Maybe someone can shed some light on his non ultra-pragmatic endeavors. Even a fraction of Geoffrey Robertson's work on this space would be good for his outlook.
My concern is that he has not been persuaded by the establishment to partake in elections similar to Chua Kim Yow plus the guaranteed seat as he is close to the establishment.
Pragmatic pple makes good Ministerial material. The compassionate ones only make good MPs.
Bishan Toa Payoh 3 corner fight? SPP/SDP and PAP?
not sure SPP & SDP have enough candidates for the WKS fight or not,,,,,,
will be happy to see if Tpy is being contested. Pretty good chance of runover
SDP should just give up and go to those Suicide wards. Most pple with half a brain wont vote for them on a good day. In a 3 corner fight, they will confirm lose their deposit. If they go to suicide ward. pple will be grateful for a chance to vote and they might actually get back their deposit
SDP and common sense usually does not do well as a team
I am hazarding a guess here but I think that he was with PAP and did not seem to have gone far.
I wonder if WP has been bitten by the scholarbug that PAP loves to peddle.
This chap has not been in Singapore for much of his life. I wonder if he knows the local mannerisms and quirks well enough to connect with the ground.
Working and living outside of Singapore does not mean cannot visit often.
This chap has not been in Singapore for much of his life. I wonder if he knows the local mannerisms and quirks well enough to connect with the ground.
Yes, I'd rather vote for people like him who spent lots of time abroad and have seen the world around, instead of deaf frogs in the well who thinks the well is the world and all's well.
I salute the guy. He has already got it made, if he wants another feather in his cap in politics then I think going to PAP is so much easier.
The fact he chose to return and put his name up says it all. It would be good if he does run and got into parliament.
Still wondering how the contact and proposal was made. WP or its member initiated the move or the other way round? Just curious. Either way, it will be interesting.
1) Yes, he failed the test. That year they had vocational attachment before selection. I think it was 2 weeks or so. As it was the pioneer batch, the top medical people wanted to be sure so they monitored it.
3) It does not make sense to deny a person a place in Medicine just because he was a top student. The govt chose a policy of applying incentives and disincentives to move some of the smart ones to pursue non-medical option. One of the disincentive is not to recognise medical qualifications from overseas except for a miserable elite few institutions. The irony was persuading Viv to do medicine when the public spiel was the opposite.
4) You may wish to check with your family and relatives who are in the medical profession about the aptitude test for 1979 A level batch and for subsequent intakes.
5) I like the word "ultra practical". Very apt for him. I can't see anything that he did suggesting that he was into humane things or along the lines of humanity related work. Anyone can recall a letter, an article or a mention along these lines would be helpful.
6) Have checked on him since my post. He has never worked in Singapore since leaving NS for overseas. In fact he has not been residing here since NS. That's 25 years.
7) Changing citizenship for Rhodes Scholarship seems to be another "ultra-practical move"
Maybe someone can shed some light on his non ultra-pragmatic endeavors. Even a fraction of Geoffrey Robertson's work on this space would be good for his outlook.
My concern is that he has not been persuaded by the establishment to partake in elections similar to Chua Kim Yow plus the guaranteed seat as he is close to the establishment.
There was a policy of "spreading" the most talented across the professions. The PAPzis perceived that too many of the top students ended up in medical school and thus channelled them to other faculties like engineering, accountancy and law. Please read the following paper for some perspective.
Many of my peers who wanted to go into medical school deliberately got Bs so as not to fall within the creme de la creme. Some succeeded, others didn't. The main result of this engineering was that NUS admission became very opaque. Nobody quite knew what the criteria for entry were.
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q...47gYiI&sig=AHIEtbTnAbiAFX33odY-OSbiyxcfQuteNQ
This chap has not been in Singapore for much of his life. I wonder if he knows the local mannerisms and quirks well enough to connect with the ground.
Still wondering how the contact and proposal was made. WP or its member initiated the move or the other way round? Just curious. Either way, it will be interesting.
unfortunately the dean at that time or close to that time is presently mourning the death of his wife so i rather not bother him...anyways like i said before i hv little regard for this so called test...i now recall the chap i used as an eg. Prof Keson Tan was a PS no less in 80'...i gather keson had his heart set on becoming a medico but was rejected n offered dentistry instead...did he really lack med eq???...i hv loads of other egs. of accepted medicos after 80' who apparently went into the med fac for the wrong reasons...
be that as it may...back to Chen...i shall be keen to hear him out n let him make his case...if Dom's son can stand as a miw...i say let us give Chen a chance...at least Chen appears to hv served out his 2.5yrs unlike Dom's son...