- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,818
- Points
- 48
Works were done poorly and unsafely, and frauds were made to shortcut and cover up quality problems and save time safe cost. Compromised structural Safety. All act blur as if these were frauds done by ghost. No body responsible!
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/沙中線剪鋼筋醜聞-始作俑者未除名-二判中科斥路署報警圖抽身-傳聞證供恐無效-214500140.html
沙中線剪鋼筋醜聞 始作俑者未除名 二判中科斥路署報警圖抽身 傳聞證供恐無效
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.7k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月17日 上午5:45
查看相片
二判中科興業批評路政署就沙中線紅磡站（圖）剪筋事件報警是嚴重行政疏忽和失誤。
港鐵昨提交沙中線紅磡站擴建月台「剪筋」事件初步調查報告，但抽走了工程二判中科興業所作的口供；路政署前日收到港鐵提交相關口供後認為事件或涉及刑事，於是報警。
重案組稱調查不會等委員會
警方表示，前日（15日）收到路政署轉介關於港鐵剪短鋼筋事件，已交由西九龍總區重案組接手調查，目前沒有任何補充，強調警方會盡力全方位、多角度地調查，不會等待政府獨立調查委員會的調查。
指另涉蓮塘口岸工傷遭定罪
中科興業昨發表聲明，指港府應按規管工務工程承建商的《承建商管理手冊（修訂版B）》中第五點一三條，第十、十三、十四、十五及十六款的條文，就涉事承建商就蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程的傷亡事件被粉嶺裁判法院定罪，以及紅磡月台「剪筋」事件，執行手冊中的行政措施，「作為執行者，不應漠視其條文上的責任，亦不應借轉移沒有結果的調查而置身事外！」
根據發展局網頁資料，該份手冊列明當承建商涉及因違犯勞工法例被法庭定罪、事件涉及公眾利益和公眾安全、於公共或私家工程中涉及嚴重差劣表現，及對工人、分判商等欠缺誠信，發展局局長有權將涉事承建商剔出「認可公共工程承建商名冊」或「供應商及專門承造商名冊」，亦可暫停資格、降級等處分。發展局在處分前須給予足夠警告，解釋原因，並讓涉事承辦商申辯。
翻查資料，粉嶺裁判法院今年五月初，就二○一六年十一月蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程中工作台倒塌導致一死三傷事件，判處工程承建商禮頓罰款十萬元。
質疑路署拖延時間令證據流失
中科興業又指，港鐵報告列明工程大判禮頓就工程發出合格完工證明書，而負責紮鐵及層板鋼筋接合的二判泛迅，更指控禮頓指示其剪鋼筋，反映事件中有人涉嫌全局知情，而且是涉嫌元兇，更涉嫌一再欺騙港鐵。中科興業質疑路政署為何不以上述內容報警，反選擇該公司被港鐵拒絕採納的口供報案，中科興業認為其口供被港鐵拒絕採納後，已淪為法律上的「傳聞證供」，不會被刑事調查接納，因此批評路政署報警是「行政上的嚴重疏忽和失誤」，並懷疑署方保護個別責任方，並以顯然沒有結果的調查拖延時間，期間可能令大量證據隨時間流失。
律師：倘找到目擊證人有力起訴
律師黃國桐表示，所謂「傳聞證供」只是法庭不會採納，並不影響警方調查，他認為只要警方找到「剪筋」目擊證人，而證人亦理解「剪筋」的目的，再輔以專家證人口供，便有足夠證據可考慮提出起訴。
" data-reactid="31">路政署報警追查沙中線紅磡站擴建月台剪短鋼筋事件。負責釘板及澆灌混土工程的工程二判中科興業指出，港府未有按發展局制訂的「承建商管理手冊」規定，處分「剪筋」的始作俑者，例如將其剔出政府認可承建商名單，批評港府未盡責監管承建商，反而路政署選擇報警及置身事外，屬嚴重行政疏忽和失誤。有律師指，警方只需找到「剪筋」目擊證人，便有有力證據考慮起訴。
港鐵昨提交沙中線紅磡站擴建月台「剪筋」事件初步調查報告，但抽走了工程二判中科興業所作的口供；路政署前日收到港鐵提交相關口供後認為事件或涉及刑事，於是報警。
重案組稱調查不會等委員會
警方表示，前日（15日）收到路政署轉介關於港鐵剪短鋼筋事件，已交由西九龍總區重案組接手調查，目前沒有任何補充，強調警方會盡力全方位、多角度地調查，不會等待政府獨立調查委員會的調查。
指另涉蓮塘口岸工傷遭定罪
中科興業昨發表聲明，指港府應按規管工務工程承建商的《承建商管理手冊（修訂版B）》中第五點一三條，第十、十三、十四、十五及十六款的條文，就涉事承建商就蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程的傷亡事件被粉嶺裁判法院定罪，以及紅磡月台「剪筋」事件，執行手冊中的行政措施，「作為執行者，不應漠視其條文上的責任，亦不應借轉移沒有結果的調查而置身事外！」
根據發展局網頁資料，該份手冊列明當承建商涉及因違犯勞工法例被法庭定罪、事件涉及公眾利益和公眾安全、於公共或私家工程中涉及嚴重差劣表現，及對工人、分判商等欠缺誠信，發展局局長有權將涉事承建商剔出「認可公共工程承建商名冊」或「供應商及專門承造商名冊」，亦可暫停資格、降級等處分。發展局在處分前須給予足夠警告，解釋原因，並讓涉事承辦商申辯。
翻查資料，粉嶺裁判法院今年五月初，就二○一六年十一月蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程中工作台倒塌導致一死三傷事件，判處工程承建商禮頓罰款十萬元。
質疑路署拖延時間令證據流失
中科興業又指，港鐵報告列明工程大判禮頓就工程發出合格完工證明書，而負責紮鐵及層板鋼筋接合的二判泛迅，更指控禮頓指示其剪鋼筋，反映事件中有人涉嫌全局知情，而且是涉嫌元兇，更涉嫌一再欺騙港鐵。中科興業質疑路政署為何不以上述內容報警，反選擇該公司被港鐵拒絕採納的口供報案，中科興業認為其口供被港鐵拒絕採納後，已淪為法律上的「傳聞證供」，不會被刑事調查接納，因此批評路政署報警是「行政上的嚴重疏忽和失誤」，並懷疑署方保護個別責任方，並以顯然沒有結果的調查拖延時間，期間可能令大量證據隨時間流失。
律師：倘找到目擊證人有力起訴
律師黃國桐表示，所謂「傳聞證供」只是法庭不會採納，並不影響警方調查，他認為只要警方找到「剪筋」目擊證人，而證人亦理解「剪筋」的目的，再輔以專家證人口供，便有足夠證據可考慮提出起訴。
查看相片
禮頓兩年前曾因承造工程有傷亡意外遭罰款。
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/港鐵報告二判指控大判叫剪鋼筋-214500806.html
港鐵報告二判指控大判叫剪鋼筋
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.7k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月16日 上午5:45
查看相片
港鐵昨提交調查報告，但無法揪出紅磡站「剪筋」真兇。
46頁報告無法解答剪筋真兇
