• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Issue of nurses wearing tudung discussed 6 months ago: Shanmugam

It merely shows the young helping the elderly n that's about it. It's a good deed. But anyone else would have done it too.
moral of the story::: does tudung-clad minahs carry umbrellas?
it would've been more practical if a payong was used or does the tudung come in water-proof version nowsadays? :confused:
Let them have their fashion statement.the malay girls never complain other peoples clothing.
hanor, adat vs ugama is the confusion here - and once these two issues are confused, it'll be a slippery slope for more self-entitled issues in the name of religion.
all organisations allow for friday prayers time-off, halal food / canteens etc and the younger ones are aware of these religious norms, the older folks (both malay and non-Malays) may not and think that's pushing the envelope and there will be some form of push-back if not managed well.
 
Making noise counts – The shift in the Government’s position on tudungs
"Don't ever forget that it was the voices of ordinary people, not those of Ministers and community leaders, that led to policy shifts."
by The Online Citizen
25/03/2021
in Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
26
Making noise counts – The shift in the Government’s position on tudungs


by Ariffin Sha
Make no mistake about it, your voice counts, and the Government has heard you loud and clear.
On 9 March 2021, the Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs defended the Government’s stance on tudungs in no uncertain terms. There was zero indication of there being any shift in the Government’s position
Between 9 March 2021 and 23 March 2021, there was a lot of public furore about the Government’s defence of, in my humble opinion, an indefensible policy position. There was an organic and widespread outburst of opinions and discussions – things you will never find in a closed-door session with a pre-selected list of invitees who may think twice before speaking up.
I am of the opinion that it was this outcry that tipped the scales and shifted the Government’s opinion. This is something that may be hard to admit to, as no Government wants to be perceived as reactionary.
The cynic in me finds it hard to believe that the Government’s stance had potentially shifted as early as August 2020 during closed-door sessions (more on this obsolete form of discussions below).
If that is true, it would mean that the Government’s unequivocal position in Parliament was not representative of the Government’s actual position.

If we cannot take the position the Government sets out in Parliament at face value, that is worrying in itself. If the Government’s position did change, why not announce it in Parliament?
It is also time for us to realise that closed-door sessions are obsolete, and do not serve the interests of transparency. If you can’t defend your policy in public, I doubt you can do so behind closed doors. We have an educated populace who are more than capable of holding civil and rational discussions about race and religion.
We shouldn’t be citing the Sedition Act every time someone brings up a legitimate, yet potentially sensitive issue.
This long overdue shift yet another example of the potency of the power of the people. Don’t ever forget that it was the voices of ordinary people, not those of Ministers and community leaders, that led to policy shifts.
So, next time you are ever in doubt of whether to speak up or wonder if your voice matters, remember this. Your voice matters, and if enough people speak up, it will be heard loud and clear.
Democracy isn’t something that happens at ballot boxes once every five years, it is something that happens every day. So, make your voice heard.
This was first published on Ariffin Sha’s Facebook, and reproduced with permission.
 
Don't understand the people of this particular faith... Wasting time arguing n debating over a pointless issue which serves no purpose @all...
When you're working on your job, just conformed to the dress code as dictated. So now next thing is what? SQ muslim stewardess also need to wear tudung ah? Ridiculous!
Where u want to wrap up or hide your face or hair, do so after your working hours, nobody cares!
 
Don't understand the people of this particular faith... Wasting time arguing n debating over a pointless issue which serves no purpose @all...
When you're working on your job, just conformed to the dress code as dictated. So now next thing is what? SQ muslim stewardess also need to wear tudung ah? Ridiculous!
Where u want to wrap up or hide your face or hair, do so after your working hours, nobody cares!
They wont touch alcohol and pork,,,and wear full body burkha
 
Masagos’ reaction to tudung issue seems to be much ado about nothing in light of K Shanmugam’s assurances
by Ghui
24/03/2021
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
21



Not too long ago, the controversy on the right of Muslim women to don the tudung in uniformed professions was raised in Parliament when Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Faisal Manap asked for the Government to reconsider the current ban.
Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs, Masagos Zulkifli on 8 Mar reiterated the Singapore government’s secular stance on the issue of allowing Muslim women to wear the tudung in uniformed professions such as nursing and the police force.
Further, Mr Masagos went on to say that any discussion on such matters should be held behind closed doors because these issues were delicate and “sensitive”.
He further said that the donning of the tudung “would introduce a very visible religious marker that identifies every tudung-wearing female nurse or uniformed officer as a Muslim” — which seems to imply that Singaporeans are racist or against certain religions.
Mr Masagos’ comments were criticised by netizens who found his arguments weak, especially given that our President herself wears a tudung. The saga continued with other prominent members of Singapore society entering the fray.
In a post in the “Activities at Mosques and by Muslim Organisations in Singapore” Facebook group, Mohd Khair Bin Mohd Noor, founder and CEO of SuChi Success Initiatives Pte Ltd wrote on 16 Mar that “there is essentially no other way for the issue to be engaged except in Parliament via any MP who is brave enough to raise the matter”.
“Had the matter been addressed at community levels and not behind closed doors, perhaps, the route to knock the government’s door via Parliament might not be necessary after all,” he said.
Mr Khair said that any blame regarding the tudung issue should not be shifted to the opposition in Parliament, as the issue does not “belong to any opposition party” but to the Muslim community as a whole.
“The narrative all these while has simply opened the door for the opposition to take up the issue in Parliament on behalf of the Muslim community,” he added.
Yet, this has not stopped Mr Masagos from attempting to pin the blame on Mr Faisal.
Instead of addressing legitimate concerns raised by an elected official, Mr Masagos shifted the onus on Mr Faisal for raising the issue in the first place.
“He dwells on issues that can injure or hurt the feelings of the community rather than inspire them. In fact, Mr Faisal has used many occasions to raise potentially discordant issues in this House,” he told Parliament in 2017.
Given that Mr Masagos is the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs, it seems odd that he is focusing his attentions on Mr Faisal instead of the actual issues raised by Mr Faisal.
Further, Mr Masagos has attempted to tarnish Mr Faisal’s reputation by linking him with Zulfikar Shariff, who was arrested under the Internal Security Act last year for his support for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Mr Masagos said: “It makes us wonder whether it is Mr Faisal who is supporting Mr Zulfikar or Mr Zulfikar supporting Mr Faisal, or are they together in this because of a common cause.”
Mr Faisal replied that he was there solely to support Wear White, which opposes homosexuality and nothing more and said: “I’m not so sure what’s behind (the) Minister’s mind when he tried to link me to Zulfikar, and I’m a bit distraught by his effort to paint me negatively.”
Mr Masagos went on to say that he too wanted “to see progress in the tudung issue and religious matters that are dear to Muslims,” but that there was “a right time, a right place and right way to discuss this,” and that the way to make progress is gradually and quietly, working under the radar to strengthen mutual trust and understanding among Singaporeans.
However, this statement seems to be at odds with what Minister for Law and Home Affairs, K Shanmugam said on Tuesday (23 Mar).
Mr Shanmugam said that nurses who wish to don the garment at work will likely be allowed to do so once the Government concludes its internal discussions on the matter.
If Mr Shanmugam is publicly saying that tudung will likely be allowed for Muslim women in the nursing profession in the public sector, why is Mr Masagos so reticent when he is the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs?
When is the “right time” or “right place” or “right way” to discuss this issue? Who determines that?
It would indeed make sense for such a specific issue to be debated between a Muslim MP as a representative of the community and the Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs.
Yet, looking at how things played out with the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs seemingly pushing the buck, which has led to Mr Shanmugam’s statement on Tuesday, does this imply that the Ministry of Law and Home Affairs determines the parameters of any such discussions?
After all, if tudung will be allowed at the workplace for uniformed Muslim female staff who wish to wear it, shouldn’t it be Mr Masagos making that announcement? Why is it coming from the Minister of Law and Home Affairs?
Mr Shanmugam’s public assurances imply that the Government had already been discussing this and that it was going to be imminently allowed.
If so, was Mr Masagos unaware of this? If he was indeed unaware, then what is the point of having a Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs? If he was aware, why is he kicking up such a fuss with Mr Faisal raising the issue?
Is it not a case of ‘much ado about nothing’?
 
