I propose a vote of no confidence for WP.

[IamHandsome]

I propose a Vote of no confidence for the PAP..

hehehehe......... u very bad.

 

[sense]

 

[iamhere]

we had long been a welfare state for papees n cronies where they first claim that
they should be paid XXX amount of $$$ if not, they would be better off in private sector or in biz themselves.

By "default", since we do not have enough opposition to veto all these "claims", these leeches at the first split second
when they are elected or "elected" thru walkovers, commit FUNDAMENTAL BREACH of what they claim.

They hold tonnes of appointments, directorships and/or in biz themselves.

Having more than one appointment does not give one more than 24hrs per calendar day...

Question remains: WHO did they neglect?

Shareholders of public listed companies?

(Public) Stakeholders of GLC or statutory boards?

or???


We had long been providing WELFARE STATE facilities for PAPees n CRONIES....


MY FELLOW SINGAPOREANS PLEASE...


REMEMBER to

VOTE papees OUT


do yrself, yr forefathers and yr generations to come, a favor, a service and a long-awaited justice

 

[Fook Seng]

Perhaps yes, perhaps no.

Thats why I say LHL is a very brave man that will make unpopular but necessary decisions.
But what for waste time and money on another GE. Wait for 2016 la. Relaks.

That is not called bravery. That is audacity.

 

[Equalisation]

I propose 7 up, if you got a nine and five.:o

 

[SamSengKia]

vote of no confidence for what??
just vote them out in the next GE lah.

 

[cleareyes]

1st time my life wherev i come across such a dumb and illogical suggestion on putting up a vote of no confident on a party that is not the govermen.

TS really out to make singaporeans look politically stupid.

 

[mojoe]

Thats why I say LHL is a very brave man that will make unpopular but necessary decisions.
But what for waste time and money on another GE. Wait for 2016 la. Relaks.

a bad policy is a bad policy; do not try and mask bad policies as being making tough decisions; it is unpopular because it it a thoughtless policy and making a big impact leading to a poorer quality of life

 

[Kinana]

a bad policy is a bad policy; do not try and mask bad policies as being making tough decisions; it is unpopular because it it a thoughtless policy and making a big impact leading to a poorer quality of life

Its not a bad policy bro, its really good policy.
Its good but unpopular and Lee is willing to take the heat for it.
Its easier to make the people happy and rot isn't it?

 

[iamhere]

Its not a bad policy bro, its really good policy.
Its good but unpopular and Lee is willing to take the heat for it.
Its easier to make the people happy and rot isn't it?

we had long been a welfare state for papees n cronies where they first claim that
they should be paid XXX amount of $$$ if not, they would be better off in private sector or in biz themselves.

By "default", since we do not have enough opposition to veto all these "claims", these leeches at the first split second
when they are elected or "elected" thru walkovers, commit FUNDAMENTAL BREACH of what they claim.

They hold tonnes of appointments, directorships and/or in biz themselves.

Having more than one appointment does not give one more than 24hrs per calendar day...

Question remains: WHO did they neglect?

Shareholders of public listed companies?

(Public) Stakeholders of GLC or statutory boards?

or???


We had long been providing WELFARE STATE facilities for PAPees n CRONIES....


MY FELLOW SINGAPOREANS PLEASE...


REMEMBER to

VOTE papees OUT


do yrself, yr forefathers and yr generations to come, a favor, a service and a long-awaited justice

As for PAPees n cronies...=>助李为孽， 其后人将世世为奴，代代为娼！！！！！！！！！

 

[mojoe]

Its not a bad policy bro, its really good policy.
Its good but unpopular and Lee is willing to take the heat for it.
Its easier to make the people happy and rot isn't it?

you can repeat it a hundred times but it does not change the fact .... it is a bad policy
he is taking the heat not because he is willing but because he goof it up
under his watch one GRC and two SMC were lost.. he screwed it big time, with bad polices

 

[MaiTuLiow]

Kinana is paid by the post, so if you ignore his thread he'll be out of job soon.

Kinana kana banned. No more rubbish from Kinana. Is he out of job yet?

 

[jw5]

Kinana kana banned. No more rubbish from Kinana. Is he out of job yet?

On no pay leave.

 

[Clone]

Is it possible to propose a vote of no confidence against a small minority party?

 

[Fook Seng]

Is it possible to propose a vote of no confidence against a small minority party?

There must be a good reason to take a vote of no confidence. What is that reason? And what is it supposed to correct?

 

[Clone]

There must be a good reason to take a vote of no confidence. What is that reason? And what is it supposed to correct?

Fook gor

I see no reason to have a vote of no confidence against a small powerless minority party.

 

[SamSengKia]

Too can say the same thing bros

propose simi lan choew...why dun go to WP HQ and ask them out for a fight.

 

[looneytan]

Its not a bad policy bro, its really good policy.

in appreciation of your good work, here's certificate of appreciation to Kinana

 

[Wildfire]

we had long been a welfare state for papees n cronies where they first claim that
they should be paid XXX amount of $$$ if not, they would be better off in private sector or in biz themselves.

By "default", since we do not have enough opposition to veto all these "claims", these leeches at the first split second
when they are elected or "elected" thru walkovers, commit FUNDAMENTAL BREACH of what they claim.

They hold tonnes of appointments, directorships and/or in biz themselves .........

Well said, Brother ... 69 in 2030 is the last straw!

 

[Fook Seng]

in appreciation of your good work, here's certificate of appreciation to Kinana

Wow. Pedigree. That is the highest honour.