港鐵昨午將沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁造假初步調查報告，上傳至沙中線工程網頁。報告以英文撰寫，全長四十六頁，但無法解答誰剪短鋼筋。報告指，港鐵會見十九名現職及前港鐵員工、三位總承建商禮頓人員，以及二判商「泛迅建築」及「中科興業」的代表，據所有被訪港鐵員工憶述，無人曾目睹「剪筋」，但有兩位駐地盤職員稱自己曾看見、或有人向他們匯報剪短鋼筋的證據，例如鋼筋螺絲頭與連接器的接駁位有縫隙、或鋼筋螺絲頭部分末端被剪短。
5度揭剪短 3條鋼筋無糾正
其中一名港鐵地盤人員說在一五年八至十二月期間，曾目睹或有人向他匯報「剪筋」共五次，他於十二月電郵禮頓要求「加強質量檢查」，禮頓遂向泛迅發不合格報告。另一名港鐵地盤人員則指，兩次目睹有鋼筋螺絲頭部分被剪短的證據，並拍下照片，而港鐵給予禮頓的電郵中亦附有該幅照片。兩人指，每次發現或聽到有問題都會向禮頓反映並要求糾正，但有駐地盤人員憶述指，其中一次有三條涉事鋼筋並無糾正。
報告指，禮頓代表稱不知道「剪筋」及鋼筋不能扭入螺絲帽的事情，但泛迅代表說所有鋼筋修正皆按照禮頓及港鐵程序，鋼筋難扭入螺絲帽，他們會向禮頓報告，並要求禮頓解決，某情況下禮頓會要求將鋼筋剪短以扭入螺絲帽。據了解，禮頓派出三名負責項目的非外籍職員與港鐵會面，態度「不算合作，亦不算不合作」，當中兩人稱收到「中科興業」電郵才知道有人「剪筋」，另一人稱是看報道才知。
問題鋼筋修訂至不多於17條
港鐵亦將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條，又稱禮頓再三確定工程符合法定要求，並有全日及持續監督鋼筋接駁工序，港鐵則按規定檢查其中兩成接駁組件。消息指，港鐵對「關鍵檢查點」制度有信心，強調工程肯定無問題才簽名；對於未能查出「剪筋元兇」，消息稱現時未能對任何人士有指控，「唔可以評論禮頓叫二判商剪」，但估計是「工人貪方便先咁做」，強調不是偷工減料，「因為冇人有錢落袋。」
馬時亨承認通報機制有問題
港鐵主席馬時亨承認事件反映通報機制有問題，已責成管理層及項目負責人檢視及改善，港鐵亦已委任獨立顧問測試紅磡站月台擴建工程，亦會全力配合港府獨立調查委員會，若有任何違規違法會送官究辦。
據悉，港鐵檢討通報機制將包括沙中線土瓜灣站「削筋」事件，事件沒有人報告給工程總監黃唯銘，「削筋」牆厚八吋屬分隔牆，削走的鋼筋並不受力，「但都係漏招，所以要徹查。」
禮頓建築於一九六二年成立，七五年起涉足亞洲，業務包括建築、土木工程等，禮頓亞洲總部設於香港，禮頓與UGL同屬一個集團，而UGL亦捲入梁振英被指收款事件。禮頓在港負責多項重要基建工程，由早年的輕鐵，到現時的港珠澳大橋、中環灣仔繞道、蓮塘香園圍口岸、高鐵、東九文化中心、將軍澳藍田隧道等也有份參與。
">港鐵沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁被揭造假事件，港鐵昨提交調查報告但無法揪出「剪筋」真兇，但披露總承建商（俗稱大判）「禮頓」與二判商「泛迅建築」說法不一，泛迅說遇上問題會由禮頓下命令才「剪筋」，之後會有補救做法，但禮頓說對「剪筋」不知情；報告又將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條。路政署昨晚指出，因調查報告揭示禮頓的二判商向港鐵的陳述，與禮頓向港鐵的陳述有不同，事情或會涉及刑事成分，因此已將事宜轉介警方跟進，現階段不會評論事件，港鐵表示會全力配合有關調查工作。案件交西九龍總區重案組接手調查。
46頁報告無法解答剪筋真兇
港鐵昨午將沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁造假初步調查報告，上傳至沙中線工程網頁。報告以英文撰寫，全長四十六頁，但無法解答誰剪短鋼筋。報告指，港鐵會見十九名現職及前港鐵員工、三位總承建商禮頓人員，以及二判商「泛迅建築」及「中科興業」的代表，據所有被訪港鐵員工憶述，無人曾目睹「剪筋」，但有兩位駐地盤職員稱自己曾看見、或有人向他們匯報剪短鋼筋的證據，例如鋼筋螺絲頭與連接器的接駁位有縫隙、或鋼筋螺絲頭部分末端被剪短。
5度揭剪短 3條鋼筋無糾正
其中一名港鐵地盤人員說在一五年八至十二月期間，曾目睹或有人向他匯報「剪筋」共五次，他於十二月電郵禮頓要求「加強質量檢查」，禮頓遂向泛迅發不合格報告。另一名港鐵地盤人員則指，兩次目睹有鋼筋螺絲頭部分被剪短的證據，並拍下照片，而港鐵給予禮頓的電郵中亦附有該幅照片。兩人指，每次發現或聽到有問題都會向禮頓反映並要求糾正，但有駐地盤人員憶述指，其中一次有三條涉事鋼筋並無糾正。
報告指，禮頓代表稱不知道「剪筋」及鋼筋不能扭入螺絲帽的事情，但泛迅代表說所有鋼筋修正皆按照禮頓及港鐵程序，鋼筋難扭入螺絲帽，他們會向禮頓報告，並要求禮頓解決，某情況下禮頓會要求將鋼筋剪短以扭入螺絲帽。據了解，禮頓派出三名負責項目的非外籍職員與港鐵會面，態度「不算合作，亦不算不合作」，當中兩人稱收到「中科興業」電郵才知道有人「剪筋」，另一人稱是看報道才知。
問題鋼筋修訂至不多於17條
港鐵亦將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條，又稱禮頓再三確定工程符合法定要求，並有全日及持續監督鋼筋接駁工序，港鐵則按規定檢查其中兩成接駁組件。消息指，港鐵對「關鍵檢查點」制度有信心，強調工程肯定無問題才簽名；對於未能查出「剪筋元兇」，消息稱現時未能對任何人士有指控，「唔可以評論禮頓叫二判商剪」，但估計是「工人貪方便先咁做」，強調不是偷工減料，「因為冇人有錢落袋。」
馬時亨承認通報機制有問題
港鐵主席馬時亨承認事件反映通報機制有問題，已責成管理層及項目負責人檢視及改善，港鐵亦已委任獨立顧問測試紅磡站月台擴建工程，亦會全力配合港府獨立調查委員會，若有任何違規違法會送官究辦。
據悉，港鐵檢討通報機制將包括沙中線土瓜灣站「削筋」事件，事件沒有人報告給工程總監黃唯銘，「削筋」牆厚八吋屬分隔牆，削走的鋼筋並不受力，「但都係漏招，所以要徹查。」
禮頓建築於一九六二年成立，七五年起涉足亞洲，業務包括建築、土木工程等，禮頓亞洲總部設於香港，禮頓與UGL同屬一個集團，而UGL亦捲入梁振英被指收款事件。禮頓在港負責多項重要基建工程，由早年的輕鐵，到現時的港珠澳大橋、中環灣仔繞道、蓮塘香園圍口岸、高鐵、東九文化中心、將軍澳藍田隧道等也有份參與。
查看相片
總承建商「禮頓」向港鐵的陳述，與二判商「泛迅」的陳述有不同。（黃仲民攝）
查看相片
螺絲帽需要全部套入鋼筋末端才屬合格。
查看相片
馬時亨
查看相片
問題鋼筋位置
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B2%99%E4%B8%AD7%E7%B7%9A%E5%89%AA%E9%8B%BC%E7%AD%8B%E9 %86%9C%E8%81%9E-%E5%A7%8B%E4%BD%9C%E4%BF%91%E8%80%85%E6%9C%AA%E9%99%A4%E5% 90%8D-%E4%BA%8C%E5%88%A4%E4%B8%AD%E7%A7%91%E6%96%A5%E8%B7%AF%E7%BD%B2%E5%A0 %B1%E8%AD%A6%E5%9C%96%E6%8A%BD%E8%BA%AB-%E5%82%B3%E8%81%9E%E8%AD%89%E4%BE% 9B%E6%81%90%E7%84%A1%E6%95%88-214500140.html
Sand-line shear steel scandal. Initiator was not delisted. Second sentence in the SARS alarm map.
