https://mil.sina.cn/2019-08-06/deta...=25&rfunc=29&tj=none&tr=25&vt=4&pos=108&his=0
华为外籍高管喊话美澳：要禁就禁吧 你们自求多福
观察者网
08月06日 08:04关注
原标题：华为外籍高管喊话美澳：要禁就禁吧，你们自求多福
[文/观察者网 谷智轩]因“舌战美媒”的而走红的华为外籍高管安迪•珀迪（Andy Purdy）又站出来“打脸”了。
这一次，他在接受彭博社采访时直接对美国和澳大利亚喊话道：要禁华为就禁，但也长点心吧，你们自己的通信系统和网络都不够安全。
这两国是目前唯二明确禁止华为参与当地5G建设的国家。
成为华为美国公司首席安全官之前，珀迪曾担任美国联邦检察官，还为美国国土安全部效力过。丰富的政府工作经验，让珀迪深谙美方在指控华为时存在的“漏洞”，并在面对媒体逼问时面不改色地逐个击破。
彭博社视频截图
“你们自己不够安全”
上周四（1日），珀迪在纽约的非营利组织华美协进社（China Institute）参加了一场小组讨论，主题是中美两国在技术发展方面的竞争。
据新华社报道，珀迪当天在谈及特朗普政府的“华为禁令”时表示，尚不清楚华为会因此受到多大影响，但“可以肯定的是，美国公司每年从华为得到的110亿美元订单有可能不保了”。
他指出，在美国，约有40家农村电信运营商和数万名农村居民受惠于华为“安全且具有价格竞争力”的设备，被迫放弃使用这些设备会令他们“不高兴”。
一段时间以来，美国企图说服盟友不要与华为合作建设5G电信网络，理由是所谓的“安全问题”，包括可能存在的“后门和数据泄露风险”。
对此，珀迪提出一个现象，即一些国家反过来对华盛顿施加压力，因为后者无法提供任何证据证明华为存在不当行为。
当天，珀迪还接受了彭博社主播雪瑞•安（Shery Ahn）的专访。
彭博社视频截图
期间主播问道，“你怎么说服外界，华为是可以信任的？”
珀迪回答，“一种方法是，我们讨论采取一些具体措施，这些措施能够为我们的产品和员工行为提供保险和透明度。”
“老实说，当你看看过去18个月美国针对华为发起的‘全球性运动’，你会很惊讶地发现，众多国家、甚至美国最亲密的盟友都在进行反击，”他说，“比如英国和德国，他们都表示没有收到美方任何的证据，表明华为在网络安全方面存在重大不当行为。他们只是在继续寻求降低风险的方法，就像所有专家呼吁的那样。”
珀迪进一步对美国和澳大利亚喊话称，“如果实在要禁华为的话，你们就禁好了。但采取点必要的措施来保障通信系统和网络的安全吧，因为你们自己不够安全。”
他还对主播透露，在接下来的5年中，华为将投入20亿美元来改善软件工程流程，以应对网络安全漏洞。
半年营收仍大增23%
事实上，珀迪在6月“迎战”福克斯商业频道（FOX Business）主播玛丽亚•巴蒂罗姆（Maria Bartiromo）的逼问时就明确指出，有关华为设备留有“后门”的消息根本就是“乌龙事件”，反倒是美国网络供应商思科（Cisco），在过去的一两年之中被发现产品中有8到10个“后门”。
他当时直言，美国大可以就所谓的“安全风险”对华为进行调查，“我非常乐意安排美国政府（对华为）进行这样的对话和访问。”
今年上半年，特朗普政府对华为的“极限施压”升级，但就实际结果来看，该公司并未受到太大影响，半年营收仍以23%的高速增长，反倒是英特尔、高通、AMD等一众华为美国供应商遭遇了营收全线下跌。
在上月底的业绩说明会上，华为董事长梁华表示，“迄今为止，华为没有一天停产，没有一天中断对客户发货。”
观察者网注意到，在5月16日被美方列入所谓的“实体清单”后至今，华为又签订了11份5G合同，目前总数为50份，领先于全球另外两家主要5G供应商诺基亚（43份）和爱立信（23份）。
相关新闻
Huawei's foreign executives shouted about the United States and Australia: If you want to ban it, you can ban it.