Tudung issue: Netizens question why Minister Masagos Zulkifli earlier gave “flimsy” reasons behind prohibition after Minister K Shanmugam says nurses likely to be permitted to wear headscarf
by The Online Citizen
24/03/2021
in Comments, Current Affairs
Reading Time: 8 mins read
41
Tudung issue: Netizens question why Minister Masagos Zulkifli earlier gave “flimsy” reasons behind prohibition after Minister K Shanmugam says nurses likely to be permitted to wear headscarf


In the wake of the debate on the tudung ban against Muslim women in uniformed professions in the public sector, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam said on Tuesday (23 Mar) that it is likely that nurses who wish to don the garment at work will be allowed to do so once the Government concludes its internal discussions on the matter.
Mr Shanmugam conveyed this position in response to a question from Ustaz Mohd Hasbi Hassan, co-chairman of the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG) on updates regarding the outcome of the Government’s consultations on the issue.
Earlier this month, Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs Masagos Zulkifli reiterated the Singapore government’s secular stance on the issue of allowing Muslim women to wear the tudung in uniformed professions such as nursing and the police force.
The sensitive nature of such issues necessitates “closed-door discussions” and consultations with the community, said Mr Masagos during a debate in Parliament on the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth’s budget for Muslim affairs for the upcoming financial year on 8 Mar.
Aljunied GRC and Workers’ Party Member of Parliament (MP) Faisal Manap had earlier asked the Government whether it would reevaluate its ban on the religious headgear for women working in uniformed services, stating that the rule has prevented many Muslim women from taking up such roles.
Allowing nurses to wear the hijab at work, thus, could expand the local pool of nurses, he illustrated.
Mr Masagos in his response said that allowing the donning of the tudung “would introduce a very visible religious marker that identifies every tudung-wearing female nurse or uniformed officer as a Muslim”.
“This has significant implications: We do not want patients to prefer or not prefer to be served by a Muslim nurse, nor do we want people to think that public security is being enforced by a Muslim or non-Muslim police officer.”
“This is what makes the decision difficult and sensitive,” said Mr Masagos.
It would be difficult to achieve compromise under the weight of “public aggressive pressure”, which is why a closed-door approach must be maintained when discussing such matters, said Mr Masagos.
Speaking at the quarterly engagement session with RRG at Khadijah Mosque in Geylang on Tuesday, Mr Shanmugam reiterated the position he expressed in a meeting in Aug last year.
“I told you very frankly: We can see good reasons why nurses should be allowed to wear tudung if they choose to do so. I said this was being discussed internally.
“And after that, our view is there is likely to be a change and we are also consulting with the community before we make a change,” he said.
Mr Shanmugam also said that the matter has also been discussed with the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS), adding that the views offered by MUIS “have been very helpful”.
Discussions with the community, he said, are ongoing and will take several more months.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will also engage Muslim community leaders on the issue, added Mr Shanmugam.
“When the discussions are completed, the Government will announce its decision,” said Mr Shanmugam.
Touching on the “closed-door” discussions he had with members of the RRG, Mr Shanmugam said that such discussion entailed how there are many Muslim women in the public sector and most areas of the healthcare sector who wear the tudung.
Approaching the issue only from that perspective, said Mr Shanmugam, would have led to the “rules” being “changed long ago”.
“But it was connected to other factors so we had to make careful considerations. I explained what I meant in private and we have to weigh the different considerations against each other and reach a judgment. We spoke frankly, behind closed doors,” he explained.

“A lot of misunderstandings” around Minister Masagos, Minister Maliki’s views on tudung issue: K Shanmugam
Mr Shanmugam also said that Mr Masagos’ and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office and Second Minister for Education and Foreign Affairs, Maliki Osman’s views during the Parliamentary debate have been misconstrued.
Dr Maliki on 8 Mar had expounded on Mr Masagos’ views on the Government’s secularist standpoint, saying that uniforms are meant to project neutrality and a common identity.
In the case of nurses and other public healthcare workers, he said that a uniform “underscores” the concept that such professionals “provide impartial care regardless of race or religion”.

He also cited the opinion of Ahmed Al-Tayyeb, the grand imam of the world-renowned Al-Azhar University, who had advised Muslim women to not leave their jobs solely out of being prohibited from wearing the hijab due to workplace requirements.
Mr Faisal had asked why opposition MPs such as himself are not included in closed-door discussions concerning such matters.
Dr Maliki replied that “whether Mr Faisal Manap participates in these sessions or not, I think the most important thing is a large segment of the community has been consulted and we continue to consult them”.
Mr Faisal highlighted that Muslim policewomen and nurses in countries like Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are now allowed to wear the hijab in their respective countries while serving.
Mr Masagos responded that there are “many things that other countries do that we do not do”.
“We are Singaporeans; we will do what is good … If you want to do something that they like, we must also then do what we don’t like that they do. I don’t think we want that either. We do what is good for us, our community, and our nation,” he added.
“In public, we are careful of how all of this is discussed. So, on tudung, Minister Masagos said in Parliament that the Government is empathetic, and the matter is being discussed. What does he mean when he says the Government is empathetic?
“It is that we understand the feelings of those who wish nurses to be allowed to wear the tudung. It is to signal flexibility. He didn’t say no,” he added.
Mr Shanmugam stressed that both he and Mr Masagos had both stated the Government’s position in the meeting in Aug last year.
“But because he was speaking in Parliament, in public, he had to be more general, whereas I could be more direct with you, in private,” he said, addressing Ustaz Hasbi.
Separately, Mr Masagos said on Tuesday that he was merely “reminding ourselves that we must proceed on this issue in a measured and considered way” in his Committee of Supply speech.
“We will need a few more months to work out how to move ahead,” he said, adding: “The Government will announce the decision when the discussions are completed.”
Netizens commenting on TODAY’s Facebook post on the matter, however, continued to question why discussions on the tudung issue have to be behind closed doors.
Some also questioned why Mr Masagos had given “flimsy” reasons in Parliament behind the Government’s stance to uphold the tudung ban in uniformed professions if plans to allow Muslim women to wear the headgear are possibly underway as stated by Mr Shanmugam.
Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-10.03.22-PM.png

Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-10.01.29-PM.png

Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-10.06.16-PM.png

Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-9.58.56-PM.png

Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-9.59.35-PM.png

Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-10.02.52-PM.png

One commenter questioned if the closed-door discussions were “purely imaginary until this matter was brought before Parliament”.
Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-9.58.43-PM.png

A couple of commenters said that if the tudung ban in uniformed professions were to be lifted for nurses, then cabin crew members should be allowed to don the tudung when on-duty.
“mid east cabin crew looks elegant in it. I’m sure SIA also can!” said one commenter.
Screenshot-2021-03-23-at-10.05.40-PM.png

Majority of netizens support open discussion on allowing Muslim female uniformed staff to don hijab after Minister Masagos Zulkifli reiterates Govt’s secular stance following ‘closed-door discussions’

Previously, many commenters had criticised Mr Masagos’ explanation of the Government’s stance to prevent frontline public service or uniformed Muslim female staff from wearing the tudung at work.
Commenting on TODAY‘s Facebook page, they said that governments in other countries where secular laws are upheld have also lifted bans on the hijab or have introduced the hijab as a part of uniformed officers’ attire.
Many also pointed out that President Halimah Yacob — Singapore’s head of state — herself wears a tudung, and that thus it is absurd to disallow frontline public service or uniformed Muslim female staff from doing the same.
Some also criticised Mdm Halimah’s apparent silence on the matter, given the significance of her position in the Government and as a Muslimah who wears the hijab.
Other commenters suggested conducting a survey to gauge the views of Singaporeans in general regarding the issue, instead of having the Government unilaterally assume the position that Singaporeans are against frontline public service or uniformed Muslim female staff from wearing the tudung at work in its closed-door discussions.
Closed-door discussions on such matters, according to one commenter, puts opposition MPs “in a bind”, as they end up “getting accused of trying to sow discord” despite merely seeking clarification from the relevant ministers, given how they were kept out of the loop during such discussions.
 
hanor, adat vs ugama is the confusion here - and once these two issues are confused, it'll be a slippery slope for more self-entitled issues in the name of religion.
all organisations allow for friday prayers time-off, halal food / canteens etc and the younger ones are aware of these religious norms, the older folks (both malay and non-Malays) may not and think that's pushing the envelope and there will be some form of push-back if not managed well.

