• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Jammu and Kashmir: Muslims waging jihad “in the name of Islam” taking sex slaves from among non-Muslim women

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
13,327
Points
113
In a supposedly “shocking” revelation, it has been reported that jihadists “active in Jammu and Kashmir, who had waged jihad in the name of Islam, were involved in sexual exploitation of innocent Kashmiri women in the valley.”

“The recovery of contraceptive pills, condoms and viagra from terror hideaways in the Valley draws a sharp similarity between the rampant sexual abuse of women in Jammu and Kashmir with that of subjugation of women as sex slaves by the ISIS in Syria.”

This should be no surprise.

According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive infidel women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition.



“Media reports suggest Kashmiri terrorists are sexually exploiting women,” OpIndia, June 15, 2020:

In a shocking revelation, a cache of condoms, viagra, contraceptive pills and porn was recovered from a terror hideout in Shopian district of Jammu and Kashmir. It betrays the fact that the terrorists active in Jammu and Kashmir, who had waged jihad in the name of Islam, were involved in sexual exploitation of innocent Kashmiri women in the valley.
The recovery of materials such as sexual potency enhancing drugs, contraceptive pills to avoid complications later, pornographic material and condoms from terror hideouts reveal that the terrorists were indulging in sexually depraved acts in Jammu and Kashmir under the guise of continuing a holy war for the ‘liberation’ of the Union Territory.
Many Kashmiri girls victimised by the sexual lust of Pakistan-backed terrorists were forcibly kidnapped from their houses in Jammu and Kashmir before being sexually exploited by the terrorists. The recovery of contraceptive pills, condoms and viagra from terror hideaways in the Valley draws a sharp similarity between the rampant sexual abuse of women in Jammu and Kashmir with that of subjugation of women as sex slaves by the ISIS in Syria.
According to the testimony of one of the victims of the sexual exploitation at the hands of Jaish-e-Muhammad terrorists, she was kidnapped at gunpoint by a Jaish terrorist from her house in Kashmir.
Sh said, “I was forcibly abducted and married after the Jaish terrorist barged in my house and thrashed my family members. I was married to Tanveer Ahmad. He too was beaten and forced to divorce me. When I refused to go with the Jaish terrorist, he forcibly abducted me.”….
 
Wow! For a religion that supposedly has so many rules, it seems that allah is very please with moslems who carry out banditry, rape and pillaging. Did the moslem prophet mo do all that too?
 
We don't really know what Mo did, but we do know he brokered a peace deal in medina between the various factions of jews and arabs. That deal survived and is the only evidence that mohamad exist as he was a witness to it.
 
We don't really know what Mo did, but we do know he brokered a peace deal in medina between the various factions of jews and arabs. That deal survived and is the only evidence that mohamad exist as he was a witness to it.

Looks like the moslem "terrorists" were simply following in the ways of their ancestors, the ghazi. The ghazis were simply following the lifestyle of mo and his companions, who were very successful bandits.


1592612305242.png



Ghazi (Arabic: غازي‎, ġāzī) originally referred to individuals who participated in ghazw (غزو, ġazw), meaning military expeditions or raiding. The latter term was applied in early Islamic literature to expeditions led by the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and later taken up by Turkic military leaders to describe their wars of conquest.[1]

Ghazi (Arabic: غازي‎, ġāzī) is an Arabic word, the active participle of the verb ġazā, meaning 'to carry out a military expedition or raid'; the same verb can also mean 'to strive for' and Ghazi can thus share a similar meaning to Mujahid or "one who struggles". The verbal noun of ġazā is ġazw or ġazawān, with the meaning 'raiding',

Ghāzī warriors depended upon plunder for their livelihood, and were prone to brigandage and sedition in times of peace. The corporations into which they organized themselves attracted adventurers, zealots and religious and political dissidents of all ethnicities.

Ottoman historian Ahmedi in his work explain the meaning of Ghazi:[13]

A Ghazi is the instrument of the religion of Allah, a servant of God who purifies the earth from the filth of polytheism. The Ghazi is the sword of God, he is the protector and the refuge of the believers. If he becomes a martyr in the ways of God, do not believe that he has died, he lives in beatitude with Allah, he has eternal life.

The first nine Ottoman chiefs all used Ghazi as part of their full throne name (as with many other titles, the nomination was added even though it did not fit the office), and often afterwards.

