• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Economic Tzar Bro Chun Sing Envisions A 3-Plus-Minus-5 Growth For Singapore's Booming Economy!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
yq-ccs-22102018.jpg


SINGAPORE - Instead of the "5 plus-minus 1" per cent growth of yesteryear, Singapore's economy will likely enter a phase of "3 plus-minus 5" per cent growth arising from technological disruption and global trade tensions, said Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing.

This new reality will have wide implications for companies and whole industries that fall on either side of the spectrum, Mr Chan said. The wider growth range means redistribution through social policies will be affected too, since it will be more difficult to help everyone move together.

Speaking at the Future Economy Conference and Exhibition at the National Trades Union Congress Centre on Monday (Oct 22), Mr Chan outlined what the economic strategy for Singapore firms should be in a likely future of slower growth.


The Government, said Mr Chan, will transit from only having broad-based measures in the past to also having industry-specific strategies as a complement since the wider range of growth impacts each industry differently.

For poor-performing companies, the goal is to recycle land, labour and capital. This means moving them out of unproductive industries, and redeploying their factors of production into more productive ones.

"At the business level, the businesses must be prepared to say that this is not going to go very far if I continue on this particular track and I need to fundamentally change," he said.

Average-performing businesses at the 3 per cent growth level will also need to go beyond digitalising current processes to re-engineering the product or service entirely, he added.

Even the most productive firms at the top will require a strategy aimed at expanding their global market share or the size of the market; otherwise, Singapore will end up with a productivity problem.

"Some companies might have high productivity, but if the market does not expand as fast, it means that they need fewer people to get the same output. This means that there will be excess labour that will be displaced to sectors that have average or below average growth," explained Mr Chan.

Displaced workers will end up in less productive industries, hence bringing down national productivity as a whole.

Noting similarities in the best-performing industries in the 23 transformative road maps - such as the banking and finance, and logistics and transport industries - Mr Chan said strong trade associations and chambers (TACs), strong labour management relationships and clear definitions of problems are needed for the strategies to work.

The banking and finance industry, for example, has a banking association and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, which work together effectively to drive innovation. Unions in this industry, such as the DBS Staff Union, also function as intermediaries for transformation to happen, he said.

"They are there for a very clear purpose. Not to lobby the Government or the banks to stay where they are, but to prepare workers to move forward together with the transformation in the industry, to overcome disruption faced by that industry," said Mr Chan.

At a panel discussion following his speech, he expanded on his hope to see more focused TACs, as some mainly harp about cost management issues such as rental prices and labour quotas.

"Another group of TACs talk in a different way: They know they cannot beat other countries on cost, but ask for help from the Government to build real capabilities, like linking up with A*Star (Agency for Science, Technology and Research) to access cutting edge technologies that their competitors do not have," he said.

https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...er-cent-model-of-future-growth-chan-chun-sing
 
So basically he is throwing up his hand and saying we are fucked w low growth & he is clueless on how to change it.
 
He is supposed to be an elite. One of the highly paid MPs of the PAP.
So how does he expect to improve the economy of Spore?
 
Boomz under PAP, dooms under WP! :eek:

Take a look at what happened in Malaysia & Najib/Rosnah.

PAP is slowly cooking the Spore goose. By the time they are finished & kicked out there will be little left.
I predict that when the opposition gains power, it will be very, very messy e.g. zero CPF, millions of foreigners in Spore, many unemployed Sporeans, sky high prices in Spore, over paid civil servants, .. etc.

So whoever takes over from the PAP will have a difficult time to fix all the problems left behind by the Lees
 
He should shut the fuck up!

He has never hired a single person in his life. As crazy as that sounds.

He has never managed a company ever.

This is the first time i have heard of such a ridiculous prediction - 3 plus-minus 5" per cent growth!!! What the fuck is that? When his penis goes from flaccid to erection?
 
.

He should shut the fuck up!

He has never hired a single person in his life. As crazy as that sounds.

He has never managed a company ever.

This is the first time i have heard of such a ridiculous prediction - 3 plus-minus 5" per cent growth!!! What the fuck is that? When his penis goes from flaccid to erection?

.

in Numero form it is just this :

+ 3% to ( - 5 ) % .

.
noticed the Band is growing larger and larger.
.

just like saying :

+ 10% to (-10%) as good as saying

sure strike one. :D
 
He can't even speak like a normal human being. It was like he had a computer glitch.

Usually, the range should be from low to high. Such as 2-5%.

This clown can't even say between -5 to +3%!
 
he forgot to bring along the script .

any how whack.

just widen the Band to be on the safe side.
 
With, if PAP cannot hit growth target in reality, just get statistics department to do some "management accounting" tricks, then hit target lor... Same with FT data, CPF data, Health data submitted to WHO, etc etc. Massage here and there and you want what data you get what. Lol :D
 
.



.

in Numero form it is just this :

+ 3% to ( - 5 ) % .

.
noticed the Band is growing larger and larger.
.

just like saying :

+ 10% to (-10%) as good as saying

sure strike one. :biggrin:

Hi bro, I think the numbers should be read as:

3% + - 5%, which translates into a band of 8% to negative 2% (recession is on the cards!!!)

Vs our current 4% + - 1% (3% to 5%)

Somebody should teach CCS about plain speaking.
 
Back
Top