Bro, this tudung issue been going on for past 2 decades. Tudung is nothing new especially this region. Is part of Muslimah attire for many centuries. As stipulated in article 152 of the Singapore Constitution:

Minorities and special position of Malays
152.—(1) It shall be the responsibility of the Government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in Singapore.
(2) The Government shall exercise its functions in such manner as to recognise the special position of the Malays, who are the indigenous people of Singapore, and accordingly it shall be the responsibility of the Government to protect, safeguard, support, foster and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.
Muslim religion
153. The Legislature shall by law make provision for regulating Muslim religious affairs and for constituting a Council to advise the President in matters relating to the Muslim religion.

Shamungam is doing damage control. Haha....actually Malays/Muslims can actually bring this case to court. Tats the last resort. Anyway, I have Cheena friends telling me the garment making it an issue. U go mkt, hawker centre...everywhere...there are Muslim woman putting on tudung. Just an attire. Btw guess what...CNA showing Hijack of SQ117 again. Islamophobia.
 
Last edited:
Bro, this tudung issue been going on for past 2 decades. Tudung is nothing new especially this region. Is part of Muslimah attire for many centuries. As stipulated in article 152 of the Singapore Constitution:

Minorities and special position of Malays
152.—(1) It shall be the responsibility of the Government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in Singapore.
(2) The Government shall exercise its functions in such manner as to recognise the special position of the Malays, who are the indigenous people of Singapore, and accordingly it shall be the responsibility of the Government to protect, safeguard, support, foster and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.
Muslim religion
153. The Legislature shall by law make provision for regulating Muslim religious affairs and for constituting a Council to advise the President in matters relating to the Muslim religion.

Actually Malays/Muslims can actually bring this case to court. Tats the last resort. Anyway, I have non Cheena friends telling me the garment making it an issue. Guess what...CNA showing Hijack of SQ117 again. Islamophobia.
A good point...and Hijab etc is Arab influence not m&d,,,that means PAP has the right to ban all arab stuff to protect m&d culture,,,and follow and enhance what the Johor Sultan has said..Means minahs and makciks can only wear baju kurung and kebaya. And men can only wear Baju Melayu. That means PAP has a legal right and obligation to prevent the Arabisation of the m&ds..,,,so PAP can and should ban the Arab words like Id etc,,,because the pap is legally obligated to
to protect, safeguard, support, foster and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.


So Pap can ban the tudung,,,,

With Arabisation, whither Malay culture?
Apr 17. 2017
default800.jpg

Facebook Twitter
By Johan Jaaffar
The Star/ANN

In their increasing efforts to become “more Muslim”, Malays are becoming less Malay. We are discarding almost everything that we perceive as “Malayness” and embracing what we believe to be “Islamic”.
ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISING

In doing so we are losing our real identity by trying to be what we are not.
In the name of religion, we Malays are questioning not only how we look but also our traditions – even folktales and the performing arts.
Islamisation is not about Arabisation. You don’t need to be an Arab to be a Muslim.
But what we are seeing in Malaysia today is the process of Arabisation of the Malays. The Malays have never been as confused in manifesting their true identity as they are now.
Islam encompasses a discourse on race. The Koran acknowledges the existence of tribes.
ADVERTISEMENT

But propagating a notion of one’s race as superior to others is not acceptable. In short, there is no conflict between manifesting one’s race and at the same time professing Islam.
Yet the fault lines began to appear in the 1970s, when the Islamic movement pressured Malays to rethink their culture. We were told we needed to “look Muslim” to be one. “Looking Muslim” meant imitating the Arabs.
The pressure is now back on to be “more Muslim”, for example in attire and gestures.
Words are also important: the traditional Malay Hari Raya has become the Arab Eid Mubarak. It is no more Selamat Hari Lahir, but Sanah Helwah. The term for the annual Koran reading competition has also evolved to ensure its “Islamic” (read “Arab”) purity: musabaqah, tilawah, ujian.
ADVERTISEMENT

The recital competition is an interesting indicator of how Islamisation has evolved in Malaysia. It was introduced by by Abdul Rahman, the first prime minister, in 1960.
Two of the most successful qariah (woman readers) were Faridah Mat Saman and Rogayah Sulong, winning the competition seven times and four times respectively.
Notably they never wore the hijab while reciting – a practice that only became custom in the 1970s when the so-called new Islamic revival emerged
Prior to that, Malay women, as can be seen in the movies of the 1950s and 1960s wore traditional Malay dress.
I am sure Malay women of my mother’s generation were no less Muslim before they adhered to the new dress code and traded in their baju kurung and kebaya for what they perceived to be more “Muslim dress”.


The Sultan of Johor weighed in on the debate recently, saying Malays should focus more on retaining their own culture instead of trying to imitate the Arabs.
Johor leaders have historically been at the forefront in pushing modernisation, tolerance and moderation. The religious education of the state is exemplary in nurturing students who are open-minded yet confidently Malay and Islamic.
Politicians have joined the fray. Former Culture Minister Rais Yatim has also felt the need to speak up about pernicious Arabisation of Malay culture. “We are not Arabs,” he declared.
Lately former Information Minister Zainuddin Maidin has written about the danger of Malays unwittingly believing that “what is Arab is Islam”.
Sadly, despite a spirited effort by well-meaning and concerned Malay intellectuals, the voice of conservatism is suppressing all discourse of reason.
Religion is an emotive subject. As the result of the tyranny of the silent majority, pleas for reason are little heard these days.
The Malays have adapted well to other cultures, unashamedly embracing traits and characteristics from abroad. But they had up until fairly recently been steadfast in protecting what they believe is their own culture and identity.
But Arabisation, in the name of religion, is changing all that. The entire culture is being challenged and society is sliding towards an unthinking conservatism and an alien culture.
– The Star/ANN
Johan Jaaffar is a journalist, former chairman of media company Media Prima and author of “A History of Modern Malay Literature”
 
Malaysia’s Muslims grapple with being ‘good enough’, as conservative voices get strident



Advertisement

AsiaMalaysia’s Muslims grapple with being ‘good enough’, as conservative voices get strident
Wrestling with criticism and what it means to be Malay-Muslim, some worry that the pressure could drive the young into the arms of extremists like ISIS. Kane Cunico reports.
Shereen Ezaini feels that people are fussing over very trivial matters. (Photo: Kane Cunico)
By Kane Cunico
19 Feb 2017 09:41PM(Updated: 06 Aug 2020 12:36AM)
Bookmark
KUALA LUMPUR: Shereen Ezaini wears a hijab when she goes out, observes the five pillars of Islam such as fasting and praying five times a day, and plans one day to go on the Haj. It is, in the 29-year-old’s own words, “living life the way a Muslim’s life should be”.
But somehow, that just is not good enough in the eyes of some fellow Malaysian Muslims.

