• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Let's talk about Indians

Adani's Australian coal unit faces human rights complaint​

FILE PHOTO: A protester holds a sign as he participates in a national Day of Action against the Indian mining company Adani's planned coal mine project in north-east Australia, at Sydney's Bondi Beach in Australia, October 7, 2017.      REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

FILE PHOTO: A protester holds a sign as he participates in a national Day of Action against the Indian mining company Adani's planned coal mine project in north-east Australia, at Sydney's Bondi Beach in Australia, October 7, 2017. REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

Nov 22, 2024

MELBOURNE - India's Adani Group, whose billionaire chairman has been indicted for fraud by U.S. prosecutors, is facing accusations of racism at its Australian coal unit after an Aboriginal group filed a complaint with the country's Human Rights Commission.

The Nagana Yarrbayn Wangan & Jagalingou Cultural Custodians in Queensland state said it filed a complaint alleging serious racial discrimination by the unit, Bravus Mining and Resources, earlier this week.

The complaint details how Adani employees sought to “verbally and physically obstruct and prevent” members of the Aboriginal group from accessing springs near Adani's Carmichael coal mine “in order to perform cultural rites and share cultural knowledge”, the group said in a statement.


“We have endured years of discrimination and vilification from Adani, and we’re not putting up with this anymore," Nagana Yarrbayn Senior Cultural Custodian, Adrian Burragubba said in the statement.

"Adani has been on notice about their conduct since our lawyers sent a concerns notice last year, and they refused to take action. Legal recourse is the only answer,” he added.

A Bravus spokesperson "wholly rejected" the group's allegations, saying it was an attempt to stop Bravus from telling its side of the story and "sharing facts with the public about our interactions with him and members of his ‘Family Council’."

It said the mine had been operating safely and responsibly in line with Queensland and Australian law and in partnership with the majority Traditional Owner group for the mining area under the terms of ratified Indigenous Land Use Agreements and Cultural Heritage Management Plans for more than two years.

It has not received any notification from the Australian Human Rights Commission of a complaint, it added.

A spokesperson said the Commission was unable to confirm if a complaint has been received until it had been publicly acknowledged by both the complainant and the respondent.

The Aboriginal group said it was seeking compensation, an apology, the removal of offending social media, a retraction of media statements, and anti-racism and cultural awareness training for Adani’s directors, managers and employees.

The Carmichael coal mine battled a seven-year campaign from climate activists and some Aboriginal groups before shipping its first cargo in December 2021.

Adani Group companies' shares fell for a second straight day on Friday after U.S. prosecutors charged chairman Gautam Adani in an alleged bribery and fraud scheme. REUTERS
 

Adani shares extend losses after $44 billion rout on US charges​

Kenya on Nov 21 cancelled a procurement process worth nearly US$2 billion that was expected to award control of the country’s main airport to Adani Group.

Investors are also watching to see if more Adani deals could be scuttled in the wake of the indictments.PHOTO: REUTERS

Nov 22, 2024

Sydney – Stocks and bonds of India’s Adani Group dropped for a second day on Nov 22 after a US arrest warrant was issued for its billionaire founder Gautam Adani over an alleged US$265 million (S$356.7 million) bribery scheme.

Adani Green Energy, the company at the centre of the case, was down 8 per cent in early trade, and has lost a total of US$7 billion in market value since the news of the indictment. The conglomerate’s stocks have seen their combined market value fall by US$33 billion (S$44 billion).

US prosecutors have charged Adani and seven others with agreeing to pay bribes to Indian government officials to obtain contracts that could yield US$2 billion of profit over 20 years and to develop India’s largest solar power plant project.


Adani Group said the accusations levelled by US federal prosecutors and by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in a parallel civil case are “baseless and denied”, and that it will seek “all possible legal recourse”.

Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone debt maturing in 2027 traded at 91.5 cents on the dollar, down more than a cent on the day and more than 4 cents below Nov 20 prices.

Longer-dated maturities have fallen around 5 cents in two days and trade near 80 cents.

Ratings agency S&P warned in a statement that the group will need regular access to equity and debt markets given its large growth plans, but that access could now be hampered. “We believe domestic, as well as some international banks and bond market investors, look at Adani entities as a group, and could set group limits on their exposure,” it said.

