa us

lol
Bbbrrrruuuuhhaaaahahaaaaaaaaahahahahahaaa
 
Back
Top