Observer network
August 06 08:04 follow
Original title: Huawei foreign executives shouting about the United States and Australia: If you want to ban, you can ban it.
[Text / Observer Network Gu Zhixuan] Andy Purdy, a foreign executive of Huawei who became popular because of "the war of the United States," stood up and "faced".
This time, when he was interviewed by Bloomberg, he directly yelled to the United States and Australia: If you want to ban Huawei, you can ban it, but you can also eat it. Your own communication system and network are not safe enough.
These two countries are currently the only countries that explicitly prohibit Huawei from participating in local 5G construction.
Prior to becoming the chief security officer of Huawei's US company, Perdy served as a US federal prosecutor and also served for the US Department of Homeland Security. Rich experience in government work has allowed Perdy to understand the “vulnerabilities” that the US has when accusing Huawei, and to smash them one by one in the face of media criticism.

Bloomberg video screenshot
"You are not safe enough yourself"
Last Thursday (1st), Purdy participated in a panel discussion at the China Institute, a non-profit organization in New York, on the topic of competition between China and the United States in technology development.
According to the Xinhua News Agency, when talking about the Trump administration’s “Huawei ban”, Purdy said that it is not clear how much impact Huawei will have, but “it is certain that the US company receives $11 billion a year from Huawei. Orders may not be guaranteed."
He pointed out that in the United States, about 40 rural telecom operators and tens of thousands of rural residents benefited from Huawei's "safe and competitively priced" equipment, and being forced to abandon the use of these devices would make them "unhappy."
For some time, the United States has tried to persuade its allies not to cooperate with Huawei to build a 5G telecommunications network. The reason is the so-called "security issues", including possible "backdoor and data leakage risks."
In this regard, Perdi raised the phenomenon that some countries in turn put pressure on Washington because the latter could not provide any evidence to prove that Huawei had misconduct.
On the same day, Purdy also accepted an exclusive interview with Bloomberg anchor Shery Ahn.

Bloomberg video screenshot
During the interview, the anchor asked, "How do you convince the outside world that Huawei can trust?"
Purdy replied, “One way is to discuss some specific measures that can provide insurance and transparency for our products and employee behavior.”
"To be honest, when you look at the 'global movement' launched by the United States against Huawei in the past 18 months, you will be surprised to find that many countries and even the closest allies of the United States are fighting back," he said. Both the UK and Germany said they have not received any evidence from the US that Huawei is having significant misconduct in cybersecurity. They are just continuing to seek ways to reduce risk, as all experts have called for."
Purdy further shouted to the United States and Australia, "If you really want to ban Huawei, you will be banned. But take the necessary measures to ensure the security of communication systems and networks, because you are not safe enough."
He also revealed to the anchor that in the next five years, Huawei will invest $2 billion to improve the software engineering process to address network security vulnerabilities.
Half-year revenue still increased by 23%
In fact, when Perdi’s “Fighting” Fox Business Channel (FOX Business) anchor Maria Bartiromo’s questioning in June clearly pointed out that the news about Huawei’s “back door” was simply The Dragon Incident, on the other hand, is the US network provider Cisco, which has seen 8 to 10 "backdoors" in its products over the past year or two.
At that time, he bluntly said that the United States could investigate Huawei on the so-called "security risk". "I am very happy to arrange such a dialogue and visit to the US government (to Huawei)."
In the first half of this year, the Trump administration upgraded Huawei's “extreme pressure”, but as far as the actual results are concerned, the company has not been affected too much. The half-year revenue is still growing at a high rate of 23%, but Intel and Qualcomm. AMD and other Chinese suppliers have suffered a decline in revenue across the board.
At the performance briefing at the end of last month, Huawei Chairman Liang Hua said, “So far, Huawei has not stopped production for one day, and did not interrupt the delivery of customers one day.”
