OK, let's get to the fundamental of the whole saga (rumors or not). Before we persecute someone for being human or acting like a natural human, we need to ask very simple questions even though that person is an MP:-
Did anyone get injured or killed as a result of Yaw's action or inaction?
Only the ruling party can cause that to happen, remember the jumping track and drowning at bedok reservoir that killed serval people.
Was Singapore reserves being raided by Yaw's action or inaction?
Paying million obscene salaries and toxic investment is the work of ruling party.
Did the train suddenly stop and someone has to break window for air?
Only temasek know best that profitablity comes before the safety of our passengers.
Was there a security lapses in Singapore because Yaw has "dessert"?
The toilet roll escape of mas selamat and SMRT depot breaches tell the complacency of our ministers.
Did he instill threat, bribe or gain from monetary exchange for passion?
He didn't go around threatening voters to regret and repent and deprive others the equal opportunity of
lift upgrading.
Did the law forbid the protection of individual privacy?
PAP forbid people to pry into their ministers extravagant lives, clean or not. Thus the law try to pain PAP whiter than white and everyone outside that arena is BLACK DOT.
Did anyone suffer lost of assets or property as a result of his action?
ONLY PAP can cause people to go bankrupt by making citizens pay sky rocket HDB price and steal our jobs for foreigners.
Did Yaw cause our sex life to suffer?
Only PAP can flood our population, add our stress and make us worked until 85 so that bed business has become less important in our lives.
Was there racial tension caused by what Yaw's did (or not)?
Well....Seng Hang Thong and LKY probably came victorious talking about other races.
So did Yaw deserve our respect?
Based on past case precedents, TT Durai did one wrong and many rights thus HO JINX welcomed him with open arms and Mrs Peanut think he is innocent and justifiied.
Based on past case precedent, the renci botak aka boy keeper was given a slap on the risk and be freed because of his contribution to charity.
Based on past case precedent, opposition stays 200m outside the voting station is illegal and PAP within 200m inside the voting station is legal.
Based on past case precedent, it is illegal for WP to cycle in West coast park, but PAP can cycle everywhere in Singapore to attract crowds.
Based on past case precedent, traditional news are objective and true, social media are cowboys.
Based on past case precedent, LKY is always right and Dr Chee is always wrong.
Based on past case precedent, peasants who spew racial disharmony will be charged under sedation act and made to serve the community but PAP racial shit has the rights to publish in HARD TOOTH for sales across bookstores.
Based on past case precedent, you should not ask for $50 more per month to improve your standard of livings, but making ministers earn merely $1.1million at entry level is a lot of sacrifice in standard of their livings.
Based on past case precent, workers must wake up to the meaning of cheaper, better and faster, salary inflation will cost Singaporeans to lost job. On the other hand, making ministers look cheaper, better and faster will dilute their dignity and their salary inflation help them keep their job as a form of "sacrifice".
Based on past case precedent, if your son could avoid 12 years of NS, you have high chance to become president
Based on past case precedent, kangaroo is always kangaroo, PAP is always white, LKY is always smart, Sinkies are always daft, Singapore has no corruption, Liu Porn Yew think sex is dirty and WP should abstain from bed business.
Based on past case precedent, LKY enlightened how hifalutin we were, KeeChiu think we cannot survive 100 years without PAP, LHL believe no minister is perfect, GCT do not believe in having total happiness but NET HAPPINESS.
Now the verdict:-
You decide who take the cake for being purer than white?
Thus, if PAP can play with fire and set Singapore ablaze with bad policies, Yaw Shin Leong is fully exonerated for lighting a little lamp to keep Hougang warm. Should we persecute him? Think at greater picture, he (aka Kuan Kung) is now entrusted to hold the fort at Hougang (Jing Province) while his master is guarding in Aljunied GRC (Si Chuan). Do you want to exterminate him using some silly beauty trick (Mei Ren Ji) for the sake of PAP (aka Wei province?)!
WP (all oppositions) is gaining momentum and this is what Singaporeans have longed for decades to happen. For the greater good of democracy, reform and Singaporeans progression, let's move on and not let a silly woman hold the country back.