But that was in late 2012, when the so-called "Sixth Will" (
not the "Last Will" a year later in late 2013, which reinstated
equal shares of the Estate) was made:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?244311-Lee-Wei-Ling-amp-Lee-Hsien-Yang-condemns-Lee-Hsien-Loong&p=2614231#post2614231
By the way, it looks like LWL also
contradicted herself in her above Facebook post (and her
e-mails worsened her contradiction) when
she claimed that "
Hsien Yang and his wife were never informed of this extra share", even though "
It was in fact my sister-in-law, Suet Fern, who interceded with my father (when Ho Ching and Hsien Loong were overseas) on my behalf."
:*:
Also, what does the "extra 1/7 share" (which seems to have been caused by the outright gift of the Cluny Hill house) mean?
If it means that she would have received
1/7 more than what she would have received in the older wills (which gave her an equal share), then her share would be
16/42 and her brothers would
each receive
13/42 (instead of an
equal 14/42 for each of the three siblings).
But if the "extra 1/7 share" means that she would have received
1/7 more than what EACH of her brothers would have received, then her share would be
24/66 and her brothers would
each receive
21/66 (instead of an
equal 22/66 for each of the three siblings).
And according to:
facebook.com/791442864357253
("
As further evidence, I am sharing these e-mails establishing that LHL's allegations are false.")
drive.google.com/file/d/0B9jJAm-8bFh8VnN4aV9UaFRETkU/view
page 2 of the pdf file:
"On 11/09/12 14:54, Kuan Yew LEE (PMO) wrote to Lee Suet Fern:
Message Classification: Restricted
I wanted Cluny to stay with the family.
Mama decided that it would be a comfortable home.
But she had a major stroke in 2008. That makes Cluny too far for SGH doctors and nurses to commute. So we stayed put at Oxley.
If the two boys will be giving to Ling their share of the 40% that is in my and Mama’s estate, then it makes no sense to have any trust or codicil to try and keep
Cluny in the estate of the two boys. I had thought it would be a good family heir
loom for one of the grandchildren to stay at Cluny.
But it is a fancy to believe that any grandchild would feel any emotional
attachment to Cluny Hill.
So let it go whichever way the boys decide. My estate will go in three equal
shares to my three children.
If they give their shares to Ling then so be it."
View attachment 30736
it seems that the
Cluny Hill house was owned by her mother (KGC), who bequeathed 40% of it to LKY and the remaining 60% (20% each) to her three children after she died in 2010.
So in order for LWL to receive the "extra 1/7 share" (from the "Sixth Will" in late 2012) because of receiving 100% of that house, LKY would have to give her (instead of his two sons) the remaining
2/3 of his 40% share, and her two brothers would also have to
sell their shares (total 40%, which they had been owning since
before LKY died)
to her (either before or after LKY's death in 2015).
If that's the case, then it looks like the
2/3 of LKY's 40% share of that house is equivalent to either
2/42 or
2/66 of LKY's estate/net worth!
If 2/42, then 40% of that house would be equivalent to 3/42, and 100% would be 7.5/42 (or 15/84); meaning that if that house is worth S$90 million (not S$100 million, so that dividing 90 by 15 results in a whole number, i.e. 6), then LKY's estate/net worth was S$
504 million!?!?!
:*:
If 2/66, then 40% of that house would be equivalent to 3/66, and 100% would be 7.5/66 (or 15/132); meaning that if that house is worth S$90 million (not S$100 million, so that dividing 90 by 15 results in a whole number, i.e. 6), then LKY's estate/net worth was S$
792 million!?!?!
:*:
Please correct me if my calculations are
wrong. :o