Advertisement

Remembering her days at university in 2009, the young mother of two said: “I was at a lecture wearing jeans, and I remember my lecturer, she told me that I am not being ‘Muslim enough’. The blouse that I was wearing fell to my knees.”
Looking incredulous, she continued: “I am not ‘Muslim enough’ because I am wearing jeans? Or I am not Muslim enough because I am drinking Starbucks?”
THE FUSS
With a rising tide of moral policing and debate over what is halal (permissible in Islam) and haram (forbidden in Islam) in recent years, Ms Shereen is not the only Muslim in Malaysia who has heard such criticism, or felt somehow pressured by the voices of religious fundamentalism.

Advertisement

WATCH: What some have to say (2:58)


In 2015, concerns about growing conservatism made headlines when security guards at some government buildings went overboard in trying to enforce dress codes even on non-Muslim women. That same year, multi-medalled gymnast Farah Ann Abdul Hadi was criticised by religious authorities and conservative netizens because she wore a “revealing” leotard.
In 2016, Auntie Anne’s, a pretzel chain that has been operating in Malaysia for years, had issues with its halal food certification because of - among other technicalities - a menu item named a “pretzel dog”.


Gymnast Farah Ann Abdul Hadi was criticised for wearing a "revealing" leotard at the SEA Games in Singapore.

And during the Pokemon Go hype, the mufti of Federal Territories, Zulkifli Mohamad al-Bakri, declared that it was haram for Muslims to play the augmented-reality game. Just this past Valentine’s Day, the National Muslim Youth Association warned women to stay away from using emoticons and too much fragrance.
Ms Shereen sees such events as making a fuss over the “trivial”. “Malay Muslims tend to focus on unnecessary things, for example, the ‘I Want To Touch A Dog’ programme'; so many unimportant issues they are taking very seriously,” she said.
CAUSE FOR CONCERN?
But, couple this trend with the number of Malaysians arrested for suspected terror links, and political campaigning that has turned to Islam to woo and retain the Malay vote, and many worry that moderate-Muslim Malaysia - once a beacon of religious pluralism and tolerance - is shifting inexorably towards a stricter, more fundamentalist Islam.
According to Pew Research Centre’s Global Attitudes survey 2015, 11 per cent of people in Malaysia held favourable views of ISIS, and nearly a quarter were unsure of their views - this despite the Malaysian government declaring ISIS a terrorist organisation.

A suspect with links to a terror network being arrested in Malaysia. (Photo: Royal Malaysian Police)

Is sympathy for a more extreme view of Islam creeping into the mainstream in Malaysia?
“No,” insists GrabCar driver Zeli Amat, during a drive through downtown Kuala Lumpur. The former businessman said he has moved house some “20 times” around Malaysia. “I have lived in so many neighbourhoods. The sentiment on the ground is still good. There is no strong focus on extremist ideologies.”
Mr Zeli, 45, believes Malaysian Muslims are merely becoming more observant of Islam. He himself reconnected with his faith after what he admits was a secular life filled with mistakes. “I can see the Islamic values getting stronger. A lot more people are wearing the hijab, a lot more people are going to the mosque,” he said.
But Mr Asyraf Ismayatim is less prosaic. A Masters student of political science at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), he has been monitoring chatrooms, student forums and blogs. He feels the university culture take on a more “conservative slant” over the years.
“There are hardline comments from foreign-exchange students who reject integration, comments that female students’ clothes are too tight. Even on the IIUM Facebook page, there are some ultra-conservative comments surfacing,” he said.
IIUM lecturer Ahmad El-Muhamady, whose field is political violence and terrorism, says, that more and more, Malaysian Muslims are using “signifiers of Islam” to pass judgement on one another.
“What are the criteria that we can use to say that you are ‘Muslim enough’? It could be your dress code, it could be the interaction between genders, or it could be (that) if you are educated in the UK or the US, you are less Islamic than me because I studied in the Middle East and am more educated in religious matters,” he said.
THE MALAY-MUSLIM IDENTITY STRUGGLE
It’s this struggle with the question of “what is a good Malay-Muslim”, or “what does it mean to be Muslim in Malaysia”, that lies at the heart of Malaysian society today, some observers believe.
Research interviews among young people aged between 18 and 35, conducted by not-for-profit research centre IMAN, reveal that many are grappling with their Malay-Muslim identity.
If you want to identify with being a proud Malay, said IMAN founding member Dina Zaman, “there will be those who say we are lazy and we are this and that”. “The only (other) identity we have is to be Muslim, but we also have issues being Muslim because ‘we are not good enough’,” she added.


Ms Dina, a former journalist and published author, cited the issue of whether Muslims should be wishing Christians a merry Christmas as an example of how edicts, guidelines and fatwas can sometimes be confusing for Muslims.
“The Federal Territories’ mufti said that it is okay to wish Christians, so I forwarded it to my mother, who then forwarded it to her friends,” said Ms Dina. “She said all the aunties were very confused, saying ‘our ustaz (Muslim scholar) says we cannot wish people Merry Christmas’.
“The mufti says this, another person says that, what is what, who do we follow? Everybody has their own opinion.”
This state of equivocation and identity confusion is exactly what extremists do best at exploiting, according to Mr Ahmad. As an advisor to Malaysian police’s special rehabilitation programme, he has spent years counselling militant detainees.
The more-than-200 suspects currently detained are proof of the illiberal portion of Malaysian society, “but at the same time, we have the so-called liberal side of society and the moderate side of society”, he said.
“So, as young people who are just coming out from the university, they look at this society and ask, ‘What is going on and which route do I take?’ They are coming to a crossroad.”
At this juncture is where the extremists come in ready with answers - a “specific world view” about how Islam should be practised in daily life, disseminated via digital media.
“(Democracy) has been hijacked by certain groups trying to impose their values upon others. This is the phenomena (where) groups of people might say, ‘I don’t think that you are Muslim enough’,” he said.
ONE YOUTH’S TUSSLE WITH ‘JIHAD’
Hamzah Nazari knows what it is like to grapple with “being a good enough Muslim” - so much so that he once hoped to die in jihad as a martyr.
The 31-year-old former political journalist’s half-Malay, half-English racial heritage meant he found it hard to fit in in his early years at an all-Malay high school.
“As a 13-year-old, it was very confusing. I stuck out like a sore thumb. And in high school, we learnt how Malaysia was colonised by the British,” he said. “I got called anjing penjanjah, which means colonial dog, and I got into a lot of fights.”
Growing up with a very religious father in a conservative Muslim family, Mr Hamzah was seven when his dad told him about the conflict in Palestine and explained jihad to him. “I responded that we should go there and help them and if we die, we go to heaven. I told my mum (about it) and she was not very happy.”
Mr Hamzah spent much of his teenage years apart from his father, and says he would have been a prime target for radicalisation. Not having been taught the meaning behind the teachings of Islam “left space for me to misunderstand a lot of things”.


“When I was a young man in my 20s, I was not a very good person and I was less of a good Muslim then. I was worried about whether or not I would go to heaven,” he said. “So my friends and I were hanging out and discussing how to go to heaven, like this was a real issue for us, looking for a way to die in jihad.”
Mr Hamzah carried that with him until about two years ago, when he was sent to Palestine as a reporter in Gaza. “I believed what I was doing (reporting the news) was a good thing … I had gone there hoping to die, when in actual fact, that is not what jihad means,” he said.
These days, he strives to be a good Muslim by “being a good son, a good brother, employee, a good member of society, being helpful and being peaceful, and being a good example to other people”, he says.
But there are challenges. Mr Hamzah says he can sometimes see why one might be “pulled to one side or the other”. “You have your extremist Muslims or your ‘very conservative Muslims’, so to speak. And you have your very liberal and secular people.
“What they have in common is that they only think that there are only two sides to the conversation. And they believe that there is no middle ground. So what I see is that there is a very large middle ground, but it is very silent.”
That wide grey area, he adds with a smile, is where he finds himself these days.

