- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 18,682
- Points
- 113
There's no evidence that the death penalty deters more than life imprisonment without parole. Personally I'd prefer the former for myself if I were convicted of drug trafficking.I'm a staunch supporter of the death penalty after seeing what the absence of capital punishment does to a society.
The fact that process may be harsh and once it a while the wrong person may end up at the gallows does not alter the significant benefits that society gains from this effective deterrent.
This "activist" would be singing a different tune if her loved ones had succumbed to the scourge of hard drugs. No process is perfect but Singapore's tough stance has stood the test of time and the results speak for themselves.
In countries which adopt a soft touch against serious crime the violence and warfare that permeates huge segments of society is horrendous. She should just shut the fuck up.
Best Rehab is to allow the bully carry on bullying in a guided control way?Trump supports the death penalty for drugs and foreigners who kill Americans
Singapore death penalty for drugs but foreigners who whack locals get a slap on the wrist not to mention MOE now wants to "rehabilitate" school bullies instead of public caning in the old days![]()
There's no evidence that the death penalty deters more than life imprisonment without parole. Personally I'd prefer the former for myself if I were convicted of drug trafficking.
What if you were the person wrongly convicted and the appeal courts say no no no and you keep shouting helpa helpa helpa.I'm a staunch supporter of the death penalty after seeing what the absence of capital punishment does to a society.
The fact that process may be harsh and once it a while the wrong person may end up at the gallows does not alter the significant benefits that society gains from this effective deterrent.
This "activist" would be singing a different tune if her loved ones had succumbed to the scourge of hard drugs. No process is perfect but Singapore's tough stance has stood the test of time and the results speak for themselves.
In countries which adopt a soft touch against serious crime the violence and warfare that permeates huge segments of society is horrendous. She should just shut the fuck up.
What if you were the person wrongly convicted and the appeal courts say no no no and you keep shouting helpa helpa helpa.
Then what?
Say helpa helpa helpa oso no juice
Instead of killing, why not save another life by making it mandatory for the punished guy to donate their organ to save the needy? You save two lives instead of killing one.I'm a staunch supporter of the death penalty after seeing what the absence of capital punishment does to a society.
The fact that process may be harsh and once it a while the wrong person may end up at the gallows does not alter the significant benefits that society gains from this effective deterrent.
This "activist" would be singing a different tune if her loved ones had succumbed to the scourge of hard drugs. No process is perfect but Singapore's tough stance has stood the test of time and the results speak for themselves.
In countries which adopt a soft touch against serious crime the violence and warfare that permeates huge segments of society is horrendous. She should just shut the fuck up.
So will the judge pay for his imperfection and wlong leecesion and be in the line-up to be the next perrrson on the gallows.I already covered that possibility in my post. No system is perfect.
Now they added an additional cost for photo shoots in a studio setupLife imprisonment without parole is horrendously expensive and the taxpayer is the one paying the bill.
A hangman, a bit of rope and a cardboard casket are a lot cheaper.
Then you should disable your ignore button and meet ginfreely at the cul de sac.I am for the death penalty, but against POFMA. It's an easy and lazy way to shut down critics and opposing views. Debate is the way.
I don't play well with crazies.Then you should disable your ignore button and meet ginfreely at the cul de sac.![]()
Uncle, I disagree. Releasing a condemned man but with tight security is unwise and expensive. He has nothing to lose, will do lagi jialat things. A person forfeits his own life when they decide to traffick drugs.I'm in for the death penalty.
But they should fine tune the whole process.
Once the suspect is found guilty and sentence to death, he should be allowed to be released with tight security in watch, allowed to enjoy outside. There is no point to be confined in a prison and drag the whole process in awaiting death. This is the most cruel thing to do than the death sentence itself.
This is true. Maybe not releasing to the outside world as you mention it will need something expensive.Uncle, I disagree. Releasing a condemned man but with tight security is unwise and expensive. He has nothing to lose, will do lagi jialat things. A person forfeits his own life when they decide to traffick drugs.
Before execution, they can have a last meal of their choice. Some even had their favourite food during the final week.This is true. Maybe not releasing to the outside world as you mention it will need something expensive.
Or maybe they can arrange a inside prison enjoyment for him eg massage etc?
Generally I just find there is no point for the criminal themselves to be locked up awaiting a death sentence. It will just make the process more painful for the criminal and the family members.
And to do them a favour to enjoy before their last breath.