- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 22,622
- Points
- 113
haf u tried posing ur questions 2 ur favorite crazy-hairstyled fella? ...... ? ... ?
haf u tried posing ur questions 2 ur favorite crazy-hairstyled fella? ...... ? ... ?
Are you saying Egyptology is a failed discipline? Is it that hard to ascertain the prevailing level of technology of the day?
So can the technology used to build the pyramids be even replicated today?
Anyone has a definitive answer? Thanks.
Egyptology did not failed. They did excellently in chronologing Dynastic Egypt just like Dynastic China; what they fail is to admit that there could be a more ancient pre-dynastic Egypt which many other scientific field had reveal.
haf u tried posing ur questions 2 ur favorite crazy-hairstyled fella? ...
Bro, you are talking about science (even if we can agree it is totally science) about the past in which we know only a tiny fraction of. We we discover a single tool, we claim to know the whole technology of that time. Is like you discover a battery and you extrapolate that we have electronics, ICs, LED display, iPhones and Andriods.
You can't be serious, do you?
That technology needs lots of slave, to build and to be buried. No way it can be replicated today.
So can the technology used to build the pyramids be even replicated today?
Anyone has a definitive answer? Thanks.
It is already known for awhile that the sphinx was built way before the Dynastic Egyptians from its erosion pattern and regarding the Pyramids, there is no way to date it as it's just stones and the Egyptologists rely on historical records written by the phaoraohs themselves to say the pyramids were built by them. Well, the phaoraohs can lie and they most likely did. The pyramids were not for burial, so what were they for, with no inscriptions whatsoever.
� Twice the height of the Pyramid, divided into the distance around the base equals the mathematical value termed p (pi) to the nearest 1/10,000. Only recently has man been able to calculate p to this accuracy.
� The Great Pyramid�s unique proportions solve one of man�s most difficult mathematical challenges�the squaring of the circle. When the radius of a circle equals the height of the pyramid, then the circumference of that circle equals the perimeter of the pyramid�s base.
� The orientation of the Great Pyramid is within 3/4 inch of true north. A modern magnetic compass is usually far less accurate.
� The measurement used by the builders, the �pyramid cubit,� when divided into the base length of the Great Pyramid is 365.242 pyramid cubits. This is precisely the number for the days in one year.
Looks like I've over-estimated the power of science to explain phenomena like pyramids.
� Twice the height of the Pyramid, divided into the distance around the base equals the mathematical value termed p (pi) to the nearest 1/10,000. Only recently has man been able to calculate p to this accuracy.
And this pre-Dynastic era was more technologically advanced than the ensuing dynasties?
This is what many scientist suspect but not universally proven yet.