In modern Turkey, gazi is used to refer to veterans.[3] 19 September is celebrated as Veterans Day in Turkey.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_(warrior)
 
I am not sure if religious warfare is encouraged by mohamad as from what i understand, he was anti religion and was trying to stop pagan rituals among arabs.
 
I normally keep off this Keling thread but this is outrageous...the Kasmiri people I mean

the question of Kashmir, who are they?..when the British decided to divide India and Pakistan on religious basis it was tasked to a man called McMahan in just weeks ...thus he decided to do it on where the majority lives ...but since Britain took the country from kings and now India to gain freedom on Union of India basis the consent of the kings matter ...3 kings differed 1 ,The Nizsm ,a Muslim king of Hydrabahd ,but majority Hindus 2.The kerala king ,a Hindu majority poulation .3 Kashmir ,a Hindu king but majority Muslim poulation

now ,this is where the Hindus played dirty ...the kerala king was bombed and threatened to join India..the Hydrabhad king ,who was the richest man on earth during the time ,was invaded just days after independence and finally Kashmir

whether Kashmir king actually consented to join India is unclear but two forces, the Pakistan and India clashed ..so a certain portion of Kashmir under India and other portion of Kashmir came under Pakistan

now ,this where and when the UN intervened ,and the consensus was for vote by the people of Kashmir to decide by a referendum which India agreed

till today ,India refused to conduct that referendum for 60 years and not only that it maintains almost 600 thousands of Indian troops on that land ..Kashmirs live under martial law all their lives ..and rapes by Indian troops are quite common but undet martial law such crimes are never trialed

if Uighurs and Tibetans are China's victims Kashmiris are India's victims
 
India need to be separated.... bad examples for the world..

Hows that... I brought it back alive....

I normally keep off this Keling thread but this is outrageous...the Kasmiri people I mean

the question of Kashmir, who are they?..when the British decided to divide India and Pakistan on religious basis it was tasked to a man called McMahan in just weeks ...thus he decided to do it on where the majority lives ...but since Britain took the country from kings and now India to gain freedom on Union of India basis the consent of the kings matter ...3 kings differed 1 ,The Nizsm ,a Muslim king of Hydrabahd ,but majority Hindus 2.The kerala king ,a Hindu majority poulation .3 Kashmir ,a Hindu king but majority Muslim poulation

now ,this is where the Hindus played dirty ...the kerala king was bombed and threatened to join India..the Hydrabhad king ,who was the richest man on earth during the time ,was invaded just days after independence and finally Kashmir

whether Kashmir king actually consented to join India is unclear but two forces, the Pakistan and India clashed ..so a certain portion of Kashmir under India and other portion of Kashmir came under Pakistan

now ,this where and when the UN intervened ,and the consensus was for vote by the people of Kashmir to decide by a referendum which India agreed

till today ,India refused to conduct that referendum for 60 years and not only that it maintains almost 600 thousands of Indian troops on that land ..Kashmirs live under martial law all their lives ..and rapes by Indian troops are quite common but undet martial law such crimes are never trialed

if Uighurs and Tibetans are China's victims Kashmiris are India's victims
 
till today ,India refused to conduct that referendum for 60 years and not only that it maintains almost 600 thousands of Indian troops on that land ..Kashmirs live under martial law all their lives ..and rapes by Indian troops are quite common but undet martial law such crimes are never trialed

if Uighurs and Tibetans are China's victims Kashmiris are India's victims

Just like Palestine. Self rule but now kana robbed and control by zionist Israel. A living hell there.
 
I normally keep off this Keling thread but this is outrageous...the Kasmiri people I mean

the question of Kashmir, who are they?..when the British decided to divide India and Pakistan on religious basis it was tasked to a man called McMahan in just weeks ...thus he decided to do it on where the majority lives ...but since Britain took the country from kings and now India to gain freedom on Union of India basis the consent of the kings matter ...3 kings differed 1 ,The Nizsm ,a Muslim king of Hydrabahd ,but majority Hindus 2.The kerala king ,a Hindu majority poulation .3 Kashmir ,a Hindu king but majority Muslim poulation

now ,this is where the Hindus played dirty ...the kerala king was bombed and threatened to join India..the Hydrabhad king ,who was the richest man on earth during the time ,was invaded just days after independence and finally Kashmir

whether Kashmir king actually consented to join India is unclear but two forces, the Pakistan and India clashed ..so a certain portion of Kashmir under India and other portion of Kashmir came under Pakistan

