"Ex-Ikea manager cleared of graft" - what is going on man !!!

[Spock]

Maybe if his act is classified as corruption, the entire Cabinet will have to be charged with corruption for ripping off taxpayers by setting their own salaries.

 

[WongMengMeng]

It is not what he did but what he was charged with.

...............................................

 

[Spock]

I agree that this case is not corruption, but what the employee did is wrong, though I can't think of any law that is more appropriate in this case. Any idea?

If it contravenes company rules, it will probably be fraud by failing to disclose. Usually, you are required to disclose any conflicts of interest to your superiors in the terms of employment contract you sign.

 

[WongMengMeng]

If it contravenes company rules, it will probably be fraud by failing to disclose. Usually, you are required to disclose any conflicts of interest to your superiors in the terms of employment contract you sign.

Welcome to the party Spock. For the average reader, but see below:

WongMengMeng, all of us already confessed that we are PAP IB.

 

[WongMengMeng]

It is not what he did but what he was charged with.

1. It is the duty of AGC to come up with the correct charge if not they themselves should be charged for INCOMPETENCE.

2. If the facts as proven in Court leads to the conclusion that a different charge is more appropriate, common sense will dictate that the charge be amended by either the AGC or judge. We need not go into the procedural details including but not limited to granting the defence a fair opportunity to rebutt. The public expects it as this would accord with common sense as well as the principles of natural justice.

Any more questions?

 

[Unrepented]

Integration efforts for new citizens from PRC..........pave the way first:o

basically if an employee starts a company and sub-cons projects out to themselves without declaring to boss, it is not corruption. welcome to dystopia.

 

[klkang]

The judge is correct.

He exploited a flaw in the IKEA system. Normally in a company you are required to declare.
you have no interest in the contractors you deal with. If not employees can set up companies
outside to secure lucrative contracts with the company. So long as procurement rules
are followed correctly, the company cannot take action against them.

So the following statement in the ST report does not count?
- "Justice Choo said ... But in this case, ... it was Mr Leng himself who came up with the idea to rip off Ikano".

- "then sell it to the furniture giant at marked-up prices"
- "The profit was split three ways, and Mr Leng pocketed $2.3 million"
if this is not corruption then what???

 

[Asterix]

This is what happens when you have
Rule of law as opposed to rule by law
When the courts are not kangaroo
Judges can act impartially and order
Prosecutor to wake up his fucking ideas
And charge the man with a graver crime
Even if this Jeffrey be an ally of Leung

Daft Sinkies still don't know or care
What rule of law means wor
As far as they are concerned
Got "free" upgrading can oredi
Please let Lightning screw them more

Lawmaker Jeffrey Lam Kin-fung may face dangerous driving charge

Executive councillor and legislator Jeffrey Lam Kin-fung may face a more serious driving charge after a magistrate ordered the prosecution to review his careless driving summons.

Principal Magistrate Ernest Lin made the order after hearing that Lam had driven on the wrong side of the road for 15 to 17 metres.

The case was initially put before Deputy Special Magistrate Hau Cheuk-man, but he later transferred it to Lin.

Lin adjourned the case to October 25 while the prosecution seeks legal advice from the Department of Justice.

No mention was made in court of any other possible charge.

But under the Road Traffic Ordinance, a dangerous driving conviction carries a fine and up to three years in prison, while the maximum for careless driving is a fine and six months' jail.

Lam was originally charged with driving carelessly at the corner of Wang Chiu Road and Cheung Yip Street in Kowloon Bay on July 1. Lam is also a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.

He told the court: "It was my first time driving to that place. It was raining and I was driving slowly."

He said his suspicions that something might be wrong were aroused after a traffic officer directed him to turn right.

"Then I observed the road condition and slowly drove my car to the next junction and drove into the correct lane," he said.

Outside court, Lam said he had been driving to join the Hong Kong Dome Festival.

Lam was not legally represented yesterday. But he said he would consider hiring a lawyer, depending on the final charge.

A Justice Department spokesman said it had not been requested to give legal advice before the summons was issued.

"After receiving the case file, the department will advise the police on the offence, evidence and the appropriate venue of trial after examining the case and its evidence," he said.

Legal academic Eric Cheung Tat-ming said many factors would determine whether Lam would be charged with dangerous driving, including the road condition at the time.

"Sometimes, it's difficult to draw a line between careless driving and dangerous driving," Cheung said.

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...am-kin-fung-may-face-dangerous-driving-charge

 

[escher]

May all this rubbish end once smear of shit on sole of shoe go get fucked and screwed by ghouls and demons and his rotten empire
of walking bags of excrement and people with no moral compasses collapse and implode.
That will also bring down all the fucking corrupt kangaroos and they all thrown into the fucking jail with those that they jailed.

 

[escher]

[
Mr Leng Kah Poh (above), 52, was acquitted of corruption and his jail sentence of nearly two years was quashed by High Court judge Choo Han Teck, who said: "What the appellant did was wrong but it was not an offence of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act."
.
.
.

and what does the Judge means when he says " to establish a charge of corruption, Mr Leng had to have been induced by a third party to act against the interests of Ikano, the company that runs the Ikea furniture stores here. But in this case, there was no third party since it was Mr Leng himself who came up with the idea to rip off Ikano" - what kind of stupid statement is this ?

What that meant is that if you are utterly corrupt like the fucking kangaroos themselves, and come up with idea to rip off sinkies themselves, with no third party inducing them, then they, the kangaroos and corrupt crooked judges can rip and rip and screw and screw and fuck and fuck to their hearts content and be innocent of corruption like Leng.

Singkies are screwed.

By their having no balls, they are screwed
First by smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY
and by his vicious greedy corrupt people without any fucking moral compass

And now by the kangaroos who are saying that since they think of ways to screw you, they are fucking innocent as they did it without any fucking third party.

You go figure it out