I am just stating fact here based on other HSR models.
I respect if you think that even though there is the same population catchment than Taiwan HSR, the SIN-KL may have lower passengers numbers and hence, lower frequencies. Time will tell. I believe that by 4Q2015 will have all the details in terms of frequencies, services (transit vs direct), alignment, etc.
Be reminded that both PM have already agreed that they will use co-located CIQ, so you will clear both immigration in one go. Similar to the exiting Johor CIQ, you can expect to have several automated CIQ lanes.
I respect if you think that even though there is the same population catchment than Taiwan HSR, the SIN-KL may have lower passengers numbers and hence, lower frequencies. Time will tell. I believe that by 4Q2015 will have all the details in terms of frequencies, services (transit vs direct), alignment, etc.
Be reminded that both PM have already agreed that they will use co-located CIQ, so you will clear both immigration in one go. Similar to the exiting Johor CIQ, you can expect to have several automated CIQ lanes.
I think we all agree that the HSR is only feasible if both Singapore and Kuala Lumpur take part. And internal HSR within Malaysia would never be economical feasible based on existing conditions.
The expected population along the Singapore-KL corridor will hit more than 20 million by the time the HSR is completed in late 2020.
Klang Valley: 10 Million
Singpore/Iskandar Malaysia: 8 million
Melaka/ Seremban/Batu Pahat/Mudar= 2 million
So now we have 20,000,000 population within 90 minutes of HSR.
If you look at the frequencies of Taiwan HSR, you will notice that frequencies can hit 5 trains per hour during peak periods. The existing population of Taiwan is 23 million but given that the HSR only serves the west cost of Taiwan, the population served by the HSR might be at around 20 million. (Like Malayasia, most of the population in taiwan lives in the west coast)