• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Good PM Lee Sues Oppie Leong For Defamation! Guess How Much Damages Oppie Leong Must Pay?

shiokalingam

Alfrescian
Loyal
Leong is deceitful. His wife pretends to be unconscious and they both go into hiding to avoid PM Lee's lawyers. Cowards!


it seems leong , wife and maid can run and can hide. but for how long ?

better to come out from hiding and face it.

otherwise how to ask for Donation ?
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
it seems leong , wife and maid can run and can hide. but for how long ?

better to come out from hiding and face it.

otherwise how to ask for Donation ?

The authorities are keeping a keen lookout at the airport, land and sea borders. Oppie Leong can run, but he can't hide.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
We've marshalled our grassroots volunteers from the neighbourhood watch to help the authorities locate Oppie Leong.
 

shiokalingam

Alfrescian
Loyal
Screenshot_20181205-162004.jpg
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
Unable to sue Facebook and takes on a user is even more defaming and shameful.
Leong's post was shared 18 times before it was taken down...that's a small audience but Facebook held tight for many more.
Human Rights should force Facebook to make a stand on this since they own the Share button
 
Last edited:

shiokalingam

Alfrescian
Loyal
Leong is deceitful. His wife pretends to be unconscious and they both go into hiding to avoid PM Lee's lawyers. Cowards!


Stirring again


Roy Ngern has some valid points :


It's an excuse. "Secondly, what exactly constitutes defamation? Leong did not write the article. Nor did he promote the article with any of his own comments or opinions. In other words, it was a "blank" share. Is this really defamation? After all, he was in no position to verify the truth of the article. He also complied with the take down notice. The only thing he did not do was issue a public apology. A refusal to apologise is not defamation in itself. Has everyone who "shared" the article been similarly prosecuted? Not that I am advocating lawsuits but if it is indeed the case that only Leong is being singled out - then we have to ask why this is the case? Last but not least, I note that the Straits Times (ST) has printed a rather misleading headline. It's headline said "PM Lee sues financial adviser Leong Sze Hian for defamation". This is not entirely true. The ST headline makes it seem like it was Leong who was behind the offending article when in reality, he merely shared it. Is this not misrepresentation on the part of ST? Further, this article is in the "premium" section of ST which means that the general public may not be able to read beyond the misleading headline. Does this not make Leong seem like he is guilty of something that he isn't? Could this be tantamount to defamation on the part of ST as well? Arguably if Leong had the deep pockets to pursue a lawsuit, he could as well?"
 
Top