Observer Network noted that after being listed by the US on the so-called “entity list” on May 16, Huawei has signed 11 5G contracts, currently 50 in total, ahead of the other two major 5G suppliers in the world. (43 copies) and Ericsson (23 copies).
related news
华为外籍高管喊话美澳：要禁就禁吧 你们自求多福
08月06日 08:04关注
原标题：华为外籍高管喊话美澳：要禁就禁吧，你们自求多福
[文/观察者网 谷智轩]因“舌战美媒”的而走红的华为外籍高管安迪•珀迪（Andy Purdy）又站出来“打脸”了。
这一次，他在接受彭博社采访时直接对美国和澳大利亚喊话道：要禁华为就禁，但也长点心吧，你们自己的通信系统和网络都不够安全。
这两国是目前唯二明确禁止华为参与当地5G建设的国家。
成为华为美国公司首席安全官之前，珀迪曾担任美国联邦检察官，还为美国国土安全部效力过。丰富的政府工作经验，让珀迪深谙美方在指控华为时存在的“漏洞”，并在面对媒体逼问时面不改色地逐个击破。
彭博社视频截图“你们自己不够安全”
上周四（1日），珀迪在纽约的非营利组织华美协进社（China Institute）参加了一场小组讨论，主题是中美两国在技术发展方面的竞争。
据新华社报道，珀迪当天在谈及特朗普政府的“华为禁令”时表示，尚不清楚华为会因此受到多大影响，但“可以肯定的是，美国公司每年从华为得到的110亿美元订单有可能不保了”。
他指出，在美国，约有40家农村电信运营商和数万名农村居民受惠于华为“安全且具有价格竞争力”的设备，被迫放弃使用这些设备会令他们“不高兴”。
一段时间以来，美国企图说服盟友不要与华为合作建设5G电信网络，理由是所谓的“安全问题”，包括可能存在的“后门和数据泄露风险”。
对此，珀迪提出一个现象，即一些国家反过来对华盛顿施加压力，因为后者无法提供任何证据证明华为存在不当行为。
当天，珀迪还接受了彭博社主播雪瑞•安（Shery Ahn）的专访。
彭博社视频截图期间主播问道，“你怎么说服外界，华为是可以信任的？”
珀迪回答，“一种方法是，我们讨论采取一些具体措施，这些措施能够为我们的产品和员工行为提供保险和透明度。”
“老实说，当你看看过去18个月美国针对华为发起的‘全球性运动’，你会很惊讶地发现，众多国家、甚至美国最亲密的盟友都在进行反击，”他说，“比如英国和德国，他们都表示没有收到美方任何的证据，表明华为在网络安全方面存在重大不当行为。他们只是在继续寻求降低风险的方法，就像所有专家呼吁的那样。”
珀迪进一步对美国和澳大利亚喊话称，“如果实在要禁华为的话，你们就禁好了。但采取点必要的措施来保障通信系统和网络的安全吧，因为你们自己不够安全。”
他还对主播透露，在接下来的5年中，华为将投入20亿美元来改善软件工程流程，以应对网络安全漏洞。
半年营收仍大增23%
事实上，珀迪在6月“迎战”福克斯商业频道（FOX Business）主播玛丽亚•巴蒂罗姆（Maria Bartiromo）的逼问时就明确指出，有关华为设备留有“后门”的消息根本就是“乌龙事件”，反倒是美国网络供应商思科（Cisco），在过去的一两年之中被发现产品中有8到10个“后门”。
他当时直言，美国大可以就所谓的“安全风险”对华为进行调查，“我非常乐意安排美国政府（对华为）进行这样的对话和访问。”
今年上半年，特朗普政府对华为的“极限施压”升级，但就实际结果来看，该公司并未受到太大影响，半年营收仍以23%的高速增长，反倒是英特尔、高通、AMD等一众华为美国供应商遭遇了营收全线下跌。
在上月底的业绩说明会上，华为董事长梁华表示，“迄今为止，华为没有一天停产，没有一天中断对客户发货。”
观察者网注意到，在5月16日被美方列入所谓的“实体清单”后至今，华为又签订了11份5G合同，目前总数为50份，领先于全球另外两家主要5G供应商诺基亚（43份）和爱立信（23份）。
相关新闻
Huawei's foreign executives shouted about the United States and Australia: If you want to ban it, you can ban it.