now ,this where and when the UN intervened ,and the consensus was for vote by the people of Kashmir to decide by a referendum which India agreed

till today ,India refused to conduct that referendum for 60 years and not only that it maintains almost 600 thousands of Indian troops on that land ..Kashmirs live under martial law all their lives ..and rapes by Indian troops are quite common but undet martial law such crimes are never trialed

if Uighurs and Tibetans are China's victims Kashmiris are India's victims

India could have a referendum on kashmir after more Hindus move back to Kashmir. Kashmir was ethnically cleansed of Hindus by the moslems. Most of the kashmir mosques played a direct role in the ethnic cleansing, by giving logistical support to jihadists, housing them, preaching hate sermons and blaring death threats against Hindus from their mosque speakers.
 
I am not sure if religious warfare is encouraged by mohamad as from what i understand, he was anti religion and was trying to stop pagan rituals among arabs.

His autuobiography, the hadith, indicated that he was very much in favour of raiding caravans for profit.

Religious warfare and banditry against Christian Byzantine was strongly encouraged by mainstream moslem ustaz during the medieval period. Today, jihadists are using the same religious instruction for their jihadist raids in Kashmir, Central Africa, Nigeria, etc. Jihadist groups draw their religious inspiration from the medieval and dark ages ghazis, aka holy bandits of islam.
 
His autuobiography, the hadith, indicated that he was very much in favour of raiding caravans for profit.

Religious warfare and banditry against Christian Byzantine was strongly encouraged by mainstream moslem ustaz during the medieval period. Today, jihadists are using the same religious instruction for their jihadist raids in Kashmir, Central Africa, Nigeria, etc. Jihadist groups draw their religious inspiration from the medieval and dark ages ghazis, aka holy bandits of islam.
Here is the reply

Screenshot_20200620-131907.jpg


 
Maybe a good question to ask aloud: Where is the ancestral land of the Jews?
that depends on which Jew you ask! :laugh:

but seriously it's not a very simple question. the reason being that because of the geography of the area, most tribes including Jews were either nomadic or semi-nomadic. True population centers were few because of lack of water. Some point to the Kingdom of Judah and Israel, but even within Jewish scholars there is debate as to whether Jerusalem was a city or a semi-permanent settlement in the hills.

Some history points to their origins as either Egyptian slaves or mercenaries.
 
what goes around comes around.

Did the Arabs
that depends on which Jew you ask! :laugh:

but seriously it's not a very simple question. the reason being that because of the geography of the area, most tribes including Jews were either nomadic or semi-nomadic. True population centers were few because of lack of water. Some point to the Kingdom of Judah and Israel, but even within Jewish scholars there is debate as to whether Jerusalem was a city or a semi-permanent settlement in the hills.

Some history points to their origins as either Egyptian slaves or mercenaries.
that depends on which Jew you ask! :laugh:

but seriously it's not a very simple question. the reason being that because of the geography of the area, most tribes including Jews were either nomadic or semi-nomadic. True population centers were few because of lack of water. Some point to the Kingdom of Judah and Israel, but even within Jewish scholars there is debate as to whether Jerusalem was a city or a semi-permanent settlement in the hills.

Some history points to their origins as either Egyptian slaves or mercenaries.

Wat better way than to hear it from the God fearing Jews themselvews. Fm the horses mouth:



 


You do realize that this Syed guy contradicted himself.

"Never attacked other caravans" is not the same as robbing them back because they first robbed me.

You yourself said before that historical accounts of muhammad are few and sketchy. So, it is easy to learn more about muhammad from past moslems' behavior. Moslems have shown that they love to mimic their "prophet", from memorizing the quran to growing long beards, wearing arabic clothes, and of course, by his actions.

Historical moslems have raided and robbed for profit and slaves. I recently shared about the moslem ghazis, aka holy robbers. They are promised paradise by mainstream imams for robbing and getting killed while robbing. Other well known moslem robbers were the saracen pirates, the Barbary pirates, Boko Haram, Haqqani, Taliban, and Mahmud of Ghazni, who raided and robbed Indian territory 8 to 10 times.

Of course followers of other religions had robbers too. But they never quite got the same amount of religious zeal while robbing unlike the moslems, simply because the moslems were mimicking their "prophet" when the early moslems were raiding caravans for food and for profit, or in retaliation to getting robbed.
 
Back
Top