• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Leong Mun Wai to whack Ridout bros with fresh questions in parleement

You are right.

Iris Koh, too.
For IK u had never seen any tips given to her in sbf besides myself . Were there any?
For mine, is a direct approach with blood and violence. She won't accept this kind of advice de woh.
 
For IK u had never seen any tips given to her in sbf besides myself . Were there any?
For mine, is a direct approach with blood and violence. She won't accept this kind of advice de woh.
Got lah. She learned not to repeat the alleged defamatory words in her own public posts.

Many behaved like my ex-mentor at first, repeating (correct term is republishing) the alleged defamatory words thinking that it would make the alleged defamation more forceful.
 
Somebody should ask again
- why somebody is will to pay $88million for a GCB when it was worth only $7.9 million a few years ago?
- who is this very generous buyer?
Any GCB is still available at only $27.3m?
 
LMW should paraphrase what @Papsmearer said about the secrecy of using a trust entity to purchase a property.

Just ask a very innocent question about the mechanism of using a trust entity to purchase a property that is apparently over-valued, and whether it'd be possible for crooks to use this trust mechanism to bribe a person without being found out, since the buyer's identity will forever be kept a secret. If so, whether there are existing checks and balances to ensure that every transaction is above board or what can be done to prevent such a trust mechanism from being abused. :confused:

It's a good opportunity for lawyers in both camps to give their 2 cents' worth, and Associate Prof. Eugene can follow up too.
LMW should go the other way and ask Lawless Wrong whether the CPIB was activated to investigate this transaction by Shan. When a Minister makes obscene profit from a single transaction like this, it should be SOP to activate CPIB to investigate. If not activated then what is the reason? Is Lawless afraid of Shan? For purposes of transparency, he must get the CPIB to check, why didn't he do that? It's easy for CPIB to get the bank to show who is behind the Nominee Company that bought Shan's house. This way, LMW kills 2 birds with one stone. He makes Lawless look impotent against Shan, and incompetent, or even complicit in the transaction. And number 2, he cast suspicions on Shan.
 
Well Done LMW, keep up the good work. :thumbsup:
 
1000007449.jpg
 
Back
Top