MOSQUES: A ‘DON’T QUESTION’ CULTURE?
Writer and human rights activist Marina Mahathir isn’t alone in believing that many Muslims, like Mr Hamzah, lack guidance.
Said Ms Marina: “You know it is really odd, because most Malay Muslims grow up with a lot of so-called religious education. All of us are taught to read the Quran.
“But what does not happen is an understanding of the ethics and principles of Islam. It is very rote. You know all the rituals, the basic lore and all that. But you do not fully understand the ethics of it, and that is the problem.”
Indeed, this reporter’s discussion with Grab driver Mr Zeli appeared to spark certain questions in his mind, because he decided to approach the second imam (worship leader) after performing his Friday prayers at a mosque in Damansara.


What, Mr Zeli asked - among other things - was his sense of the personal problems faced by Muslims in modern Malaysia?
Muhammad Syafiq Alhamdan, a young man in his 20s who has been an imam for two years after reading Islam at university, said his worry was that young Muslims were being corrupted by modernity and globalisation.
Pausing for a long while to reflect on the question, he said: “What is hindering them (from being good Muslims) is their clothes. Girls these days, when they wear the baju kurung, we can see their silhouette from the back. So that is not good. It is sad.”
It is views like this that make Mr Zeli feel a certain disconnect with how his mosque approaches real-world issues, he admitted afterwards.
“The mosque is not being the focal point for people to seek advice. They are not creating a friendly environment. It is still about, ‘Oh, you cannot do this or you cannot do that,’” he said.
Mr Hamzah calls this a culture of “don’t question” which is common in the Muslim community.
ISIS TURNS ON ‘YO, BRO’ APPEAL
And so, younger Muslims are turning instead to social media and messaging apps with questions about the issues that affect them.
Trawling through Twitter, WhatsApp and other platforms, IMAN’s research team found that their questions involved everyday problems such as, “my husband was really lazy today, or, I do not know how to deal with my boss,” noted Ms Dina.
Everyone turns to social media, she said, because “there are no alternative spaces to ask”.
And this is where groups like ISIS turn on the appeal, reaching out with slick material and advice.


“It appeals to the young, because they feel ‘these guys are not talking down to me, they sit with me and they accept me’,” said Ms Dina.
“Our researchers who have dealt with ISIS members say that they can sit down over Skype or tea, and they can talk and talk, like a ‘yo, bro’ session.
“They will say things like, ‘You have problems with your girlfriend? Let’s talk.’”
Ms Dina said she knew of someone who was asked to join ISIS but declined. “They said, ‘Fine, we are not going to pressure you.’ And people appreciate that (approach), because they are not pressured to be ‘the good Muslim’.”
POLITICS, SOCIAL MEDIA AND ‘ARABISATION’
A part of that pressure has been driven by the accelerating politicisation of Islam in recent years, in Malaysia.
After the ruling Barisan National’s poor showings in the 2008 and 2013 elections, the coalition has been trying to reconnect with the Malay voter by appealing to religion. For example, last year, the United Malays National Organisation aided its long-time rival, the Islamic party PAS, to fast-track a Bill that would allow Kelantan’s Islamic courts to enforce stricter punishments.
Ms Marina said: “The politicisation of Islam has been going on for a long time. The thing is that nowadays, it is weaponised through laws.”

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak at a rally addressing ethnic Rohingya Muslim refugees in Kuala Lumpur last December. (Photo: AFP)

Observers agree that conservatism and the Islamisation of society has been a long and slow-building thing.
“It has always been here, but it is just coming to the surface,” said Mr Hamzah. “Social media and the Internet have allowed people to express themselves. Before, people were very limited in whom they could share their opinions with.”
This conservatism - the influence of a more “Arabised” form of Islam - is eroding Malay culture, says Ms Marina.
According to scholars like Dr Ahmad Fauzi, the ‘Arabisation’ or ‘Salifisation’ of culture and religion in Malaysia has its roots in the 1980s, when Muslims from Malaysia and other developing countries studied in Saudi Arabia on scholarships funded by Sunni Saudi donors. Dr Ahmad Fauzi says this exposed many to a more “intolerant and exclusivist” form of Islam, and those former scholars now fill leadership positions in Malaysian society.
Said Ms Marina: “I know one young woman who is doing traditional dance and she is fabulous at it, but she feels so much pressure to stop (as) it is considered un-Islamic, because she performs it without her headscarf.”
She added: “Today, we ourselves do not know that much about our own culture. Many Malays, if you ask them who are the great Malay writers, they probably cannot name them. We are losing a lot of the Malay arts, in Kelantan for instance, the dikir barat (a musical form of Malay group singing, dance and percussion).”


THE PROBLEM OF THE JUDGMENTAL MUSLIM
Not all of it is about religion, believes Ms Marina, who advocates for justice and equality for Muslim women through Sisters In Islam. Particularly when the criticism pertains to women who have dared to forge a path.
Calling it the “tall poppy syndrome” among “anonymous males”, she said: “If someone is achieving something you have to bring them down. It is a very sad phenomenon.
“Like (indie-pop and R&B artiste) Yuna. She is doing so well, but wow, one hug from Usher and boom, you know, it is like she is going to hell; and little bit of hair, oh, she is going to hell.”
“People always find something (to complain about, and it is) always directed at women. It is easy for them to say this online. The other day I launched an online quiz for Muslim women to know their rights. There were photos of us. You look at the comments: ‘Tudung mana? Where is your headscarf?’” said Ms Marina.
Mr Hamzah hopes all the criticism and negativity does not perpetuate stereotypes. “I think the biggest misconception that people have of Malay Muslims is that we are confrontational and we are judgmental.
“I don’t believe that is true. I think that there are a few people who are… very narrow-minded in their view of what Islam is, and those people are very loud.”
To Mr Ahmad, such voices pose a threat to pluralism in Malaysian. “The majority of Muslims in this country are tolerant of other people, and they want to live side by side with others to build this country,” he said.
“But suddenly we find out that there are certain people who are not really tolerant and take the extreme position on certain issues. When we allow these kinds of groups to function or to dictate state policy, then we run into trouble.”


MALAYSIA IS WHAT YOU SEE AT THE COFFEESHOP
Where does all this leave people like Ms Shereen, Mr Hamzah or Mr Zeli feeling?
All are optimistic that, at the end of the day, Malaysia’s cultural diversity will be the bulwark against any shift toward religious extremism.
Said Mr Zeli: “Politics in Malaysia, at the moment, it does not look good. But we are still peace-loving people. We are moderate Muslims, and it means we are not extremists. I still think we are quite flexible in a way because we are a multicultural country.”
Ms Marina agrees. “If you just go by government policies, (it may look) like we are becoming less and less moderate. But when you look on the ground, I still have faith in people… because I think they see beyond this sort of game. I think they understand what it's about and they are not going to fall for it.”
The best representation of Malaysia, said Mr Hamzah, is “the diverse groups of Chinese, Indians and Malays sitting at the coffee shop watching football together. Or the diverse groups at weddings. It does not get better than that”.
As for Ms Shereen, she still feels disturbed by how much negative judgement is levied by the conservative-minded who, in her view, are “misinformed or uninformed”. But she believes things can get better.
“These people who are trying to preach a more extreme form of Islam, they are just the minority. I am optimistic that at the end of the day, these people will learn and change. If they do not change, they will be left behind.”
Additional reporting by Nadia Samdin and Mysara Aljaru
 
Worries about Malaysia's 'Arabisation' grow as Saudi ties strengthen
By Tavleen Tarrant, Joseph Sipalan

7 MIN READ


Kuala Lumpur (Reuters) - Malaysia’s growing ties to Saudi Arabia - and its puritan Salafi-Wahhabi Islamic doctrines - are coming under new scrutiny as concerns grow over an erosion of traditional religious practices and culture in the multi-ethnic nation.


FILE PHOTO: Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak inspects the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) youth during the annual assembly at the Putra World Trade Centre in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 10, 2015. REUTERS/Olivia Harris/File Photo
A string of recent events has fueled the concern. Hostility toward atheists, non-believers and the gay community has risen. Two annual beer festivals were canceled after Islamic leaders objected. A hardline preacher, accused of spreading hatred in India, has received official patronage.

