- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,848
- Points
- 113
Voting does not make a difference because the Election is RIGGED. There is no reason for an Election to be run by the Prime Minister if the intent is not to engineer it.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Lee Hsien Yang
- Thread starter ckmpd
- Start date
Voting does not make a difference because the Election is RIGGED. There is no reason for an Election to be run by the Prime Minister if the intent is not to engineer it.
good point. but we do what is within our control...vote for those who stand against the pap.
Besides Election Dept, other institutions which shd not report to PM are CPIB, Judiciary and AG shd not be beholden to PM
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 103,101
- Points
- 113
Frankly, there isn't much difference between Loong and those attributes. I personally also detest narcissistic selfie whores.
Yes. those attributes are lhl'sFrankly, there isn't much difference between Loong and those attributes. I personally also detest narcissistic selfie whores.
It could be that Ho Ching is behind the tekan of LHY and family.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,848
- Points
- 113
yes but don't bank on any change. It is time to foment real change through resistance.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- Messages
- 32,792
- Points
- 113
If she
IF she isn’t behind, bet your life she added salt and vinegar to the siblings’ dispute.
Imo, she may well be the causal factor leading to the dispute.
IF she isn’t behind, bet your life she added salt and vinegar to the siblings’ dispute.
Imo, she may well be the causal factor leading to the dispute.
I totally agree with you. HC is the mastermind.
Who controls all the money in sinkieland? HC! Wouldn't you consider her the most powerful person in sinkieland?
Possibly. Even if HC was responsible, LHL must take the blame as he is the head of the house
Yes...change must be achieved through many means. Election is only one of them
as a PM's wife, it is better for her to remain gracious like LKY's wife and Mahathir's wife.
It doesnt look good on LHL, does it?
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2018
- Messages
- 29,395
- Points
- 113
Actually another elephant in the room is gecko. Dead fart knew pinky could not hold the torch. The slapping incident etc n all pinky does is fall forward. In the Li Shengwu interview he hesitated to answer the question on why pinky was chosen by dead fart. Add in the comments by Francis Seow about the Empress Dowager. One can easily assume that the succession was orchestrated by gecko. Dead fart despite being all gung ho about knuckle dusters etc is nothing but a hen pecked husband. So like father like son...but what is worse is pinky is dumber and have no empathy or humanity. And the jinx is a narcissist. Incompetent but think damn smart. But of course both are dumb n lazy (how often they turn up for work?) so they are sort of tempered by the cabinet n bureaucracy. If both are smart... singkies are in deeper shit. Will be ruled by a tyrannical sadistic couple. And look throughout history, all so called powderful men whose women are in control of the men fucks up the country. The only hope is pinky kicks the bucket soon n the jinx ends up like Jiang Qing.
Good points. Well analysed. PAP will fall. It is a matter of when. Hopefully it will be soon and LHL is still alive. Good if the law catches up with those perpetrators who abused their authority and power. Such wrong doers ought to be brought before the courts and get convicted
If PAP lose they become oppo party ... and this is a strong oppo party garner at least 49% votes and cash rich...
Bankrupt beggar TCB and his team cannot do much but soend most of their time warm seating first 4 years, a headless chicken looking for files whic the government refused to co operate with them....
So how...
Bankrupt beggar TCB and his team cannot do much but soend most of their time warm seating first 4 years, a headless chicken looking for files whic the government refused to co operate with them....
So how...
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2018
- Messages
- 29,395
- Points
- 113
Now I know what your parents are...
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,208
- Points
- 63
GLOBAL WARMING aka CLIMATE CHANGE IS USED BY GOVTS OF THE WORLD TO TRY TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF HUMAN LIFE.
NOT A JOKE.
IT'S SERIOUSLY DRACONIAN.
NOT A JOKE.
IT'S SERIOUSLY DRACONIAN.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,208
- Points
- 63
William Lind looks beneath the global warming narrative
Larry Kummer, Editor Climate change, Politics, Science & Nature 14 April 2019
Summary: William Lind takes a sharp and accurate look at the politics of climate change. In modern America, always look beneath the glossy surface of narratives in the news.
ID 37081031 © Eduard Boldok | Dreamstime. Global Warming
By William S. Lind at Traditional Right, 10 April 2019.
Posted with his generous permission.
A March 15 article by Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website discusses how global warming advocates have misused a worst-case scenario to generate panic. Titled “About the corruption of climate science”, Kummer’s article details how politicians are misrepresenting climate projections, especially one called RCP 8.5. That their goal is to create fear should not surprise us: from the government’s perspective, fear is a growth industry.