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.7k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 17, 2018 5:45am
The second sentence of China Science and Technology criticized the Highways Department for reporting a severed administrative negligence and mistakes in the incident at the Shahei Hung Hom Station (Figure).
See photos
The second sentence of China Science and Technology criticized the Highways Department for reporting a severed administrative negligence and mistakes in the incident at the Shahei Hung Hom Station (Figure).
The MTR yesterday submitted a preliminary investigation report of the "severing of the ribs" incident on the platform of Hung Hom Station on the Shatin Line, but took away the confession made by Zhong Ke Xingye by the project. The HyD received the relevant confession from the MTR on the previous day and thought that the incident involved Criminal, so the police.
Heavy Cases Says Investigation Will Not Wait for Committee
Police said that on the previous day (on the 15th), the Highways Department had received a referral from the District Crime Squad of West Kowloon that had been referred by the Highways Department to take up the issue. The current situation is that there is no supplement, stressing that the police will try their best to provide comprehensive and multi-dimensional views. The investigation will not wait for the investigation of the government's independent investigation committee.
Refers to the Conviction of Work Injury at Liantang Port
China Science and Technology issued a statement yesterday, saying that the Hong Kong Government should comply with Article 5.13 of the Contractor's Management Manual (Revision B) governing public works contractors, 10th, 13th, 14th, and 15th. The provisions of paragraph 16 are convicted by Fanling Magistrates' Courts of the contractor’s casualties in relation to the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Control Point project, as well as the administrative measures in the implementation manual of the Hung Hom Terrace “cutting” event. “As an executor, You shouldn't ignore the responsibilities in its articles, and you shouldn't put yourself out by transferring investigations without results!"
According to the website information of the Development Bureau, the manual states that when contractors are involved in convictions for breaching labor laws, public interests and public safety, serious bad performance in public or private works, and for workers and subcontractors Such as lack of integrity, the Secretary for Development has the power to remove the contractor concerned from the "List of Approved Contractors for Public Works" or the "List of Suppliers and Specialist Contractors". He may also suspend the disqualifications and downgrades. The Development Bureau must give sufficient warning before explaining the disciplinary action to explain the reasons and allow the contracting parties to defend their case.
Searching the information, the Fanling Magistrates' Court sentenced the construction contractor to a fine of 100,000 yuan in early May this year for the death of a workbench in the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control project in November 2016.
Questioning the delay of the roads depriving the evidence
China Science and Technology also pointed out that the MTR report stated that the project sent Leighton to issue a certificate of qualified completion for the project, and was responsible for the determination of tie-iron and laminate reinforcement. It also accused Leighton of instructing its shear reinforcement to reflect the incident. Some people are suspected of being aware of the situation and are suspected of being the culprits. They are also suspected of repeatedly deceiving the MTR. China Science and Technology questioned why the Highways Department did not use the above content to warn against the selection of a confession that the company refused to adopt. After the Chinese company decided that its confession was rejected by the MTR, it became a legal “rumor of evidence”. It will not be accepted by criminal investigations. Therefore, it has been criticized that the Highways Department’s alarm is "an administrative gross negligence and mistake". It also suspects that the Department will protect individual responsible parties and delay investigations with apparently inconclusive investigations. During this period, a large amount of evidence may be caused over time. Loss.
Lawyer: If you find an eyewitness to sue
Attorney Wong Kwok-tong said that the so-called "rumorimony testimony" will not be adopted by the court and will not affect the police investigation. He believes that as long as the police finds the "crippling" eyewitness, the witness also understands the purpose of "reducing ribs" and supplements them with expert witnesses. For confession, there is enough evidence to consider prosecuting.
路政署報警追查沙中線紅磡站擴建月台剪短鋼筋事件。負責釘板及澆灌混土工程的工程二判中科興業指出，港府未有按發展局">"data-reactid="31">Hybrids of the Highways Department traced the incident of shearing the steel bars on the platform of the Hung Hom Station in Shachine Line. The company was responsible for the engineering of the nail board and the water-concrete mixing project. Zhong Ke Xing pointed out that the Hong Kong Government did not press the Development Bureau. The “Contractor Management Manual” established stipulates that the first person who disposes of “tightening ribs” should be excluded from the list of government approved contractors and criticizes the Hong Kong Government for failing to exercise due diligence to monitor contractors. Instead, the Highways Department has chosen to call the police and stay out of business. This is a serious administrative negligence. And mistakes. Some lawyers have pointed out that the police only need to find the “tear-strike” eyewitness and they have strong evidence to consider prosecution.
The MTR yesterday submitted a preliminary investigation report of the "severing of the ribs" incident on the platform of Hung Hom Station on the Shatin Line, but took away the confession made by Zhong Ke Xingye by the project. The HyD received the relevant confession from the MTR on the previous day and thought that the incident involved Criminal, so the police.
Heavy Cases Says Investigation Will Not Wait for Committee
Police said that on the previous day (on the 15th), the Highways Department had received a referral from the District Crime Squad of West Kowloon that had been referred by the Highways Department to take up the matter. The current situation is that there is no supplement, stressing that the police will try their best to provide comprehensive and multi-dimensional views. The investigation will not wait for the investigation of the government's independent investigation committee.
Refers to the Conviction of Work Injury at Liantang Port
China Science and Technology issued a statement yesterday, saying that the Hong Kong Government should comply with Article 5.13 of the Contractor's Management Manual (Revision B) governing public works contractors, 10th, 13th, 14th, and 15th. The provisions of paragraph 16 are convicted by Fanling Magistrates' Courts of the contractor’s casualties in relation to the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Control Point project, as well as the administrative measures in the Executive Handbook for the Hung Hom Terrace “Shearing” event. “As an executor, You shouldn't ignore the responsibilities in its articles, and you shouldn't put yourself out by transferring investigations without results!"
According to the website information of the Development Bureau, the manual states that when contractors are involved in convictions for breaching labor laws, public interests and public safety, serious bad performance in public or private works, and for workers and subcontractors Such as lack of integrity, the Secretary for Development has the power to remove the contractor concerned from the “List of Approved Public Works Contractors” or the “List of Suppliers and Specialist Contractors”. He may also suspend the disqualification and downgrade. The Development Bureau must give sufficient warning before explaining the disciplinary action to explain the reasons and allow the contracting parties to defend their case.
Searching the information, the Fanling Magistrates' Court sentenced the construction contractor to a fine of 100,000 yuan in early May this year for the death of a workbench in the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control project in November 2016.
Questioning the delay of the roads depriving the evidence
China Science and Technology also pointed out that the MTR report stated that the project sent Leighton to issue a certificate of qualified completion for the project, and was responsible for the determination of tie-iron and laminate reinforcement. It also accused Leighton of instructing its shear reinforcement to reflect the incident. Some people are suspected of being aware of the situation and are suspected of being the culprits. They are also suspected of repeatedly deceiving the MTR. China Science and Technology questioned why the Highways Department did not use the above content to warn against the selection of a confession that the company refused to adopt. After the Chinese company decided that its confession was rejected by the MTR, it became a legal “rumor of evidence”. It will not be accepted by criminal investigations. Therefore, it was criticized that the Highways Department's alarm was "an administrative gross negligence and mistake". It also suspected that the Department would protect individual responsible parties and delay the investigation with apparently inconclusive investigations. During this period, a large amount of evidence may be caused over time. Loss.
