Bro, don't get me wrong. For some reason, your experience as a permanent employee in Singapore does not carry much weight as having Australian Permanent employment history in your CV.
I always advise new migrants to clock in permanent tenure even though it might be much lower grade in order to get that history in their CV before they go outside contracting or look for a permanent position that commensurates with their actual skills and experience. To an Australian, Singapore is a 3rd world country albeit the most advanced amongst the 3rd world. Australia has 10 nobel laurettes and 3 in this decade. Singapore has none.
You are now paying the price of not having secured an Australian permanent tenure in your CV or the opportunity to have done your networking in a secured environment.
Sorry to be blunt, but I recall that you were complaining about Indians in Singapore which I agree was cheap labour. Now in Brisbane, you are complaining about them Indians again. The last I looked, IT departments in Australia are pretty much white territory.
Put yourself in the shoe of an Australian Employer or an Head Hunter in Australia. Don't you think that they would recommend someone with prior permanent experience from a 1st world country. Look at the list below and based on equal skills and background, who do you think an Australian employer will offer contracts to.
1) Australian/PR White with prior permanent tenure in Australia
2) Australian/PR Asian with prior permanent tenure in Australia
3) Pommie with prior permanent tenure in Londo in Australia
4) Australian/PR Asian with no prior permanent tenure in Australia but in Singapore.
I am not doubting your skills, your ethics or your commitment. You took a shortcut and you now paying the price. You will get there, but it will take longer than most.
In engineering and where vocations requires Industry accredidation by law, you will not smell an engineering contracting terms on an hourly basis unless you have prior permanent tenure in a 1st world country. The only contracts available in such vocations are those that based on fixed wages or temp jobs.
it is not a mistake to go into contracting as i have the past experiences and certifications. DB is DB regardless of where u go, it is the communication skills that is the main hinderance. I had worked with bigger systems that are more expensive and complicated as compared to these simpler ones in Oz. If u are singaporean and u have two CVs; one is a singaporean and the other is an indian FT, who will u choose? Unless the later has a skill in a field that is so unique, it is impossible for u not to hire the local singaporean over the indian IT professional. i wont limit my skillset nor my expectation, and like i said before, some singaporeans will try to hinder your aspiration by putting psychological barrier and limitation on your abilities. Yes, your advice is of good intent, but the background of how u derive it are still based on what PAP had done to us throughout the years and that is to put down the capabilities of the citizens. i appreciate it but i disagree with your opinion on this.
As far as the comparison between the permies and contractors, as i had worked mostly in bigger organisation and public sectors, most of the permie will disappear before 5pm, and very few are willing to work overtime and over weekend. the contractors like us carry the burden of doing the works, test out the implementation and once everything is ok, we hand over to the permie and spoonfeed them. maybe this is different in sydney and melb. im not sure.
performance appraisal? here in public sector? u have to be joking. they have no concept of SLA, KPI, and PA. zero, nada, there is no such thing as business continuity plan, no disaster recovery procedure, yes, im flabbergasted and shocked. But who am i to tell the management about this?
Sensitive data? well.. i wont go into details on this due to the type of data that im handling now.