S&P added it could lower the ratings on Adani Electricity, Adani Ports and an Adani Green Energy subsidiary if the companies started to face weakening funding access and increased funding costs.

Investors are also watching to see if more Adani deals are scuttled in the wake of the indictments.

Kenya has cancelled a procurement process worth nearly US$2 billion that had been widely expected to award control of the country’s main airport to the Adani Group. It also nixed a separate 30-year, US$736 million public-private partnership deal that an Adani Group firm signed with the energy ministry in October to construct power transmission lines.

“India’s renewable energy sector, a critical pillar for global climate goals, may face reduced international investment as a result of this controversy,” said independent analyst Nimish Maheshwari, who publishes on Smartkarma.

“Investors may demand greater transparency and due diligence, slowing down the pace of project financing.”

Adani Green also cancelled a scheduled US$600 million US bond sale.

US prosecutors say Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani and others bribed Indian officials to gain business advantages in renewable energy projects in India that benefitted Adani Green and a company called Azure Power, which was listed on the New York Stock Exchange until late 2023.

They are also accused of making misleading statements to the public, including US investors, despite being made aware of the US investigation in 2023.

The Adani Group is a major corporate presence in its home market. Still, Citigroup analysts estimate Indian banks’ exposure to the group is less than 1 per cent of total loans for most lenders. REUTERS
 
Can give your opinions on race as long as it is not offensive.

S'pore's approach in prohibiting offensive speech but not sharing of opinions on race, protects minorities: Shanmugam​

The approach gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam.


The approach gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam.PHOTO: ST FILE
hariz_baharudin.png

Hariz Baharudin


JUL 5, 2021

SINGAPORE - Singapore's approach, in strictly prohibiting offensive speech on race, but not the sharing of opinions on these matters, gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam on Monday (July 5).

He added that if racially offensive speech by all is tolerated or allowed, it can be expected that more of such speech will be directed towards minority communities, who will then bear the brunt of it.

Mr Shanmugam was replying to Ms Raeesah Khan (Sengkang GRC), who had asked if laws against racist hate speech here are consistent with recommendations by the United Nations that state how measures to combat racist speech should not be used as a pretext to curtail expressions of protest.

Singapore's laws against racist hate and offensive speech are consistent with these recommendations, said the minister.

He said that under the Penal Code, it is an offence to commit acts that deliberately wound the racial feelings of any person, promote enmity between different racial groups, or conduct acts that are prejudicial to the maintenance of racial harmony.

"These laws apply equally to everyone, regardless of race," said Mr Shanmugam. He shared two incidents when such laws were used.

In the first, in January 2019, a Chinese man was charged under the Penal Code for deliberately intending to wound the racial feelings of the Malay population. The man had scrawled racist messages about Malays on walls in void decks and sheltered walkways in Geylang and Aljunied.

In the second, in June 2020, a Malay man who used a Twitter account with a Chinese name "@sharonliew86" to make racist remarks against people of different races was similarly charged.

While noting that a significant amount of discussion, commentary and sharing of experiences on race takes place, Mr Shanmugam said that Singapore takes a strict approach to offensive speech and hate speech.

This approach applies equally to all, regardless of majority or minority, which he said gives greater protection for minorities by making it safe for them to speak about their experiences, and to give their views.

Should racially offensive speech be tolerated or allowed, more of such speech will likely be directed towards minority communities, added Mr Shanmugam.

"That will ironically reduce the safe space for discussion of such issues, and increase minority community concerns for safety and security. These are not hypotheticals. This is what has happened in several other countries," he said.

"We need to be careful about changing what has worked reasonably well in Singapore (though it is not perfect), and replacing it with policies which have not worked so well, in other places."

In his reply, Mr Shanmugam also noted that the UN recommendations have similarly taken the view that the protection of people from racist hate speech is not incompatible and is not "simply one of opposition" against the freedom of expression.

The minister added that is not clear in Ms Raeesah's question if she is suggesting that whenever anyone claims to be protesting against "injustice, expressing social discontent, or speaking in opposition", they should be exempted from the Penal Code and be allowed to engage in hate or offensive speech.

The Ministry of Home Affairs has invited her to clarify this, said Mr Shanmugam.
it follows , we cannot talk about his stay in Govt subsidised housing
 
Back
Top