Lawyer: If you find an eyewitness to sue
Attorney Wong Kwok-tong said that the so-called "rumorimony testimony" will not be adopted by the court and will not affect the police investigation. He believes that as long as the police finds the "crippling" eyewitness, the witness also understands the purpose of the "crimping" and supplements it with expert witnesses. For confession, there is enough evidence to consider prosecuting.
Leighton was fined two years ago for accidental injury to the construction project.
See photos
Leighton was fined two years ago for accidental injury to the construction project.
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B8%AF%E9%90%B5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%BA%8C%E5%88%A4%E6 %8C%87%E6%8E%A7%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%A4%E5%8F%AB%E5%89%AA%E9%8B%BC%E7%AD%8B-214500806.html
Second press cash
MTR reports second sentence accusing large scales of shear reinforcement
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.7k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 16, 2018 5:45am
The MTR submitted an investigation report yesterday, but it was unable to find out the true culprit of Hedgehog Station.
See photos
The MTR submitted an investigation report yesterday, but it was unable to find out the true culprit of Hedgehog Station.
46-page report failed to answer the truth
The MTR yesterday afternoon uploaded the preliminary survey report of steel bar connecting counterfeiting at the Hung Hom Station of the Shazhong Line to the SCL project website. The report was written in English and it was 46 pages in length, but it was impossible to answer who cut the rebar. The report said that the MTR Corporation met with 19 MRT employees and former MTR employees, three chief contractors Leighton personnel, and representatives of the second-tier commercial developers “Bao Xun Construction” and “Zhong Ke Xing Ye”, according to all interviewed MTR employees. Recalling that no one had ever witnessed "scissors", but two resident staff said they had seen or had reported to them the evidence of shearing reinforcements, such as cracks in the joints of rebar screws and connectors, or rebars. The ends of the screw heads are cut short.
5 degree unrolling and short 3 bar without correct
One of the MTR site personnel said that during the period from August to December in 1985, he had witnessed or reported to him five times. He emailed Leighton in December asking for "strengthening the quality inspection." Leighton遂 遂 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛. Another MTR site worker pointed out that the two had witnessed evidence that the heads of the rebars had been shortened and took photographs. The photographs were also attached to Leighton’s e-mails. The two men pointed out that each time they found or heard a problem, they would report to Leighton and ask for correction. However, the resident personnel recalled that there were three rebars at one time that were not corrected.
According to the report, Leighton’s representative stated that he did not know about the “barber shears” and the fact that the steel bars could not be screwed into the screw caps, but the pan-flash representatives said that all the bar rectifications were in accordance with the Leighton and MTR procedures and that the bars were difficult to twist into the screw caps. They would Leighton reported and demanded Leighton to resolve, under certain conditions, Leighton would require the steel to be shortened to twist into the screw cap. It is understood that Leighton sent three non-foreign staff members responsible for the project to meet with the MTR. The attitude is "not cooperation or cooperation," and two of them said that they received "Chong Ke Xing Ye" e-mail before they learned that someone "shorns". Another person claimed to have known the report.
Problem bars revised to no more than 17
The MTR also revised the number of shortened bars to no more than seventeen. It also stated that Leighton had repeatedly determined that the project met the statutory requirements and had a full-time and continuous supervision of the rebar connection process. The MTRCL inspected 20% of the rebar connections as required. Barge components. According to the news, the MTR Corporation has confidence in the “critical checkpoint” system and stressed that the project must be signed without any problems. For the failure to identify “criminal culprits,” the source said that no one has been charged against anybody. “You can comment on the ceremony. He called for a cut by two merchants, but it was estimated that "the workers were greedy for convenience." The emphasis was not on cutting corners, "because the monks have money to drop."
Ma Shiheng acknowledges the problem with the notification mechanism
MTR Chairman Ma Shiheng acknowledged that the incident reflected problems with the notification mechanism and had instructed management and project leaders to review and improve. The MTR has also appointed an independent consultant to test the Hung Hom station platform expansion project and will also fully cooperate with the Hong Kong Government’s independent investigation committee. Any violation of the law will be sent to the office.
It is learnt that the notification mechanism of the Hong Kong Railway Review will include the "cut ribs" incident at To Kwa Wan Station on the Shachine Line. No incident was reported to the director of engineering, Huang Weiming. The "cut ribs" wall is a partition wall and the cut off reinforcements are not affected by the incident. Force, "But they are missed, so we must investigate thoroughly."
Leighton Construction was established in 1962. Since July 5th, it has set foot in Asia. Its business includes construction and civil engineering. Leighton Asia is headquartered in Hong Kong. Leighton and UGL are in the same group, and UGL is also involved in Leung Chun-ying. Refers to the collection event. Leighton is responsible for a number of important infrastructure projects in Hong Kong, including the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, the Central Wan Chai Bypass, the Liantang Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point, the High Speed Rail, the East Kowloon Cultural Centre and the Lantian Tunnel of Tseung Kwan O.
港鐵沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁被揭造假事件，港鐵昨提交調查報告但無法揪出「剪筋」真兇，但披露總承建商（俗稱大判）「禮頓」">">The MTR station's Hung Hom Station, Hung Hom Station, has expanded the connection of steel bars on the platform to be uncovered. The MTR yesterday submitted an investigation report but was unable to reveal the "crippling", but disclosed the main contractor (commonly known as the "Great"). It differs from the second-party quotient “pan-experimental construction”. Pan-xun said that if Leighton ordered it to “scrape”, there would be a remedy afterwards, but Leighton said that he did not know about “stripping ribs”; It also revised the number of sheared bars to no more than seventeen. The Highways Department pointed out last night that since the investigation report revealed that Leighton’s second-tier bidder’s statement to MTR was different from Leighton’s statement to MTR, things could involve a criminal element and the matter was referred to the police for follow-up action. At this stage, the incident will not be commented on. The MTR Corporation said it would fully cooperate with the investigation. The case was handed over to the Regional Crime Unit of Kowloon West for investigation.
46-page report failed to answer the truth
The MTR yesterday afternoon uploaded the preliminary survey report of steel bar connecting counterfeiting at the Hung Hom Station of the Shazhong Line to the SCL project website. The report was written in English and it was 46 pages in length, but it was impossible to answer who cut the rebar. The report said that the MTR Corporation met with 19 MRT employees and former MTR employees, three chief contractors Leighton personnel, and representatives of the second-tier commercial developers “Bao Xun Construction” and “Zhong Ke Xing Ye”, according to all interviewed MTR employees. Recalling that no one had ever witnessed "scissors", but two resident staff said they had seen or had reported to them the evidence of shearing reinforcements, such as cracks in the joints of rebar screws and connectors, or rebars. The ends of the screw heads are cut short.
5 degrees unrolling and short 3 bars without correcting
One of the MTR site personnel said that during the period from August to December in 1985, he had witnessed or reported to him five times. He emailed Leighton in December asking for "strengthening the quality inspection." Leighton遂 遂 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛. Another MTR site worker pointed out that the two had witnessed evidence that the heads of the rebars had been shortened and took photographs. The photographs were also attached to Leighton’s e-mails. The two men pointed out that each time they found or heard a problem, they would report it to Leighton and demand correction. However, there were resident site staff who recalled that one of the three involved steel bars had not been rectified.
According to the report, Leighton’s representative stated that he did not know about “stripping ribs” and the fact that the steel bars could not be screwed into the screw caps. However, the pan-flash representatives said that all the steel bar amendments were in accordance with the Leighton and MTR procedures and that the bars were difficult to twist into the screw caps. They would Leighton reported and demanded Leighton to resolve, under certain conditions, Leighton would require the steel to be shortened to twist into the screw cap. It is understood that Leighton sent three non-foreign staff members responsible for the project to meet with the MTR.