Russell Kirk called conservatism “Politics Of Prudence
”, and prudence suggests we should pay some attention to climate change, or, to be more precise, increasing volatility in weather. That is something we can observe happening. Conservatives’ belief in stewardship means we owe it to future generations to hand them a planet in at least as good condition as we received from our forefathers. Reducing our own consumption, including of fossil fuels, is desirable.
But the Left seeks far more. In fact, its goal is nothing less than total control of every aspect of human life, which we call “totalitarianism”, justified by fear of climate change. Since everything a person does, including breathing, affects the climate, if climate change is a huge threat, someone needs to control everything. That “someone” should obviously be whoever is most concerned about the climate, i.e., the extreme environmentalists and the larger coalition of which they are part, the culturally Marxist Left.
Every totalitarian ideology offers a one-factor explanation of why it deserves power over everyone and everything. For Marxism-Leninism, it was that the whole condition of man and society was determined by ownership of the means of production. The Communist Party, through the state, therefore had to control all producers and consumers, i.e., everyone. Today’s cultural Marxists argue that all of history is determined by which groups, defined by race and gender, have power over which other groups. Therefore, they, through the state, must have complete control over all such groups and everyone in them.
National Socialism justified its demand for total control by the need for racial purity, since race determined everything, and Fascism’s power derived from its theory that everyone was defined by their corporate role in society. Mussolini said, “Everything for the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state.” Italy’s congenital inefficiency made sure that didn’t happen, but it is what all ideologies seek–including the ideology of environmentalism, for it is ideology, not science, that drives those sowing panic about global warming.
Theirs is an ideology of which we should warn even more strongly than other ideologies, because, again, everything we do affects the environment. This makes their demand for total control seem even more justifiable. Add in widespread public panic over increasingly volatile weather and you have an excellent basis on which everyone should surrender their freedom. Why, humanity itself stands on the brink of extinction. How can you justify your puny desires to do as you please?
We need a global warning against overstatements of global warming and its consequences. In fact, we have been for several centuries in a period of unusual climate stability. We cannot expect that to go on forever, because we know that in the past, the climate has changed and weather has become more volatile. Human ingenuity should prove adequate to deal with it, so long as we do not block that ingenuity through too much government intervention. Yes, overpopulated areas with dysfunctional states and cultures are likely to suffer, as they will under any scenario. The solution is not to let them come here, unless we want to become them.
Meanwhile, when we hear hysterical statements about global warming ending life as we know it in a few decades, we should remind ourselves that this is politics, not science. It is politics designed to panic us into surrendering our freedoms to a new, hideous totalitarian ideology. For those who want to see how such a totalitarianism might play out, read about Cascadia in Thomas Hobbes’ {AKA WIlliam Lind’s} recent novel, Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War
.
————————————–
The Left looks at climate change and see an opportunity
Lind points to an obvious but too-seldom mentioned fact: to many on the Left, stoking fears of climate change are a means to gain power. They have been quite open about that. As Matthew C. Nisbet says in “Sciences, Publics, Politics: The Green New Dilemma“, from Issues in Science and Technology, Spring 2019.
“Progressives see climate change as not only a crisis but also an opportunity. As argued by Naomi Klein in her 2014 best-selling book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
, a climate movement inspired by bold policy proposals such as the Green New Deal, and equal in intensity to political movements that battled slavery and colonialism, would allow an alliance of left-wing groups to achieve a diverse range of social justice goals. For progressives, climate change, she argued, is the best chance to right the ‘festering wrongs’ of colonialism and slavery, ‘the unfinished business of liberation.’”
Proposals for a Green New Deal end the masquerade, proudly announcing that “fighting” climate change is a means to larger ends. See About the Green New Deal, dreams given form.
[IMG]https://www.sammyboy.com/data/avatars/m/5/5372.jpg?1506454989[/IMG]
ahleebabasingaporethief
Alfrescian
Loyal
Aug 22, 2019
#4
Got to watch this in full to understand hpw the govt is using this issue to control every aspect of your life.
Please forward to as many of your friends as possible.
Not many can understand this elaborate con. It is complicated but broken down in this easy documentary.
Larry Kummer, Editor Climate change, Politics, Science & Nature 14 April 2019
Summary: William Lind takes a sharp and accurate look at the politics of climate change. In modern America, always look beneath the glossy surface of narratives in the news.
ID 37081031 © Eduard Boldok | Dreamstime. Global Warming
By William S. Lind at Traditional Right, 10 April 2019.