The government has backed a parliamentary bill that would allow the shariah court wider criminal jurisdiction over Muslims in the state of Kelantan. And after religious officials supported a Muslim-only laundromat, Malaysia’s mostly ceremonial royalty made a rare public intervention, calling for religious harmony.

Marina Mahathir, the daughter of Malaysia’s longest serving prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, publicly lashed out at the government for allowing the “Arabisation” of Malaysia.

Marina, who heads the civil rights group Sisters in Islam, told Reuters Saudi influence on Islam in Malaysia “has come at the expense of traditional Malay culture”. Her father, 93, now heads the opposition alliance.

Saudi Arabia’s fundamentalist Wahhabi beliefs have strongly influenced Malaysia – and neighboring Indonesia - for decades, but have strengthened considerably since Najib became prime minister in 2009 and began cozying up to the kingdom.

The relationship came under a harsh spotlight when nearly $700 million wound up in Najib’s bank account in 2013. Najib said it was a donation from the Saudi Royal family, rebutting allegations it was money siphoned from the 1MDB state investment fund he had founded and overseen. Malaysia’s attorney-general cleared him of any wrongdoing.

ADVERTISEMENT


The trend toward a politicized brand of Islam in Malaysia, a middle-income emerging market, has alarmed Malaysia’s non-Muslims, including ethnic Chinese who comprise a quarter of the population and dominate private sector commerce. It is also a concern for foreign investors, who account for nearly half the local bond market and have invested $8.95 billion in project investments in the first nine months of this year.

The government denies actively promoting Wahhabi-style Islamic conservatism.

Najib has been largely silent about the recent religious controversies. Critics have accused the prime minister, whose governing coalition lost the popular vote in the last general election but retained a simple majority in parliament, of playing on fears that Islam and Malay political power will be eroded should the opposition win. An election is due by mid-2018.

ELECTION CALCULATIONS
Militancy has also been on the rise in Malaysia, which from 2013 to 2016 had arrested more than 250 people with alleged ties to Islamic State, many of whom were indoctrinated with hardline interpretations of Islam.

After the visit of the Saudi monarch this year, Malaysia announced plans to build the King Salman Centre for International Peace to bring together Islamic scholars and intelligence agencies in an effort to counter extremist interpretations of Islam.


The center, which is being built on a 16-hectare (40-acre) plot in the administrative capital of Putrajaya, will draw on the resources of the Saudi-financed Islamic Science University of Malaysia, and the Muslim World League, a Wahhabi Saudi religious body.

Saudi Arabia has long been funding mosques and schools in Malaysia, while providing scholarships for Malaysians to study in the kingdom. Many of them find employment in Malaysia’s multitude of Islamic agencies, said Farouk Musa, chairman and director of the moderate think-tank, Islamic Renaissance Front.

One of the most worrisome doctrines they preach in multi-cultural Malaysia is ‘al-w ala’ wa-al-bara’ or “allegiance and disavowal”, Farouk said. “This doctrine basically means do not befriend the non-believers (al-kuffar), even if they are among the closest relatives.

“We have never heard of Islamic scholars forbidding Muslims to wish Merry Christmas before, for example. Now, this is a common phenomenon,” he said.

The adoption of Arab culture and interpretations of Islam is a result of greater exposure to Middle Eastern people and universities, said Abdul Aziz Kaprawi, a member of the Supreme Council of Najib’s political party, the United Malay National Organisation.

“The extensive usage of social media also accelerated the external influence on the locals,” he told Reuters.

ADVERTISEMENT


The government is not promoting Wahhabism but rather the doctrine of “wasatiyyah”, or moderation and balance, to accommodate Malaysia’s multi-cultural society, said Abdul Aziz, who is also a federal deputy minister.

CROWN PRINCE’S REFORMS?
Karima Bennoune, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for cultural rights, expressed concern in a report after her September visit to Malaysia about the deepening involvement of religious authorities in policy decisions. She said this was influenced by “a hegemonic version of Islam imported from the Arabian Peninsula” that was “at odds with local forms of practice.”

She also expressed concern about “the banning of books, including some about moderate and progressive Islam, in the country when the government extols these very concepts abroad”.

Marina Mahathir said religious departments, staffed with Saudi graduates, “are now consulted on absolutely everything, from movies to health and medicine to insurance, all sorts of things that they do not necessarily have any expertise in”.

The kingdom also exerts leverage over Muslim-majority countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia through the quotas it gives to countries for the number of pilgrims they can send on the Hajj, one of the five pillars of Islam that all capable Muslims must perform at least once in their lives.

ADVERTISEMENT


This could all start to change if Saudi Arabia’s powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman succeeds in returning the Saudi kingdom to “a moderate Islam,” which he says was practiced before 1979.

He has already scaled back the role of religious police, permitted public concerts and announced women will be allowed to drive.

The kingdom has also set up an authority to scrutinize uses of the “hadith” – accounts of the sayings, actions or habits of the Prophet – to prevent them being used to justify violence or terrorism.

(This story has been corrected to clarify bill on Islamic law and remove reference to stoning and amputations in paragraph 3)

Editing by Bill Tarrant

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

MORE FROM REUTERS


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-malaysia-politics-religion-analysis-idUSKBN1EF103
 
Arabisation and the threat to Singapore culture — Norshahril Saat
Thursday, 16 Aug 2018 09:41 AM MYT


Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on news you need to know.

AUGUST 16 — In Indonesia, there is an ongoing movement that promotes Islam Nusantara (Archipelagic Islam), a localised brand of Islam.


The country’s largest Islamic organisation, Nahdlatul Ulama, is championing the discourse. Recently, the West Sumatra chapter of the Ulama Council of Indonesia openly voiced its displeasure with Islam Nusantara, declaring that Islam is already perfect.

Promoters of Islam Nusantara are clear of its objective: to prevent the excessive borrowing of foreign ideas into the Indonesian Islamic discourse.

Their top concern is rising radicalism and the importation of Middle Eastern culture at the expense of local norms, a phenomenon referred to as Arabisation.


Unfortunately, the Malay/Muslim community in Singapore does not seem interested in this whole Islam Nusantara debate, even though a trend towards Arabisation is evident.


ADVERTISING


A segment of the community is relegating its own culture and heritage while opting for Arabic culture and lifestyle. Malays are evidently more comfortable wearing Arabic-style garments compared to their traditional baju Melayu.

More Malay women are putting on the niqab, the head dress that covers the face, revealing only the eyes.

Arabic phrases are preferred by some over their Malay equivalents: For example, hijab to replace tudung (headscarf), Eidul Fitri rather than hari raya (a day of celebration after the fasting month of Ramadan), and syukran instead of terima kasih (thank you).

Should we be concerned that Singapore Malays are losing interest in their culture and gravitating towards the Arabic lifestyle? Yes, but only if it leads to exclusivism.

Malays and inclusivity

Singapore Malays have always been known for being inclusive.

Unlike how race has been commonly understood in Singapore — the CMIO model, which represents the Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Others categories — a Malay is more than a racial category, it is also a cultural one.

Thus, the community accepts Arabs, Indians, Pakistanis and Chinese as Malays if they choose to live their lives as Malays and find an attachment to their language, values and cultural practices.

In 2017, in a survey of 2002 Singaporeans conducted by Institute of Policy Studies, 96 per cent of the Malay respondents ranked the ability to read, write and speak Malay, converse in basic Malay, and celebrate Hari Raya Puasa as important identity markers.

The majority of Malays also consider Islam a core element of their identity. In the same survey, 93.3 per cent of Malays believed that it is important or somewhat important for them to be Muslims.

In this modern day and age, no community is free from external influence.

For example, some netizens have expressed unhappiness at the state of Bazaar Geylang Serai, which is held every year during the fasting month. Traditionally, the bazaar is attended mainly by Malays in preparation for the Hari Raya Puasa festival, including buying traditional Malay clothes, cakes, and furniture.