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/沙中線剪鋼筋醜聞-始作俑者未除名-二判中科斥路署報警圖抽身-傳聞證供恐無效-214500140.html
沙中線剪鋼筋醜聞 始作俑者未除名 二判中科斥路署報警圖抽身 傳聞證供恐無效
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.7k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月17日 上午5:45
查看相片
二判中科興業批評路政署就沙中線紅磡站（圖）剪筋事件報警是嚴重行政疏忽和失誤。
港鐵昨提交沙中線紅磡站擴建月台「剪筋」事件初步調查報告，但抽走了工程二判中科興業所作的口供；路政署前日收到港鐵提交相關口供後認為事件或涉及刑事，於是報警。
重案組稱調查不會等委員會
警方表示，前日（15日）收到路政署轉介關於港鐵剪短鋼筋事件，已交由西九龍總區重案組接手調查，目前沒有任何補充，強調警方會盡力全方位、多角度地調查，不會等待政府獨立調查委員會的調查。
指另涉蓮塘口岸工傷遭定罪
中科興業昨發表聲明，指港府應按規管工務工程承建商的《承建商管理手冊（修訂版B）》中第五點一三條，第十、十三、十四、十五及十六款的條文，就涉事承建商就蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程的傷亡事件被粉嶺裁判法院定罪，以及紅磡月台「剪筋」事件，執行手冊中的行政措施，「作為執行者，不應漠視其條文上的責任，亦不應借轉移沒有結果的調查而置身事外！」
根據發展局網頁資料，該份手冊列明當承建商涉及因違犯勞工法例被法庭定罪、事件涉及公眾利益和公眾安全、於公共或私家工程中涉及嚴重差劣表現，及對工人、分判商等欠缺誠信，發展局局長有權將涉事承建商剔出「認可公共工程承建商名冊」或「供應商及專門承造商名冊」，亦可暫停資格、降級等處分。發展局在處分前須給予足夠警告，解釋原因，並讓涉事承辦商申辯。
翻查資料，粉嶺裁判法院今年五月初，就二○一六年十一月蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程中工作台倒塌導致一死三傷事件，判處工程承建商禮頓罰款十萬元。
質疑路署拖延時間令證據流失
中科興業又指，港鐵報告列明工程大判禮頓就工程發出合格完工證明書，而負責紮鐵及層板鋼筋接合的二判泛迅，更指控禮頓指示其剪鋼筋，反映事件中有人涉嫌全局知情，而且是涉嫌元兇，更涉嫌一再欺騙港鐵。中科興業質疑路政署為何不以上述內容報警，反選擇該公司被港鐵拒絕採納的口供報案，中科興業認為其口供被港鐵拒絕採納後，已淪為法律上的「傳聞證供」，不會被刑事調查接納，因此批評路政署報警是「行政上的嚴重疏忽和失誤」，並懷疑署方保護個別責任方，並以顯然沒有結果的調查拖延時間，期間可能令大量證據隨時間流失。
律師：倘找到目擊證人有力起訴
律師黃國桐表示，所謂「傳聞證供」只是法庭不會採納，並不影響警方調查，他認為只要警方找到「剪筋」目擊證人，而證人亦理解「剪筋」的目的，再輔以專家證人口供，便有足夠證據可考慮提出起訴。
" data-reactid="31">路政署報警追查沙中線紅磡站擴建月台剪短鋼筋事件。負責釘板及澆灌混土工程的工程二判中科興業指出，港府未有按發展局制訂的「承建商管理手冊」規定，處分「剪筋」的始作俑者，例如將其剔出政府認可承建商名單，批評港府未盡責監管承建商，反而路政署選擇報警及置身事外，屬嚴重行政疏忽和失誤。有律師指，警方只需找到「剪筋」目擊證人，便有有力證據考慮起訴。
港鐵昨提交沙中線紅磡站擴建月台「剪筋」事件初步調查報告，但抽走了工程二判中科興業所作的口供；路政署前日收到港鐵提交相關口供後認為事件或涉及刑事，於是報警。
重案組稱調查不會等委員會
警方表示，前日（15日）收到路政署轉介關於港鐵剪短鋼筋事件，已交由西九龍總區重案組接手調查，目前沒有任何補充，強調警方會盡力全方位、多角度地調查，不會等待政府獨立調查委員會的調查。
指另涉蓮塘口岸工傷遭定罪
中科興業昨發表聲明，指港府應按規管工務工程承建商的《承建商管理手冊（修訂版B）》中第五點一三條，第十、十三、十四、十五及十六款的條文，就涉事承建商就蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程的傷亡事件被粉嶺裁判法院定罪，以及紅磡月台「剪筋」事件，執行手冊中的行政措施，「作為執行者，不應漠視其條文上的責任，亦不應借轉移沒有結果的調查而置身事外！」
根據發展局網頁資料，該份手冊列明當承建商涉及因違犯勞工法例被法庭定罪、事件涉及公眾利益和公眾安全、於公共或私家工程中涉及嚴重差劣表現，及對工人、分判商等欠缺誠信，發展局局長有權將涉事承建商剔出「認可公共工程承建商名冊」或「供應商及專門承造商名冊」，亦可暫停資格、降級等處分。發展局在處分前須給予足夠警告，解釋原因，並讓涉事承辦商申辯。
翻查資料，粉嶺裁判法院今年五月初，就二○一六年十一月蓮塘/香園圍口岸工程中工作台倒塌導致一死三傷事件，判處工程承建商禮頓罰款十萬元。
質疑路署拖延時間令證據流失
中科興業又指，港鐵報告列明工程大判禮頓就工程發出合格完工證明書，而負責紮鐵及層板鋼筋接合的二判泛迅，更指控禮頓指示其剪鋼筋，反映事件中有人涉嫌全局知情，而且是涉嫌元兇，更涉嫌一再欺騙港鐵。中科興業質疑路政署為何不以上述內容報警，反選擇該公司被港鐵拒絕採納的口供報案，中科興業認為其口供被港鐵拒絕採納後，已淪為法律上的「傳聞證供」，不會被刑事調查接納，因此批評路政署報警是「行政上的嚴重疏忽和失誤」，並懷疑署方保護個別責任方，並以顯然沒有結果的調查拖延時間，期間可能令大量證據隨時間流失。
律師：倘找到目擊證人有力起訴
律師黃國桐表示，所謂「傳聞證供」只是法庭不會採納，並不影響警方調查，他認為只要警方找到「剪筋」目擊證人，而證人亦理解「剪筋」的目的，再輔以專家證人口供，便有足夠證據可考慮提出起訴。
查看相片
禮頓兩年前曾因承造工程有傷亡意外遭罰款。
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/港鐵報告二判指控大判叫剪鋼筋-214500806.html
港鐵報告二判指控大判叫剪鋼筋
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.7k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月16日 上午5:45
查看相片
港鐵昨提交調查報告，但無法揪出紅磡站「剪筋」真兇。
46頁報告無法解答剪筋真兇
港鐵昨午將沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁造假初步調查報告，上傳至沙中線工程網頁。報告以英文撰寫，全長四十六頁，但無法解答誰剪短鋼筋。報告指，港鐵會見十九名現職及前港鐵員工、三位總承建商禮頓人員，以及二判商「泛迅建築」及「中科興業」的代表，據所有被訪港鐵員工憶述，無人曾目睹「剪筋」，但有兩位駐地盤職員稱自己曾看見、或有人向他們匯報剪短鋼筋的證據，例如鋼筋螺絲頭與連接器的接駁位有縫隙、或鋼筋螺絲頭部分末端被剪短。