Posted with his generous permission.
A March 15 article by Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website discusses how global warming advocates have misused a worst-case scenario to generate panic. Titled “About the corruption of climate science”, Kummer’s article details how politicians are misrepresenting climate projections, especially one called RCP 8.5. That their goal is to create fear should not surprise us: from the government’s perspective, fear is a growth industry.
Russell Kirk called conservatism “Politics Of Prudence
”, and prudence suggests we should pay some attention to climate change, or, to be more precise, increasing volatility in weather. That is something we can observe happening. Conservatives’ belief in stewardship means we owe it to future generations to hand them a planet in at least as good condition as we received from our forefathers. Reducing our own consumption, including of fossil fuels, is desirable.
But the Left seeks far more. In fact, its goal is nothing less than total control of every aspect of human life, which we call “totalitarianism”, justified by fear of climate change. Since everything a person does, including breathing, affects the climate, if climate change is a huge threat, someone needs to control everything. That “someone” should obviously be whoever is most concerned about the climate, i.e., the extreme environmentalists and the larger coalition of which they are part, the culturally Marxist Left.
Every totalitarian ideology offers a one-factor explanation of why it deserves power over everyone and everything. For Marxism-Leninism, it was that the whole condition of man and society was determined by ownership of the means of production. The Communist Party, through the state, therefore had to control all producers and consumers, i.e., everyone. Today’s cultural Marxists argue that all of history is determined by which groups, defined by race and gender, have power over which other groups. Therefore, they, through the state, must have complete control over all such groups and everyone in them.
National Socialism justified its demand for total control by the need for racial purity, since race determined everything, and Fascism’s power derived from its theory that everyone was defined by their corporate role in society. Mussolini said, “Everything for the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state.” Italy’s congenital inefficiency made sure that didn’t happen, but it is what all ideologies seek–including the ideology of environmentalism, for it is ideology, not science, that drives those sowing panic about global warming.
Theirs is an ideology of which we should warn even more strongly than other ideologies, because, again, everything we do affects the environment. This makes their demand for total control seem even more justifiable. Add in widespread public panic over increasingly volatile weather and you have an excellent basis on which everyone should surrender their freedom. Why, humanity itself stands on the brink of extinction. How can you justify your puny desires to do as you please?
We need a global warning against overstatements of global warming and its consequences. In fact, we have been for several centuries in a period of unusual climate stability. We cannot expect that to go on forever, because we know that in the past, the climate has changed and weather has become more volatile. Human ingenuity should prove adequate to deal with it, so long as we do not block that ingenuity through too much government intervention. Yes, overpopulated areas with dysfunctional states and cultures are likely to suffer, as they will under any scenario. The solution is not to let them come here, unless we want to become them.
Meanwhile, when we hear hysterical statements about global warming ending life as we know it in a few decades, we should remind ourselves that this is politics, not science. It is politics designed to panic us into surrendering our freedoms to a new, hideous totalitarian ideology. For those who want to see how such a totalitarianism might play out, read about Cascadia in Thomas Hobbes’ {AKA WIlliam Lind’s} recent novel, Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War
.
————————————–
The Left looks at climate change and see an opportunity
Lind points to an obvious but too-seldom mentioned fact: to many on the Left, stoking fears of climate change are a means to gain power. They have been quite open about that. As Matthew C. Nisbet says in “Sciences, Publics, Politics: The Green New Dilemma“, from Issues in Science and Technology, Spring 2019.
“Progressives see climate change as not only a crisis but also an opportunity. As argued by Naomi Klein in her 2014 best-selling book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
, a climate movement inspired by bold policy proposals such as the Green New Deal, and equal in intensity to political movements that battled slavery and colonialism, would allow an alliance of left-wing groups to achieve a diverse range of social justice goals. For progressives, climate change, she argued, is the best chance to right the ‘festering wrongs’ of colonialism and slavery, ‘the unfinished business of liberation.’”
Proposals for a Green New Deal end the masquerade, proudly announcing that “fighting” climate change is a means to larger ends. See About the Green New Deal, dreams given form.
[IMG]https://www.sammyboy.com/data/avatars/m/5/5372.jpg?1506454989[/IMG]
ahleebabasingaporethief
Alfrescian
Loyal
Aug 22, 2019
#4
Got to watch this in full to understand hpw the govt is using this issue to control every aspect of your life.
Please forward to as many of your friends as possible.
Not many can understand this elaborate con. It is complicated but broken down in this easy documentary.
Similar threads
