Yet another silly excuse for god's incompetency. salt water is salt water. if god is soooo smart, he would have made it fresh water.
Fishy (Author of the Toe-Sucking Song Book),
Even though about 1% of the world's water is fresh water, there is enough for everyone because the water will recycle back to the rivers and lakes that have mostly fresh water. The problem is huge amount of fresh water is now contaminated and largely due to industrialization.
The sea-water is no just salt water because the water is needed for marine fishes and corals to thrive. Almost everyday or at least once every other day, we eat fish and they are all salt water. Sea water is more than just salt water which has many other minerals and this is one of an important sources to supply some essential minerals for human consumption....certainly salt is one of them. We just can't live without salt.
And how's your Toe-Sucking Book doing....going to get it printed and published soon?
This 3/4 of earth covering with water has proved to be just right and to produce the climate that we all now can enjoy with.
Scientist (???) Rojak,
You are just a scientific joker! I can't find better word to describe you!
Isn't this completely contradicts the theory of evolution about natural selection? See my post above.....
Wow? Less species on earth? Sounds like 2nd law of thermodynamics in action, not evolution.
where in the article did it talk about 99% extinction?
Scientist (???) Rojak,
OK...so what? That make it 99.999%, if you think 99% is still not good for you. What does all these mean....you said: It's because of nature's stress.....you cooking up story again...on one hand, the theory of evolution says (or implies) that somehow the process of natural selection has some form of 'imbedded' intelligence to promote and to enhance life from the most primitive to now, presumably, the most advance and now you saying the the stress of nature has caused extinction of animals, and 99% of them to date? Isn't this completely contradicted what evolution is all about? How come only in the recent years (relatively speaking in relation to the million or billion of years that evolutionists commonly referred to) that the stress of nature suddenly took place and has caused 99% of the animals to extinct? Would this 'intelligent' law of nature try, at least, to preserve them, or the law is now stupid enough to evolve something better of what nature has produced so far?
stupid fuck, you dun even know what is thermodynamic 2nd law as far as i recalled. linking less species to 2nd law? you are really a joke
Yep, less species, less complex. Thats the 2nd law of thermodynamics in action. Extinction of species runs smack against the face of evolution. Thanks Vamjok for the evidence.
You mean having less variety of species makes the earth more complex?
You see, once I twist the question around, it becomes apparent that your theory of evolution won't make sense. Even the evidence you showed contradicted your theory.
Cheers
thanks for confirming the fact that you have zero clue about current theory of natural selection and evolution. the theory which you keep attacking when you do not even understand it......
Dear Scientist (????) Rojak,
Oh....so now there is a 'current' one....and you mean the one provided by Charles Darwin about 150 years ago is thrown into the thresh! So...how many are there....and you are right....no one understand (and I wonder you too understand it)...because there are so many theories of evolution......by the way....any new one in the pipeline?
real retard LOL. that the issue with idiot that do not goes to sch