5度揭剪短 3條鋼筋無糾正
其中一名港鐵地盤人員說在一五年八至十二月期間，曾目睹或有人向他匯報「剪筋」共五次，他於十二月電郵禮頓要求「加強質量檢查」，禮頓遂向泛迅發不合格報告。另一名港鐵地盤人員則指，兩次目睹有鋼筋螺絲頭部分被剪短的證據，並拍下照片，而港鐵給予禮頓的電郵中亦附有該幅照片。兩人指，每次發現或聽到有問題都會向禮頓反映並要求糾正，但有駐地盤人員憶述指，其中一次有三條涉事鋼筋並無糾正。
報告指，禮頓代表稱不知道「剪筋」及鋼筋不能扭入螺絲帽的事情，但泛迅代表說所有鋼筋修正皆按照禮頓及港鐵程序，鋼筋難扭入螺絲帽，他們會向禮頓報告，並要求禮頓解決，某情況下禮頓會要求將鋼筋剪短以扭入螺絲帽。據了解，禮頓派出三名負責項目的非外籍職員與港鐵會面，態度「不算合作，亦不算不合作」，當中兩人稱收到「中科興業」電郵才知道有人「剪筋」，另一人稱是看報道才知。
問題鋼筋修訂至不多於17條
港鐵亦將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條，又稱禮頓再三確定工程符合法定要求，並有全日及持續監督鋼筋接駁工序，港鐵則按規定檢查其中兩成接駁組件。消息指，港鐵對「關鍵檢查點」制度有信心，強調工程肯定無問題才簽名；對於未能查出「剪筋元兇」，消息稱現時未能對任何人士有指控，「唔可以評論禮頓叫二判商剪」，但估計是「工人貪方便先咁做」，強調不是偷工減料，「因為冇人有錢落袋。」
馬時亨承認通報機制有問題
港鐵主席馬時亨承認事件反映通報機制有問題，已責成管理層及項目負責人檢視及改善，港鐵亦已委任獨立顧問測試紅磡站月台擴建工程，亦會全力配合港府獨立調查委員會，若有任何違規違法會送官究辦。
據悉，港鐵檢討通報機制將包括沙中線土瓜灣站「削筋」事件，事件沒有人報告給工程總監黃唯銘，「削筋」牆厚八吋屬分隔牆，削走的鋼筋並不受力，「但都係漏招，所以要徹查。」
禮頓建築於一九六二年成立，七五年起涉足亞洲，業務包括建築、土木工程等，禮頓亞洲總部設於香港，禮頓與UGL同屬一個集團，而UGL亦捲入梁振英被指收款事件。禮頓在港負責多項重要基建工程，由早年的輕鐵，到現時的港珠澳大橋、中環灣仔繞道、蓮塘香園圍口岸、高鐵、東九文化中心、將軍澳藍田隧道等也有份參與。
">港鐵沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁被揭造假事件，港鐵昨提交調查報告但無法揪出「剪筋」真兇，但披露總承建商（俗稱大判）「禮頓」與二判商「泛迅建築」說法不一，泛迅說遇上問題會由禮頓下命令才「剪筋」，之後會有補救做法，但禮頓說對「剪筋」不知情；報告又將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條。路政署昨晚指出，因調查報告揭示禮頓的二判商向港鐵的陳述，與禮頓向港鐵的陳述有不同，事情或會涉及刑事成分，因此已將事宜轉介警方跟進，現階段不會評論事件，港鐵表示會全力配合有關調查工作。案件交西九龍總區重案組接手調查。
46頁報告無法解答剪筋真兇
港鐵昨午將沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁造假初步調查報告，上傳至沙中線工程網頁。報告以英文撰寫，全長四十六頁，但無法解答誰剪短鋼筋。報告指，港鐵會見十九名現職及前港鐵員工、三位總承建商禮頓人員，以及二判商「泛迅建築」及「中科興業」的代表，據所有被訪港鐵員工憶述，無人曾目睹「剪筋」，但有兩位駐地盤職員稱自己曾看見、或有人向他們匯報剪短鋼筋的證據，例如鋼筋螺絲頭與連接器的接駁位有縫隙、或鋼筋螺絲頭部分末端被剪短。
5度揭剪短 3條鋼筋無糾正
其中一名港鐵地盤人員說在一五年八至十二月期間，曾目睹或有人向他匯報「剪筋」共五次，他於十二月電郵禮頓要求「加強質量檢查」，禮頓遂向泛迅發不合格報告。另一名港鐵地盤人員則指，兩次目睹有鋼筋螺絲頭部分被剪短的證據，並拍下照片，而港鐵給予禮頓的電郵中亦附有該幅照片。兩人指，每次發現或聽到有問題都會向禮頓反映並要求糾正，但有駐地盤人員憶述指，其中一次有三條涉事鋼筋並無糾正。
報告指，禮頓代表稱不知道「剪筋」及鋼筋不能扭入螺絲帽的事情，但泛迅代表說所有鋼筋修正皆按照禮頓及港鐵程序，鋼筋難扭入螺絲帽，他們會向禮頓報告，並要求禮頓解決，某情況下禮頓會要求將鋼筋剪短以扭入螺絲帽。據了解，禮頓派出三名負責項目的非外籍職員與港鐵會面，態度「不算合作，亦不算不合作」，當中兩人稱收到「中科興業」電郵才知道有人「剪筋」，另一人稱是看報道才知。
問題鋼筋修訂至不多於17條
港鐵亦將被剪短鋼筋數目修訂至不多於十七條，又稱禮頓再三確定工程符合法定要求，並有全日及持續監督鋼筋接駁工序，港鐵則按規定檢查其中兩成接駁組件。消息指，港鐵對「關鍵檢查點」制度有信心，強調工程肯定無問題才簽名；對於未能查出「剪筋元兇」，消息稱現時未能對任何人士有指控，「唔可以評論禮頓叫二判商剪」，但估計是「工人貪方便先咁做」，強調不是偷工減料，「因為冇人有錢落袋。」
馬時亨承認通報機制有問題
港鐵主席馬時亨承認事件反映通報機制有問題，已責成管理層及項目負責人檢視及改善，港鐵亦已委任獨立顧問測試紅磡站月台擴建工程，亦會全力配合港府獨立調查委員會，若有任何違規違法會送官究辦。
據悉，港鐵檢討通報機制將包括沙中線土瓜灣站「削筋」事件，事件沒有人報告給工程總監黃唯銘，「削筋」牆厚八吋屬分隔牆，削走的鋼筋並不受力，「但都係漏招，所以要徹查。」
禮頓建築於一九六二年成立，七五年起涉足亞洲，業務包括建築、土木工程等，禮頓亞洲總部設於香港，禮頓與UGL同屬一個集團，而UGL亦捲入梁振英被指收款事件。禮頓在港負責多項重要基建工程，由早年的輕鐵，到現時的港珠澳大橋、中環灣仔繞道、蓮塘香園圍口岸、高鐵、東九文化中心、將軍澳藍田隧道等也有份參與。
查看相片
總承建商「禮頓」向港鐵的陳述，與二判商「泛迅」的陳述有不同。（黃仲民攝）
查看相片
螺絲帽需要全部套入鋼筋末端才屬合格。
查看相片
馬時亨
查看相片
問題鋼筋位置
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B2%99%E4%B8%AD7%E7%B7%9A%E5%89%AA%E9%8B%BC%E7%AD%8B%E9 %86%9C%E8%81%9E-%E5%A7%8B%E4%BD%9C%E4%BF%91%E8%80%85%E6%9C%AA%E9%99%A4%E5% 90%8D-%E4%BA%8C%E5%88%A4%E4%B8%AD%E7%A7%91%E6%96%A5%E8%B7%AF%E7%BD%B2%E5%A0 %B1%E8%AD%A6%E5%9C%96%E6%8A%BD%E8%BA%AB-%E5%82%B3%E8%81%9E%E8%AD%89%E4%BE% 9B%E6%81%90%E7%84%A1%E6%95%88-214500140.html
Sand-line shear steel scandal. Initiator was not delisted. Second sentence in the SARS alarm map.
