• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Hin Leong Trading.. Singapore's largest pte ltd..Going COLLAPSE!...

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
HSBC Holdings Plc along with a clutch of other banks have a combined exposure of at least $3 billion to Singapore’s Hin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd., and are in talks with the privately-held oil trader over shoring up its finances, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

A group of about 10 lenders including HSBC, Singapore’s three largest banks, Standard Chartered Plc and Deutsche Bank AG held a virtual meeting with the oil trader and its advisers on Tuesday, the people said, asking not to be identified because they aren’t authorized to speak publicly. HSBC has the biggest exposure to Hin Leong at about $600 million, they added.


Singapore’s closely-knit oil trading community is gripped by speculation over the predicament of one of its biggest players and the potentially far-reaching impact its difficulties could have on the market and trading partners. Before crude’s spectacular crash due to the coronavirus crisis, it would have been almost unfathomable that a company of Hin Leong’s status could be in such a position.

Bloomberg reported last week that some banks wouldn’t issue new letters of credit to the trader because of concern over its ability to repay the short-term debt. Nobody responded to calls or emails to the company seeking comment.

DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Singapore’s largest lender, has an exposure of about $300 million to Hin Leong, while its local competitors Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. and United Overseas Bank Ltd. are owed at least $100 million each, according to the people.

Representatives for HSBC, Standard Chartered, Deutsche Bank and the three Singapore lenders declined to comment.

Possible Solutions
Among the measures discussed at the Tuesday meeting were debt reduction, extending loan maturities and some form of moratorium on repayments, according to one of the people.

The banks are planning to come back early next week on possible solutions, and will likely appoint an adviser to help them in their negotiations, another person said.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore, the nation’s financial regulator and central bank, last week eased capital requirements to give banks more leeway to bolster lending during the coronavirus-fueled slowdown.

Founded by legendary self-made Chinese tycoon Lim Oon Kuin, Hin Leong could be the latest casualty of the collapse in oil prices and a heightened caution among lenders to finance commodity trades.

The company was established in 1963 and has grown into one of Asia’s largest suppliers of ship fuel, or bunkers. OK Lim, as the founder is known, built the company from a one-man-one-truck oil dealer to a regional powerhouse with assets including 130 vessels and businesses across oil trading, terminal and storage, bunker supply and lubricants manufacturing, according to its website.


The company’s bunkering arm, Ocean Bunkering Services (Pte.) Ltd., was ranked the third-largest shipping fuel supplier in Singapore last year, according to the city-state’s Maritime and Port Authority. Singapore is the world’s biggest shipping fuel bunkering hub.

Letters of credit are a critical financial lifeline for commodity traders, used as way of financing short-term trade. A bank issues the so-called L/C on behalf of the buyer as a guarantee of payment to the seller. Once the goods have exchanged hands, the buyer repays the lender.

— With assistance by Philip Lagerkranser
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
sorry to bust the bubble ...in international trade we have L/C precisely because buyers cannot back out from a contract to buy...L/C means the bank gurantee payment ...even if the opening bank is based in say China or India there is always a negotiating bank in singapore or your home country ....even if your negotiating to bank takes no responsibly you can always say confirm with any bank...meaning even if the opening bank refuses to pay the confirming bank pays....and all these are regulated by Internatiinal banking regulation....so ,where is the question of buyers refusing to take delivery or pay ...since the buyer is not paying but the bank is

unless,the buyer and seller enter into othet arrangements if psyments....even than ,in all transactions banks are somehow involved ....for example where is lim to get 3 billion dollars to pay for the oil he is buying frm oil producers?..from banks ,of course...which begets the question what is the basis or collateral the lending bank sees before they lent to lim?...most likely the L/C lim received
So then what gives?
I dunno about the bunkering industry but I’m sure these traders would hedge their bets. Unless he was speculating big time and got burnt then got nobody to blame but himself.
 

Nice-Gook

Alfrescian
Loyal
So then what gives?
I dunno about the bunkering industry but I’m sure these traders would hedge their bets. Unless he was speculating big time and got burnt then got nobody to blame but himself.
i don't know pal...its just like telling a lawyer that i had committed a murder ,can you defend me ? ...unless you study the case i can't tell anything that may weigh in ...othetwise just KPKB here

the very reason why i had prempted that i am merely speculating ..and all rebuttals in thia tread is discounting the possiblity

what i suspect is..the banks and lim were by passing good bank practices...eg if you go to a bank and say i want to buy X from China for 100 bucks and i dont really trust the supplier can you open an L/C...than thw bank would say we alao don't trust you so put down 130 bucks we open L/C..than over the years you trade and thw bank knows you and your supplier...now,the bank will beg you for business for say 30 bucks collateral for 100 bucks L/C...soon thw bank will offer you clean L/C and you take back even that 30 buck deposit...now many banks will be chasing you for business and than 1 will come amd also offer TR ,trust receipt ...meaning now you can import 100 bucks using bank money and and when the goods arrive the convert to TR for 30 to 120 days credit..now you don't pay the bank for 6 months, of course you will incur interest charges

and the cycle goes on ..but banking regulations by the central bank puts some restrictions ...the MAS may say if your paid capital is only 2 bucks than banks should not lend you a 1000.

this where i speculate where lim and banks got too comfy and did not follow the good banking practice ...than this covd 19 hapened, and all got cold feet
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
which begets the question what is the basis or collateral the lending bank sees before they lent to lim?...most likely the L/C lim received
His collateral was the crude oil and refined oil which he trades. The banks maybe financed 70% of the trade. He puts in the rest. But his collateral went South.
So we can conclude he was a humongous trader to lose usd3 bil of banks money. That was apart from his cash portion.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
So then what gives?
I dunno about the bunkering industry but I’m sure these traders would hedge their bets. Unless he was speculating big time and got burnt then got nobody to blame but himself.



me smell think Lim Senior and or Junior might be doing a Thakral Brothers Pte Ltd stunt.
 
Top