- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Messages
- 979
- Points
- 43
I forgot I have not zap you for suaning me in my argument against MMVPAP.
fuck you! you want me to so show your contradictions!
I forgot I have not zap you for suaning me in my argument against MMVPAP.
I ever saw some heated argument exchange between 2 people.
One is an old bird with hundred of points who used a lot of "bad language".
Whereas the other is pretty new to the forum with very few points who is more cautious with his words.
In the end the new bird got his points zapped all the way till -ve into moderation.
Why is this so?
Is it because the new bird is not much of a contributor?
Who in this case got the right to deduct points from a person?
i'll place a wager of a cup of kopi-O siew dai there wouldn't be an election within the next 6 months unless the old man kicks the bucket.
If there is an election within 6 months, I buy everyone in this thread one infP.
Wow. Start thread talking about zap and reputation points. What a high quality thread from an esteem Nick.
I saved you. He was running rings around you. It was becoming embarrassing. Calling someone "chump" in not the zenith of one's wisdom. He not only knew who to pick but his of the command of the language and history was far superior than yours.
He was also being selective because he knew you knew no better.
As I said Malaysia and Singapore are where they are because of the migrants and the Chinese played an immense role. You did not know how to counter it despite a wealth of facts over 2 centuries.
Instead you picked on a contentious issue - some sale by unknown chieftain from Riau Island whose legitimacy was doubtful and Raffles had his warship. It was the same with Mainland China who caved into superior British gunships. Remember the Opium wars. Would you recognise the treaty the Chinese were forced to sign.
I would suggest leaving someone who knows how the Chinese turned the 2 countries into good economies to handle the chap.
fuck you! you want me to so show your contradictions!
Mark Andrew Yeo Kah Chong aka scroobal.
The New Father Of Singapore and The Saviour Of All Sinkie Peasants.
LOL .................. LOL
I have been a very ferment opponent of the reputation system since Day One. I made it clear to that forum host that i did not like the idea.
But since he won't budge, I have no choice but to pony up and buy points to play the game myself. He's right about one thing though - this forum has become a microcosm of real life, replete with cronyism, backstabbing, squabbles, flame wars, and people buying their way ($$$$) to elite status.
The person with the more reasoned, more factually substatiated argument should win, but unfortinately, that's not what happens in real life, and that's not what happens in the forum too.
Leongsam loves flame wars....$$$$$ .... Huat Ah!!![]()
Screwing the PAP is off course very welcomed. Can't wait for another Anal Doctor candidate from the PAP.
Ah Meng, did you zapd Scew Ball 4 points?
i'd think that they can do better by providing free healthcare and not to worry about paying for insurance. i'd think of our insurance industry is a rip-off.
Dun glorify yourself, you did not save me and in the first place, there was not embarrassment on my part. If any, it was on the part of MMVPAP. Also criticize somebody's written English and relating it to fact is saving someone?
The fact is that you Scroobal agree with him that Singapore is Malay Land. You said it here again!!
He was going round and round because he was trying to confuse others as he cannot convince others that that Singapore is Malay Land. His stupidity was shown when he mentioned that the Brits returned HK to China because it was Chinese Land. He failed to realise that Brit return the whole HK to China because the lease for NT was up and it make no economic and political sense to keep Kowloon and HK Island and just return NT per se. Again you chose to be silent on this.
That chump (yes is CHUMP) also brought in issues like the Palestinian-Israeli issue into the discussion which is not linked. When I asked him the question, based on his own logic (not mine) that should the Arabs leave Israel because Israel was the PROMISED LAND of the Jewish people (as such Jewish Land). This is mentioned in the Quran and Bible and not me eErotica69. He did not answer.
The sale of Singapore was contentious? Says who? It was sold in 1819 and treaty was rectified in 1824. The person who signed the treaty was Sultan Husssein Shah and not some "unknown Chieftian" as you claimed! Now let's assume (which is lame) that it was not a "valid" sale, then how come Johore did not claim this from 1824 till 2014?
More importantly, you totally ignore the fact the Singapore was KICK OUT of the Malaysia Federation by the Malay dominated Government in Malaysia. Effectively that means that Singapore is not any Malay Land, she belong to all the races in Singapore including the Malays!
Your point about Chinese
There is no such thing as FREE healthcare. If someone receives a heart transplant FOC, it's because other taxpayers are picking up the tab.