When the two apunehs said yes but shook their heads left and right Pinky was confused and got the wrong advice.
Wow,Pinky looked so scared to light up the firecrackers.Bang bang bang....!!! $30 m disappear into thin air.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious How Brave Is LHL?
- Thread starter ckmpd
- Start date
When the two apunehs said yes but shook their heads left and right Pinky was confused and got the wrong advice.
Wow,Pinky looked so scared to light up the firecrackers.Bang bang bang....!!! $30 m disappear into thin air.
Look at the advice given by VB during the YOG and the Terrex issue. They were obviously bad advice.Coupled with the blur LHL,YOG was carried out with almost empty venues. The Terrex issue can become a big problem. NEH and LHL claim sovereign immunity and said China didnt give an official reason for detention of our Terrexs. But China already said that the cargo manifest was not truthful. Wrong cargo manifest is a seizable offence.So the ball is in SG's court. LHL and NEH must not act blur and said that China has not given a reason. China's reason has been clearly spelt out and explained
China is still waiting for reply from Pinky for 2 issues:
Why no manfest for the 9 terrex vehicles and accessories ?
Why Singapore did not comply to the one-China policy by having military training arrangement with Taiwan "Starlight Exercise" ?
Yes, China already made their stand clear that Singapore didnt have proper manifest. And also why was SG having training in Taiwan (without China's official knowledge since SG agreed with One China policy).
PAP cant act blur and said that SG has trained in Taiwan already for more than 30years. What happened to LHL's statement that China must follow rule of law? Did SG follow rule of law to train in Taiwan which SG has admitted is part of China?
PAP must follow their own advice to live according to rule of law
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 5,058
- Points
- 0
he shud get David Singh to sue 11......... sure win one
If PAP and Davinder were to sue President XI in international court, they will lose.
PAP and their cronies can only win in SG Court
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,947
- Points
- 113
Just in case you are not aware of, or have forgotten about:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China
"The tribunal ruled that China has "no historical rights" based on the "nine-dash line" map"
So if even the Philippines, whose:
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
is roughly the same as Singapore's, can win, why can't Singapore/PAP also win?
Last edited:
Just in case you are not aware of, or have forgotten about:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China
"The tribunal ruled that China has "no historical rights" based on the "nine-dash line" map"
So if even the Philippines, whose:
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
is roughly the same as Singapore's, can win, why can't Singapore/PAP also win?
Does PAP dare to sue its opponents in an international Court?
Just in case you are not aware of, or have forgotten about:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China
"The tribunal ruled that China has "no historical rights" based on the "nine-dash line" map"
So if even the Philippines, whose:
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
is roughly the same as Singapore's, can win, why can't Singapore/PAP also win?
From the onset, China refused to participate in the alleged Arbitration. So its findings do not apply to China
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,947
- Points
- 113
Once again, just in case you are not aware of, or have forgotten about:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedra_Branca_dispute
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,947
- Points
- 113
Most criminals also refuse to be charged in court, which is why they usually try their best to avoid getting caught by the police in the first place, right?
But does that mean that they have not committed any crime?
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 23,788
- Points
- 113
Silly man lah you! Say so many times already it is shipping company fault 100%! Obviously diplomatic channels have been exhausted and Beijing play punk say cannot interfere with HK. So now threaten talk law with lowly officials in HK looking to curry favour with Beijing. It will end when Beijing officials decided they had enough fun and call off their honkie dogs back into the kennels.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2009
- Messages
- 11,702
- Points
- 83
Hi there
1. What do you expect bravery from a pinky individual who sits cross legged.
2. Hounded by a group of toy paper soldiers.
3. Option B: wear pink and spot some piggy tail; bend forward or down, serve tea and beg for forgiveness.
1. What do you expect bravery from a pinky individual who sits cross legged.
2. Hounded by a group of toy paper soldiers.
3. Option B: wear pink and spot some piggy tail; bend forward or down, serve tea and beg for forgiveness.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,715
- Points
- 113
Most criminals also refuse to be charged in court, which is why they usually try their best to avoid getting caught by the police in the first place, right?
But does that mean that they have not committed any crime?
you have to differentiate between a hopping kangaroo court
and an unbiased court.
thats Y Benjamin Jeyaretnam and others like him
always lose.
that does no mean they are guilty.
if given the choice ,
ben certain wont attend this kind of court.
Similar threads