But in recent years, the bazaar has featured “hipster” dishes and drinks which are alien to the community.

Some examples include meatballs, churros, a fried dough treat of Iberian origin, and raclette, a variety of cheese that is usually melted. The sale of these products in what has traditionally been a bazaar featuring Malay dishes, clothing and trinkets, among others, has drawn flak from the more conservative segments in the community.

Still, there is no way to stop society from following contemporary trends and fashion. Singaporeans have adopted foreign cultures - Korean music, Japanese cuisine and Western dress, among many - and the Arabic way of life is no exception.

Following Arabic trends and fashion is not a concern unless it is equated with the level of piety. For example, one should be concerned if someone says you cannot lead prayers in a mosque if you do not put on an Arabic-style garment.

Nevertheless, the real threat is not Arabisation per se, but how it may lead to exclusivism.

Over the years, Malay culture has evolved and adapted to meet contemporary needs. Islam came to the Malay world as early as the 13th century, and the religion was neutral towards many Malay cultural practices.

For example, rituals conducted during Malay weddings, such as the merenjis (sprinkling ceremony to bless the couple and ward off evil spirits), might have originated from Hinduism, yet the religious elites of the past did not censure them simply because they were not found in the Quran or hadith (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad).

However, these days, there are some who view Malay music, dress, dance, and arts as not conforming to Islam, by which they are referring to its Arabised form.

For example, the baju kebaya is not commonly worn by Malay women anymore. Instead, many are opting for the abayas worn by the Arabs. Increasingly, more women are also wearing the niqab. Such outfits, alien to Malays 50 years ago, are now a more common sight.

This cultural erosion was cited as one of three challenges faced by Singapore’s Malay/Muslim community by Minister Masagos Zulkifli earlier this year. It is a theme he has spoken of before.

Radicals who espouse violence are not the only threat - non-violent exclusivists are, too.

For instance, groups which promote the way Islam is practised in Singapore - which stresses tolerance and harmony in a multi-cultural society - are openly criticised by exclusivists. Such criticisms are especially common on social media.

There have also been instances in which groups actively discussing Western philosophy, theories, and development models are publicly castigated.

To be sure, there are arguments to be made over whether Western ideals and ideas ought to be adopted by Asian societies, but that is a subject for another debate.

Countering exclusivism is pressing issue that needs to be discussed by the community before its heritage is erased in the name of religion. — TODAY

* Norshahril Saat is Fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and author of Tradition and Islamic Learning: Singapore Students in the Al-Azhar University. This article is based on a recent talk he delivered at IPS-OnePeople.sg Forum on Ethnic Identity and Culture.



** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

https://www.malaymail.com/news/what...-to-singapore-culture-norshahril-saat/1662936
 
Saudi Arabia’s influence in Southeast Asia – too embedded to be disrupted?
November 9, 2018 3.31pm AEDT
Authors
  1. Asmiati Malik
    Doctoral Researcher in Political Economy, University of Birmingham
  2. Scott Edwards
    Doctoral Researcher in International Relations, University of Birmingham
Disclosure statement
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners
University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham
provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation UK.
View all partners
Languages
CC BY ND

We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

Republish this article
file-20181115-194491-1eqk23g.jpg
Indonesian President Joko Widodo (R) welcomes Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir (L) upon his arrival at the Presidential Palace in Bogor, Indonesia, 22 October 2018. Adi Weda/EPA
The revelation of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder inside the Saudi Arabia embassy in Turkey is harming Saudi Arabia’s international relations, including with Muslim majority Southeast Asian countries Malaysia and Indonesia.
Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Muhammad closed the Saudi-backed King Salman Centre for International Peace (KSCIP). Malaysia is also withdrawing troops from Saudi Arabia.
In Indonesia, in addition to uneasiness about Khashoggi’s fate, people are protesting against the Saudi execution of Indonesian domestic worker Tuti Tursilawati without warning Indonesian authorities.
But, despite signs of change, the influence of Saudi money and ideology may be too big to dismantle in these countries.
Join 160,000 people who subscribe to free evidence-based news.
Get newsletter
Saudi influence in Southeast Asia
Islam in Malaysia and Indonesia shares similar values and was constructed and merged with ancient Melayu’s culture in 625c. Initially spread through arts such as music and wayang (theatre), it emphasises not only moderation and compassion, but also respect for local customs.
After increasing influence from Saudi scholars throughout the past two decades, however, there has been a change in how both countries interpret Islamic studies.
Saudi influence gained massive publicity due to the extravagant donation of US$680 million to Mahathir’s predecessor, Najib Razak, despite the fact it is increasingly evident it did not come from the kingdom’s royal family as claimed, but instead from corruption surrounding the 1MDB development fund.
In Malaysia, Saudi Arabia also donates to schools and universities to spread their conservative views. Scholarships are given to male scholars to study at Saudi universities such as the Islamic University of Madinah, famous for Salafism ideology.
The Islamic Science University of Malaysia (USIM) receives generous funding from the Saudis. Similarly, in the Philippines, Saudi money has been traceable to the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), which allegedly had strong ties with al Qaeda.
The Saudis recently have been on a charm offensive in Malaysia. Their foreign minister visited in October, discussing matters such as Haj pilgrimage quotas. The Saudies have also tried to reassure the new government that their support for Najib was not malevolent.
When Saudi King Salman bin Abdl Aziz visited Jakarta in 2017, he allocated a $13 billion budget for business, education and religion in Indonesia.
In Indonesia, Saudi money is traceable back to the 1980s. They made contributions to the Institute for the Study of Islam and Arabic (LIPIA). The institution, founded on Saudi money, is famously known for ultra-orthodox Islamic views.
For instance, male students are urged to grow their beard and wear ankle-length linen pants. Women are encouraged to wear a burqa. The students study philosophical thoughts of Imam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, a founding father of Saudi Wahhabism.
LIPIA has strong links to Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University in Riyadh. It’s strictly monitored by the Saudi embassy, essentially making it a branch of Saud Islamic University in Indonesia.
Khalid bin Muhammad Al-Deham, a Saudi national, leads the LIPIA management. There have been 11,535 alumni from 1982-2013. The number of graduates increases each year. In 2017 750 graduated.
The alumni include Liberal Islam Network (JIL) coordinator Ulil Abshar Abdalla, former house of representatives deputy speaker and Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) leader Anis Matta and former governor of West Java Ahmad Heryawan. Other notable alumni include Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) leader Rizieq Syihab, Aman Abdurrahman, the ideologue behind the 2016 Jakarta bombing that killed seven victims, and Jafar Umar Thalib, a founder of the militant and radical Islamic organisation Laskar Jihad.
Saudi Arabia also funds scholars from Indonesia to pursue Islamic studies at the Islamic University of Madinah. Among them are PKS politician Hidayat Nur Wahid, chair of the National Movement to Safeguard the Fatwas of the Indonesian Ulemas Council (GNPF-MUI) Bahtiar Nasir, and Syafiq Riza Basalamah, a famous Islamic preacher on YouTube. Syafiq is also head of the Islamic University of Imam Syafi'i in Jember, which adapts its curriculum from the Islamic University of Medinah.
Spread of Saudi ideology
There is a clear line between LIPIA in Jakarta, USIM in Malaysia, King Saud University in Riyadh and Islamic University of Madinah, which assists in the spread of Saudi ideology funded by Saudi money.
Not all their graduates support extreme views, of course. But there is a rise in extreme Islamic views triggering polarisation and conflict. Some are concerned that an increasing “Arabisation” of Malaysia and Indonesia has led to growing intolerance and division, even between Islamic adherents – creating a dichotomy of liberal and orthodox views.
This has a stronger impact when Saudi Arabia not only exports its Wahabism view, but then encourages people to enter politics. In Malaysia, proselytisation via Saudi-funded mosques has been followed by a growing role of Saudi-trained Islamic scholars being recruited into the governmental bureaucracy.
Wahabi and Salafi politicians are gaining stronger influence in Indonesian and Malaysian politics. This not only furthers the spread of Wahabism, but also embeds Saudi influence into these very structures.
The generosity of Saudi money in Southeast Asia allows the embedding of this influence, as well as their ideology. Economic linkages such as funding and oil deals with Indonesia and Malaysia increase the support of the Saudi Kingdom. As such, while there are current disruptions and attempts to transform the relationship with Saudi Arabia, their ideological and economic influences make this extremely difficult.
https://theconversation.com/saudi-a...east-asia-too-embedded-to-be-disrupted-106543
 