Observer network
August 06 08:04 follow
Original title: Huawei foreign executives shouting about the United States and Australia: If you want to ban, you can ban it.
[Text / Observer Network Gu Zhixuan] Andy Purdy, a foreign executive of Huawei who became popular because of "the war of the United States," stood up and "faced".
This time, when he was interviewed by Bloomberg, he directly yelled to the United States and Australia: If you want to ban Huawei, you can ban it, but you can also eat it. Your own communication system and network are not safe enough.
These two countries are currently the only countries that explicitly prohibit Huawei from participating in local 5G construction.
Prior to becoming the chief security officer of Huawei's US company, Perdy served as a US federal prosecutor and also served for the US Department of Homeland Security. Rich experience in government work has allowed Perdy to understand the “vulnerabilities” that the US has when accusing Huawei, and to smash them one by one in the face of media criticism.

Bloomberg video screenshot
"You are not safe enough yourself"
Last Thursday (1st), Purdy participated in a panel discussion at the China Institute, a non-profit organization in New York, on the topic of competition between China and the United States in technology development.
According to the Xinhua News Agency, when talking about the Trump administration’s “Huawei ban”, Purdy said that it is not clear how much impact Huawei will have, but “it is certain that the US company receives $11 billion a year from Huawei. Orders may not be guaranteed."
He pointed out that in the United States, about 40 rural telecom operators and tens of thousands of rural residents benefited from Huawei's "safe and competitively priced" equipment, and being forced to abandon the use of these devices would make them "unhappy."
For some time, the United States has tried to persuade its allies not to cooperate with Huawei to build a 5G telecommunications network. The reason is the so-called "security issues", including possible "backdoor and data leakage risks."
In this regard, Perdi raised the phenomenon that some countries in turn put pressure on Washington because the latter could not provide any evidence to prove that Huawei had misconduct.
On the same day, Purdy also accepted an exclusive interview with Bloomberg anchor Shery Ahn.

Bloomberg video screenshot
During the interview, the anchor asked, "How do you convince the outside world that Huawei can trust?"
Purdy replied, “One way is to discuss some specific measures that can provide insurance and transparency for our products and employee behavior.”
"To be honest, when you look at the 'global movement' launched by the United States against Huawei in the past 18 months, you will be surprised to find that many countries and even the closest allies of the United States are fighting back," he said. Both the UK and Germany said they have not received any evidence from the US that Huawei is having significant misconduct in cybersecurity. They are just continuing to seek ways to reduce risk, as all experts have called for."
Purdy further shouted to the United States and Australia, "If you really want to ban Huawei, you will be banned. But take the necessary measures to ensure the security of communication systems and networks, because you are not safe enough."
He also revealed to the anchor that in the next five years, Huawei will invest $2 billion to improve the software engineering process to address network security vulnerabilities.
Half-year revenue still increased by 23%
In fact, when Perdi’s “Fighting” Fox Business Channel (FOX Business) anchor Maria Bartiromo’s questioning in June clearly pointed out that the news about Huawei’s “back door” was simply The Dragon Incident, on the other hand, is the US network provider Cisco, which has seen 8 to 10 "backdoors" in its products over the past year or two.
At that time, he bluntly said that the United States could investigate Huawei on the so-called "security risk". "I am very happy to arrange such a dialogue and visit to the US government (to Huawei)."
In the first half of this year, the Trump administration upgraded Huawei's “extreme pressure”, but as far as the actual results are concerned, the company has not been affected too much. The half-year revenue is still growing at a high rate of 23%, but Intel and Qualcomm. AMD and other Chinese suppliers have suffered a decline in revenue across the board.
At the performance briefing at the end of last month, Huawei Chairman Liang Hua said, “So far, Huawei has not stopped production for one day, and did not interrupt the delivery of customers one day.”
Observer Network noted that after being listed by the US on the so-called “entity list” on May 16, Huawei has signed 11 5G contracts, currently 50 in total, ahead of the other two major 5G suppliers in the world. (43 copies) and Ericsson (23 copies).
related news