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.7k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 17, 2018 5:45am
The second sentence of China Science and Technology criticized the Highways Department for reporting a severed administrative negligence and mistakes in the incident at the Shahei Hung Hom Station (Figure).
See photos
The second sentence of China Science and Technology criticized the Highways Department for reporting a severed administrative negligence and mistakes in the incident at the Shahei Hung Hom Station (Figure).
The MTR yesterday submitted a preliminary investigation report of the "severing of the ribs" incident on the platform of Hung Hom Station on the Shatin Line, but took away the confession made by Zhong Ke Xingye by the project. The HyD received the relevant confession from the MTR on the previous day and thought that the incident involved Criminal, so the police.
Heavy Cases Says Investigation Will Not Wait for Committee
Police said that on the previous day (on the 15th), the Highways Department had received a referral from the District Crime Squad of West Kowloon that had been referred by the Highways Department to take up the issue. The current situation is that there is no supplement, stressing that the police will try their best to provide comprehensive and multi-dimensional views. The investigation will not wait for the investigation of the government's independent investigation committee.
Refers to the Conviction of Work Injury at Liantang Port
China Science and Technology issued a statement yesterday, saying that the Hong Kong Government should comply with Article 5.13 of the Contractor's Management Manual (Revision B) governing public works contractors, 10th, 13th, 14th, and 15th. The provisions of paragraph 16 are convicted by Fanling Magistrates' Courts of the contractor’s casualties in relation to the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Control Point project, as well as the administrative measures in the implementation manual of the Hung Hom Terrace “cutting” event. “As an executor, You shouldn't ignore the responsibilities in its articles, and you shouldn't put yourself out by transferring investigations without results!"
According to the website information of the Development Bureau, the manual states that when contractors are involved in convictions for breaching labor laws, public interests and public safety, serious bad performance in public or private works, and for workers and subcontractors Such as lack of integrity, the Secretary for Development has the power to remove the contractor concerned from the "List of Approved Contractors for Public Works" or the "List of Suppliers and Specialist Contractors". He may also suspend the disqualifications and downgrades. The Development Bureau must give sufficient warning before explaining the disciplinary action to explain the reasons and allow the contracting parties to defend their case.
Searching the information, the Fanling Magistrates' Court sentenced the construction contractor to a fine of 100,000 yuan in early May this year for the death of a workbench in the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control project in November 2016.
Questioning the delay of the roads depriving the evidence
China Science and Technology also pointed out that the MTR report stated that the project sent Leighton to issue a certificate of qualified completion for the project, and was responsible for the determination of tie-iron and laminate reinforcement. It also accused Leighton of instructing its shear reinforcement to reflect the incident. Some people are suspected of being aware of the situation and are suspected of being the culprits. They are also suspected of repeatedly deceiving the MTR. China Science and Technology questioned why the Highways Department did not use the above content to warn against the selection of a confession that the company refused to adopt. After the Chinese company decided that its confession was rejected by the MTR, it became a legal “rumor of evidence”. It will not be accepted by criminal investigations. Therefore, it has been criticized that the Highways Department’s alarm is "an administrative gross negligence and mistake". It also suspects that the Department will protect individual responsible parties and delay investigations with apparently inconclusive investigations. During this period, a large amount of evidence may be caused over time. Loss.
Lawyer: If you find an eyewitness to sue
Attorney Wong Kwok-tong said that the so-called "rumorimony testimony" will not be adopted by the court and will not affect the police investigation. He believes that as long as the police finds the "crippling" eyewitness, the witness also understands the purpose of "reducing ribs" and supplements them with expert witnesses. For confession, there is enough evidence to consider prosecuting.
路政署報警追查沙中線紅磡站擴建月台剪短鋼筋事件。負責釘板及澆灌混土工程的工程二判中科興業指出，港府未有按發展局">"data-reactid="31">Hybrids of the Highways Department traced the incident of shearing the steel bars on the platform of the Hung Hom Station in Shachine Line. The company was responsible for the engineering of the nail board and the water-concrete mixing project. Zhong Ke Xing pointed out that the Hong Kong Government did not press the Development Bureau. The “Contractor Management Manual” established stipulates that the first person who disposes of “tightening ribs” should be excluded from the list of government approved contractors and criticizes the Hong Kong Government for failing to exercise due diligence to monitor contractors. Instead, the Highways Department has chosen to call the police and stay out of business. This is a serious administrative negligence. And mistakes. Some lawyers have pointed out that the police only need to find the “tear-strike” eyewitness and they have strong evidence to consider prosecution.
The MTR yesterday submitted a preliminary investigation report of the "severing of the ribs" incident on the platform of Hung Hom Station on the Shatin Line, but took away the confession made by Zhong Ke Xingye by the project. The HyD received the relevant confession from the MTR on the previous day and thought that the incident involved Criminal, so the police.
Heavy Cases Says Investigation Will Not Wait for Committee
Police said that on the previous day (on the 15th), the Highways Department had received a referral from the District Crime Squad of West Kowloon that had been referred by the Highways Department to take up the matter. The current situation is that there is no supplement, stressing that the police will try their best to provide comprehensive and multi-dimensional views. The investigation will not wait for the investigation of the government's independent investigation committee.
Refers to the Conviction of Work Injury at Liantang Port
China Science and Technology issued a statement yesterday, saying that the Hong Kong Government should comply with Article 5.13 of the Contractor's Management Manual (Revision B) governing public works contractors, 10th, 13th, 14th, and 15th. The provisions of paragraph 16 are convicted by Fanling Magistrates' Courts of the contractor’s casualties in relation to the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Control Point project, as well as the administrative measures in the Executive Handbook for the Hung Hom Terrace “Shearing” event. “As an executor, You shouldn't ignore the responsibilities in its articles, and you shouldn't put yourself out by transferring investigations without results!"
According to the website information of the Development Bureau, the manual states that when contractors are involved in convictions for breaching labor laws, public interests and public safety, serious bad performance in public or private works, and for workers and subcontractors Such as lack of integrity, the Secretary for Development has the power to remove the contractor concerned from the “List of Approved Public Works Contractors” or the “List of Suppliers and Specialist Contractors”. He may also suspend the disqualification and downgrade. The Development Bureau must give sufficient warning before explaining the disciplinary action to explain the reasons and allow the contracting parties to defend their case.
Searching the information, the Fanling Magistrates' Court sentenced the construction contractor to a fine of 100,000 yuan in early May this year for the death of a workbench in the Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control project in November 2016.
Questioning the delay of the roads depriving the evidence
China Science and Technology also pointed out that the MTR report stated that the project sent Leighton to issue a certificate of qualified completion for the project, and was responsible for the determination of tie-iron and laminate reinforcement. It also accused Leighton of instructing its shear reinforcement to reflect the incident. Some people are suspected of being aware of the situation and are suspected of being the culprits. They are also suspected of repeatedly deceiving the MTR. China Science and Technology questioned why the Highways Department did not use the above content to warn against the selection of a confession that the company refused to adopt. After the Chinese company decided that its confession was rejected by the MTR, it became a legal “rumor of evidence”. It will not be accepted by criminal investigations. Therefore, it was criticized that the Highways Department's alarm was "an administrative gross negligence and mistake". It also suspected that the Department would protect individual responsible parties and delay the investigation with apparently inconclusive investigations. During this period, a large amount of evidence may be caused over time. Loss.