Ampun Tuanku...beribu ampun. Sembah patek harap di ampun!:smile:


1616680054206.png
:smile:
 
Bro, this tudung issue been going on for past 2 decades. Tudung is nothing new especially this region. Is part of Muslimah attire for many centuries. As stipulated in article 152 of the Singapore Constitution:

Minorities and special position of Malays
152.—(1) It shall be the responsibility of the Government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in Singapore.
(2) The Government shall exercise its functions in such manner as to recognise the special position of the Malays, who are the indigenous people of Singapore, and accordingly it shall be the responsibility of the Government to protect, safeguard, support, foster and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.
Muslim religion
153. The Legislature shall by law make provision for regulating Muslim religious affairs and for constituting a Council to advise the President in matters relating to the Muslim religion.

Shamungam is doing damage control. Haha....actually Malays/Muslims can actually bring this case to court. Tats the last resort. Anyway, I have Cheena friends telling me the garment making it an issue. U go mkt, hawker centre...everywhere...there are Muslim woman putting on tudung. Just an attire. Btw guess what...CNA showing Hijack of SQ117 again. Islamophobia.
That means Minahs and Makciks have to wear this...as this was what was worn when the constitution was adopted,,,,because it is Malay culture


1616680471315.png
 
why nor push to equip all toileta cubicles with spray hose instead?

form over cleaniness..?
 
Why the need for a full cabinet $m minister to look after muslim affairs when they only constitute 15% of population ?

About time this ministerial title to be changed to Minister For Religious Affairs.

The constitution written in 1965 should be amended to reflect that we are now out of the woods with regards to appeasing the m&ds back then.
 
Last edited:
Actually the m&ds themselves are the victims of these tudung thing.. as the have surrendered their culture to a foreign one n they dont see it. The cina etc have not even influenced them to the extent the arabs did. N the Arabs are miles away n yet control them by their religious schools. m&ds boleh

Against The Grain: Arabisation and the Malay identity
Against The Grain: Arabisation and the Malay identity
This article first appeared in Forum, The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on October 24 - 30, 2016.
There has been much resentment expressed recently towards what is perceived as the Arabisation of Malays. This Arabisation is said to be manifested in a number of ways, the most common being the adoption by Malays of Arabic words in their vocabulary and the donning of Arabic dress such as the thobe, an ankle-length garment similar to a robe.

In the past, for example, Muslims in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia would use the term “buka puasa” for the breaking of the fast during the month of Ramadan. These days, however, the Arabic word, iftar, is often heard.

After the end of the fasting month, the common greeting among Muslims was Selamat Hari Raya Aidilfitri, but this has increasingly given way to the Arabic eid mubarak.

Sponsored Content

Pandemic no barrier to this woman - LED SME
LabIVF (M) Sdn Bhd, a specialist devices supplier for the fertility treatment industry, has suffered its fair share of disappointments over the past year as the Covid-19 pandemic swept through the country in unprecedented fashion.

More and more male Muslims in the region are using the Arab thobe rather than the sarong or kain pelikat. In fact, a variety of thobes originating from the United Arab Emirates, Oman and other countries in the Arab world can be seen in our mosques and at religious functions.

Many have lamented the fact that things Malay have been substituted by things Arab and fear that this is the beginning of a trend of the Arabisation of the Malay identity and culture. Indeed, this phenomenon of Arabisation must be properly understood and distinguished from an earlier process of the Islamisation of the Malays, when Islam arrived in the Malay world of Southeast Asia.

When a religion spreads from one region to another, it is quite normal that elements of the culture of the society of origin of that religion would be adopted by its new adherents. This can be said to have happened with the spread of Islam to the Malay world.

When the Malays adopted Islam as a religion and way of life, the Malay language was influenced in significant ways. Not only was the Arabic script in a modified form adopted by the Malays, but many Arabic words also found their way into the Malay language. This was the case not only with religious vocabulary but also with words used in other areas of social, cultural and political life.

Some words in Malay are obviously of Arabic origin. Examples are tadbir (administer), had (limit) and mustahil (impossible). Other words, however, are less obviously of Arabic origin. Examples are kuat (strong), derived from the Arabic quwwah, and pasal (paragraph, section), derived from the Arabic fasl.

This process of acculturation is something normal that takes place whenever there is contact between two different cultural areas. Aspects of the Arabisation of the Malays that had accompanied the Islamisation of the Malays since the early days of the coming of Islam to the Malay world must be distinguished from what is being referred to as Arabisation today.

What is referred to as Arabisation today is in fact a worrying trend. This is because the adoption by some Malays of certain elements of Arab culture would result in the gradual erosion of Malay culture and practices. If more and more Malay men were to adopt the thobe, this would mean the marginalisation of the kain pelikat and baju Melayu and their possible demise as a cultural artifact. Indeed, it is already the case that there is hardly a Malaysian kain pelikat industry to speak of, as this is dominated by a few Indonesian manufacturers.

An even greater concern as far as the trend of Arabisation is concerned is the adoption of a way of life that is not only contrary to Malay culture but is also inappropriate for our society. The example I have in mind is the adoption of the niqab, the part of the hijab that covers the face. The niqab is a tradition of many Arab societies but is foreign to Malay culture. Still, it is increasingly seen on the streets of Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Jakarta.

Arabisation in this sense is really a reflection of the influence of certain understandings of Islam originating from the Arab world. For example, there is the phenomenon of Malaysians and Indonesians going to the Hadhramaut region in Yemen to study and returning home with Hadhrami Arab practices such as the donning of the niqab, gender segregation and so on.

Those Malays and Indonesians who adopt such ways perhaps imagine that they are practising a more authentic version of Islam. In doing so, they set themselves apart from the larger Malay society, contribute to the erosion of Malay traditions and practices, and could be a party to the infusion of extremist interpretations of Islam.

When Islam arrived in the Malay world centuries ago, it adapted itself to the culture of the region and did not marginalise the culture of its people. Take the zapin, a musical and dance genre. Zapin (Ar. zafin) was introduced to the region from Hadhramaut centuries ago.

In each part of the Malay-Indonesian archipelago, zapin was indigenised to suit local conditions. Among the Malays of Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula, for example, the language of the song-text of zapin became Malay and the dance was not gender-segregated, unlike in Hadhramaut.

Furthermore, the introduction of zapin throughout the region did not result in the marginalisation of the music and dance genres that were already thriving in the Malay world. This is unlike the situation in Malaysia today in which some Malay music and dance genres, such as wayang kulit (shadow puppetry) and mak yong (dance drama), are said to be unIslamic and proscribed.

If elements of Arab culture blend in with Malay traditions and practices without eroding or eliminating things Malay, then such “Arabisation” can be said to be a creative process.

On the other hand, if Arabisation is founded on the idea of the greater Islamic authenticity of Arab culture, it would result in the erosion and marginalisation of Malay culture and the adoption of inappropriate practices.

It is this sense of Arabisation that has come under attack in Malaysia recently. The same can be said of the influence of any other culture such as Westernisation.

Syed Farid Alatas teaches at the National University of Singapore’s Department of Sociology
Actually cina all so gullible, influenced by lgbt silliness and white left radicalism and political correctness. :cautious:
 
Back
Top