Lawyer: If you find an eyewitness to sue
Attorney Wong Kwok-tong said that the so-called "rumorimony testimony" will not be adopted by the court and will not affect the police investigation. He believes that as long as the police finds the "crippling" eyewitness, the witness also understands the purpose of the "crimping" and supplements it with expert witnesses. For confession, there is enough evidence to consider prosecuting.
Leighton was fined two years ago for accidental injury to the construction project.
See photos
Leighton was fined two years ago for accidental injury to the construction project.
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B8%AF%E9%90%B5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%BA%8C%E5%88%A4%E6 %8C%87%E6%8E%A7%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%A4%E5%8F%AB%E5%89%AA%E9%8B%BC%E7%AD%8B-214500806.html
Second press cash
MTR reports second sentence accusing large scales of shear reinforcement
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.7k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 16, 2018 5:45am
The MTR submitted an investigation report yesterday, but it was unable to find out the true culprit of Hedgehog Station.
See photos
The MTR submitted an investigation report yesterday, but it was unable to find out the true culprit of Hedgehog Station.
46-page report failed to answer the truth
The MTR yesterday afternoon uploaded the preliminary survey report of steel bar connecting counterfeiting at the Hung Hom Station of the Shazhong Line to the SCL project website. The report was written in English and it was 46 pages in length, but it was impossible to answer who cut the rebar. The report said that the MTR Corporation met with 19 MRT employees and former MTR employees, three chief contractors Leighton personnel, and representatives of the second-tier commercial developers “Bao Xun Construction” and “Zhong Ke Xing Ye”, according to all interviewed MTR employees. Recalling that no one had ever witnessed "scissors", but two resident staff said they had seen or had reported to them the evidence of shearing reinforcements, such as cracks in the joints of rebar screws and connectors, or rebars. The ends of the screw heads are cut short.
5 degree unrolling and short 3 bar without correct
One of the MTR site personnel said that during the period from August to December in 1985, he had witnessed or reported to him five times. He emailed Leighton in December asking for "strengthening the quality inspection." Leighton遂 遂 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛. Another MTR site worker pointed out that the two had witnessed evidence that the heads of the rebars had been shortened and took photographs. The photographs were also attached to Leighton’s e-mails. The two men pointed out that each time they found or heard a problem, they would report to Leighton and ask for correction. However, the resident personnel recalled that there were three rebars at one time that were not corrected.
According to the report, Leighton’s representative stated that he did not know about the “barber shears” and the fact that the steel bars could not be screwed into the screw caps, but the pan-flash representatives said that all the bar rectifications were in accordance with the Leighton and MTR procedures and that the bars were difficult to twist into the screw caps. They would Leighton reported and demanded Leighton to resolve, under certain conditions, Leighton would require the steel to be shortened to twist into the screw cap. It is understood that Leighton sent three non-foreign staff members responsible for the project to meet with the MTR. The attitude is "not cooperation or cooperation," and two of them said that they received "Chong Ke Xing Ye" e-mail before they learned that someone "shorns". Another person claimed to have known the report.
Problem bars revised to no more than 17
The MTR also revised the number of shortened bars to no more than seventeen. It also stated that Leighton had repeatedly determined that the project met the statutory requirements and had a full-time and continuous supervision of the rebar connection process. The MTRCL inspected 20% of the rebar connections as required. Barge components. According to the news, the MTR Corporation has confidence in the “critical checkpoint” system and stressed that the project must be signed without any problems. For the failure to identify “criminal culprits,” the source said that no one has been charged against anybody. “You can comment on the ceremony. He called for a cut by two merchants, but it was estimated that "the workers were greedy for convenience." The emphasis was not on cutting corners, "because the monks have money to drop."
Ma Shiheng acknowledges the problem with the notification mechanism
MTR Chairman Ma Shiheng acknowledged that the incident reflected problems with the notification mechanism and had instructed management and project leaders to review and improve. The MTR has also appointed an independent consultant to test the Hung Hom station platform expansion project and will also fully cooperate with the Hong Kong Government’s independent investigation committee. Any violation of the law will be sent to the office.
It is learnt that the notification mechanism of the Hong Kong Railway Review will include the "cut ribs" incident at To Kwa Wan Station on the Shachine Line. No incident was reported to the director of engineering, Huang Weiming. The "cut ribs" wall is a partition wall and the cut off reinforcements are not affected by the incident. Force, "But they are missed, so we must investigate thoroughly."
Leighton Construction was established in 1962. Since July 5th, it has set foot in Asia. Its business includes construction and civil engineering. Leighton Asia is headquartered in Hong Kong. Leighton and UGL are in the same group, and UGL is also involved in Leung Chun-ying. Refers to the collection event. Leighton is responsible for a number of important infrastructure projects in Hong Kong, including the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, the Central Wan Chai Bypass, the Liantang Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point, the High Speed Rail, the East Kowloon Cultural Centre and the Lantian Tunnel of Tseung Kwan O.
港鐵沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁被揭造假事件，港鐵昨提交調查報告但無法揪出「剪筋」真兇，但披露總承建商（俗稱大判）「禮頓」">">The MTR station's Hung Hom Station, Hung Hom Station, has expanded the connection of steel bars on the platform to be uncovered. The MTR yesterday submitted an investigation report but was unable to reveal the "crippling", but disclosed the main contractor (commonly known as the "Great"). It differs from the second-party quotient “pan-experimental construction”. Pan-xun said that if Leighton ordered it to “scrape”, there would be a remedy afterwards, but Leighton said that he did not know about “stripping ribs”; It also revised the number of sheared bars to no more than seventeen. The Highways Department pointed out last night that since the investigation report revealed that Leighton’s second-tier bidder’s statement to MTR was different from Leighton’s statement to MTR, things could involve a criminal element and the matter was referred to the police for follow-up action. At this stage, the incident will not be commented on. The MTR Corporation said it would fully cooperate with the investigation. The case was handed over to the Regional Crime Unit of Kowloon West for investigation.
46-page report failed to answer the truth
The MTR yesterday afternoon uploaded the preliminary survey report of steel bar connecting counterfeiting at the Hung Hom Station of the Shazhong Line to the SCL project website. The report was written in English and it was 46 pages in length, but it was impossible to answer who cut the rebar. The report said that the MTR Corporation met with 19 MRT employees and former MTR employees, three chief contractors Leighton personnel, and representatives of the second-tier commercial developers “Bao Xun Construction” and “Zhong Ke Xing Ye”, according to all interviewed MTR employees. Recalling that no one had ever witnessed "scissors", but two resident staff said they had seen or had reported to them the evidence of shearing reinforcements, such as cracks in the joints of rebar screws and connectors, or rebars. The ends of the screw heads are cut short.
5 degrees unrolling and short 3 bars without correcting
One of the MTR site personnel said that during the period from August to December in 1985, he had witnessed or reported to him five times. He emailed Leighton in December asking for "strengthening the quality inspection." Leighton遂 遂 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛 泛. Another MTR site worker pointed out that the two had witnessed evidence that the heads of the rebars had been shortened and took photographs. The photographs were also attached to Leighton’s e-mails. The two men pointed out that each time they found or heard a problem, they would report it to Leighton and demand correction. However, there were resident site staff who recalled that one of the three involved steel bars had not been rectified.
According to the report, Leighton’s representative stated that he did not know about “stripping ribs” and the fact that the steel bars could not be screwed into the screw caps. However, the pan-flash representatives said that all the steel bar amendments were in accordance with the Leighton and MTR procedures and that the bars were difficult to twist into the screw caps. They would Leighton reported and demanded Leighton to resolve, under certain conditions, Leighton would require the steel to be shortened to twist into the screw cap. It is understood that Leighton sent three non-foreign staff members responsible for the project to meet with the MTR.
